The aim of this study was to assess the opinions and role of intensive care unit (ICU) nurses regarding the distribution of ICU beds. We conducted this research among 30% of the attendees at two ICU congresses in Turkey. A self-administered questionnaire was used, which included 13 cases and allocation criteria. Of the total (136 nurses), 53.7% participated in admission/discharge decisions. The most important criterion was quality of life as viewed by the physician; the least important was the patient’s social status. According to the findings, the nurses thought that medical benefit and avoiding discrimination were important. On the other hand their ignorance of patients’ autonomous preferences arouses suspicions about these nurses’ role in advocating for patients’ rights. For this reason, nurses’ role in allocation decisions should be clearly described and should also be the basis on which intensive care nurses’ duties in allocation decisions should be determined.
Vickie AMThe life and impact of Florence Nightingale. Dimens Crit Care Nurs2008; 27: 21-23.
2.
Celikel T.Dunyada ve Turkiye’de yogun bakim uzmanligi. (Specialty of critical care medicine in the world and in Turkey.)Yoğun Bakım Dergisi2001; 1: 5-9 (in Turkish).
3.
Intensive care medicine.Wikipedia the Free Encyclopaedia. 2009. Retrieved 23 April, 2009, from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensive_care_medicine
4.
Halvorsen K. , Førde R., Nortvedt P.Value choices and considerations when limiting intensive care treatment: a qualitative study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand2009; 53: 10-17.
5.
Lin F., Chaboyer W., Wallis M.A literature review of organisational, individual and teamwork factors contributing to the ICU discharge process. Aust Crit Care2009; 22: 29-43.
6.
Brand SLNurses’ roles in discharge decision making in an adult high dependency unit. Intens Crit Care Nurs2006; 22: 106-14.
7.
Douglas HR, Normand C.Economic evaluation: what does a nurse manager need to know?J Nurs Manage2005; 13: 419-27.
8.
Crigger NJA review of current healthcare funding models. JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul2004; 6: 105-13.
9.
Schroeter K. , Taylor GJ, Veijo A.Ethical considerations in organ donation for critical care nurses. Crit Care Nurse1999 ; 19(2): 60-69.
10.
Sosyal Sigortalar ve Genel Saglik Sigortasi Kanunu ile Bazi Kanun ve Kanun Hukmunde Kararnamelerde Degisiklik Yapilmasina Dair Kanun. (Turkish Law of Social Insurance and Universal Health Insurance.) Date 07.05.08; no. 5754 (in Turkish).
11.
Breier-Mackie S.Patient autonomy and medical paternity: can nurses help doctors to listen to patients?Nurs Ethics2001; 8: 510-21.
12.
Turk Hemsireler Dernegi. (Turkish Nurses Association.)Hemşireler için etik ilke ve yükümlülükler. (Ethical principles and responsibilities for nurses) [Draft Report]. 2009. Retrieved 23 April, 2009, from: http://www.turkhemsirelerdernegi.org.tr/?page=page&pid=151&cmd=show (in Turkish).
13.
Yogun Bakim Hemsireleri Dernegi. (Turkish Association of Critical Care Nurses.)Yogun bakim hemsirelerinin gorev tanimi. (Definition of critical care nurses’ tasks.) (n.d.) Retrieved 23 April, 2009, from: http://www.ybhd.org.tr/ (in Turkish).
14.
Turkiye Cumhuriyeti (TC).(Turkish Ministry of Health.) Saglik Bakanligi, Hasta Haklari Yonetmeligi . (Bill of Patients’ Rights.) Date 01.08.98; no. 23420 (in Turkish).
15.
International Council of Nurses (ICN).Participation of nurses in health services decision making and policy development . (n.d.) Retrieved 23 April, 2009, from: http://www.icn.ch/PS_D04_ParticipationDecisionMaking.pdf
16.
Yogun Bakim Hemsireleri Dernegi. (Turkish Association of Critical Care Nurses.)Yogun bakim sorumlu hemsirelerinin gorev tanimi. (Definition of responsible critical care nurses’ tasks.) (n.d.) Retrieved 23 Apr 2009, from: http://www.ybhd.org.tr/ (in Turkish).
17.
