The principle of respect for autonomy (PRA) is a central tenet of bioethics. In the quest for a global bioethics, it is pertinent to ask whether this principle can be applied as it is to cultures and societies that are devoid of the Western sociopolitical historical pressures that led to its emergence. Relational autonomists have argued for a more inclusive approach to patient autonomy which takes into account factors such as interdependency and social relations. However, at the outset of any relational approach, it is necessary to identify underlying factors that influence patient autonomy in non-Western cultures.
Objective
To conduct a review of the literature to uncover the mechanisms through which social, cultural, and religious factors influence and impact the application of the PRA in healthcare decision-making in non-Western cultures and societies.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review through a comprehensive search of three major electronic databases of biomedical sciences. Returned citations were imported to Covidence, full texts were assessed for eligibility, included articles were thoroughly reviewed and data was synthesized. PRISMA guidelines were followed.
Results
Our search retrieved 590 non-duplicate results, 50 of which were included after screening and full-text eligibility checks. The included studies were predominantly qualitative in nature, with few quantitative, mixed-methods, and review studies included. Our synthesis of data identified nine key factors that influenced patients’ autonomous decision-making through cultural, social, religious, or intersectional pathways.
Conclusion
Two main conclusions emerge from this review. Firstly, there is a notable dearth of bioethical research examining the influence of diverse factors on patients’ inclination towards different conceptions of autonomy. Secondly, the analysis of prevalent collectivist cultures and deference of autonomy adds value to the solution-oriented relational autonomy debate. This raises questions regarding how decision-making can be truly autonomous in the presence of such large-scale factors, warranting further attention.
WillJF. A brief historical and theoretical perspective on patient autonomy and medical decision making: Part II: the autonomy model. Chest2011; 139(6): 1491–1497.
2.
KabaRSooriakumaranP. The evolution of the doctor-patient relationship. Int J Surg2007; 5(1): 57–65.
3.
GilbarRMiolaJ. One size fits all? On patient autonomy, medical decision-making, and the impact of culture. Med Law Rev2015; 23(3): 375–399.
TauberAI. Historical and philosophical reflections on patient autonomy. Health Care Anal2001; 9(3): 299–319.
6.
HoltzmanJNSchwartzsteinRM. Health care in the United States: individual right or government duty?Acad Med2020; 95(6): 868–871.
7.
LambrightD. Man, morality, and the United States constitution. U Pa J Const L2014; 17: 1487.
8.
AnnasGJGrodinMA. The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code: human rights in human experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
9.
BlackHCNolanJR. Black’s law dictionary: definitions of the terms and phrases of American and English urisprudence. In: Ancient and modern. West Publishing Company, 1990.
10.
RothsteinMA. The role of law in the development of American bioethics. J Int Bioethique2009; 20(4): 73–111.
11.
BazzanoLADurantJBrantleyPR. A modern history of informed consent and the role of key information. Ochsner J2021; 21(1): 81–85.
12.
BakerR. Bioethics and human rights: a historical perspective. Camb Q Healthc Ethics2001; 10(3): 241–252.
13.
CampbellL. Kant, autonomy and bioethics. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health2017; 3(3): 381–392.
14.
JenningsB. Reconceptualizing autonomy: a relational turn in bioethics. Hastings Cent Rep2016; 46(3): 11–16.
15.
ChildressJF. Respecting personal autonomy in bioethics: relational autonomy as a corrective?Thick (concepts of) autonomy: Personal autonomy in ethics and bioethics2022: 135–149.
16.
HoA. The individualist model of autonomy and the challenge of disability. J bioeth Inq2008; 5: 193–207.
17.
ChristmanJ. Autonomy in moral and political philosophy. In: ZaltaEN (ed). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Fall, 2020.
18.
GauthierCC. Philosophical foundations of respect for autonomy. Kennedy Inst Ethics J1993; 3(1): 21–37.
19.
O'NeillO. Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge University Press, 2002.
