Conscientious object in nursing: Regulations and practice in two European countries

Abstract

Background:

The concept of conscientious objection is well described; however, because of its nature, little is known about real experiences of nursing professionals who apply objections in their practice. Extended roles in nursing indicate that clinical and value-based dilemmas are becoming increasingly common. In addition, the migration trends of the nursing workforce have increased the need for the mutual understanding of culturally based assumptions on aspects of health care delivery.

Aim:

To present (a) the arguments for and against conscientious objection in nursing practice, (b) a description of current regulations and practice regarding conscientious objection in nursing in Poland and the United Kingdom, and (c) to offer a balanced view regarding the application of conscientious objection in clinical nursing practice.

Design:

Discussion paper.

Ethical considerations:

Ethical guidelines has been followed at each stage of this study.

Findings:

Strong arguments exist both for and against conscientious objection in nursing which are underpinned by empirical research from across Europe. Arguments against conscientious objection relate less to it as a concept, but rather in regard to organisational aspects of its application and different mechanisms which could be introduced in order to reach the balance between professional and patient’s rights.

Discussion and conclusion:

Debate regarding conscientious objection is vivid, and there is consensus that the right to objection among nurses is an important, acknowledged part of nursing practice. Regulation in the United Kingdom is limited to reproductive health, while in Poland, there are no specific procedures to which nurses can apply an objection. The same obligations of those who express conscientious objection apply in both countries, including the requirement to share information with a line manager, the patient, documentation of the objection and necessity to indicate the possibility of receiving care from other nurses. Using Poland and the United Kingdom as case study countries, this article offers a balanced view regarding the application of conscientious objection in clinical nursing practice.

Keywords

Conscientious objection nursing practice regulation England Poland

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lachman

. Conscientious objection in nursing: definition and criteria for acceptance. Medsurg Nurs 2014; 23(3): 196–198.

Lamb

Babenko-Mould

Evans

, et al. Conscientious objection and nurses: results of an interpretive phenomenological study. Nurs Ethics 2019; 26(5): 1337–1349.

Fleming

Frith

Luyben

, et al. Conscientious objection to participation in abortion by midwives and nurses: a systematic review of reasons. BMC Med Ethics 2018; 19(1): 31.

Davis

Schrader

Belcheir

. Influencers of ethical beliefs and the impact on moral distress and conscientious objection. Nurs Ethics 2012; 19(6): 738–749.

Fleming

Ramsayer

Zaksek

. Freedom of conscience in Europe? An analysis of three cases of midwives with conscientious objection to abortion. J Med Ethics 2017; 44(2): 104–108.

Main Council of Nurses and Midwives. A report entitled ‘the provision of nursing and midwifery care for Polish society’. Warsaw, http://nipip.pl/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Raport_druk_2017.pdf (2017, accessed 25 February 2018).

Schaefer

. Sociology: a brief introduction. 9th ed. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill, 2010.

Wicclair

. Conscientious objection in health care: an ethical analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Kant

. The metaphysic of morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

10.

Beauchamp

Childress

. Principles of biomedical ethics. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.

11.

Lamb

Evans

Babenko-Mould

, et al. Conscience, conscientious objection, and nursing: A concept analysis. Nurs Ethics 2019;26: 37–49.

12.

Caulfield

. Accountability. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2005.

13.

Smith

Lorentzon

. Is emotional labour ethical. Nurs Ethics 2005; 12(6): 638–642.

14.

Smith

Cowie

. Perspectives on emotional labour and bullying: reviewing the role of emotions in nursing and healthcare. The IJWOE 2010; 3(3): 227–236.

15.

Winter

. Conscientious objection: a hundred years on. Pract Nurs 2014; 25(5): 254.

16.

Shaw

Downie

. Welcome to the wild, wild north: conscientious objection policies governing Canada’s medical, nursing, pharmacy, and dental professions. Bioethics 2014; 28(1): 33–46.

17.

Magelssen

. When should conscientious objection be accepted. J Med Ethics 2012; 38(1): 18–21.

18.

Kolers

. Am I my profession’s keeper. Bioethics 2014; 28(1): 1–7.

