Mechanical behaviour of carbon fibre reinforced polymer composite material at different temperatures: Experimental and model assessment

Abstract

In the present study, temperature and frequency effects are studied involving carbon fibre reinforced polymeric materials with unidirectional fibers. Before testing, laminates were preserved in a deep freezer at −80, −20, 0, and 25°C for 60 days. Compressive, tensile, and stiffness behaviors of the laminates were assessed. The results confirmed that the compressive strength, tensile strength, and tensile modulus of laminates severely deteriorate at high temperatures. This might happen because of the weakening of the fibre/matrix interface, resulting in the load-carrying capacity of the carbon fibre being severely reduced. Lower temperatures did not significantly affect the mechanical performance of the laminates. This is due to minor deformation of the frozen laminates and closely compacted epoxy chain segments. The effects of temperature and vibration on the storage modulus, loss modulus, and damping behaviour of laminates are discussed. The results confirm that a reduction in mechanical performance is a strongly temperature-dependent phenomenon. Laminate damping properties are also evaluated. According to the results of the experiments, −80°C has the greatest permanence. Finally, the accuracy of the results on storage modulus was compared with empirical models. The model suggested by Gibson et al. provided the most accurate estimates for the storage modulus of the laminates. Other models were less accurate and gave non-conservative estimates.

Keywords

CFRP laminate RTM mechanical properties temperature-dependent properties empirical models

Introduction

Fibre-reinforced polymeric (FRP) composites have received considerable attention for components used in aerospace, automobiles, and wind turbine blades.^1–2 Currently, carbon fibre reinforced polymeric (CFRP) composites have been the choice to develop large wind turbine blade structures.^3–5 A blade can be exposed to moisture, temperature, and mechanical loads during its life span. Moisture often induces swelling and forms residual stresses, leading to degradation.^6–8 Moisture absorption in a polymeric matrix can influence the thermophysical, mechanical, and chemical properties.^9–11 Stress can develop under loading conditions on tension, compression, and fatigue leading to interlaminar cracks, and consequently delamination.^12–13 At low temperatures, the relaxation of residual stress is low, and this may lead to larger debonded, causing brittle failure. Zafar et al.¹⁴ assessed the effects of long-term moisture on the mechanical behavior of CFRP laminates. Results indicated that the glass transition temperature ( $T_{g}$ ) decreased and the strength was reduced as the moisture content increased. This was due to increased residual stresses and plasticizing of the polymer networks, resulting in an increase in the mobility of polymer chains.

Composite structures that use thermosetting polymer matrix as a binder deteriorate when exposed to elevated temperatures.¹⁵ The polymer matrix will soften and decompose when the temperature exceeds $T_{g}$ and the decomposed temperature ( $T_{d}$ ). The softening and decomposition of the resin not only reduce the strength of the resin itself, but also weakens the bonding of fibres, resulting in the rapid reduction of the strength.^16–18 Ogi et al.¹⁹ conducted a tensile test on dry and wet CFRP specimens to assess the stress/strain response at different temperatures. They reported a decrease in tensile strength when temperature increased and decreased during higher moisture immersion periods. In another study, Ogi²⁰ investigated the influence of thermal history on CFRP laminates. Results indicated that a reduction in strength occurs due to higher degradation at the fibre/matrix interface. Hawileh et al.²¹ studied the effect of temperature on the mechanical performance of carbon, glass, and carbon-glass fibre with a common epoxy matrix as the binder. They found that the stiffness and tensile strength were reduced as the temperature increased. Other researchers^22–23 investigated the mechanical response of CFRP and hybrid FRP laminates at elevated temperatures. They observed that the mechanical properties decreased significantly when the temperature increased.

Understanding the viscoelastic properties of CFRP composites at different states is essential. Melo and Radford²⁴ used the DMA tool to assess the viscoelastic properties of CFRP laminates. They observed a decrease in storage modulus and an increase in damping properties as the temperature changed. Many researchers have been developing empirical models to validate the experimental results.²⁵ Hawileh et al.²⁶ reported an analytical model to predict the tensile strength and elastic modulus of FRP composites at elevated temperatures. The test data and the proposed analytical model agreed well.

Carbon fibre reinforced polymeric composite has been used to produce the spar cap sections of the blades to increase their stiffness. The spar cap sections are exposed to fluctuating wind loads and different environments. It is important to assess the mechanical response of CFRP materials under different environmental conditions before using them for designing purposes.