20.
MillJS. On liberty. Parker, 1859.
21.
MiyamotoM. Political legacy: John Locke and the American government. University of Oregon, 2016.
22.
Gómez-VírsedaCde MaeseneerYGastmansC. Relational autonomy: what does it mean and how is it used in end-of-life care? A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. BMC Med Ethics2019; 20(1): 76.
23.
DoveESKellySELuciveroF, et al.Beyond individualism: is there a place for relational autonomy in clinical practice and research?Clin Ethics2017; 12(3): 150–165.
FreedmanB. Offering truth: one ethical approach to the uninformed cancer patient. Arch Intern Med1993; 153(5): 572–576.
26.
CarrollCBoothA. Quality assessment of qualitative evidence for systematic review and synthesis: is it meaningful, and if so, how should it be performed?Res Synth Methods2015; 6(2): 149–154.
27.
McDougallRJNotiniL. Overriding parents’ medical decisions for their children: a systematic review of normative literature. J Med Ethics2014; 40(7): 448–452.
28.
ThomasJHardenA. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol2008; 8: 45–50.
29.
PrincewillCWJegedeASNordströmK, et al.Factors affecting women's autonomous decision making in research participation amongst Yoruba women of western Nigeria. Develop World Bioeth2017; 17(1): 40–49.
30.
PrincewillCWWangmoTJegedeAS, et al.Bride price payment and women's autonomy: findings from qualitative interviews from Nigeria. Women Health2019; 59(7): 775–788.
31.
GwatimbaLRaselekoaneNRNwaforAO. Obstacles to the realization of women's reproductive health rights in Zimbabwe. Afr J Reprod Health2020; 24(3): 146–153.
32.
SwansonJMHenninkMMRochatRW. I have no choice“: influences on contraceptive use and abortion among women in the democratic republic of the Congo. Afr J Reprod Health2019; 23(1): 128–138.
33.
MushekeMNtalashaHGariS, et al.A systematic review of qualitative findings on factors enabling and deterring uptake of HIV testing in Sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Publ Health2013; 13: 220.
34.
AlhassanYTwimukyeAMalabaT, et al.‘I fear my partner will abandon me’: the intersection of late initiation of antenatal care in pregnancy and poor ART adherence among women living with HIV in South Africa and Uganda. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth2022; 22(1): 566.
35.
MemonZAMianARealeS, et al.Community and health care provider perspectives on barriers to and enablers of family planning use in rural sindh, Pakistan: qualitative exploratory study. JMIR Form Res2023; 7: e43494.
36.
BaadaJNBaruahBSanoY, et al.Mothers in a ‘strange land’: migrant women farmers' reproductive health in the brong-ahafo region of Ghana. J Health Care Poor Underserved2021; 32(2): 910–930.
37.
Murphy-LawlessJOhajaM. Persistent challenges and barriers encountered by women attending formal antenatal care in south east Nigeria. Afr J Nurs Midwifery2017; 19(2): 1–13.
38.
O'ConnellTSBedfordKJThiedeM, et al.Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative evidence on non-financial access barriers: implications for assessment at the district level. Int J Equity Health2015; 14: 54.
39.
ChiangFMWangYWHsiehJG. How acculturation influences attitudes about advance care planning and end-of-life care among Chinese living in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Australia. Health Care2021; 9(11): 1477.
40.
AkterMKYimyamSChareonsantiJ, et al.The challenges of prenatal care for Bangladeshi women: a qualitative study. Int Nurs Rev2018; 65(4): 534–541.
41.
MatteboMLindkvistMPedersenC, et al.The influence of a patriarchal culture on women’s reproductive decision-making: exploring the perceptions of 15 Nepali healthcare providers. Evid base Midwifery2016; 14(3): 94–100.
42.
VidlerMRamadurgUCharantimathU, et al.Utilization of maternal health care services and their determinants in Karnataka State, India. Reprod Health2016; 13(Suppl 1): 37.
