Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study focuses on the isolation, chemical and crystalline structures, and the kinetics of heterogeneous deacetylation of chitin from mud crab shells (Scylla serrata). The independent variables in this work are temperature, NaOH concentration, and reaction time. The degree of deacetylation (DD) of the resulting chitosan was determined for different reaction times. It was found that the DD increases nonlinearly with the reaction time. The deacetylation of the chitin followed pseudo first-order kinetics and it occurred in two stages, which are respectively attributed to the reaction of acetamide groups in the amorphous region on the external layer, and in the crystalline region inside the chitin particles. The rate constants for the latter stage of the deacetylation at 35°C, 75°C, and 105°C were 4.67×10⁻⁴ min⁻¹, 3.00×10⁻³ min⁻¹, and 4.61×10⁻³ min⁻¹, respectively. Based on this temperature-dependent rate constant, the activation energy of the slow deacetylation stage was estimated to be 32.6 kJ mol⁻¹.

Keywords

N-deacetylation kinetics chitin chitosan mud crab shells

Introduction

Chitin is a polymeric carbohydrate, consisting of a linear structure of β-(1→4)-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine monomers, which is found ubiquitously in nature mainly in crustacean shells, insect cuticles, and fungal cell walls.^1-5 Chitin can also be found in arthropoda phylum like mollusks⁶ and snails.⁷ This biopolymer has unique natural structures and it is used in high-tech applications due to its biocompatibility, biodegradability, and non-toxicity.⁸ Chitin is commonly converted to chitosan by removing the acetyl group. Chitosan has attracted considerable interests for drug delivery systems and medical applications.^9,10 Although chitin can be chemically deacetylated using acids or bases, or using enzymatic processes,^11,12 the chemical method is more practical and it is widely applied to produce chitosan in bulk for commercial purposes. It is noteworthy that the resulting chitosan is only obtained in its polymeric form when the hydrolysis is done in basic solutions.¹³ In this condition, the hydroxyl (OH⁻) ions react with acetamide groups and generate a dianion intermediate species which converts into chitosan.¹⁴ The structure of chitosan consists of randomly distributed β-(1→4)-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine and β-(1→4)-D-glucosamine residues.¹²

Although the deacetylation reaction can be controlled by several parameters, the conversion from acetyl to amine groups is difficult to complete, and repetitive deacetylation is often required in order to achieve high conversion from chitin to chitosan. The extent of conversion of the acetyl groups can be expressed as the degree of deacetylation (DD), and is one of the important criteria of chitosan.¹⁵ In addition, the amino group (pKa ∼7.0) of chitosan is deprotonated in basic conditions.¹⁶ The DD and ionic state are significant with respect to the structural network, viscosity, performance, chemical modification, reactivity, biological activities, and applications of chitosan.^17,18

Extraction and physicochemical characterization of chitin and chitosan derived from different species of crustacean, insects, fungi, and mollusks is still one of the important research topics related to biopolymers.^1-5,19-25 Recently, we have demonstrated that the amount of chitin isolated from mud crab (Scylla serrata) shells is higher than that isolated from the shells of other crabs, shrimp shells, and cuttlefish.²⁶ This result suggests that this scarcely explored species of crab is a potentially rich source of chitin.^26,27 Prolonged deacetylation converted the isolated chitin to chitosan with 84.7% yield,²⁸ which is higher than that of the deacetylation of chitin extracted from other crab and shrimp shells (53.0% and 74.5%).²⁸ This would open up the avenue for biotechnological applications due to the negligible allergenic substances in the estuarine, mangrove swamp, and freshwater crab shells.²⁴ Moreover, under the same deacetylation condition, the degree of acetylation (DA) of mud crab chitin (74.8%) was lower than that of chitin isolated from other crab and shrimp shells (78.6% and 88.5%), while the DD of the mud crab chitosan (88.5%) was higher compared to other crab and shrimp chitosan (83% and 88%). Although mud crab chitin and chitosan clearly showed different physicochemical properties from those derived from other crab and shrimp shells, as reported earlier in detail,²⁶ the fundamental aspect of the kinetics of deacetylation of the mud crab chitin remains a research challenge. The conversion from the mud crab chitin to chitosan should be established before considering of a large scale production of biopolymers from mud crab shells.

Therefore, the aim of the current work is to investigate the kinetics of deacetylation of the mud crab chitin. The objective is to evaluate the effects of the concentration of NaOH, the temperature, and reaction time on the deacetylation kinetics. Chitosan that formed after the deacetylation of chitin using different parameters were characterized using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD), in addition to evaluation of their physicochemical properties. The effect of the above-named variables on the conversion from acetyl to amino functional groups and the DD of the resulting chitosan were determined.