This paper presents further research about the mechanical response of CFRP under different environmental conditions. Tensile and compressive responses under low and high-temperature tests were assessed. Additionally, storage modulus, loss modulus, damping ratio and $T_{g}$ of laminates were assessed. Finally, the accuracy of experimental results with empirical models was assessed to estimate the variation as a function of temperature and frequency. A better empirical model from the authors was proposed, and its accuracy was compared with the measured results.

Experimental program

Material properties

Carbon fibre, prime 27 LV epoxy resin, and prime 27 LV slow hardener were purchased from AMT composites in South Africa. Table 1 shows the properties of carbon fibre and epoxy matrix. The matrix material was prepared with a weight mixing ratio of 10:2.6.

Table 1.

Properties of carbon fibre and epoxy resin.²⁷

Materials	Young’s modulus (GPa)	Tensile strength (MPa)	Density (Kg/m³)	Poisson’s ratio
T-300 carbon	230	3530	1760	0.30
Epoxy resin	3.3	69.9	1020	0.36

Laminate preparation and test methods

Laminates were prepared under ASTM standards.^28–30 Three-ply carbon fibre with epoxy matrix was used to prepare laminates. Fourteen-ply carbon fibre was used to prepare the samples for the dynamical mechanical analysis. Laminates were produced using the resin transfer moulding (RTM) method and cured for 24 h at 25°C, then post-cured at 65°C for 16 h. Laminates were cooled at room temperature and tabs were produced by the hand lay-up method using plain weave glass fibres. Laminates were cut using a CNC machine with a tolerance of 0.02 mm, then cleaned, and flash was removed with sandpaper.

Matrix digestion using burn-off method was used to determine the volume fractions according to ASTM 3171 standard.³¹ The volume fraction of fibres was found to be 55%. Laminates preparation process, fibre orientation and testing methods are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

A flow chart for specimen preparation.

Compressive and tensile strength tests were carried out using a Lloyd LR testing machine. The testing machine was equipped with a 30 kN load cell, and measurements were taken at a rate of 2 mm/min. Laminates were preserved in a deep freezer at −80, −20, and 0°C for 60 days. Compressive tests were performed at −80, −20, and 0°C, and tensile tests were performed at −20 and 0°C. Additional tests were carried out at 25, 50, 75, and 100°C. A heat-con thermocouple was used to measure the temperatures. An epsilon digital extensometer of 25 mm gauge length was used.

DMA tool was used to assess the change in storage modulus, loss modulus, and damping factors of laminates as a function of temperature and frequency. These tests were carried out under ASTM D5023 standard, using DMA Q 800 TA Instrument. Three-point bending modes were used. The heating rate was increased at 2°C/min, and frequencies were set at 1, 10 and 100 Hz. Liquid nitrogen was used as a cooling agent and test temperatures ranged from −80 to 140°C, −20 to 140°C, 0 to 140°C, and 20 to 160°C. Dimensions were set at a height of 4.57 ± 0.03 mm, a width of 13 ± 0.02 mm, and a length of 64 ± 0.02 mm.

Weibull distribution

Tensile and compressive results were analysed using the Weibull distribution.³² The basic form of the cumulative probability density function is given by

P (σ) = 1 - \exp [- {(\frac{σ}{σ_{a}})}^{m}]

(1)

where

σ

is tensile or compressive strength and

σ_{a}

is a scalar parameter and

m

is a shape parameter. The shape parameter was obtained from test data using a linear fit to linearise the form of the two-parameter Weibull probability function.

Experimental results and discussions

Compressive tests

A compressive test was performed to assess the response of CFRP laminates as a function of temperature. As shown in Figure 2, at testing temperatures of −20 and 100°C, the highest and lowest compressive strength were obtained. When the temperatures were raised from 0 to 100°C, the compressive strength decreased by 1.22%, 2.97%, 32.28%, 67.84%, and 93.11%, respectively, compared to −20°C laminate. The compressive strength of the laminates was affected less and was almost the same when the temperature dropped from 25 to −80°C. The reason is that the polymer chain segment motion is frozen and more closely compacted due to absorbed moisture. The compressive strength of the laminates was degraded little when the temperature was below −20°C. This could occur due to rapid fibre/matrix interface debonding and delamination caused by more moisture absorption and swelling.³³

Figure 2.

