For the patients receiving care in the operating room, it emphasizes that the ethical behavior and attitude of health professionals should be aligned with patients’ basic human rights. Surgical ethics may provide an ethical alternative in a specific operating room context. However, it is unclear how actively research is being conducted in this regard.
Aim
This study determines the direction of future research by identifying ethical issues experienced in the operating room.
Method
This scoping review is based on the methodological framework suggested by Arksey and O’Malley in 2005. PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, WOS, Cochrane, KISS, and KMbase databases were searched from January 2012 to May 2022. Two researchers independently screened the searched articles by reviewing the titles, abstracts, and full texts. Consequently, 19 studies were selected.
Findings
Five categories were identified: Professional ethics, Organizational ethics, Patients’ rights, Patient safety, and Allocating resources. The derived categories covered all the same content as the International Council of Nurses’ (ICN) code of ethics, with the exception of one element, that is, global health.
Conclusions
This study highlights ethical issues in the operating theatre and emphasizes the need for individual and organizational strategies aligned with the ICN code of ethics. Future research should cover a wider range of issues, employ diverse perspectives and methodologies, and enhance ethical practices to improve understanding and ethical practices in the field.
AghamohammadiFImaniBKooshaMM. Operating room nurses’ lived experiences of ethical codes: a phenomenological study. Int J Nurs Sci2021; 8(3): 332–338. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2021.05.012
2.
BakhtiariSSharifFShahriariM, et al.Perspective and experience of hospital operating room nurses with the concept of excellence: a qualitative study. Risk Manag Healthc Pol2020; 13: 125–134. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S236389
3.
CardenasD. Surgical ethics: a framework for surgeons, patients, and society. Rev Col Bras Cir2020; 47: e20202519. DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20202519
4.
McCulloughLBJonesJWBrodyBA. Surg ethics. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998, p. 146.
5.
NazimSMShahabuddinS. Surgeons and ethical challenges in operating room. J Pakistan Med Assoc2022; 7(Suppl 1)(1): S64–S70. DOI: 10.47391/JPMA.AKU-13
6.
KellyPDFanningJBDroletB. Operating room time as a limited resource: ethical considerations for allocation. J Med Ethics2022; 48(1): 14–18. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106519
7.
DunnD. Ghost surgery: a frank look at the issue and how to address it. AORN J2015; 102(6): 603–616. DOI: 10.1016/j.aorn.2015.10.003
SepehriradEHeidarzadehMAslZE, et al.The relationship between moral sensitivity, ethical climate, and job strain with patient privacy from viewpoint of operating room staffs. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res2021; 26(2): 183–187. DOI: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_22_20
10.
ParedesAZAquinaCTSelbyLV, et al.Increasing importance of ethics in surgical decision making. Adv Surg2020; 54: 251–263. DOI: 10.1016/j.yasu.2020.05.008
11.
PoolaVPSuhBParrT, et al.Medical students’ reflections on surgical educators’ professionalism: contextual nuances in the hidden curriculum. Am J Surg2021; 221(2): 270–276. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.09.003
12.
MarsdenKAKaldjianLCCarlisleEM. Ethical issues encountered during the medical student surgical clerkship. J Surg Res2019; 244: 272–277. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.047
13.
KamaliNHannaniSAmiriF, et al.Level of moral distress in operating room technologist students in Iran: a cross-sectional study. Midwifery2020; 29(4): 1–6.
14.
BouldMDSutherlandSSydorDT, et al.Residents' reluctance to challenge negative hierarchy in the operating room: a qualitative study. Can J Anaesth2015; 62(6): 576–586. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-015-0364-5
15.
BleakleyAHobbsABoydenJ, et al.Safety in operating theatres: improving teamwork through team resource management. J Workplace Learn2004; 16: 83–91. DOI: 10.1108/13665620410521549
PreshawDHBrazilKMcLaughlinD, et al.Ethical issues experienced by healthcare workers in nursing homes: literature review. Nurs Ethics2016; 23(5): 490–506. DOI: 10.1177/0969733015576357
18.
