Nurses are the largest professional group in healthcare and those who make more decisions. In 2014, the Committee on Bioethics of the Council of Europe launched the “Guide on the decision-making process regarding medical treatment in end-of-life situations” (hereinafter, Guide), aiming at improving decision-making processes and empowering professionals in making end-of-life decisions. The Guide does not mention nurses explicitly.
Objectives:
To analyze the ethical principles most valued by nurses working in palliative care when making end-of-life decisions and investigate if they are consistent with the framework and recommendations of the Guide; to identify what disputed/controversial issues are more frequent in these nurses’ current end-of-life care practices.
Design:
Qualitative secondary analysis.
Participants/context:
Three qualitative datasets including 32 interviews from previous studies with nurses working in palliative care in Portugal.
Ethical consideration:
Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Research Lab of the Instituto de Bioética (Ethics Research Lab of the Institute of Bioethics) (Ref.04.2015). Ethical procedures are thoroughly described.
Findings:
All participant nurses referred to autonomy as an ethical principle paramount in end-of-life decision-making. They were commonly involved in end-of-life decision-making. Palliative sedation and communication were the most mentioned disputed/controversial issues.
Discussion:
Autonomy was highly valued in end-of-life care and decision-making. Nurses expressed major concerns in assessing patients’ preferences, wishes, and promoting advance care planning. Nurses working in palliative care in Portugal were highly involved in end-of-life decision-making. These processes embraced a collective, inclusive approach. Palliative sedation was the most mentioned disputed issue, which is aligned with previous findings. Communication also emerged as a sensitive ethical issue; it is surprising, however, that only three nurses referred to it.
Conclusion:
While the Guide does not explicitly mention nurses in its content, this study shows that nurses working in palliative care in Portugal are involved in these processes. Further research is needed on nurses’ involvement and practices in end-of-life decision-making.
World Health Organization (WHO). WHO nursing and midwifery progress report2009-2012. Geneva: WHO, 2013.
2.
OlsenLAGoolsbyWAMcGinnisJM. Leadership commitments to improve value in health care: finding a common ground. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press, 2009.
FreundTEverettCGriffithsP, et al.Skill mix, roles and remuneration in the primary care workforce: who are the healthcare professionals in the primary care teams across the world?Int J Nurs Studies2015; 52: 727–743.
5.
ThompsonCCullumNMcCaughanD, et al.Nurses, information use, and clinical decision—making—the real world potential for evidence-based decisions in nursing. Evid Based Nur2004; 7: 68–72.
6.
CeritBDinçL. Ethical decision-making and professional behaviour among nurses: a correlational study. Nurs Ethics2013; 20(2): 200–212.
7.
ThelenM. End-of-life decision making in intensive care. Crit Care Nurse2005; 25(6): 28–37.
8.
PuntilloKAMcAdamJL. Communication between physicians and nurses as a target for improving end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: challenges and opportunities for moving forward. Crit Care Med2006; 34(Suppl. 11): S332–S340.
9.
McMillenRE. End of life decisions: nurses perceptions, feelings and experiences. Intensive Crit Care Nurs2008; 24(4): 251–259.
10.
HannaDR. Moral distress: the state of the science. Res Theory Nurs Pract2004; 18(1): 73–93.
11.
AdamsJABaileyDEJrAndersonRA, et al.Nursing roles and strategies in end-of-life decision making in acute care: a systematic review of the literature. Nurs Res Practice2011; 2011: 527834.
12.
Hernández-MarreroPPereiraSMCarvalhoAS. Ethical decisions in palliative care: interprofessional relations as a burnout protective factor? Results from a mixed-methods multicenter study in Portugal. Am J Hosp Palliat Med2016; 33(8): 723–732.
13.
TeixeiraCMRibeiroOFonsecaAM, et al.Ethical decision-making in intensive care units: a burnout risk factor? Results from a multicentre study conducted with physicians and nurses. J Med Ethics2014; 40(2): 97–103.
14.
