A persistent devaluation of care-work, difficult working conditions, and low salaries have led to challenges with staff recruitment and retention in the homecare sector in France. A new homecare organization adopting an innovative organizational model recently experimented an hourly payment method yielding positive outcomes.
Objectives
Using Tronto’s caring framework, this paper analyzes the strategies used by the founders as they developed their innovative model and the nursing activities performed during home visits.
Design
A longitudinal qualitative study was conducted between 2017 and 2023. Homecare nursing teams were shadowed for 1–2 days per year yielding detailed field notes on caregiving activities, both before and after the new payment method. Secondary data included reports, videos, articles, and unpublished documents found online.
Ethical considerations
While there is no requirement in France to obtain ethical approval in non-interventional research, verbal consent was obtained by all participants prior to their involvement in the study; confidentiality and anonymity were strictly maintained; and pseudonyms were assigned to protect identities.
Findings
63 interviews and 185 h of shadowing and observations were conducted. Results revealed a virtuous cycle of caring facilitated and encouraged by new incentives that resonated with nurses’ professional ethics. The favorable working environment and the hourly payment method enabled nurses to provide caregiving in accordance with their values.
Conclusions
As the new hourly payment experiment is scaled-up nationally, it is imperative that it is not isolated from the organizational model. Without the underpinning values and principles, the hourly payment method alone is unlikely to shift the value attributed to caring.
KittayEF. Love’s labor: essays on women, equality and dependency. Abingdon, Oxford: Routledge, 2019.
2.
ChatzidakisAHakimJLitterJ, et al.The care manifesto: the politics of interdependence. London: Verso Books, 2020.
3.
FraserN. Capitalism’s crisis of care. Dissent2016; 63(1): 30–37.
4.
BudlenderD. What do time use studies tell us about unpaid care work? Evidence from seven countries. In: Time use studies and unpaid care work. London: Routledge, 2010.
5.
DalyM. Care as a good for social policy. J Soc Pol2002; 31(2): 251–270.
6.
DalyMLewisJ. The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states. Br J Sociol2000; 51(2): 281–298.
7.
RummeryKFineM. Care: a critical review of theory, policy and practice. Soc Policy Adm2012; 46(3): 321–343.
8.
QuinnMMMarkkanenPGalliganCJ, et al.Healthy aging requires a healthy home care workforce: the occupational safety and health of home care aides. Curr Environ Health Rep2021; 8(3): 235–244.
9.
BoneAEGomesBEtkindSN, et al.What is the impact of population ageing on the future provision of end-of-life care? Population-based projections of place of death. Palliat Med2018; 32(2): 329–336.
TrontoJC. An ethic of care. Generations1998; 22(4): 15–20.
12.
NewmanSLawlerJ. Managing health care under new public management: a Sisyphean challenge for nursing. J Sociol2009; 45(4): 419–432.
13.
Rothier BautzerE. Le care négligé: Les professions de santé face au malade chronique. Paris: ESTEM, 2013.
14.
BjornsdottirK. The ethics and politics of home care. Int J Nurs Stud2009; 46(5): 732–739.
15.
ScalesK. It is time to resolve the direct care workforce crisis in long-term care. Gerontol2021; 61(4): 497–504.
16.
HallaranAJJessupSJ. Examining predictors of intention to leave in home care and differences among types of providers. J Nurs Manag. 2023; 31(5): 1–14.
17.
ParksJA. No place like home?: Feminist ethics and home health care. Indiana: Indiana University Press, 2003.
18.
CeciC. Increasingly distant from life: problem setting in the organization of home care. Nurs Philos2008; 9(1): 19–31.
19.
KreitzerMJMonsenKANandramS, et al.Buurtzorg Nederland: a global model of social innovation, change, and whole-systems healing. Glob Adv Health Med2015; 4(1): 40–44.
20.
HegedüsASchürchABischofbergerI. Implementing Buurtzorg-derived models in the home care setting: a scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud Adv2022; 4: 100061.
21.
NandramS. ‘Buurtzorg’: a case of being-centredness as example of an organic worldview for corporate peace. In: OetzelJGTing-ToomeyS (eds). Business, ethics and peace. UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2015, pp. 333–349.
22.
DrennanVMCalestaniMRossF, et al.Tackling the workforce crisis in district nursing: can the Dutch Buurtzorg model offer a solution and a better patient experience? A mixed methods case study. BMJ Open2018; 8(6): e021931.
23.