43.
SattarTAhmadSZakarR, et al.Watering the plant in another’s courtyard: an ethnographic exploration of daughters' devaluation through sex-selected abortions among the rural married females in south Punjab, Pakistan. J Interpers Violence2021; 36(9–10): 4490–4519.
44.
McKinnSLinhDTFosterK, et al.Distributed health literacy in the maternal health context in vietnam. Health Lit Res Pract2019; 3(1): e31–e42.
45.
GanleJKObengBSegbefiaAY, et al.How intra-familial decision-making affects women's access to, and use of maternal healthcare services in Ghana: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth2015; 15: 173.
46.
SumankuuroJMahamaMYCrockettJ, et al.Narratives on why pregnant women delay seeking maternal health care during delivery and obstetric complications in rural Ghana. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth2019; 19(1): 260.
47.
MacDonaldCAAubelJAidamBA, et al.Grandmothers as change agents: developing a culturally appropriate program to improve maternal and child nutrition in Sierra Leone. Curr Dev Nutr2020; 4(1): nzz141.
48.
MumtazZSalwaySM. Gender, pregnancy and the uptake of antenatal care services in Pakistan. Sociol Health Illness2007; 29(1): 1–26.
49.
ScottJOnyangoMABurkhardtG, et al.A qualitative analysis of decision-making among women with sexual violence-related pregnancies in conflict-affected eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth2018; 18(1): 322.
50.
HoMJAlkhalATekianA, et al.Contextualizing the physician charter on professionalism in Qatar: from patient autonomy to family autonomy. J Grad Med Educ2016; 8(5): 719–725.
51.
GongNDuQLouH, et al.Treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer: a qualitative study. Nurs Ethics2021; 28(2): 242–252.
52.
NishaMKAlamARahmanA, et al.Modifiable socio-cultural beliefs and practices influencing early and adequate utilisation of antenatal care in rural Bangladesh: a qualitative study. Midwifery2021; 93: 102881.
53.
SamaranayakeUMathangasingheYBanagalaASK. Are predominantly western standards and expectations of informed consent in surgery applicable to all? A qualitative study in a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. BMJ Open2019; 9(1): e025299.
54.
LeeHTSYangCLLeuSV, et al.Barriers to initiate a discussion about advance care planning among older Taiwanese residents of nursing homes and their families: a qualitative study. Appl Nurs Res2024; 75: 151766.
55.
BoucherNA. Faith, family, filiality, and fate: Dominican and Puerto Rican elders’ perspectives on end-of-life decisions. J Appl Gerontol2017; 36(3): 351–372.
56.
DuttaOLallPPatinadanPV, et al.Patient autonomy and participation in end-of-life decision-making: an interpretive-systemic focus group study on perspectives of Asian healthcare professionals. Palliat Support Care2020; 18(4): 425–430.
57.
GondweMJTotoNMGundaC, et al.Guardians and research staff experiences and views about the consent process in hospital-based paediatric research studies in urban Malawi: a qualitative study. BMC Med Ethics2022; 23(1): 125.
58.
Akpa-InyangFChimaSC. South African traditional values and beliefs regarding informed consent and limitations of the principle of respect for autonomy in African communities: a cross-cultural qualitative study. BMC Med Ethics2021; 22(1): 111.
59.
ItoMTanidaNTuraleS. Perceptions of Japanese patients and their family about medical treatment decisions. Nurs Health Sci2010; 12(3): 314–321.
60.
RowtherAAKaziAKNazirH, et al.A woman is a puppet. women’s disempowerment and prenatal anxiety in Pakistan: a qualitative study of sources, mitigators, and coping strategies for anxiety in pregnancy. Int J Environ Res Publ Health2020; 17(14): 4926.
61.
AhmedKAGrundyJHashmatL, et al.An analysis of the gender and social determinants of health in urban poor areas of the most populated cities of Pakistan. Int J Equity Health2022; 21(1): 52.
