Response to ‘Six-week postnatal cervical screening: Moving from acceptability toward mechanistic evidence and policy change’

Thanchonnang C Rattanapitoon SK Nav L , et al. Letter to the Editor: Six-week postnatal cervical screening: moving from acceptability toward mechanistic evidence and policy change. J Med Screen 2026; 33: 59.

Cullimore V Newhouse R Baker-Rand H , et al. Investigating the acceptability of cervical screening, using conventional clinician-taken cervical samples or urine self-sampling, at 6 weeks postnatal: a cross-sectional questionnaire. J Med Screen 2026; 33: 48–58.

Office for National Statistics. Ethnicity facts and figures, https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/uk-population-by-ethnicity/national-and-regional-populations/population-of-england-and-wales/latest/ (2022, last update 21 May 2024, accessed 10 Oct 2025).

Marmot M. Fair society, healthy lives : the Marmot Review : strategic review of health inequalities in England post-2010. London: Department of Health, 2010. https://www.instituteofhealthequity.org/resources-reports/fair-society-healthy-lives-the-marmot-review/fair-society-healthy-lives-full-report-pdf.pdf (accessed 10 Oct 2025)

Midlands Decision Support Network. Rural health inequalities. https://www.strategyunitwm.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/2024-09/Rural-health-inequalities-MDSN-PDF_0.pdf (accessed 10 Oct 2025)

Social Mobility Commission. State of the nation 2017: social mobility in Great Britain. London: Social Mobility Commission, 2017. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a822b92e5274a2e87dc182f/State_of_the_Nation_2017_-_Social_Mobility_in_Great_Britain.pdf (accessed 10 Oct 2025)

Social Mobility Commission. Social mobility index: 2017 data, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/social-mobility-index-2017-data (2017, accessed 10 Oct 2025).

Somerset Intelligence. https://www.somersetintelligence.org.uk/social-mobility.html (accessed 10 Oct 2025).

Coleridge SL Wiggans A Nelissen E , et al. Improving the uptake of cervical screening in pregnant and recently postnatal women: a quality improvement project. BMJ Open Qual 2022; 11. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001709

Gillibrand S Gibson H Howells K , et al. Exploring the barriers to cervical screening and perspectives on new self-sampling methods amongst under-served groups. BMC Health Serv Res 2025; 25: 79. 20250115.

Whitley S Hawkins RL Davies JC , et al. Acceptability of self-sampling for cervical screening in ethnically diverse groups in northwest England: a focus group study. Health Expect 2025; 28: e70338.

Rarick TL Tchabo JG . Timing of the postpartum papanicolaou smear. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 83: 761–765.

Cullimore V Newhouse R Baker-Rand H , et al. Postnatal instead of normally-timed cervical screening (PINCS-1): a protocol for a feasibility study of paired-sample cervical screening and urine self-sampling at 6 weeks and 12 weeks postnatal in the UK. BMJ Open 2025; 15: e092701. 20250530.

Davies JC Sargent A Pinggera E , et al. Urine high-risk human papillomavirus testing as an alternative to routine cervical screening: a comparative diagnostic accuracy study of two urine collection devices using a randomised study design trial. BJOG 2024; 131: 1456–1464. 20240425.

Davies J Carter S Cao J , et al. Urine HPV testing for cervical screening in a UK general screening population: a diagnostic test accuracy study. Br J Gen Pract 2025. 20250915. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2025.0105.