ThanchonnangCRattanapitoonSKNavL, et al.Letter to the Editor: Six-week postnatal cervical screening: moving from acceptability toward mechanistic evidence and policy change. J Med Screen2026; 33: 59.
2.
CullimoreVNewhouseRBaker-RandH, et al.Investigating the acceptability of cervical screening, using conventional clinician-taken cervical samples or urine self-sampling, at 6 weeks postnatal: a cross-sectional questionnaire. J Med Screen2026; 33: 48–58.
ColeridgeSLWiggansANelissenE, et al.Improving the uptake of cervical screening in pregnant and recently postnatal women: a quality improvement project. BMJ Open Qual2022; 11. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001709
10.
GillibrandSGibsonHHowellsK, et al.Exploring the barriers to cervical screening and perspectives on new self-sampling methods amongst under-served groups. BMC Health Serv Res2025; 25: 79. 20250115.
11.
WhitleySHawkinsRLDaviesJC, et al.Acceptability of self-sampling for cervical screening in ethnically diverse groups in northwest England: a focus group study. Health Expect2025; 28: e70338.
12.
RarickTLTchaboJG. Timing of the postpartum papanicolaou smear. Obstet Gynecol1994; 83: 761–765.
13.
CullimoreVNewhouseRBaker-RandH, et al.Postnatal instead of normally-timed cervical screening (PINCS-1): a protocol for a feasibility study of paired-sample cervical screening and urine self-sampling at 6 weeks and 12 weeks postnatal in the UK. BMJ Open2025; 15: e092701. 20250530.
14.
DaviesJCSargentAPinggeraE, et al.Urine high-risk human papillomavirus testing as an alternative to routine cervical screening: a comparative diagnostic accuracy study of two urine collection devices using a randomised study design trial. BJOG2024; 131: 1456–1464. 20240425.
15.
DaviesJCarterSCaoJ, et al.Urine HPV testing for cervical screening in a UK general screening population: a diagnostic test accuracy study. Br J Gen Pract2025. 20250915. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2025.0105.