HamrouniN. Vers une théorie politique du care: Entendre le care comme “service rendu”. In: Care éthique féministe actuelle. Paris: L’Harmattan, 2015, pp. 71–93.
24.
PierronJ-PVinotDChelleE. Les valeurs du soin. Paris: Seli Arslan, 2018.
25.
GilliganC. In a different voice: women’s conceptions of self and of morality. Harv Educ Rev2012; 47(4): 481–517.
26.
LachmanVD. Applying the ethics of care to your nursing practice. Medsurg Nurs2012; 21(2): 112–114.
27.
LaurinA-CMartinP. Towards democratic institutions: Tronto’s care ethics inspiring nursing actions in intensive care. Nurs Ethics2022; 29(7–8): 1578–1588.
28.
BennerP. Interpretive phenomenology: embodiment, caring, and ethics in health and illness. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1994.
SwansonKM. Empirical development of a middle range theory of caring. Nurs Res1991; 40(3): 161–166.
31.
WatsonJ. The theory of human caring: retrospective and prospective. Nurs Sci Q1997; 10(1): 49–52.
32.
TrontoJC. Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. 1st ed.. Routledge, 2020.
33.
TrontoJC. Who cares? How to reshape a democratic politics. 1st ed.. Cornell University Press, 2015.
34.
LemonLLBomanCD. Ethics of care in action: overview of holistic framework with application to employee engagement. Public Relat Rev2022; 48(5): 102232.
35.
CristofaloPDarielODurandV. How does social innovation cross borders? Exploring the diffusion process of an alternative homecare service in France. J Innov Econ Manag. 2019; 30(3): 59–88.
36.
CristofaloPDarielO. Travail en équipe et autonomie collective: une expérience dans les soins infirmiers à domicile. Santé Publique. 2021; 33(4): 527–536.
EylandILeblancS. Comprendre l’activité des infirmiers libéraux: Légitimation de gestes professionnels liés au care dans une visée formative. Activités2019.
40.
Ward-GriffinC. Negotiating care of frail elders: relationships between community nurses and family caregivers. Can J Nurs Res Arch2001; 33(4): 63–81.
41.
YakushevaORamburBBuerhausPI. The ethical foundations of value-informed nursing practice. Nurs Outlook2021; 69(4): 539–541.
42.
StoneD. Care and trembling. Caring1999;18(6):8–10.
43.
DiamondT. Social policy and everyday life in nursing homes: a critical ethnography. Soc Sci Med1986; 23(12): 1287–1295.
44.
SawbridgeYHewisonA. Time to care? responding to concerns about poor nursing care. Birmingham: Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, 2011.
45.
FormentinMBortreeD. Giving from the heart: exploring how ethics of care emerges in corporate social responsibility. J Commun Manag2019; 23(1): 2–17.
46.
PlaceKR. “People are more than just a statistic”: ethical, care-based engagement of marginalized publics on social media. J Media Ethics2021; 36(3): 141–153.
47.
KellyLAMcHughMDAikenLH. Nurse outcomes in Magnet® and non-Magnet hospitals. J Nurs Adm2011; 41(10): 428–433.
48.
StimpfelAWRosenJEMcHughMD. Understanding the role of the professional practice environment on quality of care in Magnet® and non-magnet hospitals. J Nurs Adm2015; 45(10): S52–S58.
MunkebyHBratbergGDevikSA. Registered nurses’ exposure to high stress of conscience in long-term care. Nurs Ethics2023; 30: 1011–1024.
51.
MorinièreA. Analyse du rôle des mesures de performance dans l’émergence de dynamiques de tensions et de compromis dans les hôpitaux publics français. PhD thesis2021.
52.
SchweyerF-X. Santé, contrat social et marché: La fonction publique hospitalière en réformes. Rev Fr Adm Publique2009; n° 132(132): 727–744.
53.
NolanMKeadyJGrantG. Developing a typology of family care: implications for nurses and other service providers. J Adv Nurs1995; 21(2): 256–265.
54.
BurridgeLWinchSClavarinoA. Reluctance to care: a systematic review and development of a conceptual framework. Cancer Nurs2007; 30(2): E9–E19.
55.
GraeberD. Toward an anthropological theory of value: the false coin of our own dreams. 1st ed. Springer, 2001.
56.
GraeberD. Caring too much: that’s the curse of the working classes. The Guardian. [Internet]. 2014. Available from:https://www.theguardian.com
57.
CloyesKG. Agonizing care: care ethics, agonistic feminism and a political theory of care. Nurs Inq2002; 9(3): 203–214.