Experimental

Chemicals

All chemicals, except chitosan, used in these experiments including HCl and NaOH were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. and were used as received without any further purification. Throughout the experiments, double distilled water was used for washing and dilution. The 1 N HCl stock solution used in this study was prepared by serial of dilution of 37% fuming HCl, which is equivalent to 10.14 N. The 5% NaOH solution used in this study for the deproteinization process was prepared by dissolving 5 g of NaOH pellets in 100 mL of distilled water in a volumetric flask. The flask was gently shaken until all of the pellets were dissolved.

Preparation and demineralization of mud crab shells

Mud crabs were purchased from the local fish market in Brunei Darussalam. The crabs were thoroughly cleaned to remove dirt and mud from their surface. After cleaning, the crabs were de-shelled to remove the meat and the gills from the body and claws of the crab. The shells were collected and washed with water to remove residual meat and dirt. They were put in metal trays, and dried under the sun. The drying time depends the weather, but on sunny days the process takes up 2 days. In any event, the shells were dried until they achieved constant weight.

After drying, the shells were ground into smaller pieces using a mortar and pestle, allowing the shells to fit into a miller (Zojirushi Mill BM-RT08-GA), in which they were milled to a fine powder. The powdered shells then were sieved through a stainless-steel sieve with a 355-micron aperture (ISO23310-1). Particles that have the sizes less than 355 micron passed through the sieve and were collected in the receiver end. The shell particles that did not manage to pass through the sieve underwent another round of grounding before re-sieving. The crushed shells were stored in a dry container until they were used for experiments.

Isolation of chitin

The procedure for chitin extraction from the powdered shells involves demineralization and deproteinization steps. The powdered shells were demineralized with 1M HCl in a 1:40 (w/v) ratio whilst stirring for 3 h at room temperature. The sample was added slowly into an HCl solution to suppress the formation of carbon dioxide foam, which is spontaneously produced when the crab shells reacts with the acid. After 3 h, the precipitate was retrieved using vacuum filtration, followed by washing with distilled water. The demineralized crab shell was then dried overnight in an oven at 60–70°C and it was weighed the next day.

The dried demineralized shell powder was deproteinized using a 5% NaOH solution in 1:10 (w/v) ratio of shell powder to solution whilst stirring for 6 h at 90−95°C. After stirring the mixture was cooled down to a temperature at which it was safe enough to vacuum filtrate. The resulting chitin was washed with distilled water to remove any residues, followed by drying in an oven overnight at 60–70°C.

Deacetylation of chitin

The chitin obtained (1 g) was deacetylated using 15 mL of NaOH solution with different parameters, such as NaOH concentration and temperature. The NaOH concentration was set at 10, 20, 40, and 60% which is equivalent to 2.5, 5.0, 10, and 15 N, and the temperature was varied in the range of 35–105°C. The reaction kinetics were evaluated by monitoring the deacetylation at different stirring times between 0 to 300 mins. The deacetylated chitin obtained was isolated by vacuum filtration, and the precipitate was washed with distilled water several times until the solution was maintained at pH 7. Finally, the chitosan obtained was dried overnight in an oven at 60−70°C, and then collected and kept in desiccator until it was used in other experiments.

Characterization

The molecular weight of chitosan was estimated using the Mark-Houwink equation.^29,30 The intrinsic viscosity of chitosan was determined from a linear plot of its kinematic viscosity as a function of the biopolymer concentration. The kinematic viscosity of the biopolymer was measured using an Ostwald U-tube viscometer. These procedures have been previously described.²⁶

The functional groups and chemical structures on the chitin and chitosan were analyzed using an FTIR spectrometer (IR Prestige-21, Shimadzu) in KBr discs. The FTIR spectrum was scanned (32 scans) in the range of 400–4000 cm⁻¹ with a spectral resolution of 2.0 cm⁻¹. The DD of chitosan was then determined based on the FTIR spectrum using the following formula³¹

D D (%) = 100 - [\frac{A_{1665}}{A_{3450}} \times \frac{100}{1.33}]

(1)

where

A_{1665}

and

A_{3450}

are the peak intensities of amide band of acetyl group and hydroxyl group of chitosan, respectively. The ratio of

A_{1665} / A_{3450}

was normalized to a factor of 1.33 as a representative value of fully acetylated chitosan.