ChambaereKLoodtsIDeliensL, et al.Forgoing artificial nutrition or hydration at the end of life: a large cross-sectional survey in Belgium. J Med Ethics2014; 40(7): 501–504.
15.
PereiraSMPasmanHVan der HeideA, et al.Old age and forgoing treatment: a nationwide mortality follow-back study in the Netherlands. J Med Ethics2015; 41(9): 766–770.
16.
LangleyGSchmollgruberSFulbrookP, et al.South African critical care nurses’ views on end-of-life decision-making and practices. Nurs Crit Care2014; 19(1): 9–17.
17.
LagoPNilsonCPivaJ, et al.Nurses’ participation in the end-of-life process in two paediatric intensive care units in Brazil. Int J Palliat Nurs2011; 16(6): 264267–264270.
18.
HoKEnglishSBellJ. The involvement of intensive care nurses in end-of-life decisions: a nationwide survey. Intensive Care Med2005; 31(5): 668–673.
19.
PereiraSMFradiqueEHernández-MarreroP. End-of-life decision making in palliative care and recommendations of the Council of Europe: qualitative secondary analysis of interviews and observation field notes. J Palliat Med2018; 21: 604–615.
20.
AlbersGFranckeALde VeerAJ, et al.Attitudes of nursing staff towards involvement in medical end-of-life decisions: a national survey study. Patient Educ Couns2014; 94(1): 4–9.
21.
BenbenishtyJGanzFDLippertA, et al.Nurse involvement in end-of-life decision making: the ETHICUS Study. Intensive Care Med2006; 32(1): 129–132.
22.
CohenJMarcouxIBilsenJ, et al.European public acceptance of euthanasia: socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries. Soc Sci Med2006; 63: 743–756.
23.
SprungCLCarmelSSjokvistP, et al.Attitudes of European physicians, nurses, patients, and families regarding end-of-life decisions: the ETHICATT study. Intensive Care Med2007; 33: 104–110.
24.
De VeerAJEFranckeALPoortvlietE-P. Nurses’ involvement in end-of-life decisions. Cancer Nursing2008; 33(3): 222–228.
25.
AzoulayEHerridgeM. Understanding ICU staff burnout: the show must go on. Am J Resp Crit Care Med2011; 184: 1099–1100.
26.
PereiraSMTeixeiraCMCarvalhoAS, et al.Compared to palliative care, working in intensive care more than doubles the chances of burnout: results from a nationwide comparative study. PLoS ONE2016; 11(9): e0162340.
27.
Council of Europe. Guide on the decision-making process regarding medical treatment in end-of-life situations. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2014.
PoikkeusTNumminenOSuhonenR, et al.A mixed-method systematic review: support for ethical competence of nurses. J Adv Nurs2014; 70(2): 256–271.
30.
PereiraSM. Burnout em cuidados paliativos. Uma perspectiva bioética [Burnout in palliative care. A bioethical perspective]. PhD Dissertation, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Porto, 2011.
31.
PereiraSMFonsecaAMCarvalhoAS. Burnout in nurses working in Portuguese palliative care teams: a mixed methods study. Int J Pall Nurs2012; 18(8): 373–381.
32.
PereiraSMFradiqueEFialhoR, et al.Advance directives: Portuguese palliative care professionals’ views. Int J Palliat Nurs2011; 17(8): 373–380.
33.
FradiqueEPereiraSM. Primary home care for palliative and terminal patients near Lisboa: nursing practice and hospital palliative care team support. Palliat Med2012; 26(4): 640.
HindsPSVogelRJClarke-SteffenL. The possibilities and pitfalls of doing a secondary analysis of a qualitative dataset. Qual Health Res1997; 7(3): 408–424.
36.
Long-SutehallTSqueMAddington-HallJ. Secondary analysis of qualitative data: a valuable method for exploring sensitive issues with an elusive population?J Res Nurs2010; 16(4): 335–344.
37.