The compressive strength properties of the laminates under different temperatures.

The compressive strength response between 50 and 75°C was reduced due to resin softening as approached the $T_{g}$ of the epoxy matrix. At 100°C, the lowest compressive strength was obtained. The load-carrying capacity of the fibres was reduced due to the softening of the resin. Mobilizations of resin molecules were the main reason for a reduction in the compressive strength of laminates. The van der Waals forces weaken leading to lower hydrogen bonds.³⁴

Compressive strength properties with the cumulative failure probability distribution of laminates are shown in Figure 3. A higher reduction in compressive strength was observed as the testing temperature increased from ambient to higher temperatures. Additionally, the accumulated compressive failure probability of each laminate was observed using the curves. The distribution of test results was characterized by the shape parameter (m) and the scale parameter $(σ_{a})$ .³⁵ The scale parameter is related to the failure distribution of laminates at compressive stress levels. The average compressive results and model data were found to be within the range of 1.63%–2.88%, which is acceptable.

Figure 3.

The cumulative failure probability of the laminates under different temperatures.

Tensile tests

A tensile test was performed to assess the tensile performance of CFRP laminates at various temperatures. As shown in Figure 4(a) and (b), the tensile and stiffness properties of laminates decreased as the temperature increased from 0 to 100°C. The tensile strength decreased by 0.76%, 13.19%, 19.82%, and 67.58% when compared to the tensile strength at 0°C. The reduction in tensile modulus was about 3.24%, 12.66%, 19.28%, and 67.09%. A high level of moisture swelling may increase plasticization to lower elastic deformation. Lower tensile properties were observed on −20°C laminates. This might occur due to the presence of moisture, which degrades the interface strength rapidly and induces debonding and delamination.³³ The tensile strength and stiffness of the laminates were evaluated between 50 and 75°C. Results show that the tensile and stiffness properties were reduced as the temperature increased. In this case, the force transfer capacity of the resin was reduced due to the resin’s softening effects.³⁴ At 100°C, the lowest tensile strength and stiffness properties were obtained. The cumulative failure probability of laminates at different temperatures is shown in Figure 5.

Figure 4.

Average tensile failure stress (a) and tensile stiffness (b) of CFRP laminates at different temperatures.

Figure 5.

Cumulative failure probability of laminates at different temperatures.

Dynamic mechanical analysis

Storage modulus $(E^{'})$

Storage modulus is a measure of how stiff or flimsy a sample is. It provides useful information about the degree of cross-linking and fibre/matrix interfacial strength.^36–38 Figure 6 shows the $E^{'}$ of laminates held at temperatures of −80, −20, 0, and 25°C and frequencies of 1, 10 and 100 Hz. Below $T_{g}$ , $E^{'}$ of the laminates decreased as the temperature increased. In the vicinity of $T_{g}$ , a sharp decrease in $E^{'}$ was observed. This indicates that the material is going through a glassy/rubbery transition stage. The highest and lowest $E^{'}$ were obtained on −80°C and CE laminates. In the case of glassy/rubbery regions, the molecules become free for mobilization, and $E^{'}$ is reduced. It may occur due to the softening and weak load transfer capacity of the epoxy matrix. The lowest $E^{'}$ was observed after $T_{g}$ , corresponding to the decomposed state.

Figure 6.

Storage modulus versus temperature of CE control (a), 0°C (b), −20°C (c), −80°C (d) groups of laminates.

$E^{'}$ and $T_{g}$ of laminates were characterized under different frequencies. At a frequency of 1 and 10 Hz, $E^{'}$ of laminates were nearly similar. This might occur due to the flow behaviour of the polymer matrix at low frequencies, acting similarly to flow at higher and elevated temperatures which increased the mobility of the molecules. In the case of 100 Hz, gaps between the cross-linking of the polymer matrix tend to close. This caused the material to behave with less elastic deformation and thus obtain a better $E^{'}$ . In particular, $E^{'}$ of the −80°C group of laminates varied from the other laminates. This might happen due to the lower mobility of the molecules which reduces the gaps in the cross-links of molecules. $T_{g}$ of the polymer matrix was estimated using $E^{'}$ curves. A substantial drop in $T_{g}$ occurred in the case of −20 and −80°C laminates as the frequency increased. This might have occurred due to rapid degradation in the fibre/matrix interface, resulting in induced debonding and delamination.³² However, the $T_{g}$ of the remaining groups of laminates increased as the frequency increased.

