Dignity is a fundamental value and right of every human being and a central concept in nursing care. Due to radical life changes caused by neurodegenerative diseases, there is an increased risk of experiencing impaired dignity.
Research aim
The aim was to gain an understanding of how people suffering from selected neurodegenerative diseases make sense of their dignity.
Research design and participants
A qualitative, multiperspective interpretative phenomenological design was used, collecting data through semi-structured, face-to-face interviews with 9 participants with multiple sclerosis and 5 participants with Parkinson’s disease.
Ethical considerations
The study was approved by the faculty Ethical Committee (No. EK 49/2021).
Findings
Two overlapping themes were identified: Embodiment and new identity affecting self-worth, and Desire to be accepted. The dignity of the participants was shaped by reframing values, active determination to fight for the highest possible quality of life, and receiving support from the community and relationships. Conversely, bodily limitations with unpredictable symptoms, stigmatization, expressions of pity, and loss of independence negatively impacted their sense of identity. In the context of dignified healthcare, participants emphasized the importance of a partnership approach, the need to be heard, and the ability to rely on healthcare professionals. The inhumane approach, disinterest, and paternalism were seen as aspects that increased vulnerability and diminished dignity.
Conclusions
Individual narratives provide valuable insights into the dynamic and relational nature of dignity. Identifying unique lived experiences of dignity shaped by illness and understanding the needs of a particular person is an integral part of dignified life and person-centered care.
MatitiMRBaillieL. Dignity in healthcare: a practical approach for nurses and midwives. Radcliffe Publishing, 2011, p. 294.
2.
EdlundMLindwallLvon PostI, et al.Concept determination of human dignity. Nurs Ethics2013; 20(8): 851–860.
3.
JacobsonN. Dignity and health: a review. Soc Sci Med2007; 64(2): 292–302.
4.
Van GennipIEPasmanHRWOosterveld-VlugMG, et al.The development of a model of dignity in illness based on qualitative interviews with seriously ill patients. Int J Nurs Stud2013; 50(8): 1080–1089.
5.
NordenfeltL. Dignity in care for older people. Wiley-Blackwell, 2009, p. 240.
6.
MalpasJLickissN. Introduction to a conversation. In: MalpasJLickissN (eds). Perspectives on Human Dignity: A Conversation. Springer, 2007, pp. 1–8.
7.
ChapmanKDixonAEhrlichC, et al.Dignity and the importance of acknowledgement of personhood for people with disability. Qual Health Res2024; 34(1-2): 141–153.
8.
JacobsonN. A taxonomy of dignity: a grounded theory study. BMC Int Health Hum Right2009; 9(3): 3–9.
9.
NordenfeltL. The varieties of dignity. Health Care Anal2004; 12(2): 69–81.
10.
Rodríguez-PratAEscribanoX. A philosophical view on the experience of dignity and autonomy through the phenomenology of illness. J Med Philos2019; 44(3): 279–298.
11.
LindwallLLohneV. Human dignity research in clinical practice – a systematic literature review. Scand J Caring Sci2021; 35(4): 1038–1049.
CerneraSEisingerRSWongJK, et al.Long-term Parkinson's disease quality of life after staged DBS: STN vs GPi and first vs second lead. npj Parkinson's Dis2020; 6(13): 13.
15.
HammarlundCSWestergrenAÅströmI, et al.The impact of living with Parkinson's disease: balancing within a web of needs and demands. Parkinsons Dis2018; 2018: 1–18.
16.
HosseiniZHomayuniAEtemadifarM. Barriers to quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study. BMC Neurol2022; 22(1): 174.
17.
SharifiSBorhaniFAbbaszadehA. Factors affecting dignity of patients with multiple sclerosis. Scand J Caring Sci2016; 30(4): 731–740.
18.
TomagováMKozákováDŽiakováK, et al.Lived experience of outpatients with parkinson's disease: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Kontakto2021; 23(4): 274–280.
19.
ŽiakováKČápJMiertováM, et al.An interpretative phenomenological analysis of dignity in people with multiple sclerosis. Nurs Ethics2020; 27(3): 686–700.
20.
SmithJAFlowersPLarkinM. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. 1st ed.Sage, 2009, p. 232.
21.
SmithJAFlowersPLarkinM. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. 2nd ed.Sage, 2022, p. 240.
22.