19.

Pawlikowski

. Spór o klauzulę sumienia z perspektywy celów medycyny i etyki lekarskiej [The debate over the conscience clause from the perspective of goals of medicine and medical ethics]. In: Stanisz

Pawlikowski

Ordon

(eds) Sprzeciw sumienia w praktyce medycznej – aspekty etyczne i prawne [Conscientious objection in medical practice–ethical and legal aspects]. Lublin: Publisher of Catholic University in Lublin, 2014, pp. 145–171 (in Polish).

20.

Smith

. Duty and dilemma: perioperative nurses hiding an objection to participate in organ procurement surgery. Nurs Inq 2017; 24(3): e12173.

21.

Heino

Gissler

Apter

, et al. Conscientious objection and induced abortion in Europe. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2013; 18(4): 231–233.

22.

United Nations. Universal declaration of human rights, http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/ (1948, accessed 25 February 2018).

23.

United Nations. International covenant on civil and political rights, https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/ccpr.pdf (1966, accessed 25 February 2018).

24.

Council of Europe. European convention on human rights, https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf (1950, accessed 25 February 2018).

25.

Council of Europe-Parliamentary Assembly, Resolution 1763. The right to conscientious objection in lawful medical care, http://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=17909& (2010, accessed 05 May 2018)

26.

Borovecki

Babic-Bosanac

. Discourse, ethics, public health, abortion, and conscientious objection in Croatia. Croat Med J 2017; 58(4): 316–321.

27.

de La Hougue

The right to conscientious objection of medical practitioners. Geneva, 8 March 2016. United Nations–Human Rights Council, http://9afb0ee4c2ca3737b892-e804076442d956681ee1e5a58d07b27b.r59.cf2.rackcdn.com/ECLJ%20Docs/The%20right%20to%20conscientious%20objection%20of%20medical%20practitioners%2C%20Dr%20Claire%20de%20La%20Hougue.pdf (2016, accessed 09.04.2018).

28.

Nieminen

Lappalainen

Ristimäki

, et al. Opinions on conscientious objection to induced abortion among Finish medical and nursing students and professionals. BMC Med Ethics 2015; 16: 17.

29.

Zoll

. Klauzula sumienia [Conscience clause]. In: Stanisz

Pawlikowski

Ordon

30.

Meaney

Casini

Spagnolo

. Objective reasons for conscientious objection in health care. NCBQ 2012; 12(4): 611–620.

31.

Paco

Deodato

. Conscientious objection: reflections for nursing in Portugal. Rev Gaucha Enferm 2015; 36(4): 112–116.

32.

Birchley

. A clear case for conscience in healthcare practice. J Med Ethics 2012; 38(1): 13–17.

33.

Pellegrino

. The physician’s conscience, conscience clauses, and religious belief: a Catholic perspective. Fordham Urb Law J 2002; 30(1): 221–244.

34.

Deans

. Conscientious objection in pharmacy practice in Great Britain. Bioethics 2013; 27(1): 48–57.

35.

Murray

. A reflective study on abortions in theatre. J Perioper Pract 2014; 24(6): 147–150.

36.

Olsen

. Nursing and other health care disciplines have a longstanding tradition of conscientious objection. Nurs Ethics 2007; 14(3): 277–279.

37.

Weinstock

. Conscientious refusal and health professionals: does religion make a difference. Bioethics 2014; 28(1): 8–15.

38.

Finer

Fine

. Abortion law around the world: progress and pushback. Am J Public Health 2013; 103(4): 585–589.

39.

Dobrowolska

. Sprzeciw sumienia w zawodzie pielęgniarki i położnej – założenia i praktyka [Objection of conscience in the profession of nurse and midwife-assumptions and practice]. In: Stanisz

Pawlikowski

Ordon

40.

Edwards

. Editorial: conscientious objection. Nurs Ethics 2010; 17(7): 421–423.

41.

LaFollette

. Private conscience, public acts. J Med Ethics 2007; 33(5): 249–254.

42.

Kantymir

McLeod

. Justification for conscience exemptions in health care. Bioethics 2014; 28(1): 16–23.