Loss modulus $(E^{″})$

Figure 7 plots $E^{″}$ of laminates as a function of temperature and frequency. It is noted that $E^{″}$ of the laminates significantly decreased as the temperature exceeded $T_{g}$ and had nearly similar dissipation properties at 1 and 10 Hz. This might have happened due to an increase in the internal friction that enhances the mobility of polymer molecules to dissipate more heat. However, the highest value of $E^{″}$ was observed at 100 Hz.

Figure 7.

Loss modulus with the temperature of CE (a), 0°C (b), −20°C (c), −80°C (d) groups of laminates.

The T_g values of the laminates were assessed. It is observed that T_g of CE laminate shifted to a higher temperature as the frequency increased. This shows that the epoxy molecules need a higher temperature to increase their mobility. In the case of 0, −20, and −80°C laminates, the lowest $T_{g}$ values were observed at 100 Hz. This might occur due to the plasticization effects. The $T_{g}$ values estimated from the curves of $E^{″}$ were higher than those obtained from the $E^{'}$ curves. Mostly, $T_{g}$ values obtained from $E^{'}$ curves are recommended for composite structural design applications.

Damping factor $(\tan δ)$

Figure 8 shows the damping behavior of the laminates. Results show that the damping properties of the laminates increased slightly up to $T_{g}$ and then decreased drastically. These changes in damping behavior may occur due to molecular mobility. As the frequency increased from 1 to 100 Hz, the damping behavior of CE, 0, −20, and −80°C laminates increased by 3.18%, 4.94%, 7.62%, and 3.14%. The damping behaviors of the laminates were compared with each other at the specified frequency. Results from the curves indicate that −80°C laminate has the highest damping property. At 100 Hz, −80°C laminates dissipate their maximum stored energy. It might occur due to the plasticization effect of the CFRP laminates. The highest $T_{g}$ values were obtained from the damping curves. While the lowest and intermediate $T_{g}$ values were obtained from $E^{'}$ and $E^{″}$ curves.

Comparison of experimental results and prediction models

The storage modulus results of laminates are compared with existing empirical models. Bai and Keller³⁹ summarized the available models used to assess the mechanical behavior of FRP composites at elevated temperatures. According to Gibson et al.,⁴⁰ the modulus of FRP composites at a temperature $T$ can be determined by the equation

E (T) = \frac{E_{u} + E_{r}}{2} - \frac{E_{u} - E_{r}}{2} \tanh [k (T - T^{'})]

(2)

where

E (T)

is the modulus at a temperature

T

E_{u}

is the modulus at room temperature and

E_{r}

is the relaxed modulus of a material. In equation (2),

k a n d T^{'}

are variables obtained by fitting the data using regression analysis. The value of

T^{'}

was recommended when the modulus fell rapidly (assumed

T_{g}

values).

An empirical model proposed by Gu and Asaro⁴¹ computes the mechanical properties of the laminates as a function of temperature using degradation parameters. The equation is given by

E (T) = E_{u} {(1 - \frac{T - T_{r}}{T_{r e f} - T_{r}})}^{g}

(3)

where

T_{r e f}

is the temperature at which the modulus tends to zero,

T_{r}

is the ambient temperature and

g

is a power index between 0 and 1.

Mahieux and Reifsnider⁴² predicted the degradation of stiffness of FRP as a function of temperature which has the effect of breaking, relaxing and increasing intermolecular bonds in the polymeric matrix. Their empirical model is given by

E (T) = E_{u} + (E_{u} - E_{r}) \exp [{- (\frac{T}{T_{0}})}^{n}]

(4)

where

T_{0}

is the relaxation temperature and

n

is the Weibull exponent. A close fit of the data could be achieved with several possible

n

values between 0 and 1. The coefficient

k

in equation (2),

g

in equation (3) and

n

in equation (4) were determined using an Excel solver. Regression analysis was carried out to achieve the minimum error between storage modulus and empirical models.

Figure 8.

Damping factor with temperature of CE (a), 0°C (b), −20°C (c), −80°C (d) groups of laminates.

