Relief of Suffering and Regard for Personhood: nurses’ ethical concerns in Japan and the USA

Abstract

The ethical concerns of Japanese nurses are compared with those of previously described nurses from the USA. Patient comfort was a primary concern of nurses from both countries. Participants described an ethical imperative to provide adequate pain medication for patients and prevent unnecessary and uncomfortable invasive tests and procedures, especially at the end of life as the focus changed from ‘cure’ to ‘care’. The notion of regard for personhood varied, based on the communication styles and definition of the self inherent in the different cultures of the nurses. A common meaning centred around knowing patients as persons, listening to their needs and preferences, supporting their everyday choices through advocacy, and maintaining their dignity. Despite background cultural differences, there are common ethical concerns between nurses in Japan and the USA. This article invites readers to reflect on everyday nursing practices that exemplify ethical expertise, and the significance of this expertise in uncovering and articulating nursing ethics across cultures.

Keywords

ethics Japan nursing transcultural

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Wros P. Behind the curtain: nursing care of dying patients in critical care[Dissertation]. Portland, OR: Oregon Health Sciences University, 1993.

Tanner C , Benner P , Chesla C , Gordon D. The phenomenology of knowing the patient . Image J Nurs Schol 1993; 25: 273-280 .

Benner P , Wrubel J. The primacy of caring: stress and coping in health and illness. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley , 1989.

Bishop A , Scudder J. Nursing ethics: therapeutic caring presence. Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett , 1996.

Perryman J. Factors in end-of-life decision making: caring practices, ethical concerns, and personal knowing. Atlanta, GA: Georgia State University , 1998.

Taylor C. Everyday nursing concern: unique? trivial? or essential to health care ethics ? HEC Forum 1997; 9(1): 68-84 .

Carse A. Facing up to moral perils: the virtues of care in bioethics. In: Gordon S , Benner P , Nodding N eds. Caregiving: readings in knowledge, practice, ethics, and politics. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press , 1996: 84-110.

Gilligan C. In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press , 1993.

Benner P. The role of experience, narrative, and community in skilled ethical comportment . ANS Adv Nurs Sci 1991; 8(1): 1-21 .

10.

Dreyfus H , Dreyfus S. Towards a phenomenology of ethical expertise. Hum Stud 1991; 14: 229-250 .

11.

Davis A , Aroskar M , Liaschenko J , Drought T. Ethical dilemmas and nursing practice, fourth edition. Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange , 1997.

12.

Sherwin S. No longer patient: feminist ethics and health care. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press , 1992.

13.

Omery A. Care; the basis for a nursing ethic ? J Cardiovasc Nurs 1995; 9(3): 1-10 .

14.

MacIntyre A. After virtue, second edition. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press , 1984.

15.

Brody J. Virtue ethics, caring, and nursing . Schol Inquiry Nurs Pract 1988; 2(2): 87-96 .

16.

Bishop A , Scudder J. The practical, moral, and personal sense of nursing: a phenomenological philosophy of practice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press , 1990.

17.

Gadow S. Advocacy with silent patients . Nurs Clin North Am 1989; 24: 535-541 .

18.

Yokoo K , Katada N , Ibe T et al. Ethical concerns for Japanese nurses and their responses. [Nihon no kangofu ga chokumen suru rinriteki kadai to sono hannou.] J Jpn Acad Nurs Sci 1993; 13(1): 32-37 .

19.

Benner P , Tanner C , Chesla C. Expertise in nursing practice: caring, clinical judgement, and ethics. New York: Springer Publishing , 1996.

20.

Packer M , Addison R. Entering the circle: hermeneutic investigation in psychology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press , 1989.

21.

van Manen M. Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Ontario: Althouse Press , 1990.

22.

Benner P. Quality of life: a phenomenological perspective on explanation, prediction, and understanding in nursing science . ANS Adv Nurs Sci 1985; 8(1): 1-4 .

23.

Wros P. The ethical context of the nursing care of dying patients in critical care. In: Benner P ed. Interpretative phenomenology: embodiment, caring, and ethics in health and illness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 1994: 255-277.

24.

Soyano A , Konishi E , Davis A , Suzuki M , Ota K. Ethical issues at the patient’s end-of-life: international and Japanese nurses’ perceptions. Kagaku Kenkyu Kiban Kenkyu C-2. Report No.: 09672413. Nagano: College of Nursing, Nagano , 1999 March.

25.

Kahn D , Steeves R. An understanding of suffering grounded in clinical practice and research. In: Ferrell B ed. Suffering. Boston, MA: Jones & Bartlett , 1996: 3-27.

26.

Rodgers B , Cowles K. A conceptual foundation for human suffering in nursing care and research . J Adv Nurs 1997; 25: 1048-1053 .

27.

Erikson K. Understanding the world of the patient, the suffering human being: the new clinical paradigm from nursing to caring . Adv Pract Nurs Q 1997;3(1): 8-13 .

28.

Flaming D. Patient suffering: a taxonomy from the nurse’s perspective . J Adv Nurs 1995; 22: 1120-1127 .

29.

Gregory D , English J. The myth of control: suffering in palliative care. J Palliat Care 1994; 10(2): 18-22 .

30.

Cassell E. The nature of suffering and the goals of medicine . N Engl J Med 1982; 306: 639-645 .

31.

Konishi E , Davis A. Japanese nurses’ perceptions about disclosure of information at the patient’s end of life . Nurs Health Sci 1999; 1: 179-187 .