NobleHPriceJEPorterS. The challenge to health professionals when carers resist truth telling at the end of life: a qualitative secondary analysis. J Clin Nurs2014; 24: 927–936.
38.
SullivanAMLakomaMDMatsuyamaRK, et al.Diagnosing and discussing imminent death in the hospital: a secondary analysis of physicians interviews. J Palliat Med2007; 10(4): 882–893.
39.
GlaserBStraussA. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine, 1967.
40.
BernardHKPeltoPWernerO, et al.The construction of primary data in cultural anthropology. Curr Anthropol1987; 27: 382–396.
41.
HymanHH. Secondary analysis of sample surveys: principles, procedures and potentialities. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1972.
42.
StajduharKIFunkLOutcaltL. Family caregiver learning—how family caregivers learn to provide care at the end of life: a qualitative secondary analysis of four datasets. Palliat Med2013; 27(7): 657–664.
43.
MurraySKendallMBoydK, et al.Archetypal trajectories of social, psychological, and spiritual wellbeing and distress in family care givers of patients with lung cancer: secondary analysis of serial qualitative interviews. BMJ2010; 340: c2581.
44.
PereiraSMHernández-MarreroP. Análise secundária de dados qualitativos na investigação em Cuidados Paliativos: recomendações baseadas na evidência [Secondary analysis of qualitative research in palliative care: evidence-based recommendations]. Revista Cuidados Paliativos2017; 4(1): 103–104.
45.
Van den BergH. Reanalyzing qualitative interviews from different angles: the risk of decontextualization and other problems of sharing qualitative data. Forum Qual Soc Res2005; 6(1): 30.
46.
HeatonJ. Secondary analysis of qualitative data: a review of the literature. In: MillerRLBrewerJD (eds) The A-Z of social research: a dictionary of key social science research concepts. London: Sage, 2004, pp. 285–288.
47.
HeatonJ. Secondary analysis of qualitative data. Social Res Update1998; 22: 1–6.
48.
EvansNPasmanHRWPayneSA, et al.Older patient’s attitudes towards and experiences of patient-physician end-of-life communication: a secondary analysis of interviews from British, Dutch and Belgian patients. BMC Palliat Care2012; 11: 24.
49.
CortiLDayABackhouseG. Confidentiality and informed consent: issues for consideration in the preservation of and provision of access to qualitative data archives. Forum Qual Soc Res2005; 1(3): 7.
50.
YardleySJWattsKMPearsonJ, et al.Ethical issues in the reuse of qualitative data: perspectives from literature, practice, and participants. Qual Health Res2014; 24(1): 102–113.
51.
EtkindSNBristoweKBaileyK, et al.How does uncertainty shape patient experience in advanced illness?A secondary analysis of qualitative data. Palliat Med2017; 31(2): 171–180.
52.
O’BrienBCHarrisIBBeckmanTJ, et al.Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med2014; 89(9): 1245–1251.
53.
SugarmanJKassNFadenR. Categorizing empirical research in bioethics: why count the ways?Am J Bioeth2009; 9(6–7): 66–67.
54.
LevineCFadenRGradyC, et al.The limitations of “vulnerability” as a protection for human research participants. Am J Bioeth2004; 4(3): 44–49.
55.
BeauchampTLChildressJF. Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
56.
BeauchampTL. History and theory in “applied ethics.” Kennedy Inst Ethics J2007; 17(1): 55–64.
57.
BeauchampT. Methods and principles in biomedical ethics. J Med Ethics2003; 29(5): 269–274.
58.
JonasH. The imperative of responsibility. In search of an ethics for the technological age. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
59.
ToaderEDamirD. Medical responsibility as moral and ethical foundation for the professional conduit. Procedia Soc Behav Sc2015; 149(5): 955–961.
60.
KempPRendtorffJD. The Barcelona Declaration. Synth Philos2008; 46(2): 239–251.
61.
HematiZAshouriEAllahBakhshianM, et al.Dying with dignity: a concept analysis. J Clin Nurs2016; 25(9–10): 1218–1228.