The crystallinity of chitin and chitosan was determined based on XRD patterns measured over a wide range of diffraction angle (10−70°) on an XRD-7000 (Shimadzu) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15418 nm). The surface morphology of the isolated chitin before and after deacetylation was determined using scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images recorded on a JSM-7600F (JEOL) operating at 30 kV.

Results and discussion

The kinetics of deacetylation of chitin

The kinetics and mechanisms of deacetylation of chitin have been described in many research reports, and they are described based upon the observed DD using different parameters, including the alkali concentration and temperature.³¹ As the reaction occurs randomly in a homogeneous alkaline solution, there are few proposed kinetic mechanisms for the deacetylation reaction.³¹ In general, as deacetylation can be considered as a non-catalytic liquid-solid reaction, the kinetics could be described by the shrinking core model.³¹ This model is based on a hypothesis that deacetylation occurs at the liquid-solid interface. This implies that the external layer is deacetylated first, followed by acetyl groups that were initially deeper inside chitin particle. In the literature, the deacetylation of the acetamide groups on the external layer and those inside particle is empirically considered to be a first-order process.

As chitin was deacetylated using a basic solution, the deacetylation reaction can be described in the following equation³²

RNHCOC H_{3} + NaOH \to RN H_{2} + C H_{3} COONa

(2)

where

R

denotes the chitin polymer backbone, i.e. (1→4) linked 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-β-D-glucan. In this reaction, it can be rationalized that the hydroxyl (OH⁻) ions in the solution react with chitin to produce solid chitosan and acetate ions which are dissolved in the solution finally forming sodium acetate. In general, under non-isothermal conditions, the deacetylation kinetics for the conversion of acetyl groups to amino groups will be dependent on the activation energy and frequency factor. On the other hand, under isothermal conditions, the deacetylation is approximately a pseudo first-order reaction.^31-33 With this in mind, the deacetylation kinetics are given by

- \frac{d [RNHCOC H_{3}]}{d t} = k [RNHCOC H_{3}] [NaOH]

(3)

where

[RNHCOC H_{3}]

is the remaining concentration of chitin, which can be calculated based on the DA, and

k

is the deacetylation rate, which can be found from the rate of removal of the acetyl group.

The concentration of chitin should reduce exponentially, and the above equation can be rewritten as

- \frac{d [RNHCOC H_{3}]}{d t} = k^{'} [RNHCOC H_{3}]

(4)

where

k^{'} = k [NaOH]

. In this study, one could consider that

[NaOH]

, which is 10 N, is excessive and relatively unchanged along the reaction.

Integration of the above equation with limits of ${[RNHCOC H_{3}]}_{t}$ at time $t$ and ${[RNHCOC H_{3}]}_{0}$ at $t = 0$ , gives

- \ln {\frac{({[RNHCOC H_{3}]}_{0} - {[RNHCOC H_{3}]}_{t})}{{[RNHCOC H_{3}]}_{0}} = k^{'} t}

(5)

Considering that ${[RNHCOC H_{3}]}_{t} / {[RNHCOC H_{3}]}_{0}$ is equal to the DD, the above equation can be simplified as

- \ln {1 - DD} = k^{'} t

(6)

Figure 1 shows representative examples of FTIR spectra of chitosan upon deacetylation of chitin using 10 N NaOH at T=105°C, as a typical example of a kinetics run data-set. Based on the peak intensity at 1665 cm⁻¹ and 3450 cm⁻¹, the DD of the resulting chitosan were calculated.

Figure 1.

FTIR spectra of deacetylated chitin using 10 N NaOH at 105°C at different reaction times; (a) 0 min, (b) 30 min, (c) 60 min, (d) 90 min, (e) 120 min, (f) 150 min, (g) 180 min, (h) 210 min, (i) 240 min, (j) 270 min, and (k) 300 min.

As shown in Figure 2, the DD increases with the reaction time, and the effect of temperature on the time-dependent DD value is clearly observed. At 105°C, the DD reaches 48% at 30 mins and it exceeds more than 85% at 300 mins. Clearly, deacetylation occurs much more efficiently at early reaction times, followed by a slower deacetylation that occurs at longer reaction times.

Figure 2.

Time-dependent DD of deacetylated chitin using 10 N NaOH at 105°C (■), 75°C (○), and 35°C (▲).

