Digitalization is a widespread global phenomenon that is increasingly integrated into healthcare delivery. Nursing, as the largest group of healthcare professionals, relies heavily on Hospital Information Systems (HIS) to record and access patient data. This reliance raises important concerns regarding privacy, security, and the ethical standards of care.
Aim
This qualitative study sought to investigate the ethical experiences of nurses utilizing HIS in patient care delivery.
Research Design
A qualitative exploratory design was employed, utilizing semi-structured interviews in line with COREQ guidelines. The data were analyzed using conventional content analysis.
Participants and Research Context
The study included 17 nurses involved in patient care within a healthcare setting.
Ethical Considerations
The research received ethical approval from the relevant ethics committee. All participants provided informed consent and were guaranteed confidentiality and anonymity.
Results
Three themes emerged from the data: patient privacy, ethical behavior, and ethical challenges.
Conclusion
Addressing the ethical experiences of nurses using HIS is crucial to enhancing care quality. However, issues like unauthorized access and lack of training highlight the need for ongoing education and privacy awareness initiatives to support ethical nursing practice in the digital era.
AfzalSArshadA. Ethical issues among healthcare workers using electronic medical records: a systematic review. Comput Methods Programs Biomed Update2021; 1: 100030.
2.
SalmanizadehFAmeriAKhajoueiR, et al.Examining nurses' awareness level and compliance between defined and required access levels to core functionalities of hospital information system: an observational and survey study. BMC Health Serv Res2024; 24: 1538.
3.
MustafaNKIbrahimRAwangZ, et al.Validation of a quantitative instrument measuring critical success factors and acceptance of Casemix system implementation in the total hospital information system in Malaysia. BMJ Open2024; 14: e082547.
4.
JoIKimWLimY, et al.Strategy for scheduled downtime of hospital information system utilizing third-party applications. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak2024; 24: 300.
5.
MohammadpourAGhaemiMMDarrudiR, et al.Use of hospital information system to improve the quality of health care from clinical staff perspective. Galen Med J2021; 10: e1830.
6.
JacquemardTDohertyCPFitzsimonsMB. The anatomy of electronic patient record ethics: a framework to guide design, development, implementation, and use. BMC Med Ethics2021; 22: 9.
7.
BalestraML. Electronic health records: patient care and ethical and legal implications for nurse practitioners. J Nurse Pract2017; 13: 105–111.
8.
Salminen‐KarlssonMGolayD. Information systems in nurses' work: technical rationality versus an ethic of care. New Technol Work Employ2022; 37: 270–287.
9.
HaddadLMGeigerRA. Nursing ethical considerations. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, 2023.
10.
DehghaniADastpakMGharibA. Barriers to respect professional ethics standards in clinical care viewpoints of nurses. Iran J Med Edu2013; 13: 421–430.
11.
ANA. Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. 2nd ed.American Nurses Association, 2015.
12.
ZhenCZonghuaWYuL, et al.Development and application of an online learning platform for nursing ethics: a teaching practice research. Nurse Educ Today2022; 112: 105336.
13.
DellasegaCKanaskieML. Nursing ethics in an era of pandemic. Appl Nurs Res2021; 62: 151508.
MonteverdeS. Nursing ethics and the access to nursing care. Pflege2013; 26: 271–280.
16.
EramiEHajbagheryMADianatiM. Ethical competence in nursing: a concept analysis with Walker and Avans approach. JTHUMS2019; 7: 77–90.
17.
BoothRGStrudwickGMcBrideS, et al.How the nursing profession should adapt for a digital future. BMJ2021; 373: n1190.
18.
RouleauGGagnonMPCôtéJ, et al.Impact of information and communication technologies on nursing care: results of an overview of systematic reviews. J Med Internet Res2017; 19: e122.
19.
YousefiARH. Ethical impact of the technology on the healthcare system. J Clin Investig Stud2020; 3: 1–2.
20.
OzairFFJamshedNSharmaA, et al.Ethical issues in electronic health records: a general overview. Perspect Clin Res2015; 6: 73–76.
21.
