FletcherSWBlackWHarrisRReport of the International Workshop on Screening for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1993;85:1644–56.
2.
KerlikowskeKGradyDRubinSMEfficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis. JAMA, 1995;273:149–54.
3.
HumphreyLLHelfandMChanBKSBreast cancer screening: A summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med, 2002;137:347–60.
4.
LipskieTL.A summary of cancer screening guidelines. Chronic Dis Can1998; 19:112–30.
5.
Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Familial breast cancer: Collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease. Lancet, 2001;358:1389–99.
6.
ChartPLFranssenE. Management of women at increased risk for breast cancer: Preliminary results from a new program. Can Med Assoc J, 1997;157:1235–42.
7.
Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC)Implementation Working Group for Predictive Cancer Genetics Services. Clinical risk management approaches for families at risk of inherited breast/ovarian/colorectal cancers., Toronto: MOHLTC, 2001.
8.
ShapiroSVenetWStraxPTen to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1982;69:349–55.
9.
TabarLFagerbergCJGadAReduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group or the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, lancet1985;i:829–32.
10.
ShapiroSColemanEABroedersM.Breast cancer screening programmes in 22 countries: Current policies, administration and guidelines. Int J Epidemiol, 1998;27:735–42.
11.
DayNEWilliamsDRKhawKT.Breast cancer screening programmes: The development of a monitoring and evaluation system. Br J Cancer, 1989;59:954–8.
12.
KerlikowskeKGradyDBarclayJ. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. JAMA, 1993;270:2444–50.
13.
KerlikowskeKCarneyPAGellerBPerformance of screening mammography among women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer. Ann Intern Med, 2000;133:855–63.
14.
KerlikowskeKGradyDBarclayJEffect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA, 1996;276:33–8.
15.
KolliasJSibberingDMBlameyRWScreening women aged less than 50 years with a family history of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer, 1998;34:878–83.
16.
LallooFBoggisCREvansDGScreening by mammography, women with a family history of breast cancer. Eur J Cancer, 1998;34:937–40.
17.
MollerPMaehleLHeimdalK. Prospective findings in breast cancer kindreds: Annual incidence rates according to age, stage at diagnosis, mean sojourn time, and incidence rates for contralateral cancer. The Breast, 1998;7:55–9.
18.
MollerPReisMMEvansGEfficacy of early diagnosis and treatment in women with a family history of breast cancer. European Familial Breast Cancer Collaborative Group. Disease Markers, 1999;15:179–86.
19.
MacmillanRD.Screening women with a family history of breast cancer — results from the British Familial Breast Cancer Group. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2000;26:149–52.
20.
Tilanus-LinthorstMMBartelsCCObdeijnALEarlier detection of breast cancer by surveillance of women at familial risk. Eur J Cancer2000; 36:514–9.
21.
LibstugARMoravanVAitkenSE.Results from the Ontario Breast Screening Program, 1990–1995. J Med Screen, 1998;5:73–80.
22.
KleinbaumDG.Logistic regression. A self-learning text., New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994.
23.
Statistical Analysis System (SAS). SAS User's Guide, Basics. 5th edn.Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1990.
24.
SellersTAMinkPJCerhanJRThe role of hormone replacement therapy in the risk for breast cancer and total mortality in women with a family history of breast cancer. Ann Intern Med, 1997;127:973–80.
25.
BanksE. Hormone replacement therapy and the sensitivity and specificity of breast cancer screening: A review. J Med Screen, 2001;8:29–34.
26.
KavanaghAMMitchellHGilesGG.Hormone replacement therapy and accuracy of mammographic screening. Lancet, 2000;355:270–4.
27.
CarneyPAMigliorettiDLYankaskasBCIndividual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med, 2003;138:168–75.
28.
ZivEShepherdJSmith-BindmanRMammographic breast density and family history of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2003;95:556–8.
29.
ElmoreJGWellsCKHowardDHThe impact of clinical history on mammographic interpretations. JAMA, 1997;277:49–52.
30.
TheisBBoydNLockwoodGAccuracy of family cancer history in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Prev, 1994;3:321–7.
31.
ParentMEGhadirianPLacroixAAccuracy of reports of familial breast cancer in a case-control series. Epidemiology, 1995;6:184–6.
32.
EerolaHBlomqvistCPukkalaEFamilial breast cancer in southern Finland: How prevalent are breast cancer families and can we trust the family history reported by patients?Eur J Cancer2000;36:1143–8.
33.
OzaAMBoydNF.Mammographic parenchymal patterns: A marker of breast cancer risk. Epidemiol Rev, 1993;15:196–208.
34.
KelseyJLBernsteinL. Epidemiology and prevention of breast cancer. Ann Rev Public Health1996; 17:47–67.