Why we need a golden rule for peer review

Abstract

View all access options for this article.

Crigger

. What we owe the author: rethinking editorial peer review. Nurs Ethics 1998; 5: 451–458.

Gallagher

. The good reviewer? Nurs Ethics 2010; 17: 283–284.

Kotsis

Chung

. How to submit a revision and tips on being a good peer-reviewer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133: 958–964.

Kung

. Declaration toward a global ethic. Chicago, IL: Council for a Parliament of the World’s Religions, 1993.

McPeek

DeAngelis

Shaw

. The Golden Rule of Reviewing. Am Nat 2009; 173: E155–E158.

Wingfield

. The peer review system has flaws. But it’s still a barrier to bad science. The Conversation, https://theconversation.com/the-peer-review-system-has-flaws-but-its-still-a-barrier-to-bad-science-84223 (accessed 21 October 2017).

Davis

. Difficulty in finding reviewers taints editorial decisions. The Scholarly Kitchen, https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/10/16/difficulty-finding-reviewers-taints-editorial-decisions/ (accessed 21 October 2017).

Rose

Boshoff

. The peer-review system for academic papers is badly in need of repair. The Conversation, https://theconversation.com/the-peer-review-system-for-academic-papers-is-badly-in-need-of-repair-72669 (accessed 21 October 2017).

10.

Ware

. Peer review in scholarly journals: perspectives of the scholarly community-Results from an international survey. Inform Serv Use 2008; 28: 109–112.

11.

Serio

. Peer review is in crisis, but should be fixed, not abolished. The Conversation, https://theconversation.com/peer-review-is-in-crisis-but-should-be-fixed-not-abolished-67972 (accessed 21 October 2017).

12.