Research concerning relatives’ participation in the everyday care related to persons living in special care units for persons with dementia is limited.
Research questions:
To examine relatives’ participation in their near one’s everyday care, the level of burden experienced and important factors for participation, in this special context.
Design:
The study had a cross-sectional design, and data collection was carried out by means of a study-specific questionnaire.
Participants and context:
A total of 233 relatives from 23 different special care units participated.
Ethical consideration:
The study was approved by the Norwegian Social Science Data Services.
Results:
A great majority of relatives reported that they visited weekly and were the resident’s spokesperson, but seldom really participated in decisions concerning their everyday care. Participation was seldom reported as a burden.
Discussion:
This study indicated that relatives were able to make a difference to their near one’s everyday life and ensure quality of care based on their biographical expertise, intimate knowledge about and emotional bond with the resident. Since knowing the resident is a prerequisite for providing individualised care that is in line with the resident’s preferences, information concerning these issues is of utmost importance.
Conclusion:
This study prompts reflection about what it is to be a spokesperson and whether everyday care is neglected in this role. Even though relatives were satisfied with the care provided, half of them perceived their participation as crucial for the resident’s well-being. This indicated that relatives were able to offer important extras due to their biographical expertise, intimate knowledge about and emotional bond with the resident. Good routines securing that written information about the residents’ life history and preferences is available and used should be implemented in practice.
GauglerJE. Family involvement in residential long-term care: a synthesis and critical review. Aging Ment health2005; 9(2): 105–118.
2.
AdamsTDementia care nursing: promoting well-being in people with dementia and their families. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008, 291 pp.
3.
PrinceMBryceRAlbaneseE. The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Alzheimer’s Dement2013; 9(1): 63–75.
4.
LandmarkBKirkeheiIBrurbergKG. Botilbud til mennesker med demens [The physical environment for people with dementia]. Oslo, Norwegian Knowledge Centre of the Health Services, 2009.
5.
TeeriSVälimäkiMKatajistoJ. Maintenance of patients’ integrity in long-term institutional care. Nurs Ethics2008; 15(4): 523–535.
6.
PowersBA. Ethnographic analysis of everyday ethics in the care of nursing home residents with dementia: a taxonomy. Nurs Res2001; 50(6): 332–339.
7.
BolmsjöIÅEdbergA-KSandmanL. Everyday ethical problems in dementia care: a teleological model. Nurs Ethics2006; 13(4): 340–359.
McCormackB. Person-centredness in gerontological nursing: an overview of the literature. J Clin Nurs2004; 13: 31–38.
10.
GauglerJEYuFKrichbaumK. Predictors of nursing home admission for persons with dementia. Med Care2009; 47(2): 191–198.
11.
Norwegian Directorate of Health. Forgetful, but not forgotten! Concerning the present situation and future challenges in strengthening the services for persons with dementia. Oslo: Sosial- og helsedirektoratet, 2007, 122 pp.
12.
GruneirALapaneKLMillerSC. Does the presence of a dementia special care unit improve nursing home quality?J Aging Health2008; 20(7): 837–854.
13.
World Health Organization (WHO). Improving the performance of health service delivery/putting patients at the centre of health systems. Geneva: WHO, 2007.
14.
HillS. The knowledgeable patient: communication and participation in health. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, 223 pp.
15.
EdwardsAElwynG. Shared decision-making in health care: achieving evidence-based patient choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, 414 pp.
16.
CollinsS. Patient participation in health care consultations: qualitative perspectives. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2007, 237 pp.
17.
KeadyJClarkeCLPageSRMN. Partnerships in community mental health nursing and dementia care: practice perspectives. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2007, 344 pp.
18.
GjerbergEFørdeRBjørndalA. Staff and family relationships in end-of-life nursing home care. Nurs Ethics2011; 18(1): 42–53.
Norwegian Nurses Association. Code of ethics for nurses. Oslo: Norsk sykepleierforbund, 2011.
21.
DaviesSNolanM. ‘Making it better’: self-perceived roles of family caregivers of older people living in care homes: a qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud2006; 43(3): 281–291.
22.
AdamsTGardinerP. Communication and interaction within dementia care triads: developing a theory for relationship-centred care. Dementia2005; 4(2): 185–205.
23.
WoodsRTKeadyJSeddonD. Involving families in care homes: a relationship-centred approach to dementia care. London: Jessica Kingsley, 2008, 143 pp.
24.
DobbsDMunnJZimmermanS. Characteristics associated with lower activity involvement in long-term care residents with dementia. Gerontologist2005; 45(1): 81–86.
25.
Yamamoto-MitaniNAneshenselCSLevy-StormsL. Patterns of family visiting with institutionalized elders the case of dementia. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci2002; 57(4): S234–S246.
26.
RyanAAScullionHF. Family and staff perceptions of the role of families in nursing homes. J Adv Nurs2000; 32(3): 626–634.
27.
HelgesenAKLarssonMAthlinE. How do relatives of persons with dementia experience their role in the patient participation process in special care units?J Clin Nurs2013; 22(11–12): 1672–1681.
28.
TranvågOPetersenKANådenD. Dignity-preserving dementia care: a metasynthesis. Nurs Ethics2013; 20(8): 861–880.
29.
RobinsonGEGallagherA. Culture change impacts quality of life for nursing home residents. Top Clin Nutr2008; 23(2): 120–130.