Figure 9 shows the comparison between $E^{'}$ of CE laminate and targeted empirical models. The minimum square errors based on equation (3) and equation (4) were between 6.28% and 8.0%. While equation (2) has a close correlation to the experimental result. The errors were between 0.71% and 0.82% as the frequencies changed from 1 to 100 Hz.

Figure 9.

Comparison of measured $E^{'}$ and empirical models for CE laminate at frequencies 1 (a), 10 (b), and 100 Hz (c).

Figure 10 shows the comparison between $E^{'}$ of 0°C laminates with the specified empirical models. The descriptive empirical model provided in equation (4) moved away from $E^{'}$ curve as the temperature exceeded 86°C. The minimum square errors were between 8.95% and 9.33%. In the case of equation (3), the minimum errors were between 5.92% and 6.39%. The empirical model provided in equation (2) has close correlations. The errors were between 0.70% and 0.80% as the frequencies changed from 1 to 100 Hz.

Figure 10.

Comparison of measured $E^{'}$ and empirical models for 0°C laminate at frequencies 1 (a), 10 (b), and 100 Hz (c).

Figure 11 shows a comparison of measured $E^{'}$ of −20°C laminates with the targeted empirical models. The empirical models specified in equation (4) deviate from the curves when the temperature exceeds 72°C. The minimum errors were between 9.19% and 9.41%. While the errors in the case of equation (3) were between 4.98% and 6.65%. The empirical model denoted in equation (2) has close correlations. The errors were between 0.99% and 1.38% as the frequency increased from 1 Hz to 100 Hz.

Figure 11.

Comparison of measured $E^{'}$ and empirical models for −20°C laminates at frequencies 1 (a), 10 (b), and 100 Hz (c).

Figure 12 illustrates the comparisons of $E^{'}$ of −80°C laminates with the specified empirical models. Empirical models provided in equations (3) and (4) correlate with measured data below 70°C. The minimum errors were between 3.56% and 12.42%. While the empirical model represented in equation (2) has a close correlation. The errors were between 2.44% and 3.09% as the frequencies increase from 1 to 100 Hz.

Figure 12.

Comparison of measured $E^{'}$ and empirical models for −80°C laminate at frequencies 1 (a), 10 (b), and 100 Hz (c).

Proposed empirical model

The storage modulus of laminates was compared with the empirical models. Based on the least square regression analyses, the empirical model represented in equation (2) is chosen to predict the

E^{'}

of laminates with the minimum square errors being less than 5%. The values of coefficients were determined by calibrating the test data. The parameters used to minimize the errors are given in Table 2.

Table 2.

Coefficients based on equation (2) for $E^{'}$ of all groups of laminates.

Frequency, Hz	Coefficient	CE (control)	0°C	−20°C	−80°C
1	E_u (GPa)	30.45	45.40	52.99	59.93
	E_r (GPa)	1.40	1.27	1.11	0.70
	k	0.061	0.048	0.032	0.025
	T ^′	80	80	82	82
	R	0.9918	0.9940	0.9862	0.9756
10	E_u (GPa)	30.38	45.44	53.13	60.27
	E_r (GPa)	1.44	1.09	1.17	0.76
	k	0.060	0.042	0.031	0.026
	T ^′	84	84	82	82
	R	0.9930	0.9929	0.9902	0.9760
100	E_u (GPa)	37.78	60.56	74.82	90.38
	E_r (GPa)	1.13	1.54	1.06	1.45
	k	88	84	82	80
	T ^′	0.05	0.038	0.027	0.017
	R	0.9929	0.9920	0.9902	0.9691

Conclusions

The mechanical properties of CFRP laminates at different testing temperatures and frequencies were assessed using the DMA tool and a tensile testing machine. The following observations and conclusions could be drawn:

1. The compressive strength, tensile strength, and tensile modulus of laminates are not significantly affected below 25°C. This indicates that the epoxy chain segment motion was frozen and tightly compacted, and small elastic deformations occur at low temperatures.

2. At a temperature of 75°C, the compressive strength, tensile strength, and tensile modulus of laminates decrease by 66.85%, 19.20%, and 16.58%, respectively, compared to room temperature. When the test temperature increases to 100°C, the compressive strength, tensile strength, and tensile modulus of laminates decrease by 92.89%, 67.33%, and 65.99%, respectively, compared to room temperature. In this case, the load-carrying capacity of the carbon fibre is severely compromised.