SmithJANizzaIE. Essentials of interpretative phenomenological analysis. American Psychological Association, 2022, p. 94.
23.
McInallyWGray-BruntonC. Research made simple: using multiperspective interpretative phenomenological analysis to explore healthcare phenomena. Evid Base Nurs2021; 24(3): 71–73.
24.
LarkinMShawRFlowersP. Multiperspectival designs and processes in interpretative phenomenological analysis research. Qual Res Psychol2019; 16(2): 182–198.
25.
BarkerABSmaleKHuntN, et al.Experience of identity change in people who reported a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a qualitative inquiry. Int J MS Care2019; 21(5): 235–242.
26.
PhillippiJLauderdaleJ. A guide to field notes for qualitative research: context and conversation. Qual Health Res2017; 28(3): 381–388.
27.
SmithJA. Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health Psychol Rev2011a; 5(1): 9–27.
28.
SmithJA. “we could be diving for pearls”: the value of the gem in experiential qualitative psychology. Bpsqmip2011b; 1: 6–15.
29.
LevittHMBambergMCreswellJW, et al.Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: the APA publications and communications board task force report. Am Psychol2018; 73(1): 26–46.
30.
EcclesFJMurrayCSimpsonJ. Perceptions of cause and control in people with parkinson’s disease. Disabil Rehabil2011; 33(15-16): 1409–1420.
31.
KassieSAAliaJHylandL. Biopsychosocial implications of living with multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study using interpretative phenomenological analysis. BMJ Open2021; 11(8): e049041.
32.
JacobsonN. Dignity and health. Vanderbilt University Press, 2012, p. 232.
33.
FekonjaZKmetecSLorberM, et al.Experiences with dignity among older people confined to beds living in a nursing home: a qualitative descriptive study. J Nurs Manag2022; 30(7): 2362–2369.
34.
NehraAMakkarRSinghRK, et al.Is disease a threat to identity? A systematic review of parkinson's disease and personal identity. Indian J Publ Health2023; 67(1): 117–122.
35.
CarelH. Phenomenology of illness. Oxford University Press, 2016, p. 272.
36.
Van der MeideHTeunissenTCollardP, et al.The mindful body: a phenomenology of the body with multiple sclerosis. Qual Health Res2018; 28(14): 2239–2249.
37.
PourhajiFPeymanNTaraghdarMM, et al.Explaining the burden of psychosocial factors on the worsening symptoms of MS: a qualitative study of patients’ experiences. BMC Neurol2023; 23(1): 98.
38.
ToombsSK. Illness and the paradigm of lived body. Theor Med1988; 9(2): 201–226.
39.
TomagováMŽiakováKMagurováD, et al.Real-life experiences of patients with parkinson's disease. Kontakto2019; 21(3): 269–278.
40.
ZhaoNYangYZhangL, et al.Quality of life in parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. CNS Neurosci Ther2021; 27(3): 270–279.
41.
Van GennipIEPasmanHROosterveld-VlugMG, et al.Dynamics in the sense of dignity over the course of illness: a longitudinal study into the perspectives of seriously ill patients. Int J Nurs Stud2015; 52(11): 1694–1704.
42.
BužgováRKozákováRJuríčkováL. The unmet needs of patients with progressive neurological diseases in the Czech Republic: a qualitative study. J Palliat Care2019; 34(1): 38–46.
43.
HellqvistCDizdarNHagellP, et al.Improving self-management for persons with parkinson's disease through education focusing on management of daily life: patients' and relatives' experience of the Swedish national parkinson school. J Clin Nurs2018; 27(19-20): 3719–3728.
44.
RoganCFortuneDGPrenticeG. Post-traumatic growth, illness perceptions and coping in people with acquired brain injury. Neuropsychol Rehabil2013; 23(5): 639–657.
45.
GibsonG. Signposts on the journey'; medication adherence and the lived body in men with parkinson's disease. Soc Sci Med2016; 152: 27–34.
46.
BužgováRKozákováR. Informing patients with progressive neurological disease of their health status, and their adaptation to the disease. BMC Neurol2019; 19(1): 250.
47.
SytsmaTTBjorkLBJenkinsSM, et al.Slowed Down but not stopped: a spiritual life review intervention in patients with neurodegenerative disease. J Pastor Care Counsel2020; 74(2): 108–114.