30.
Oosterveld-VlugMPasmanHvan GennipI. Nursing home staff’s views on residents’ dignity: a qualitative interview study. BMC Health Serv Res2013; 13(1): 353.
31.
VenturatoLMoyleWSteelA. Exploring the gap between rhetoric and reality in dementia care in Australia: could practice documents help bridge the great divide?Dementia2013; 12(2): 251–267.
32.
CapstickABaldwinC. Tom Kitwood on dementia: a reader and critical commentary. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2007, 352 pp.
33.
KitwoodT. Dementia reconsidered: the person comes first. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1997, 160 pp.
34.
CarpenterBDLeeMRuckdeschelK. Adult children as informants about parent’s psychosocial preferences. Fam Relat2006; 55(5): 552–563.
35.
ReamyAMKimKZaritSH. Understanding discrepancy in perceptions of values: individuals with mild to moderate dementia and their family caregivers. Gerontologist2011; 51(4): 473–483.
36.
BlackWAlmeidaOP. A systematic review of the association between the Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia and burden of care. Int Psychogeriatr2004; 16(3): 295–315.
37.
MatsumotoNIkedaMFukuharaR. Caregiver burden associated with behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia in elderly people in the local community. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord2007; 23(4): 219–224.
38.
UlsteinIBruun WyllerTEngedalK. The relative stress scale, a useful instrument to identify various aspects of carer burden in dementia?Int J Geriatr Psychiatry2007; 22(1): 61–67.
39.
LivingstonGLeaveyGManelaM. Making decisions for people with dementia who lack capacity: qualitative study of family carers in UK. BMJ2010; 341: C4184.
40.
HertzbergAEkmanS-LAxelssonK. Staff activities and behaviour are the source of many feelings: relatives’ interactions and relationships with staff in nursing homes. J Clin Nurs2001; 10(3): 380.
41.
HertzbergAEkmanS-LAxelssonK. ‘Relatives are a resource, but …’: registered nurses’ views and experiences of relatives of residents in nursing homes. J Clin Nurs2003; 12(3): 431–441.
42.
HelgesenAKLarssonMAthlinE. ‘Patient participation’ in everyday activities in special care units for persons with dementia in Norwegian nursing homes. Int J Older People Nurs2010; 5(2): 169–178.
43.
StreinerDLNormanGR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, 431 pp.
RehnsfeldtALindwallLLohneV. The meaning of dignity in nursing home care as seen by relatives. Nurs Ethics. Epub ahead of print 13 January 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0969733013511358.
50.
CarrTJHicks-MooreSMontgomeryP. What’s so big about the ‘little things’: a phenomenological inquiry into the meaning of spiritual care in dementia. Dementia2011; 10(3): 399–414.
51.
GraneheimUHJohanssonALindgrenB-M. Family caregivers’ experiences of relinquishing the care of a person with dementia to a nursing home: insights from a meta-ethnographic study. Scand J Caring Sci2013; 28: 215–224.
52.
HeggestadAKTNortvedtPSlettebøÅ. The importance of moral sensitivity when including persons with dementia in qualitative research. Nurs Ethics2013; 20(1): 30–40.
53.
HelgesenAKLarssonMAthlinE. Patient participation in special care units for persons with dementia: a losing principle?Nurs Ethics2013; 21: 108–118.
54.
ZingmarkKSandmanPONorbergA. Promoting a good life among people with Alzheimer’s disease. J Adv Nurs2002; 38(1): 50–58.
55.
BourretEMBernickLGCottCA. The meaning of mobility for residents and staff in long-term care facilities. J Adv Nurs2002; 37(4): 338–345.
56.
BerglandÅKirkevoldM. Thriving in nursing homes in Norway: contributing aspects described by residents. Int J Nurs Stud2006; 43(6): 681–691.
57.
VolicerLSimardJPupaJH. Effects of continuous activity programming on behavioral symptoms of dementia. J Am Med Dir Assoc2006; 7(7): 426–431.
58.
AndersenF. A community-based factorial trial on Alzheimer’s disease: effects of expectancy, recruitment methods, co-morbidity and drug use: the Dementia Study in Northern Norway. Tromsø: University of Tromsø, 2011.
59.
KirkevoldØEngedalK. The quality of care in Norwegian nursing homes. Scand J Caring Sci2006; 20(2): 177–183.
60.
SöderlundM.Som drabbad av en orkan [As if Struck by a Hurricane]. Åbo Akademi University Press, 2004.
61.
GeorgesJJansenSJacksonJ. Alzheimer’s disease in real life – the dementia carer’s survey. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry2008; 23(5): 546–551.
62.
JanssonWAlmbergBGrafströmM. A daughter is a daughter for the whole of her life: a study of daughters’ responsibility for parents with dementia. Health Care Later Life1998; 3(4): 272–284.
63.
PinquartMSörensenS. Spouses, adult children, and children-in-law as caregivers of older adults: a meta-analytic comparison. Psychol Aging2011; 26(1): 1–14.
64.
EttersLGoodallDHarrisonBE. Caregiver burden among dementia patient caregivers: a review of the literature. J Am Acad Nurse Pract2008; 20(8): 423–428.
65.
BruvikFKUlsteinIDRanhoffAH. The effect of coping on the burden in family carers of persons with dementia. Aging Ment Health2013; 17: 973–978.