3. The stiffness parameters of laminates decreased as the testing temperature increased. This happens due to the presence of higher mobilization of the epoxy matrix in the rubbery region. The highest damping property was observed on −80°C laminates. Based on this, CFRP material is noted to have good vibration capacity in moist conditions and is recommended for use in the spar cap sections.

4. Finally, the storage modulus results were compared with empirical models to reduce the material, test costs, and design time. The empirical model developed by Gibson et al.⁴⁰ was found to be accurate in predicting the storage modulus of laminates in the temperature and frequency ranges implemented in the present study.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material - Mechanical behaviour of carbon fibre reinforced polymer composite material at different temperatures: Experimental and model assessment

Supplemental Material for Mechanical behaviour of carbon fibre reinforced polymer composite material at different temperatures: Experimental and model assessment by Getahun Tefera, Sarp Adali and Glen Bright in Polymers and Polymer Composites

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by UKZN, NRF and DDU.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Getahun Tefera

Sarp Adali

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Aklilu

Adali

Bright

. Temperature effect on mechanical properties of carbon, glass and hybrid polymer ‘composite specimens’. Int J Eng Res Africa 2018; 39: 119–138.

Alam

Robert

Brádaigh

. Tidal turbine blade composites - a review on the effects of hygrothermal aging on the properties of CFRP. Compos B Eng 2018; 149: 248–259.

Meng

Rizvi

Grove

, et al. Effects of hygrothermal stress on the failure of CFRP composites. Compos Struct 2015; 133: 1024–1035.

Mishnaevsky

Branner

Petersen

, et al. Materials for wind turbine blades: an overview. Materials 2017; 10: 1285.

Mishnaevsky

. Composite materials for wind energy applications: micromechanical modeling and future directions. Comput Mech 2012; 50: 195–207.

Tsai

Bosze

Barjasteh

, et al. Influence of hygrothermal environment on thermal and mechanical properties of carbon fiber/fiberglass hybrid composites. Compos Sci Technol 2009; 69: 432–437.

Pacheco

Cauich

Valadez

, et al. Effect of moisture absorption on the mechanical behavior of carbon fiber/epoxy matrix composites. J Mater Sci 2013; 48: 1873–1882.

Selzer

Friedrich

. Mechanical properties and failure behaviour of carbon fibre-reinforced polymer composites under the influence of moisture. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 1997; 28: 595–604.

Cheng

Yasir

. Effects of hygrothermal environmental conditions on compressive strength of CFRP stitched laminates. J Reinf Plast Compos 2011; 30: 110–122.

10.

Botelho

Pardini

Rezende

. Hygrothermal effects on the shear properties of carbon fiber/epoxy composites. J Mater Sci 2006; 41: 7111–7118.

11.

Ray

. Temperature effect during humid ageing on interfaces of glass and carbon fibers reinforced epoxy composites. J Colloid Interf Sci 2006; 298: 111–117.

12.

Almudaihesh

Holford

Pullin

, et al. The influence of water absorption on unidirectional and 2D woven CFRP composites and their mechanical performance. Compos Part B Eng 2020; 182: 107626.

13.

Bazli

Abolfazli

. Mechanical properties of fibre reinforced polymers under elevated temperatures: an overview. Polymers 2020; 12: 2600.

14.

Zafar

Bertocco

Thomsen

, et al. Investigation of the long term effects of moisture on carbon fibre and epoxy matrix composites. Compos Sci Technol 2012; 72: 656–666.

15.

Barbosa

Fulco

Guerra

, et al. Accelerated aging effects on carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Compos Part B Eng 2017; 110: 298–306.

16.

Zhou

Zhang

Song

, et al. Effect of temperature on material properties of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) tendons: experiments and model assessment. Materials 2019; 12: 1025.

17.

Ray

Rathore

. Durability and integrity studies of environmentally conditioned interfaces in fibrous polymeric composites: critical concepts and comments. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 2014; 209: 68–83.

18.

Feng

Guo

. Effects of temperature and frequency on dynamic mechanical properties of glass/epoxy composites. J Mater Sci 2016; 51: 2747–2758.

19.

Ogi

Kim

Maruyama

, et al. The influence of hygrothermal conditions on the damage processes in quasi-isotropic carbon/epoxy laminates. Compos Sci Technol 1999; 59: 2375–2382.

20.

Ogi

. Influence of thermal history on transverse cracking in a carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composite. Adv Compos Mater 2003; 11: 265–275.