ArkseyHO’MalleyL. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol2005; 8: 19–32. DOI: 10.1080/1364557032000119616
19.
TriccoACLillieEZarinW, et al.PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med2018; 169(7): 467–473.
20.
International Council of Nurses. The ICN code of ethics for nurses. International Council of Nurses: Geneva, 2012.
21.
HongQNPluyePFàbreguesS, et al.Mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT), version 2018. Registration of copyright, 2018; 1148552(10): 2018.
22.
KrippendorffK. Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. 2nd ed.California: Sage Publications Inc, 2003.
23.
AkyüzEErdemirF. Surgical patients' and nurses' opinions and expectations about privacy in care. Nurs Ethics2013; 20(6): 660–671. DOI: 10.1177/0969733012468931
24.
SilasMRGrassiaPLangermanA. Video recording of the operating room--is anonymity possible?J Surg Res2015; 197(2): 272–276. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.03.097
25.
Fanti SilvaDAColleoniR. Patient's privacy violation on social media in the surgical area. Am Surg2018; 84(12): 1900–1905.
EkmekciPEKazak BengisunZArdaB. Resolving ethical issues in the field of anaesthesia: a mixed-methods study. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim2021; 49(5): 407–413. DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2021.1295
28.
MuenstererOJKreutzHPoplawskiA, et al.Timeout procedure in paediatric surgery: effective tool or lip service? A randomised prospective observational study. BMJ Qual Saf2021; 30(8): 622–627. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012001
29.
SydorDTBouldMDNaikVN, et al.Challenging authority during a life-threatening crisis: the effect of operating theatre hierarchy. Br J Anaesth2013; 110(3): 463–471. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aes396
30.
HazaryanMSalehi KambooMMirzaeipourF, et al.Observance of patients’ rights by physicians and operating room technicians. Med Surg Nurs J2021; 10(4): e123316. DOI: 10.5812/msnj.123316
31.
HowardFMcKneallyMFUpshurRE, et al.The formal and informal surgical ethics curriculum: views of resident and staff surgeons in Toronto. Am J Surg2012; 203(2): 258–265. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.02.008
32.
BakryAMSobhyEAbdelmohtyH. Cardiac surgeons between apprehension and ethical duty in the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann2022; 30(8): 954–960. DOI: 10.1177/0218492320943355
33.
FastIVillafrancaAHenrichsB, et al.Disruptive behaviour in the operating room is under-reported: an international survey. Can J Anaesth2020; 67(2): 177–185. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-019-01540-3
34.
MiandoabNYArbabisarjouAZareS, et al.Operating room staff attitude toward the ethical climate of educational hospitals. Scholars’ Res J2015; 7(12): 122–125.
35.
DeKeyser GanzFBerkovitzK. Surgical nurses' perceptions of ethical dilemmas, moral distress and quality of care. J Adv Nurs2012; 68(7): 1516–1525. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05897.x
36.
WillassenETJacobsenILSTveitenS. Safe surgery checklist, patient safety, teamwork, and responsibility-coequal demands? A focus group study. Glob Qual Nurs Res2018; 5(5): 2333393618764070. DOI: 10.1177/2333393618764070
37.
GunaratnamCBernsteinM. Patients' views on priority setting in neurosurgery: a qualitative study. Br J Neurosurg2016; 30(1): 16–22. DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2015.1071330
38.
BlombergACBisholtBLindwallL. Value conflicts in perioperative practice. Nurs Ethics2019; 26(7–8): 2213–2224. DOI: 10.1177/0969733018798169
39.
KangasniemiMPakkanenPKorhonenA. Professional ethics in nursing: an integrative review. J Adv Nurs2015; 71(8): 1744–1757. DOI: 10.1111/jan.12619
40.
FerreresAR. The surgeon and the anesthesiologist in the operating room: ethical issues and professionalism. J Anesth Surg Rep2018; JASR-104. DOI: 10.29011/JASR-104.100004
41.