62.
GuoQJacelonCS. An integrative review of dignity in end-of-life care. Palliat Med2014; 28(7): 831–940.
63.
International Council of Nurses. Palliative care for a dignified dying—International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) catalogue. Geneva: International Council of Nurses, 2009.
64.
GooldSD. Trust, distrust and trustworthiness: lessons from the field. J Gen Int Med2002; 17(1): 79–81.
65.
HallMADuganEZhengB, et al.Trust in physicians and medical institutions: what is it, can it be measured, and does it matter?Milbank Q2001; 79(4): 613–639.
66.
GooldSD. Trust and the ethics of health care institutions. Hastings Center Rep2001; 31(6): 26–33.
67.
HalpernJ. What is clinical empathy?J Gen Int Med2003; 18(8): 670–674.
68.
MercerSWReynoldsWJ. Empathy and quality of care. Br J Gen Pract2002; 52(Suppl): S9–S12.
69.
JeffreyD. Empathy, sympathy and compassion in healthcare: is there a problem?Is there a difference? Does it matter? J R Soc Med2016; 109(12): 446–452.
70.
HeldV. The ethics of care: personal, political, and global. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
71.
BowdenPL. The ethics of nursing care and “the ethic of care.” Nurs Inq1995; 2(1): 10–21.
72.
PettersenT. The ethics of care: normative structures and empirical implications. Health Care Anal2011; 19(1): 51–64.
73.
GradalskiTWesolekEKlejaJ. Terminal cancer patients’ informed consent for palliative care admission and their quality of life. J Palliat Med2012; 15(8): 847.
74.
World Health Organization (WHO). Global health ethics: key issues. Geneva: WHO, 2015.
75.
NorheimOFAsadaY. The ideal of equal health revisited: definitions and measures of inequity in health should be better integrated with theories of distributive justice. Int J Equity Health2009; 8: 40.
76.
EmanuelLScandrettKG. Decisions at the end of life: have we come of age?BMC Med2010; 8: 57.
77.
World Health Organization (WHO). Strengthening of palliative care as a component of integrated treatment throughout the life course. Executive Board EB134/28 (134th session), http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/EB134/B134_28-en.pdf(2013, accessed 11 April 2015).
78.
PereiraSMHernández-MarreroP. In memory of those who left: how “thank you” letters are perceived and used as a team empowerment motivational factor by a home-based palliative care team in the Azorean Islands. J Palliat Med2016; 19(11): 1130–1131.
79.
Hernández-MarreroPPereiraSM. Professional caregivers’ emotional well-being, empowerment and burnout prevention: lessons to be learned from palliative care. In: MałeckaKGibbsR (eds) And death shall have dominion: interdisciplinary perspectives on dying, caregivers, death, mourning and the bereaved. Oxford: Inter-disciplinary.net, 2015, pp. 73–87.
80.
HebertKMooreHRooneyJ. The nurse advocate in end-of-life care. Ochsner J2011; 11(4): 325–329.
81.
RietzeLStajduharK. Registered nurses’ involvement in advance care planning: an integrative review. Int J Palliat Nurs2015; 10: 495–503.
82.
IzumiS. Advance care planning: the nurse’s role. AJN2017; 117(6): 56–61.
83.
IzumiSNagaeH. Defining end-of-life care from perspectives of nursing ethics. Nurs Ethics2012; 19(5): 608–618.
84.
BaugmanKRAultmanJMLudwickR, et al.Narrative analysis of the ethics in providing advance care planning. Nurs Ethics2014; 21(1): 53–63.
85.
HeylandDKDodekPRockerG, et al.What matters most in end-of-life care: perceptions of seriously ill patients and their family members. CMAJ2006; 174(5): 627–633.
86.
RomerALHammesBJ. Communication, trust, and making choices: advance care planning four years on. J Palliat Med2004; 7: 335–340.
87.
EmanuelEJEmanuelL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA1992; 267(16): 2221–2226.