EnaizanOZaidanAAAlwiNHM, et al.Electronic medical record systems: decision support examination framework for individual, security and privacy concerns using multi-perspective analysis. Health Technol2020; 10: 795–822.
22.
KaziAMQaziSAAhsanN, et al.Current challenges of digital health interventions in Pakistan: mixed methods analysis. J Med Internet Res2020; 22: e21691.
23.
EloSKääriäinenMKansteO, et al.Qualitative content analysis: a focus on trustworthiness. Sage Open2014; 4: 2158244014522633.
24.
CorcoranLFriedenreichCMMcNeelyML, et al.A qualitative study examining newly diagnosed breast cancer patients' experiences of participating in the Alberta Moving beyond Breast Cancer (AMBER) prospective cohort study. BMC Cancer2023; 23: 500.
25.
TongASainsburyPCraigJ. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care2007; 19: 349–357.
26.
BraunVClarkeV. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health2021; 13: 201–216.
27.
GraneheimUHLundmanB. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today2004; 24: 105–112.
28.
JohnsonJLAdkinsDChauvinS. A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research. Am J Pharm Educ2020; 84: 7120.
29.
KeshtaIOdehA. Security and privacy of electronic health records: concerns and challenges. Egypt Inform J2021; 22: 177–183.
30.
RaspaMMoultrieRWagnerL, et al.Ethical, legal, and social issues related to the inclusion of individuals with intellectual disabilities in electronic health record research: scoping review. J Med Internet Res2020; 22: e16734.
31.
GülİYılmazV. Factors influencing nurses' intentions to protect patient privacy: a survey-based study using the theory of planned behavior. Res Theory Nurs Pract2024. DOI: 10.1891/rtnp-2024-0076.
32.
BoladoGNAyalewTLFelekeMG, et al.Documentation practice and associated factors among nurses working in public hospitals in Wolaita Zone, Southern Ethiopia. BMC Nurs2023; 22: 330.
33.
McCarthyBFitzgeraldSO'SheaM, et al.Electronic nursing documentation interventions to promote or improve patient safety and quality care: a systematic review. J Nurs Manag2019; 27: 491–501.
34.
Bani IssaWAl AkourIIbrahimA, et al.Privacy, confidentiality, security and patient safety concerns about electronic health records. Int Nurs Rev2020; 67: 218–230.
35.
ShihundlaRCLebeseRTMaputleMS. Effects of increased nurses' workload on quality documentation of patient information at selected Primary Health Care facilities in Vhembe District, Limpopo Province. Curationis2016; 39: 1545.
36.
JawadLA. Security and privacy in digital healthcare systems: challenges and mitigation strategies. Abhigyan2024; 42: 23–31.
37.
GriffithR. Patient information: confidentiality and the electronic record. Br J Nurs2015; 24: 894–895.
38.
EbrahimiHNikraveshMOskouieF, et al.Ethical behavior of nurses in decision-making in Iran. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res2015; 20: 147–155.
39.
ZhangNLiJBuX, et al.The relationship between ethical climate and nursing service behavior in public and private hospitals: a cross-sectional study in China. BMC Nurs2021; 20: 136.
40.
AnthonyDLStableinT. Privacy in practice: professional discourse about information control in health care. J Health Organ Manag2016; 30: 207–226.
41.
CobradoUNShariefSRegahalNG, et al.Access control solutions in electronic health record systems: a systematic review. Inform Med Unlocked2024; 49: 101552.
42.
PoolJAkhlaghpourSFatehiF, et al.A systematic analysis of failures in protecting personal health data: a scoping review. Int J Inf Manag2024; 74: 102719.
43.
Nikbakht NasrabadiANorouzkhaniNManookianA, et al.Safeguarding patient information as an issue faced by nurses: a policy brief. Asia Pac J Health Manag2024; 19. DOI: 10.24083/apjhm.v19i2.3013.
44.
JeyakumarTMcClureSLoweM, et al.An education framework for effective implementation of a health information system: scoping review. J Med Internet Res2021; 23: e24691.
45.
ParkEHKimJParkYS. The role of information security learning and individual factors in disclosing patients' health information. Comput Secur2017; 65: 64–76.