An important point of note is that, theoretically, deacetylation should finally reach 100% conversion of chitin into chitosan at a prolonged reaction times, as this is predicted in the shrinking core model.³¹ However, in practice, incomplete deacetylation is suggested by the final DDs, which are less than 100% at longer times. This has been commonly reported in literature.^18,34 It is noteworthy that chitosan with a high DD is achieved by multiple deacetylation processes,³⁵ where the resulted chitosan is washed with water followed by subsequent deacetylation processes. In this sense, the DD of commercial chitosan is often above 95% and the molecular weight is higher than 10⁴ g mol⁻¹.

At lower temperatures, the DD also increased significantly during early reaction times but it tended to have a steady slower rate at longer times. At 75°C and 35°C the slower deacetylation occurred at reaction times longer than 90 mins and 120 mins, respectively, suggesting that at lower temperature the transition from the fast to slower processes shifted to longer reaction time. At the lowest temperature, the DD becomes almost constant or even tends to saturate at longer reaction times. This suggests that deacetylation rate at low temperature is slower and that the resulting chitosan has lower DD even at prolonged reaction times. Similar findings have been reported for the deacetylation of shrimp-shell chitin at 25°C.³² Considering that deacetylation is a trans-arrangement of the acetyl groups of chitin, and that it depends on diffusion of the OH^‒ ions and their reaction with acetamide groups, this finding implies that acetamide groups are easier for the OH⁻ ions to access due to a higher molecular diffusion rate, structural changes or larger swelling of the chitin particles at higher temperatures. Therefore, it is not surprising that deacetylation is often performed at temperatures higher than 120°C,³² or is done at high pressure to ensure a successful reaction.³⁶

Figure 3 shows a plot of $- \ln {1 - D D}$ against reaction time $t$ for chitin deacetylated with the same NaOH concentration at different temperatures. This data clearly demonstrates that there are two linear regions separated by one sharp transition point. The two linear regions suggested that there are two stages in the deacetylation process, both of which follow pseudo-first order kinetics.³⁷ Referring to equation (6), the observed rate constants for the deacetylation processes, at early and late stages, are respectively $k_{1}^{'}$ and $k_{2}^{'}$ , and they are determined from the slope of the two linear regression plots. As summarized in Table 1, the $k_{1}^{'}$ and $k_{2}^{'}$ values were in the range of 5.68×10⁻³−2.23×10⁻² min⁻¹ and 4.67×10⁻⁴−4.61×10⁻³ min⁻¹, respectively, and both the $k_{1}^{'}$ and $k_{2}^{'}$ increased with temperature.

Figure 3.

Plots of $- \ln {1 - D D}$ as a function of reaction time, $t$ , for the deacetylation reaction using 10 N NaOH at 105°C (■), 75°C (○), and 35°C (▲).

Table 1.

The observed rate constant estimated from the slope of $- \ln {1 - D D}$ as a function of the reaction time. $t$

T (°C)	$k_{1}^{'}$ (min⁻¹)	$k_{2}^{'}$ (min⁻¹)	Transition time (min)
35	5.68×10⁻³	4.67×10⁻⁴	110
75	1.09×10⁻²	3.00×10⁻³	72
105	2.23×10⁻²	4.61×10⁻³	30

As mentioned above, the faster rate is attributed to the kinetics of the deacetylation of acetamide groups within the amorphous region on the external layer of the chitin particles, whereas the slower rate is associated with the reaction in the crystalline region in the interior of the chitin particle.^18,37 At all temperatures, $k_{1}^{'}$ is larger than $k_{2}^{'}$ by a factor of 10–20, suggesting that the heterogeneous deacetylation is more efficient in the amorphous region compared to the crystalline region inside chitin particle. This could also be the reason for the slow rate of the heterogeneous deacetylation, where the rate-determining step is the diffusion of OH^‒ ions into the crystalline region inside the chitin particle. This slower deacetylation should be also be governed by the reaction of OH⁻ ions with the chitin acetamide groups.³⁸

It is noteworthy that transition between the deacetylation of acetamide groups on the external surface and that in the crystalline region inside chitin particles occurs earlier at higher temperature, as listed in Table 1. This means that it is easier to attack the crystalline structure of the chitin particle at higher temperature.

The slow deacetylation rate (4.61×10⁻³ min⁻¹) using 10 N NaOH at 105°C is the same order as those reported for the deacetylation of chitin derived from shrimp shells (5.86×10⁻³ min⁻¹)³⁹ and from squid (1.58×10⁻³ min⁻¹).⁴⁰ This highlights that deacetylation reaction of chitin using basic solution shows the same kinetics, regardless of the source of the chitin. In other words, the isolated chitins from the different sources have comparable structure and physicochemical properties, which play the key role in the deacetylation process.⁴¹

In addition to the temperature, the NaOH concentration is also an important factor that controls the deacetylation kinetics. As shown in Figure 4, the DD of chitosan increased nonlinearly with the NaOH concentration. It has been reported in many studies that the deacetylation rate is enhanced as a quadratic polynomial with respect to the NaOH concentration.^37,42 This indicates that OH⁻ ions are generated, which deprotonate an intermediate species in order to convert the acetyl group into an amino group.