43.

Catlin

Armigo

Volat

, et al. Conscientious objection: a potential neonatal nursing response to care orders that cause suffering at the end of life? Study of a concept. Neonatal Netw 2008; 27(2): 101–108.

44.

Strickland

. Conscientious objection in medical students: a questionnaire survey. J Med Ethics 2012; 38(1): 22–25.

45.

Card

. Is there no alternative? Conscientious objection by medical students. J Med Ethics 2012; 38(10): 602–604.

46.

Rasinski

Yoon

Kalad

, et al. Obstetrician-gynaecologists’ opinions about conscientious refusal of a request for abortion: results from a national vignette experiment. J Med Ethics 2011; 37(12): 711–714.

47.

Curlin

Lawrence

Chin

, et al. Religion, conscience, and controversial clinical practices. N Eng J Med 2007; 356(6): 593–600.

48.

Lawrence

Curlin

. Physicians’ beliefs about conscience in medicine: a national survey. Acad Med 2009; 84(9) 1276–1282.

49.

Jarmoluk

Ikwanty

Durak

, et al. Klauzula sumienia w praktyce pielęgniarki [The conscience clause in the practice of a nurse]. In: Caban

Szala

(eds) Lubelski Kongres Studenckich Kół Naukowych Tygiel 2009 – czyli jak rozwijać naukę? [Lublin Congress of Students’ Scientific Association Tygiel 2009–how to develop science?] Lublin: Publisher of Polytechnic of Lublin, 2009, pp. 116–120 (in Polish).

50.

Durak

Tetych

Jarmoluk

, et al. Sumienie jako kategoria etyczno-prawna w pracy pielęgniarki [Conscience as an ethical and legal category in work of a nurse]. Pielęg XXI w 2009; 4: 13–19 (in Polish).

51.

Montgomery

. Conscientious objection: personal and professional ethics in the public square. Med Law Rev 2015; 23(2): 200–220.

52.

Dickens

Cook

. Conscientious commitment to women’s health. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011; 113(2): 163–166.

53.

Nuttall

. Conscientious objection: justified or just refusal to care? J Perioper Pract 2007; 17(5): 210–215.

54.

Waller-Wise

Conscientious objection. Do nurses have the right to refuse to provide care?

AWHONN Lifelines 2005; 9(4): 283–286.

55.

Antommaria

. Adjudicating rights or analysing interests: ethicists’ role in the debate over conscience in clinical practice. Theor Med Bioet 2008; 29(3): 201–212.

56.

Kane

. Conscientious objection to termination of pregnancy: the competing rights of patients and nurses. J Nurs Manag 2009; 17(7): 907–912.

57.

Young

. Professionalism and ethical issues in nurse prescribing. Nurse Prescribing 2010; 8(6): 284–290.

58.

Zampas

Andion-Ibanez

. Conscientious objection to sexual and reproductive health services: international human rights standards and European law and practice. Eur J Health Law 2012; 19(3): 231–256.

59.

Clarke

. Two concepts of conscience and their implications for conscience based refusal in healthcare. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2017; 26(1): 97–108.

60.

Savulescu

. Conscientious objection in medicine. Br Med J 2006; 332(7536): 294–297.

61.

Hill

. Abortion and conscientious objection. J Eval Clin Pract 2010; 16(2): 344–350.

62.

Hardt

. The conscience debate: resources for rapprochement from the problem’s perceived source. Theor Med Bioeth 2008; 29(3): 151–160.

63.

Cantor

. Conscientious objection gone awry-restoring selfless professionalism in medicine. N Engl J Med 2009; 360(15): 1484–1485.

64.

Nordstrand

Nortvedt

, et al. Medical students’ attitudes towards conscientious objection: a survey. J Med Ethics 2014; 40(9): 609–612.

65.

Piecuch

Gryka

Kozlowska-Wojciechowska

. Attitudes towards conscientious objection among community pharmacists in Poland. Int J Clin Pharm 2014; 36(2): 310–315.

66.