88.
KabaRSooriakumaranP. The evolution of the doctor-patient relationship. Int J Surg2007; 5(1): 57–65.
89.
TruogRD. Patients and doctors: the evolution of a relationship. N Engl J Med2012; 366: 581–585.
90.
SugarmanJ. Is shared decision making an appropriate analytic frame for research on medical practices?Am J Bioethics2015; 15(9): 18–20.
91.
SongM-KWardSEHansonLC, et al.Determining consistency of surrogate decisions and end-of-life care received with patient goals-of-care preferences. J Palliat Med2016; 19(6): 610–616.
92.
TraversJLSmaldoneACohnEG. Does state legislation improve nursing workforce diversity?Policy Polit Nurs Pract2015; 16(3–4): 109–116.
93.
AikenLHBuchanJSochalskiJ, et al.Trends in international nurse migration. Health Affairs2004; 23(3): 69–77.
94.
RechelBDuboisC-AMcKeeM, et al.The Health Care Workforce in Europe. Learning from experience. Copenhagen: WHO, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 2006.
95.
RanchalAJolleyMJKeoghJ, et al.The challenge of the standardization of nursing specializations in Europe. Int Nurs Rev2015; 62(4): 445–452.
96.
RautiainenEVallimies-PatomäkiM. A review of the organization, regulation, and financing practices of postgraduate education in clinical nursing in 12 European countries. Nurse Educ Today2016; 36: 96–104.
97.
ChernyNIRadbruchL. European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommended framework for the use of sedation in palliative care. Palliat Med2009; 23(7): 581–593.
98.
PatelBGorawara-BhatRLevineS, et al.Nurses’ attitudes and experiences surrounding palliative sedation: components for developing policy for nursing professionals. J Palliat Med2012; 15(4): 432–437.
99.
ZinnCLDeirdreM. Nurses’ perceptions of palliative sedation in a Scottish Hospice: an exploratory study. J Hosp Palliat Nurs2012; 14(5): 358–364.
100.
GielenJVan den BrandemSVan IerselT, et al.Flemish palliative-care nurses’ attitudes to palliative care sedation: a quantitative study. Nurs Ethics2012; 19(5): 692–704.
101.
ClaessensPGenbruggeEVannuffelenR, et al.Palliative sedation and nursing: the place of palliative sedation within palliative nursing care. J Hosp Palliat Nurs2007; 9(2): 100–106.
102.
AbarshiEAPapavasiliouESPrestonN, et al.The complexity of nurses’ attitudes and practice of sedation at the end of life: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage2014; 47(5): 915.e11–925.e11.
103.
KrikorianALimoneroJTMatéJ. Suffering and distress at the end-of-life. Psychooncology2012; 21(8): 799–808.
104.
WachholtzABFitchCEMakowskiS, et al.A comprehensive approach to the patient at end of life: assessment of multidimensional suffering. South Med J2016; 109(4): 200–206.
105.
CassellERichBA. Intractable end-of-life suffering and the ethics of palliative sedation. Pain Med2010; 11(3): 435–438.
106.
ChaturvediSKLoiselleCGChandraPS. Communication with relatives and collusion in palliative care: a cross-cultural perspective. Ind J Palliat Care2009; 15(1): 2–9.
107.
LingDLYuHJGuoHL. Truth-telling, decision-making, and ethics among cancer patients in nursing practice in China. Nurs Ethics2019; 26: 1000–1008.
108.
SchapiraLSteensmaDP. Truth telling and palliative care. In: MooreRJ (ed.) Handbook of pain and palliative care. New York: Springer, 2013, pp. 35–41.
109.
FallowfieldLJJenkinsVABeveridgeHA. Truth may hurt but deceit hurts more: communication in palliative care. Palliat Med2002; 16(4): 297–303.
110.
FriedrichsenMLindholmAMilbergA. Experiences of truth disclosure in terminally ill cancer patients in palliative home care. Palliat Support Care2011; 9(2): 173–180.