21.

Rami

Adi

Jamal

, et al. Temperature effect on the mechanical properties of carbon, glass and carbon-glass FRP laminates. Constr Build Mater 2015; 75: 342–348.

22.

Cao

Wang

. Tensile properties of CFRP and hybrid FRP composites at elevated temperatures. J Compos Mater 2009; 43: 315–330.

23.

Aklilu

Adali

Bright

. Tensile behaviour of hybrid and non-hybrid polymer composite specimens at elevated temperatures. Eng Sci Technol Int J 2020; 23: 732–743.

24.

Melo

Radford

. Time and temperature dependence of the viscoelastic properties of CFRP by dynamic mechanical analysis. Compos Struct 2005; 70: 240–253.

25.

Bai

Keller

Vallée

. Modeling of stiffness of FRP composites under elevated and high temperatures. Compos Sci Technol 2008; 68: 3099–3106.

26.

Hawileh

Abdalla

Hasan

, et al. Models for predicting elastic modulus and tensile strength of carbon , basalt and hybrid carbon-basalt FRP laminates at elevated. Constr Build Mater 2016; 114: 364–373.

27.

Aklilu

Adali

Bright

. Experimental characterization of hybrid and non-hybrid polymer composites at elevated temperatures. Int J Eng Res Africa 2018; 36: 37–52.

28.

ASTM 3039/D 3039M . Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2002.

29.

ASTM D 695 . Standard test method for compressive properties of plastic materials SRM 1R-94. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2002.

30.

Menard

. Dynamic mechanical analysis: a practical introduction. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2008.

31.

ASTM D 3171 . Standard test method for constituent content of composite materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2000.

32.

Zhu

. Tensile behavior of glass fiber reinforced composite at different strain rates and temperatures. Constr Build Mater 2015; 96: 648–656.

33.

Zhang

Fan

, et al. Effect of seawater ageing with different temperatures and concentrations on static/dynamic mechanical properties of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites. Compos Part B Eng 2019; 173: 106910.

34.

, et al. Effect of temperature on the compressive behavior of carbon fiber composite pyramidal truss cores sandwich panels with reinforced frames. Theor Appl Mech Lett 2016; 6: 76–80.

35.

Ashrafi

Bazli

Najafabadi

, et al. The effect of mechanical and thermal properties of FRP bars on their tensile performance under elevated temperatures. Constr Build Mater 2017; 157: 1001–1010.

36.

Xian

. Effects of elevated temperatures on the mechanical properties of basalt fibers and BFRP plates. Constr Build Mater 2016; 127: 1029–1036.

37.

Jawaid

Khalil

Alattas

. Woven hybrid biocomposites: dynamic mechanical and thermal properties. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 2012; 43: 288–293.

38.

Barbosa

Duque

Junior

. Temperature-frequency-dependent properties analysis of a bio-composite based on a new liquid thermoplastic resin reinforced with jute fibers. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 2020; 1: 1–21.

39.

Bai

Keller

. Modeling of mechanical response of FRP composites in fire. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 2009; 40: 731–738.

40.

Gibson

Evans

, et al. Laminate theory analysis of composites under load in fire. J Compos Mater 2006; 40: 639–658.

41.

Asaro

. Structural buckling of polymer matrix composites due to reduced stiffness from fire damage. Compos Struct 2005; 69: 65–75.

42.

Mahieux

Reifsnider

. Property modeling across transition temperatures in polymers: application to thermoplastic systems. J Mater Sci 2002; 37: 911–920.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.23 MB

Mechanical behaviour of carbon fibre reinforced polymer composite material at different temperatures: Experimental and model assessment

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Experimental program

Material properties

Laminate preparation and test methods

Weibull distribution

Experimental results and discussions

Compressive tests

Tensile tests

Dynamic mechanical analysis

Storage modulus ( E ′ )

Loss modulus ( E ″ )

Damping factor ( tan δ )

Comparison of experimental results and prediction models

Proposed empirical model

Conclusions

Supplemental Material

Supplemental Material - Mechanical behaviour of carbon fibre reinforced polymer composite material at different temperatures: Experimental and model assessment

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iDs

Supplemental Material

References

Supplementary Material

Storage modulus $(E^{'})$

Loss modulus $(E^{″})$

Damping factor $(\tan δ)$