Figure 4.

The trend of DD for deacetylated chitin as a function of the NaOH concentration.

Activation energy, E_a

The kinetics of basic hydrolysis of chitin is governed by the activation energy (E_a) of the reaction of OH⁻ ions with the chitin acetamide groups. The E_a values for chitin deacetylation in both stages were estimated based on $k_{1}^{'}$ and $k_{2}^{'}$ values listed in Table 1, using Arrhenius equation

k^{'} = A \exp (\frac{- E_{a}}{RT}) .

(7)

where R is the gas constant (8.314 J mol⁻¹ K⁻¹) and A is the pre-exponential or frequency factor. Figure 5 shows the Arrhenius plots, from which the E_a values were calculated, from the slope of the linear plot, to be 18.5 kJ mol⁻¹ and 32.6 kJ mol⁻¹, respectively. These results confirm that, for the heterogeneous deacetylation of chitin derived from mud crab shells, at the same NaOH concentration, the activation energy of deacetylation of acetamide groups of the amorphous region on the external layer is lower than that in the crystalline region inside chitin particle.³⁷

Figure 5.

Arrhenius plots of from the fast (○) and slower (■) deacetylation processes.

The estimated activation energy in this study is in the range of those reported for heterogeneous deacetylation of chitin derived from different crustacean shells (16.2–56.0 kJ mol⁻¹).^32,35,43 The interpretation of the large distribution of the activation energy for the slower deacetylation is still an open question, but the solubility, crystallinity, and particle size of chitin could be considered as the factors determining potential barriers to the diffusion and penetration of OH⁻ ions into the crystalline region inside chitin particle. Thus, the OH⁻ concentration in the solution could be different from that on the solid-liquid interface. Another important factor is structural changes and swelling of chitin particles in the solution. In this sense, the activation energy of the heterogeneous deacetylation should be governed by DA and the chitin molecular weight.

On the other hand, homogeneous deacetylation, i.e. deacetylation of completely soluble chitin using acid or basic solutions, occurs much more slowly and has a higher activation energy compared to the heterogeneous deacetylation. For example, the activation energy for homogeneous deacetylation of shrimp-shell chitin in an alkaline solution has been reported to be 92 kJ mol⁻¹³⁷ Nevertheless, elucidating the kinetics of deacetylation of single monomers of chitin N-acetyl-glucosamine into glucosamine remains a research challenge in the near future. In particular, this reaction could be probed using single molecule spectroscopy.

Surface morphology

Figure 6 shows SEM images of the isolated chitin before and after being deacetylated for 300 mins. These SEM images indicate that the chitin forms pasty and flaky microparticles consisting of lamelar or layered structures stacked on top of each other, so that it has a rough surface and a high porosity. It has been reported that chitin microparticles isolated from other crustacean shells⁴⁴ and insect cuticles^5,20 also arranged in stacked layers. After converting to chitosan, the particle size becomes larger and the surface is smoother. This might be attributed to the change in the microfibrillar crystalline structure and hydrogen bonding interactions of chitin due to deacetylation.¹⁹

Figure 6.

SEM images of mud crab chitin (a) before and (b) after being deacetylation at 105°C using 10 N NaOH for 300 mins. The magnification is ×30,000, and the scale bars denote a 5-μm distance.

Mud crab shell characterization

It has been reported by Narudin et al. that raw mud crab shells have an ash content of 37.7%,²⁶ which is less than shrimp and other crab shells (48.8% and 59.8%).²⁸ The extraction yield of chitin in this study was approximately 17.9% with respect to the powdered shell weight which is similar to that previously reported (16.8%),²⁶ but it was lower than that of shrimp shells (37.4–80.5%).^28,40,45 The chitin extracted from mud crab shells has been found to have a DA in the range of 73.2–76.4%, which is lower than those extracted from crab shells (53.0%) or shrimp shells (74.5%).²⁶