Nordberg

Skirbekk

Magelssen

. Conscientious objection to referrals for abortion: pragmatic solution or threat to women’s rights. BMC Med Ethics 2014; 15: 15, http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/15/15

67.

Zotti

Charrier

. Conscientious objection to legal abortion in Italy. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care 2015; 20: 272–282.

68.

Human Rights Act 1998 (c.9). London: HMSO.

69.

Lamackova

. Conscientious objection in reproductive health care: analysis of Pichon and Sajous v. France. Eur J Health Law 2008; 15(1): 7–43.

70.

Abortion Act 1967 (c.4). London: HMSO, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1967/87/data.pdf (1967, accessed 18 December 2018).

71.

Cowley

. A defence of conscientious objection in medicine: a reply to Schuklenk and Savulescu. Bioethics 2016; 30(5): 358–364.

72.

Haddad

Acute care decisions. Ethics in action…conscientious objection. Registered Nurse 1996; 59(9): 70–71.

73.

Rodriguez-Calvo

Martinez-Silva

Soto

, et al. University students’ attitudes towards voluntary interruption of pregnancy. Leg Med 2012; 14(4): 209–213.

74.

Nursing and Midwifery Council. Conscientious objection by nurses and midwives. London: Nursing and Midwifery Council, http://www.nmc.org.uk/standards/code/conscientious-objection-by-nurses-and-midwives/ (2015, accessed 2 April 2015).

75.

Nursing and Midwifery Council. The code: professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses and midwives. London: Nursing and Midwifery Council, http://www.nmc.org.uk/globalassets/sitedocuments/nmc-publications/revised-new-nmc-code.pdf (2015, accessed 2 April 2015).

76.

Nursing Midwifery Council. The NMC code of professional conduct: standards for conduct, performance and ethics. London: NMC, 2004.

77.

Nursing Midwifery Council. Conscientious objection. London: NMC, 2008.

78.

Marshall

Raynor

. Conscientious objection 1: legal and ethical issues. Br J Midwifery 2002; 10(6): 388–392.

79.

Oak

. A conflict of loyalties: nursing, conscientious objection, and JCAHO HR. Mak Rounds Health Faith Ethics 1996; 1(12): 13–58.

80.

Lipp

. An all-Wales examination of service provision for women undergoing termination of pregnancy and an examination of nurses‘/midwives’ affective attributes who care for these women. RCBC Post-doctoral Fellow, Pontypridd: University of Glamorgan, http://www.rcbcwales.org.uk/fellowships/post-doctoral-fellowships/ (2006, accessed 10 April 2019).

81.

McHale

. Conscientious objection: a right or a privilege? Br J Nurs 2009; 18(20): 1262–1263.

82.

Lipp

. Challenges in abortion care for practice nurses. Pract Nurs 2008; 19(7): 326–329.

83.

Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan and Another (2014). UKSC 68.

84.

Symon

. Termination of pregnancy: the ‘conscientious objection’ clause. Br J Midwifery 2013; 21(3): 221–222.

85.

Bosek

. Problem zakresowej niekonstytucjonalności art. 39 ustawy o zawodach lekarza i lekarza dentysty [The problem of unconstitutionality of the scope of article 39 of the Act on medical and dental professions]. In: Stanisz

Pawlikowski

Ordon

86.

The Constitution of the Republic of Poland, 1997, https://www.sejm.gov.pl/prawo/konst/angielski/kon1.htm

87.

Nawrot

. Prawa człowieka, sprzeciw sumienia i państwo prawa [Human rights, conscientious objection and rule of law]. In: Stanisz

Pawlikowski

Ordon

88.

The Act on the professions of Nurses’ and Midwives’ of 15 July 2011. Journal of Laws of 2014 item 1435 as amended (in Polish).

89.

The Code of ethics for nurses and midwives of the Republic of Poland, http://nipip.pl/prawo/samorzadowe/krajowy-zjazd-pielegniarek-i-poloznych/kodeks-etyki-zawodowej-pielegniarki-i-poloznej-rzeczypospolitej-polskiej/ (2003, accessed 18 December 2018) (in Polish).

90.