Cooper AB, Joglekar AS, Gibson J., Swota AH, Martin DKCommunication of bed allocation decisions in a critical care unit and accountability for reasonableness. BMC Health Serv Res2005 ; 5: 67.
Pirzadeh SM, McCarthy Veach P., Bartels DM, Kao J., Leroy BSA national survey of genetic counselors’ personal values. J Genet Couns2007; 16: 763-73.
20.
Ersoy N., Altun İ. Professional and personal values of nursing in Turkey. Eubios J Asian Int Bioethics1998; 8(3): 72-75.
21.
Latour JM, Fulbrook P., Albarran JWEfCCNa survey: European intensive care nurses’ attitudes and beliefs towards end-of-life care. Nurs Crit Care2009 ; 14(3): 110-21.
22.
The Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee.Attitudes of critical care medicine professionals concerning distribution of intensive care resources. Crit Care Med1994; 22: 358-62.
23.
Akpinar A., Ersoy N.Attitudes of Turkish intensive care physicians concerning distribution of intensive care resources. Presented at the 9th World Congress of Bioethics, Rijeka, Croatia, 3-8 September, 2008 (in press).
24.
Jonsen AR, Siegler M., Winslade WJClinical ethics: a practical approach to ethical decisions in clinical medicine , fifth edition. New York: McGraw-Hill , 2002.
25.
Sokol DKThe ‘four quadrants’ approach to clinical ethics case analysis; an application and review. J Med Ethics2008 ; 34: 513-16.
26.
Khorshid L.Sağlık Ekibi üyeleri arasında iletişim. (Communication among health care teams.)Sağlık ve Sosyal Yardım Vakfı Dergisi1997; 2: 30-34 (in Turkish).
27.
Eşer İ., Khorshid L., Demir Y.Yoğun bakım hemşirelerinde eleştirel düşünme eğilimi ve etkileyen faktörlerin incelenmesi. (Intensive care nurses’ tendency for critical thinking and influential factors.)CÜ Hemsirelik Yuksekokulu Dergisi2007; 11(3): 13-22 (in Turkish).
28.
Beauchamp TL, Childress JFPrinciples of biomedical ethics, sixth edition. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2009.
29.
Ferrand E., Lemarie F., Regnier B., Kuteifan K., Badet M., Asfar P.Discrepancies between perceptions by physicians and nursing staff of intensive care unit end-of-life decisions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med2003; 167: 1310-15.
30.
Ersoy N.Yaş amın Sonuyla İlgili Etik Konular (I): Yaş amı Destekleyen Tedavilerin Esirgenmesi ve Çekilmesi. (Ethical issues at the end of life (I): Withholding and withdrawing of life support systems.) In: Erdemir AD, Öncel Ö, Aksoy Ş eds ÇağdaşTıp Etiği. (Contemporary medical ethics.)Istanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, 2003: 328-57 (in Turkish).
31.
British Medical Association.Withholding or withdrawing life-prolonging medical treatment: guidance for decision making, second edition. London: BMJ Books, 2000.
32.
Ersoy N., Altun İ.Tıbbi kaynakların paylaştırılması ile ilgili hemşirelerin görüşleri. (Opinions of nurses on distribution of medical resources.) In: Ersoy N, Gundogmus UN eds. I. Ulusal Tıbbi Etik Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı. (Proceedings of the 1st National Medical Ethics Congress; 1999 June 9-11; Kocaeli University, Turkey.)Kocaeli: Kocaeli University Publications, 1999: 119-23 (in Turkish).
33.
Ersoy N.Ara şt ırma eti ği. (Research ethics.) In: Erdemir AD, Öncel Ö, Aksoy Ş eds ÇağdaşTıp Etiği. (Contemporary medical ethics.)Istanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri, 2003: 483-505 (in Turkish).
34.
American College of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.Guidelines for ICU admission, discharge, and triage. Crit Care Med1999; 27: 633-38.
35.
Akpinar A., Ozcan Senses M., Er RAAttitudes to end-of-life decisions in paediatric intensive care. Nurs Ethics2009; 16: 83-92.
36.
TC Sa ğlik Bakanliği. (Ministry of Health.) Organ ve doku nakli hizmetleri yonetmeli ği. (Regulation on organ and tissue donation services.) Date 01.06.2000; no. 24066 (in Turkish).