The mud crab chitosan has a moisture content and residual ash content of approximately 8.5% and 2.1%, respectively, and its intrinsic viscosity is around 93 mL g⁻¹, which is larger than that for chitosan from other crab shells (78 mL g⁻¹), but lower than that of shrimp chitosan (175 mL g⁻¹).²⁶ These results suggest that the chitosan derived from mud crab shells has fewer, or less dominant intermolecular interactions with water compared with chitosan derived from shrimp shells. This argument is supported by the viscosity-average molecular weight which has been estimated to be 8.96 kDa,²⁶ which is slightly higher than that of chitosan derived from other crab shells (6.12 kDa) but much lower than that for chitosan derived from shrimp shells (17.03 kDa). The DA of chitosan derived from mud crab shells is comparable to shrimp shells, although they are lower than that of other crab shells. Nevertheless, the DA of chitosan depends on both chitin source and deacetylation process, which is the subject of this study.

X-Ray crystal structure

Figure 7 shows typical XRD patterns with 2θ within 20–60° of chitin and chitosan derived from mud crab shells. The existence of the diffraction peaks indicates that both chitin and chitosan form crystalline solids. The main diffraction peak of chitin was observed at 26.5°, and other minor peaks appeared at higher diffraction angles. This sharp diffraction peak at 26.5° is an indicative of the crystalline reflection of the (130) plane of the α-chitin structure,⁴⁶ confirming that chitin derived from the mud crab shells adopts the α-form. This XRD pattern of chitin is in accordance with those in literature.⁴⁷

Figure 7.

XRD patterns of mud crab chitin (a) before and (b) after being deacetylation at 105°C using 10 N NaOH for 300 mins. Vibrational spectra of chitin and chitosan.

On the other hand, the diffraction peaks of chitosan are observed at 27.9°, 29.2°, 33.9°, 36.9°, 40.0°, 44.6°, 45.6°, 46.3°, 51.5°, 52.6°, 55.3°, and 57.8°. It is well documented that the XRD pattern reflects the crystal structure of the α-chitosan.²⁸ It is noteworthy that, typically, both α-chitin and α-chitosan crystallize into orthorhombic with the P2₁2₁2₁ space symmetry group.⁴⁶ The unit cell of the crystal lattice parallel to the interstrand of chitin is 0.469 nm, which is much shorter than that of chitosan (0.895 nm).⁴⁶ Consequently, the d spacing of atomic planes in the crystal of chitin which gives rise to the diffraction peaks is shorter compared to that of chitosan.⁴⁶ In other words, as compared to chitosan, chitin strands are arranged in a more compact manner in the three dimensional crystal structure. This can be attributed to the presence of amide group in the chitin strands, which could be interlinked and form strong intramolecular and intermolecular hydrogen bonds.

The α-chitin and α-chitosan also exhibit an amorphous structure. Their crystallinity index, which is the ratio of the crystalline portion and the amorphous portion, can be determined, based on the XRD patterns, by comparing the relative area of diffraction peaks with the total area under the curve.⁴⁸ It was found that the crystallinity index of mud crab chitin was 60.1%, which is slightly lower than those of chitin isolated from other crab and shrimp shells (64.1–67.8%).⁴⁹ The crystallinity of mud crab chitosan prepared by deacetylation using a basic solution at 105°C for a prolonged reaction time up to 300 mins was 73.8%. This highlights that it has a high crystalline portion compared to those of chitosan derived from other crab and shrimp shells (31.9–38.8%).²⁸

Typical FTIR spectra of chitin and chitosan derived from mud crab shells are shown in Figure 8. Chitin shows a few broad and intense vibrational bands. The OH group of chitin forms –OH···OC– intramolecular hydrogen bonds, exhibiting a vibrational band at around 3450 cm⁻¹. This band may also be contributed by incorporated water molecules though further corroboration is required.

Figure 8.

FTIR spectra of mud crab chitin (a) before and (b) after being deacetylation at 105°C using 10 N NaOH for 300 mins.

The NH of the amide I shows two intense bands at 3264 and 3110 cm⁻¹ due to its intermolecular and intramolecular hydrogen bonding interactions with amide carbonyl (C=O) groups in the α-chitin.²⁸ The amide I is the key feature to determine the crystalline structure of chitin. In the lower frequency region, the bands at 1662 and 1630 cm⁻¹ are assigned to doublet vibrational peaks of amide I of chitin interconnected by hydrogen bonding interactions.⁵⁰ The doublet vibrations of amide I indicate that carbonyl (C=O) forms intramolecular and intermolecular hydrogen bonds with hydroxyl and amine (–OH and –NH) groups,^50,51 thus supporting the presence of the α-form. This spectral pattern of α-chitin is distinct from that β-chitin, where the latter shows a single amide I band. Based on this finding, the FTIR pattern of chitin suggests that the mud crab chitin adopts the α-form, and it is similar to those derived from shrimp and crab shells.²⁸ The intramolecular and intermolecular hydrogen bonds stabilize the structure of the α-chitin. In addition, the FTIR of chitin also showed bands at 2861–2971 cm⁻¹, 1424 cm⁻¹, and 1380 cm⁻¹ which are assigned to CH vibrations.