The Act on the professions of Nurses’ and Midwives’ of 5 July 1996. Journal of Laws of 1996 item 91/ 410 (in Polish).

91.

Dobrowolska

Sprzeciw sumienia w praktyce pielęgniarki i położnej. Analiza rozwiązań polskich i wybranych rozwiązań europejskich [Conscientious objection in the practice of nurses and midwives. Analysis of Polish and selected European solutions]. Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego 2013; 16: 249–266 (in Polish).

92.

European Court of Human Rights. RR. v. Poland, http://trybunal.gov.pl/uploads/media/Sprawa_R.R._przeciwko_Polsce__skarga_nr_27617_04___wyrok_z_dnia_26_maja_2011_r..pdf (accessed 18.12.2018) (in Polish).

93.

European Court of Human Rights (2012) P and S. v Poland, http://trybunal.gov.pl/uploads/media/Sprawa_P._i_S._przeciwko_Polsce__skarga_nr_57375_08___wyrok_z_dnia_30_pazdziernika_2012_r..pdf (2011, accessed 18 December 2018) (in Polish).

94.

BBC. Polish doctor dismissed in ‘abortion refusal case’, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-28225793 (2014, accessed 26 February 2018).

95.

Kmieciak

. Obecność pielęgniarek, położnych oraz diagnostów laboratoryjnych w polskiej debacie dotyczącej klauzuli sumienia [The presence of nurses, midwives and laboratory diagnostics in the Polish debate on the clause of conscience]. In: Sinkiewicz

Grabowski

. (eds) Medyczne, etyczne i prawne aspekty sprzeciwu sumienia w praktyce medcznej (Medical, ethical and legal aspects of conscientious objection in medical practice). Bydgoszcz: Publisher Komisja Bioetyczna and Collegium Medicum UMK, 2015, pp. 97–122 (in Polish).

96.

The bioethics committee at the presidium of the polish academy of sciences (Position statement on conscientious objection, no. 4/2013), http://www.bioetyka.pan.pl/images/stories/Pliki/Stanowisko%20KB%20nr%204-2013.pdf (2013, accessed 05 May 2018) (in Polish)

97.

Presidium of Supreme Medical Council. Stanowisko Prezydium Naczelnej Rady Lekarskiej (NRL), nr 74/13/P-VI z dnia 6 grudnia 2013 w sprawie korzystania z klauzuli sumienia w praktyce lekarskiej [Position of the Presidium of the Supreme Medical Council regarding the use of the conscience clause in medical practice], https://www.nil.org.pl/aktualnosci/stanowiska-prezydium-nrl-z-dn.-6-grudnia-2013-r. (2013, accessed 18 December 2018) (in Polish).

98.

Conference of the Polish Episcopate. Stanowisko Zespołu Ekspertów Konferencji Episkopatu Polski (KEP) ds. Bioetycznych w sprawie klauzuli sumienia [Position of the experts of the conference of the Polish episcopate for bioethics on the conscience clause], https://episkopat.pl/stanowisko-zespolu-ekspertow-kep-ds-bioetycznych-w-sprawie-klauzuli-sumienia/ (2014, accessed 18 December 2018).

99.

The Judgment of the Constitutional Court regarding the right to object realization of medical service/procedure which is against the conscience (7.10, ref. no K 12/14), http://trybunal.gov.pl/rozprawy/wyroki/art/8602-prawo-do-odmowy-wykonania-swiadczenia-zdrowotnego-niezgodnego-z-sumieniem/ (2015, accessed 10 October 2015).

100.

Brecher

. Which values? And whose? A reply to fulford. J Eval Clin Pract 2011; 17(5): 996–998.

101.

Houghton

Diamond

. Value-based practice: a critique. Clin Psychol Forum 2010; 206: 24–27.

102.

Ford

Fraser

Marck

. Conscientious objection: a call to nursing leadership. Nurs Leadersh 2010; 23(3): 46–55.

103.

Lewis-Newby

Wicclair

Pope

, et al. An official American Thoracic Society Policy Statement: managing conscientious objection in intensive care medicine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015; 191(2): 219–227.