In this article we elaborate on the concept of mature care, in which reciprocity is crucial. Emphasizing reciprocity challenges other comprehensions where care is understood as a one-sided activity, with either the carer or the cared for considered the main source of knowledge and sole motivation for caring. We aim to demonstrate the concept of mature care’s advantages with regard to conceptualizing the practice of care, such as in nursing. First, we present and discuss the concept of mature care, then we apply the concept to two real life cases taken from the field of acute psychiatry. In the first example we demonstrate how mature care can grasp tacit reciprocal aspects in caring. In the other, we elucidate a difficulty related to the concept, namely the lack of reciprocity and interaction that affects some relationships.
Gilligan C.In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development, 33rd edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
2.
Noddings N.Caring: a feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984.
3.
Gilligan C., Lyons NP and Hanmer TJMaking connections: the relational worlds of adolescent girls at Emma Willard School. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
4.
Tronto JCMoral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge, 1993.
5.
Benner P.Caring as a way of knowing and not knowing. In: Phillips SS, Benner P (eds). The crisis of care: affirming and restoring caring practices in the helping professions. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 1994, p.42-62.
6.
Benner P.The roles of embodiment, emotion and lifeworld for rationality and agency in nursing practice. Nurs Philos2000; 1: 5-19.
7.
Kittay EFLove’s labour: essays on women, equality, and dependency. New York: Routledge, 1999.
8.
Daly M. and Lewis J.The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states . Br J Sociol2000; 52: 281-98.
9.
Watson N., McKie L., Hughes B., Hopkins D. and Gregory S.(Inter)dependence, needs and care: the potential for disability and feminist theorists to develop an emancipatory model. Sociology2004; 38: 331-50.
10.
Held V.The ethics of care: personal, political, and global. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006 .
11.
Fine MDA caring society: care and the dilemmas of human service in the 21st century . New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
12.
Bowden P.Caring: gender-sensitive ethics. New York: Routledge, 1997.
13.
Norsk Sykepleierforbund. (Norwegian Nurses Organisation.) Yrkesetiske retningslinjer for sykepleiere. (Code of ethics for nurses.)https://www.sykepleierforbundet.no/portal/page/portal/NSF/VisArtikkel?p_sub_doc_id=295315&p_document_id=295315 (2009, accessed October 2010; in Norwegian).
14.
Den Norske Legeforening. (Norwegian Medical Association.) Etiske regler for leger. (Code of ethics for doctors.)http://www.legeforeningen.no/id/485.1 (2002, accessed October 2010; in Norwegian).
15.
Martinsen K.Omsorg, sykepleie og medisin: historisk-filosofiske essays. (Caring, nursing and medicine: historical-philosophical essays.)Oslo: Tano, 1989 (in Norwegian).
16.
Martinsen K.yet og kallet. (The eye and the vocation.)Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, 2000 (in Norwegian).
17.
Foss Ø.Omsorgsetikk. Søkelys på omsorgens motivasjon. (The ethics of care. Illuminating the motivation for caring.)Oslo: Cappelen Akademiske, 2005 (in Norwegian).
18.
Hem MHMature care? An empirical study of interaction between psychotic patients and psychiatric nurses [Thesis]. Oslo: Unipub. http://www.duo.uio.no/sok/work.html?WORKID=70654 (2008, accessed October 2010).
19.
Tuckett A.Nursing practice: compassionate deception and the Good Samaritan. Nurs Ethics1999; 6: 383-89.
20.
Løgstrup K.Den etiske fordring. (The ethical demand.)Gjøvik : JW Cappelens Forlag, 1999 (in Norwegian).
21.
Løgstrup K.Opgør med Kierkegaard. (Confrontation with Kierkegaard.)Third edition. Copenhagen: Gyldendal, 2005 (in Danish).
22.
Mayeroff M.On caring. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.
23.
Nortvedt P.Sensitive judgment: nursing, moral philosophy and an ethics of care. Oslo: Tano Aschehoug, 1996.
24.
Vetlesen AJPerception, empathy, and judgment: an inquiry into the preconditions of moral performance. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1994.
25.
Slote M.The ethics of care and empathy. London: Routledge, 2007.
26.
Simons MAIntroduction. In: Simons MA and de Beauvoir S (eds). Wartime diary: translations and notes. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, 2009, p.1-35.
27.
Pettersen T.Comprehending care: problems and possibilities in the ethics of care. Lanham, ND: Lexington Books. http://www.lexingtonbooks.com/Catalog/SingleBook.shtml?command=Search&db=%5EDB/CATALOG.db&eqSKUdata=0739126156 (2008, accessed October 2010 ).
28.
Pettersen T.Comprehending care: problems and possibilities in Carol Gilligan’s Ethics of care [Thesis]. Oslo: Unipub, 2004.
29.
Pettersen T.Omsorg som etisk teori. (Care as an ethical theory.)Norsk filosofisk tidsskrift (Nor J Philos)2006; 2: 151-63 (in Norwegian).
30.
Brown LM and Gilligan C.Meeting at the crossroads: women’s psychology and girls’ development . London: Harvard University Press , 1992.
31.
Gilligan C.Reply to critics. In: Larrabee MJ (ed.) An ethic of care: feminist and interdisciplinary perspectives. New York: Routledge, 1993: p.207-14.
32.
Pettersen T.Acting for others: moral ontology in Beauvoir’s Pyrrhus and Cineas. In: Patterson YA (ed.) Simone de Beauvoir studies. Menlo Park, CA: Simone de Beauvoir Society, 2010, p.18-26.
33.
Gilligan C, Ward JV, Taylor JM and Bardige B (eds). Mapping the moral domain . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.
34.
Dalmiya V.Why should a knower care? Hypatia2002; 17(1): 34-51.
35.
Skjervheim H.Deltakar og tilskoder og andre essay. (Participant and observer, and other essays.)Oslo: Aschehoug, 1996 (in Norwegian).
36.
Pettersen T.Vennskap og kunnskap: læring i et aristotelisk perspektiv. (Friendship and knowledge. Learning in an Aristotelian perspective.) In: Bostad I and Pettersen T (eds). Dialog og danning: det filosofiske grunnlaget for læring. (Dialogue and general education: the philosophical foundation for learning.)Oslo: Scandinavian Academic Press, 2006, p.65-83 (in Norwegian).
37.
Engster D.The heart of justice: care ethics and political theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
38.
Skråmestø L.Det modne omsorgsbegrepet. Kan moden omsorg som fordrer gjensidighet, fortsatt være et ideal i asymmetriske relasjoner hvor det er minimal grad av gjensidighet? (The concept of mature care. Can mature care, requiring reciprocity, still be an ideal in asymmetrical relations where there is a minimal degree of reciprocity?) [Masters essay.] Oslo: University of Oslo, 2009 (in Norwegian).