Deacetylation of chitin leads to notable changes in the FTIR spectrum, especially those regions related to OH and NH vibrations at 2800−3600 cm⁻¹ and amide bands at 1550−1660 cm⁻¹. In this sense, the FTIR spectrum of chitosan shows broad bands at 2850−3650 cm⁻¹ with peaks at 3445 cm⁻¹ and 3221 cm⁻¹ due to OH and NH₂ vibrations. In the low frequency region, the band at 1657 cm⁻¹ is assigned to the carbonyl of amide group, and the band at 1600 cm⁻¹ is due to deformation of the NH₂ group. The band at 1406 cm⁻¹ is assigned to CH group. In addition, the vibrational band of the pyranose groups appears at 484–825 cm⁻¹.

The changes in the FTIR pattern confirm that the acetyl group of chitin is removed upon deacetylation, resulting in the formation of the NH₂ of chitosan. It is also interesting to highlight that (i) the doublet vibrational peaks of the amide I of chitin, that are related to its α-form, disappeared in FTIR spectrum of chitosan, and (ii) the two intense bands at 3264 cm⁻¹ and 3110 cm⁻¹ due to NH of the amide group of chitin disappeared and turned into small shoulder in the FTIR spectrum of chitosan. These facts suggested that hydrogen bonding interactions involving the amide group disappeared in chitosan.

Conclusions

In summary, α-chitin has been isolated from the shells of mud crab (S. serrata) obtained in Brunei Darussalam. The isolation involved demineralization and deproteinization processes. The extracted chitin was deacetylated using 10 N NaOH at different temperatures (35, 75, and 105°C). Degrees of deacetylation (DD) as high as 85.1% were obtained at 105°C for a prolonged reaction times up to 300 mins. The chemical and crystalline structures of the α-chitin before and after deacetylation were characterized by FTIR spectroscopy and XRD analysis. The kinetics of deacetylation was evaluated by monitoring the DD of the α-chitin before and after deacetylation at different reaction times from 0 to 300 mins. It was found that the DD values of the deacetylated chitin increases nonlinearly with the reaction time, and the heterogeneous deacetylation of the chitin particles occurred in two stages. The fast stage occurred in early reaction time is attributed to the deacetylation of acetamide groups in the amorphous region on the external layer of the chitin particles. The slower rate is associated with reaction in the crystalline region inside chitin particles. Both fast and slow deacetylation stages followed pseudo first-order kinetics, with rate constants that increased with temperature in the range of 5.68×10⁻³−2.23×10⁻² min⁻¹ and 4.67×10⁻⁴−4.61×10⁻³ min⁻¹, respectively. The activation energies for the deacetylation of acetamide groups in the amorphous region on the external layer and in the crystalline region inside chitin particle were estimated to be 18.5 kJ mol⁻¹ and 32.6 kJ mol⁻¹, respectively. The observed rate constant and activation energy of deacetylation of acetamide groups in the crystalline region inside chitin particle are in the same order as those reported for deacetylation of chitin derived from different Crustacean shells, highlighting that deacetylation reaction of chitin using basic solution shows the same kinetics, regardless of chitin sources.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

JH is grateful to National Cheng Kung University’s NCKU90 distinguished visiting scholar program for hosting his research.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iDs

Nur Alimatul Hakimah Narudin

Anwar Usman

References

Negm

Hefni

HHH

Abd-Elaal

AAA

, et al. Advancement on modification of chitosan biopolymer and its potential applications. Int J Biol Macromol 2020; 152: 681–702.

Kaya

Baublys

Satkauskiene

, et al. First chitin extraction from Plumatella repens (Bryozoa) with comparison to chitins of insects and fungal origin. Int J Biol Macromol 2015; 79: 126–132.

Ifuku

. Chitin and chitosan nanofibers: Preparation and chemical modifications. Molecules 2014; 19: 18367–18380.

Abidin

NAZ

Kormin

Abidin

NAZ

, et al. The potential of insects as alternative sources of chitin: An overview on the chemical method of extraction from various sources. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21: 4978.