62.
HudaMRabbaniFShiptonL, et al.Listening to caregivers: narratives of health seeking for children under five with pneumonia and diarrhea: insights from the NIGRAAN trial in Pakistan. J Multidiscip Healthc2023; 16: 3629–3640.
63.
JissoMAssefaNAAlemayehuA, et al.Barriers to family planning service utilization in Ethiopia: a qualitative study. Ethiop J Health Sci2023; 33(Spec Iss 2): 143–154.
64.
GoffmanE. Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. Touchstone, 1963.
65.
SiminoffLABoltSGardinerHM, et al.Family first: asian Americans' attitudes and behaviors toward deceased organ donation. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities2020; 7(1): 72–83.
66.
SpielmanB. Elderly, social attitudes toward. In: ChadwickR (ed). Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics. 2nd ed.San Diego: Academic Press, 2012, pp. 56–62.
67.
ZivkovicT. About face: relationalities of ageing and dying in Chinese migrant families. Soc Sci Med2021; 291: 112827.
68.
GoffmanE. On face-work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychiatry1955; 18(3): 213–231.
69.
SialubanjeCMassarKvan der PijlMS, et al.Improving access to skilled facility-based delivery services: women’s beliefs on facilitators and barriers to the utilisation of maternity waiting homes in rural Zambia. Reprod Health2015; 12: 61.
70.
SattarTAhmadSSaleemU, et al.Influence of women's reproductive autonomy on sex biased coercive miscarriages in rural establishments of South Punjab, Pakistan. Rawal Med J2020; 45(2): 451–455.
71.
HoytJHamonJKKrishnaratneS, et al.It was my own decision“: the transformational shift that influences a woman’s decision to use contraceptives covertly. BMC Wom Health2022; 22(1): 144.
72.
PrincewillCWDe ClercqERiecher-RösslerA, et al.Education and reproductive autonomy: the case of married Nigerian women. Narrat Inq Bioeth2017; 7(3): 231–244.
73.
SeetharamSZanottiR. Patients’ perceptions on healthcare decision making in rural India: a qualitative study and ethical analysis. J Clin Ethics2009; 20(2): 150–157.
74.
NgureKTrinidadSBBeima-SofieK, et al.Perceived social influences on women’s decisions to use medications not studied in pregnancy. A qualitative ethical analysis of preexposure prophylaxis implementation research in Kenya. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics2021; 16(3): 225–337.
75.
MweembaODixeyRBondV, et al.The influence of social constructs of hegemonic masculinity and sexual behaviour on acceptability of vaginal microbicides in Zambia. Global Publ Health2018; 13(7): 931–943.
76.
AlfahmiMZ. Patients’ preference approach to overcome the moral implications of family-centred decisions in Saudi medical settings. BMC Med Ethics2022; 23(1): 128.
77.
ChoGH. A psychological inquiry into the Confucian origins of East Asian collectivism. Korean Social Sciences Review (KSSR)2011; 1(1): 37–103.
78.
SilversteinER. Deep deference, autonomy, and the deferential wife. Riverside: University of California, 2013.
79.
GarnettM. Ghostwritten lives: autonomy, deference, and self-authorship. Ethics2023; 133(2): 189–215.
80.
ScocciaD. Paternalism and respect for autonomy. Ethics1990; 100(2): 318–334.
81.
LoughreyD. Second-order desire accounts of autonomy. Int J Phil Stud1998; 6(2): 211–229.
82.
FrankfurtH. Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. Agency and responsiblity. Routledge, 2018, pp. 77–91.
83.
DworkinG. The theory and practice of autonomy. Cambridge University Press, 1988.
84.
MarsGMKempenGIWiddershovenGA, et al.Conceptualizing autonomy in the context of chronic physical illness: relating philosophical theories to social scientific perspectives. Health2008; 12(3): 333–348.
85.
AgichGJ. Autonomy and long-term care. Oxford University Press, 1993.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
