Abstract
This philosophical discourse examines the relationship between temporality and ethical practice in nursing, with particular attention to the distinction between chronos (quantitative time) and kairos (qualitative, opportune time). Drawing upon ancient Greek philosophical thought, contemporary nursing scholarship, and empirical research on moral judgement, the author argues that temporal awareness fundamentally shapes ethical deliberation and action in nursing practice. Despite the existence of multiple ethical decision-making frameworks in nursing (including principle-based approaches, dignity-enhancing care models, and professional codes of ethics) these frameworks remain largely atemporal, emphasising processes and components of ethical decisions rather than their temporal dimensions. Furthermore, empirical evidence demonstrates that time pressure systematically alters moral judgement, yet this phenomenon has received limited attention in nursing ethics literature. Building on classical virtue ethics (particularly the Aristotelian concept of phronesis, practical wisdom, which encompasses knowing not only what to do but when to act) and integrating insights from moral distress, moral resilience, and decision-making literature, the author introduces the construct of kairotic sensitivity (the capacity to recognise moments when patients are particularly receptive to difficult conversations or crucial decisions). This construct represents a significant contribution to nursing ethics, offering a conceptual framework for understanding how experienced nurses navigate the temporal complexities of ethical practice and providing a bridge between established ethical frameworks and the lived experience of temporal decision-making in clinical settings. The author proposes that kairotic sensitivity, alongside moral resilience, constitutes an essential yet undertheorised dimension of ethical expertise in nursing, with significant implications for patient outcomes, professional satisfaction, and nursing education. Practical implications for patient care and recommendations for nursing education and practice development are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
