Genetic information and technologies are increasingly important in health care, not only in technologically advanced countries, but world-wide. Several global factors promise to increase future demand for morally conscious genetic health services and research. Although they are the largest professional group delivering health care world-wide, nurses have not taken the lead in meeting this challenge. Insights from feminist analysis help to illuminate some of the social institutions and cultural obstacles that have impeded the integration of genetics technology into the discipline of nursing. An alternative model is suggested - the transdisciplinary model - which was developed initially by a nurse and introduced in the 1970s into the delivery of health care and social services for children with developmental disabilities. This holistic model enables all health care professionals to have an equal voice in determining how genetic health care will be globalized.
Rokusek C.An introduction to the concept of interdisciplinary practice. In: Thyer B , Kropf N , eds. Developmental disabilities: a handbook for interdisciplinary practice. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books , 1995: 4-12.
2.
Tuana N , Tong R.Feminism and philosophy: essential reading in theory, reinterpretation and application. Boulder, CO: Westview Press , 1995.
3.
Bunting S , Campbell J.Feminism and nursing: historical perspective . Adv Nurs Sci1990;12(4): 11-24 .
4.
Norsen L , Opladen J , Quinn J.Practice model: collaborative practice . Crit Care Nurs ClinNorth Am1995; 7: 43-52 .
5.
Ornstein H.Collaborative practice between Ontario nurses and physicians: is it possible?Can J Nurs Admin1990; 3(4): 10-14 .
6.
Ketner Lain K.An implicit world view in technology and its consequences for contemporary life . Nurs Outlook1996; 44: 280-283 .
7.
Taylor C.The ethics of authenticity, seventh edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UniversityPress , 1997.
8.
Heidegger M.The phenomenological method of investigation in being and time. In: Krell DF , ed. Basic writings: from being and time to the task of thinking. New York, NY: Harper and Row , 1977: 72-89.
9.
Sandelowski M. ( Ir)Reconcilable differences? The debate concerning nursing and technology . Image J Nurs Schol1997; 29: 169-174 .
10.
Reverby S.Ordered to care: the dilemma of American nursing, 1850-1945. New York, NY:Cambridge University Press , 1987.
11.
Chambliss D.Hospitals, nurses and the social organization of ethics. Chicago, IL: University ofChicago Press , 1995: 120-149.
12.
Benjamin M , Curtis J.Ethics in nursing. New York: Oxford University Press , 1992.
13.
Harding S.Value-laden technologies and the politics of nursing. In: Spicker S , Gadow S , eds. Nursing: images and ideals. New York: Springer Publishing , 1980: 49-75.
14.
Aroskar M.Envisioning nursing as a moral community . Nurs Outlook1995; 43: 134-138 .
15.
Allen D , Benner P , Diekelmann N.Three paradigms for research: methodological implications. In: Chinn P , ed. Nursing research methodology: issues and implications. Rockville, MD: Aspen , 1986: 23-38.
16.
Schumacher K , Gortner S. ( Mis)conceptions and reconceptions about traditional science . AdvNurs Sci1992; 14(4): 1-11 .
17.
Silva M , Sorrell J , Sorrell C.From Carper’s patterns of knowing to ways of being: an ontological philosophical shift in nursing . Adv Nurs Sci1995; 18(1): 1-13 .
18.
Belenky M , Clinchy B , Goldberger N , Tarule J.Women’s ways of knowing: the development of self, voice and mind. New York, NY: Basic Books , 1986.
19.
Benner P , Wruble J.The primacy of caring. Menlo Park, CA: Addison Wesley , 1988.
20.
Warnke G.Feminism and hermeneutics . Hypatia1993; 8(1): 81-98 .
Barry P , ed. Psychosocial nursing care of physically ill patients and their families. Hartford, CT: Lippincott , 1996: 54-77.
24.
Morse J , Solberg S , Neander W , Bottorff J , Johnson J.Concepts of caring and caring as a concept . Adv Nurs Sci1990; 13(1): 1-14 .
25.
Gilligan C.In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press , 1982.
26.
Noddings, N.Caring: a feminist approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press , 1984: 79-103.
27.
Katz Rothman B.Genetic maps and human imaginations: the limits of science in understanding who we are. New York, NY: Norton , 1999.
28.
Yol Jung H.The genealogy of technological rationality in the human sciences . Res PhilosTechnol1989; 9: 59-82 .
29.
Martin K.Coordinating multidisciplinary, collaborative research: a formula for success . ClinNurse Specialist1994; 8(1): 18-22 .
30.
Carper B.Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing . Adv Nurs Sci1978; 1(1): 13-23 .
31.
Anderson G.Creating moral space in prenatal genetics . Qualitative Health Res1998; 8: 168-187 .
32.
Rosenfield P.The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences . Soc Sci Med1992; 35: 1343-1357 .
33.
Orelove F , Sobsey D.Educating children with multiple disabilities: a transdisciplinary approach. Baltimore, MD: Brookes , 1996.
34.
Anderson G.Prenatal genetic services signal a much deeper problem in health care delivery [Response to case study] . Nurs Ethics1999; 6: 255-257 .
35.
Jaffe K , Walsh P.The development of the specialty rehabilitation home care team: supporting the creative thought . Holistic Nurs Pract1993; 7(4): 36-41 .
36.
Kenen R.Genetic counseling: the development of a new interdisciplinary occupational field . Soc Sci Med1984; 18: 541-549 .
37.
Ferrer N , Navarra T.Issues in collaborative practice. Professional boundaries: clarifying roles and goals . Cancer Pract1994; 2: 3111-3112 .
38.
Watson J.NLN perspective: President’s message: From disciplinary specific to ‘inter’ to‘multi’ to ‘transdisciplinary’ health care education and practice . Nurs Health Care1996; 17: 90-91 .
39.
Ryan-Vincek S , Tuesday-Heathfield L , Lamorey S.From theory to practice: a pilot study of team members’ perspectives on transdisciplinary service delivery . Infant Toddler Interventions1995; 5: 153-176 .
40.
Sherwin S.Feminist and medical ethics: two different approaches to contextual ethics. In: Holmes, H , Purdy L , eds. Feminist perspectives in medical ethics. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press , 1992: 17-31.
41.
Hoeman S.A research-based transdisciplinary team model for infants with special needs and their families . Holistic Nurs Pract1993; 7(4): 63-72 .
