The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on care homes in the United Kingdom, particularly for those residents living with dementia. The impetus for this article comes from a recent review conducted by the authors. That review, a qualitative media analysis of news and academic articles published during the first few months of the outbreak, identified ethical care as a key theme warranting further investigation within the context of the crisis. To explore ethical care further, a set of salient ethical values for delivering care to care home residents living with dementia during the pandemic was derived from a synthesis of relevant ethical standards, codes and philosophical approaches. The ethical values identified were caring, non-maleficence, beneficence, procedural justice, dignity in death and dying, well-being, safety, and personhood. Using these ethical values as a framework, alongside examples from contemporaneous media and academic sources, this article discusses the delivery of ethical care to care home residents with dementia within the context of COVID-19. The analysis identifies positive examples of ethical values displayed by care home staff, care sector organisations, healthcare professionals and third sector advocacy organisations. However, concerns relating to the death rates, dignity, safety, well-being and personhood – of residents and staff – are also evident. These shortcomings are attributable to negligent government strategy, which resulted in delayed guidance, lack of resources and Personal Protective Equipment, unclear data, and inconsistent testing. Consequently, this review demonstrates the ways in which care homes are underfunded, under resourced and undervalued.
Public Health England. Guidance on shielding and protecting people who are clinically extremely vulnerable from COVID-19. London: Public Health England, 2020.
6.
Office of National Statistics (ONS). Deaths involving COVID-19 in the care sector, England and Wales: deaths occurring up to 12 June 2020 and registered up to 20 June 2020 (provisional). London: ONS, 2020.
BraunVClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol2006; 3(2): 77–101.
15.
MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJ, et al.Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med2009; 6(7): e1000097.
16.
Alzheimer’s Society. Dementia advisers: a cost-effective approach to delivering integrated dementia care. London: Alzheimer’s Society, 2016.
Department of Health. Care homes for older people: national minimum standards – care homes regulations. 3rd ed. London: TSO, 2003.
20.
Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC). The code: professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses, midwives and nursing associates. London: NMC, 2015.
21.
Skills for Care. Code of conduct for healthcare support workers and adult social care workers in England. Leeds: Skills for Care, 2013.
22.
JotterandF. The Hippocratic Oath and contemporary medicine: dialectic between past ideals and present reality?J Med Philos2005; 30: 107–128.
23.
StrechDMertzMKnüppelH, et al.The full spectrum of ethical issues in dementia care: systematic qualitative review. Br J Psychiat2013; 202: 400–406.
24.
KitwoodT. Dementia reconsidered: the person comes first. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1997.
25.
BrookerD. What is person-centred care in dementia?Clin Gerontol2004; 13(3): 215–222.
26.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Dementia: assessment, management and support for people living with dementia and their carers: NICE guideline [NG97], 2018, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng97(accessed 20 May 2020).
27.
SchwartzSH. Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?J Soc Issue1994; 50(4): 19–45.
28.
CalmanKC. Evolutionary ethics: can values change. J Med Ethics2004; 30(4): 366–370.
29.
PakizehAGebauerJEMaioGR. Basic human values: inter-value structure in memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology2007; 43(3): 458–465.
30.
JenningsLSovereignABottorffN, et al.Nine ethical values of master therapists. J Ment Healt Counsel2005; 27(1): 32–47.
31.
GilliganC. In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
32.
NoddingsN. Starting at home: caring and social policy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002.
33.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Dementia: ethical issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
34.
LakhaniM. End-of-life care during COVID-19: tips for GPs. Pulse, 2020.
35.
KunzRMinderM. COVID-19 pandemic: palliative care for elderly and frail patients at home and in residential and nursing homes. Swiss Med Wkly2020; 150: w20235.
SummersJ. Principles of healthcare ethics. In: MorrisonEE (ed.) Health care ethics: critical issues for the 21st century. 2nd ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2009, pp. 41–56.
Department of Health & Social Care. Responding to COVID-19: the ethical framework for adult social care. London: Department of Health & Social Care, 2020.
SulmasyDP. Dignity and bioethics: history, theory, and selected applications. In: PellegrinoEDSchulmanAMerrillTW (eds) Human dignity and bioethics. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2009, pp. 469–501.
49.
SulmasyDP. The varieties of human dignity: a logical and conceptual analysis. Med Healt Care Philos2013; 16(4): 937–944.
50.
JacobsonN. Dignity and health: a review. Soc Sci Med2007; 64: 292–302.
51.
JonesDA. Human dignity in healthcare: a virtue ethics approach. New Bioethic2015; 21(1): 87–97.
52.
HornRKerasidouA. The concept of dignity and its use in end-of-life debates in England and France. Cambridge Quart Healthc Ethics2016; 25: 404–413.
53.
GardnerWStatesDBagleyN. The coronavirus and the risks to the elderly in long-term care. J Aging Soc Policy2020; 32(4–5): 310–315.
