Anonymized reflection was employed as an innovative way of teaching ethics in order to enhance students' ability in ethical decision making during a `Care of the Dying Patient and Family' module. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected from the first two student cohorts who experienced anonymized reflection ( n = 24). The themes identified were the richness and relevance of scenarios, small-group work and a team approach to teaching. Students indicated that they preferred this style of teaching. This finding was verified by a postal questionnaire conducted four months later. The conclusions drawn from this study suggest that using anonymized reflection is an effective method for teaching ethics to nurses and indicates that learning about ethical issues in this way reduces uncertainties.
Woods M.Nursing ethics education: are we really delivering the good(s)?Nurs Ethics2005; 12: 5—18.
8.
Seedhouse D.Ethics: the heart of health care, second edition. Chichester : Wiley, 1998.
9.
Holland S.Teaching nursing ethics by cases: a personal perspective. Nurs Ethics1999; 6: 434—36.
10.
Hunt G.Engaged ethics: toolkit for professionals, activists and teachers. Paper presented at the Surrey Summer School: Teaching Ethics to Healthcare Students; 2006 July 12—14; University of Surrey, Guildford.
11.
Whitehead ANThe aims of education. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1929.
12.
Brown JS, Collins A., Duguid P. et al. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Res1989; 18(1): 32—42.
13.
Vygotsky L.Mind in society. London: Harvard University Press, 1978.
14.
Dewey J.How we think. Boston, MA: Heath , 1933.
15.
Billett S.Towards a model of workplace learning: the learning curriculum. Stud Contin Educ1996; 18(1): 43—58.
16.
Kerka S.Constructivism, workplace learning and vocational education accessed through the Education Resource Information Center (ERIC) Digest (181) 1997. Retrieved 15 October, 2006, from: http://www.ericdigests.org/1998-1/learning.htm
17.
Bergman R.Ethics: concepts and practice. Int Nurs Rev1973; 20: 140—41.
Johnson SD, Thomas RGImplications of cognitive science for industrial design in technology education . J Tech Stud1994; 20(1): 33—45.
20.
Boyd E., Fales A.Reflective learning: key to learning from experience. J Humanistic Psychol1983, 23: 99—117.
21.
Duke S., Appleton J.The use of reflection in a palliative care programme: a quantitative study of the development of reflective skills over an academic year. J Adv Nurs2000; 32: 1557—68.
22.
Johns C.Becoming a reflective practitioner, second edition. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.
23.
Burns S., Bulman C.Reflective practice in nursing: the growth of the professional practitioner , second edition. London : Blackwell Science, 2000.
24.
Daly W.Critical thinking as an outcome of nursing education. What is it? Why is it important to nursing practice?J Adv Nurs1998; 28: 323—31.
25.
Youngblood N., Beitz JMDeveloping critical thinking with active learning strategies. Nurs Educ2001 ; 26(1): 39—42.
26.
Anderson LRImprove the quality of instruction through interdisciplinary internationally-oriented faculty resource teams. Washington DC: Fund for the improvement of post-secondary education. 1991 . Retrieved through the Education Resource Information Center (ERIC) Reproduction Service no. ED369 309, 11 July, 2007, from: http://www.ERIC.ed.gov
27.
Crossman DM, Behrens SGAffective strategies for effective learning. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 1992. Retrieved through the Education Resource Information Center (ERIC) Reproduction Service no. ED 344 573, 11 July, 2007, from: www.ERIC.ed.gov
28.
Fu GS, Chase M.Team teaching as a form of staff development: when are two teachers better than one?Guidelines1991; 13(2): 81—87.
29.
Garner AE, Thillen C.Is your school of nursing ready to implement interdisciplinary team teaching?J Nurs Educ1997; 16(7): 27—30.
30.
Herzog CJ, Lieble C., Arts and Science/School of Education. A cooperative approach to the teaching of geography. Proceedings of the National Conference on Successful College Teaching, Orlando, FL , 1994. Retrieved through the Education Resource Information Center ERIC Document Reproduction no. ED 390 470, 11 July, 2007, from: www.ERIC.ed.gov
31.
Rinn FJ, Weir SBImproving college and university teaching. 1984; 32(1): 5—10. Retrieved through the Education Resource Information Center ERIC Document Reproduction no. EJ 298 332, 12 September, 2007, from: www.ERIC.ed.gov
32.
Hatcher T., Hinton B., Swartz J.Graduate students' perceptions of university team teaching. Coll Stud J1996; 30(3): 367—76.
33.
Nead MJA team taught business course. Bus Educ Forum1995; 49(3): 33—35.
34.
Colarulli GC , McDaniel EAInterdisciplinary general education: five ways of promoting good freshman teaching and learning. J Freshman Year Exp1990; 2(1): 107—17.
35.
Bowen BA, Nantz KAWhere the breakthroughs came: team teaching across the disciplines. IssuesWriting1992; 5(1): 23—36.
36.
Jongeling S.Practice what we preach: experience cooperative small group learning and feel the difference. Higher education in transition. In: Pettigrove M, Pearson M eds. A collection of papers presented at the 20th annual National Conference of Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia; 1994 July 6—10; Australian National University, Canberra, ACT. Milperra, NSW: HERSDA, 1995 [pagination not available].
37.
Steinert Y.Student perceptions of effective small group teaching. Med Educ2004; 38: 286—93.
38.
Johnson D., Johnson R., Smith K.Co-operative learning: increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE_ERIC Higher Education Report 1991; (4). Washington, DC: George Washington University , 1991.
39.
Goodsell A., Maher M., Tinto V.Collaborative learning: a sourcebook for higher education. University
40.
Park, PA: National Centre on Post-Secondary Teaching, Learning and Assessment, 1992. 40 Parlett M., Hamilton D.Evaluation as illumination. Edinburgh: Centre for Research in the Educational Sciences, 1972.
41.
Parlett M, Dearden G eds. Introduction to illuminative evaluation. Cardiff-by-the Sea, CA: Pacific Sounding Press, 1977.
42.
Miller C., Tomlinson A., Jones M.Learning styles and facilitating reflection. (Researching Professional Education Series.)London: English National Board for Nursing Midwifery and Health Visiting, 1994.
43.
Ellis L.Illuminative case study design: a new approach to the evaluation of continuing professional education. Nurs Res2003; 10(3): 48—59.
44.
Kaufman D., Holmes D.Tutoring in problem-based learning: perceptions of teachers and students . Med Educ1996; 30: 371—77.
45.
MacPherson R., Jones A., Whitehouse C., O'Neill P.Small group learning in the final year of a medical degree: a quantitative and qualitative evaluation . Med Teach2001; 23: 494—502.
46.
Dolmans D., Wolfhagen I., Scherpbier A., Vleuten CPRelationship of tutors' group-dynamics skills to their performance ratings in problem-based learning. Acad Med2001; 76: 473—76.
47.
Caplow J., Donaldson J., Kardash C., Osokawa M.Learning in a problem-based medical curriculum: students' conceptions . Med Educ1997; 31: 440—47.
48.
Steinert Y.Student perceptions of effective small group teaching. Med Educ2004; 38: 286—93.
49.
Mayo P., Donnelly MB, Nash PP, Schwartz RW et al. Student perceptions of tutor effectiveness in a problem-based surgery clerkship. Teach Learning Med1993 ; 5: 227—33.
