Hugh Owen Thomas (1834–1891) is considered to be the father of British orthopedics. Hugh Owen Thomas came from a bonesetting family in Anglesey, Wales. Although raised and taught in the methods of bonesetting, he, later on, came to harshly condemn bonesetting, both by unqualified bonesetters and qualified medical practitioners as well. Writers on Hugh Owen Thomas's life questioned his harsh condemning of bonesetting, as this method of treatment helped many patients, and wondered why he was so critical of it. This paper discusses Hugh Owen Thomas's views on bonesetting and gives some discussion on why he was so critical, critical to the point of being polemic and argumentative on the subject.
McMurrayT.P. The life of Hugh Owen Thomas. Liverpool Medico-Chirurgical Journal1935; 43: 3–41.
3.
Le VayD. The life of Hugh Owen Thomas. London: Livingston Ltd., 1956.
4.
ThomasJ. A reconsideration of the principles and methods of Hugh Owen Thomas. British Medical Journal1916; 2: 71–72.
5.
WatsonF. Hugh Owen Thomas A personal study. London: Oxford University Press, 1934.
6.
JonesR. Manipulation of stiff joints. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Am1921; 3: 385–395.
7.
JonesR. Manipulation as a therapeutic measure. The Proceeding of the Royal Society of Medicine1932; 25(9): 1405–1412.
8.
HoodW. On bone-setting (so called) and its relation to the treatment of joints crippled by injury, rheumatism, inflammation, &c. London: Macmillan & Co., 1871.
9.
BovineG. William Rae, the blantyre bonesetter. Scottish Medical Journal2012; 57: 103–106.
10.
McMurrayT. Thomas and his splint. British Medical Journal1946; 1: 872–875.
11.
LeysonS. A man of his people. A concise ethnology of a Welsh bonesetter. In: OthsKSHinojozaSZ (eds) Healing by hand. Manual medicine and bonesetting in global perspective. Lantham, MD: Altamira Press, 2004, pp. 237–264.
12.
A letter to Sir Arnold Knight, M.D., on a late inquest. Liverpool, 1849.
13.
HumphriesT. Verbatim report of the trial, crowley versus Thomas, in the liverpool court of passage. Liverpool: Charles Ratcliffe, 1854.
14.
Coroners Court, Yesterday. The charge against Mr. Evan Thomas. Daily Post, Wales, UK, 5 December 1857.
15.
ThomasE. Chester Chronicle. Chester, UK, 1860.
16.
ThomasH. Diseases of the Hip, Knee, and Ankle joints. London: Little, Brown, 1962.
17.
CleobureyW. A full account of the system of friction: as adopted and pursued with the greatest success in cases of contracted joints and lameness. Oxford: Munday and Slatter, 1825.
18.
ThomasG. From bonesetter to orthopaedic surgeon part 1. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England1974: 55: 134–142.
19.
ThomasH. Contributions to surgery and medicine. Principles of the treatment of diseased joints. London: H.K. Lewis, 1883.
20.
WatsonF. The life of Sir Robert Jones. Baltimore: William Wood, 1934.
21.
On bone-setting (so-called) and its relation to the treatment of joints crippled by injury. Edinburgh Medical Surgical Journal1871; 17: 267–268.
22.
On bone-setting (so-called) and its relation to the treatment of joints crippled by injury. Philadelphia Medical Times1871; 2: 56–57.
23.
On bone-setting (so-called) and its relation to the treatment of joints crippled by injury. New York Medical Journal1871; 14: 404–405.
24.
On bone-setting (so-called) and its relation to the treatment of joints crippled by injury. The Practitioner1871; 7: 103–105.
25.
Hood On bone-setting. Nature. A Weekly Illustrated Journal of Science1872; 6: 22–23.
26.
A well-known bone-setter. Lancet1871; 1: 63.
27.
The death of richard hutton of harrow. British Medical Journal1871; 1: 97.
28.
HoodW. The treatment of injuries by friction and movement. London: Macmillan and Co., 1902.
29.
PagetJ. Cases that bonesetters cure. British Medical Journal1867; 1: 1–4.