SuhonenRStoltMVirtanenH, et al.Organizational ethics: a literature review. Nurs Ethics2011; 18(3): 285–303. DOI: 10.1177/0969733011401123
42.
BerlingerNDietzE. Time-out: the professional and organizational ethics of speaking up in the OR. AMA J Ethics2016; 18(9): 925–932. DOI: 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.9.stas1-1609
43.
Stephen EkpenyongMNyashanuMOssey-NwezeC, et al.Exploring the perceptions of dignity among patients and nurses in hospital and community settings: an integrative review. J Res Nurs2021; 26(6): 517–537. DOI: 10.1177/1744987121997890
44.
OlejarczykJPYoungM. Patient rights and ethics. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL). StatPearls Publishing, 2022.
45.
Committee opinion no. 464: patient safety in the surgical environment. Ob Gyn2010; 116(3): 786–790. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f69b22
46.
NejadsarvariNEbrahimiAEbrahimiA, et al.Medical ethics in plastic surgery: a mini review. World J Plast Surg2016; 5(3): 207–212.
47.
IyengarKPMongaPElbanaH, et al.Orthopaedic surgical prioritisation: can it be made fairer to minimise clinical harm?Postgrad Med J2022; 98(e1): e61–e62. DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-140272
48.
TørringBGittellJHLaursenM, et al.Communication and relationship dynamics in surgical teams in the operating room: an ethnographic study. BMC Health Serv Res2019; 19(1): 528. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4362-0
49.
FagerdahlAMTorbjörnssonEGustavssonM, et al.Moral distress among operating room personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. J Surg Res2022; 273: 110–118.
50.
SøreideKHalletJMatthewsJB, et al.Immediate and long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on delivery of surgical services. Br J Surg2020; 107(10): 1250–1261. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11670
51.
AkbariAMehrvarNAkbariME. Surgery priority at the time of COVID-19 pandemic, a conceptual framework recommendation. Caspian J Intern Med2020; 11(Suppl 1): 577–579. DOI: 10.22088/cjim.11.0.577
52.
FarmerPEKimJY. Surgery and global health: a view from beyond the OR. World J Surg2008; 32(4): 533–536. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-008-9525-9
53.
BicklerSOzgedizDGosselinR, et al.Key concepts for estimating the burden of surgical conditions and the unmet need for surgical care. World J Surg2010; 34(3): 374–380. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0261-6
54.
JainADaiTMyersCG, et al.Prioritising surgical cases deferred by the COVID-19 pandemic: An ethics-inspired algorithmic framework for health leaders. BMJ Lead2021; 5(2): 124–126.
55.
MinehartRDFoldyEGLongJA, et al.Challenging gender stereotypes and advancing inclusive leadership in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth2020; 124(3): e148–e154. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.015
56.
JonassonLLLissPEWesterlindB, et al.Empirical and normative ethics: a synthesis relating to the care of older patients. Nurs Ethics2011; 18(6): 814–824. DOI: 10.1177/0969733011405875
57.
VogelsteinEColbertA. Normative nursing ethics: a literature review and tentative recommendations. Nurs Ethics2020; 27(1): 7–15. DOI: 10.1177/0969733019836148
58.
AlsaffarHWilsonLKamdarDP, et al.Informed consent: do information pamphlets improve post-operative risk-recall in patients undergoing total thyroidectomy: Prospective randomized control study. J Otolaryngol-Head N2016; 45: 14. DOI: 10.1186/s40463-016-0127-5
59.
HansonMPittD. Informed consent for surgery: risk discussion and documentation. Can J Surg2017; 60(1): 69–70. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.004816
60.
AgozzinoEBorrelliSCancellieriM, et al.Does written informed consent adequately inform surgical patients? A cross sectional study. BMC Med Ethics2019; 20(1): 1. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-018-0340-z
61.
KimJNJeongSH. Types of perception toward ethical issues in perioperative nurses: Q-methodological approach. J Korean Acad Nurs2018; 48(6): 679–691. DOI: 10.4040/jkan.2018.48.6.679
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