Feás

Vázquez-Tato

Seijas

, et al. Extraction and physicochemical characterization of chitin derived from the Asian hornet, Vespa velutina Lepeletier 1836 (Hym.: Vespidae). Molecules 2020; 25: 384.

Baharin

SNA

Istamam

Suhaimi

, et al. Synthesis and characterization of polyaniline/chitin (squid pens) for the removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous solution. Malays J Chem 2021; 23: 26–32.

Sundalian

Husein

Putri

NKD

. Review: Analysis and benefit of shells content of freshwater and land snails from gastropods class. Biointerface Res Appl Chem 2022; 12: 508–517.

Rinaudo

. Chitin and chitosan: Properties and applications. Prog Polym Sci 2006; 31: 603–632.

Morin-Crini

Lichtfouse

Torri

, et al. Applications of chitosan in food, pharmaceuticals, medicine, cosmetics, agriculture, textiles, pulp and paper, biotechnology, and environmental chemistry. Environ Chem Lett 2019; 17: 1667–1692.

10.

Pellá

MCG

Lima-Tenorio

Tenorio-Neto

, et al. Chitosan-based hydrogels: From preparation to biomedical applications. Carbohydr Polym 2018; 196: 233–245.

11.

Eddya

Tbib

EL-Hami

. A comparison of chitosan properties after extraction from shrimp shells by diluted and concentrated acids. Heliyon 2020; 6: e03486.

12.

Galed

Miralles

Paños

, et al. N-deacetylation and depolymerization reactions of chitin/chitosan: Influence of the source of chitin. Carbohydr Polym 2005; 62: 316–320.

13.

Barbosa

HFG

Francisco

Ferreira

APG

, et al. A new look towards the thermal decomposition of chitins and chitosans with different degrees of deacetylation by coupled TG-FTIR. Carbohydr Polym 2019; 225: 115232.

14.

Sikorski

Gzyra-Jagieła

Draczyński

. The kinetics of chitosan degradation in organic acid solutions. Mar Drugs 2021; 19: 236.

15.

Bradić

Bajec

Pohar

, et al. A reaction–diffusion kinetic model for the heterogeneous N-deacetylation step in chitin material conversion to chitosan in catalytic alkaline solutions. React Chem Eng 2018; 3: 920–929.

16.

Aihemaiti

Cao

, et al. Physicochemical stability, microrheological properties and microstructure of lutein emulsions stabilized by multilayer membranes consisting of whey protein isolate, flaxseed gum and chitosan. Food Chem 2016; 202: 156–164.

17.

Tolaimate

Desbrieres

Rhazi

, et al. Contribution to the preparation of chitins and chitosans with controlled physico-chemical properties. Polymer 2003; 44: 7939–7952.

18.

Tavares

Flores

EEE

Rodrigues

, et al. Effect of deacetylation degree of chitosan on rheological properties and physical chemical characteristics of genipin-crosslinked chitosan beads. Food Hydrocoll 2020; 106: 105876.

19.

Poerio

Petit

Jehl

, et al. Extraction and physicochemical characterization of chitin from Cicada orni sloughs of the south-eastern French Mediterranean basin. Molecules 2020; 25: 2543.

20.

Mohan

Ganesan

Muralisankar

, et al. Recent insights into the extraction, characterization, and bioactivities of chitin and chitosan from insects. Trends Food Sci Technol 2020; 105: 17–42.

21.

Olafadehan

Amoo

Ajayi

, et al. Extraction and characterization of chitin and chitosan from Callinectes amnicola and Penaeus notialis shell wastes. J Chem Eng Mater Sci 2021; 12: 1–30.

22.

Triunfo

Taf

Guarnieri

, et al. Characterization of chitin and chitosan derived from Hermetia illucens, a further step in a circular economy process. Sci Rep 2022; 12: 6613.

23.

Abo Elsoud

El Kady

. Current trends in fungal biosynthesis of chitin and chitosan. Bull Natl Res Cent 2019; 43: 59.

24.

Bahuguna

Rana

Singh

. Diet composition of freshwater crab, Potamon koolooense Rathbun, 1904 from hillstream of Uttarakhand. J Appl Natl Sci 2016; 8: 301–304.

25.

Fadlaoui

El Asri

Mohammed

, et al. Isolation and characterization of chitin from shells of the freshwater crab Potamon algeriense. Prog Chem Appl Chitin Deriv 2019; 24: 23–35.

26.

Narudin

NAH

Mahadi

Kusrini

, et al. Chitin, chitosan, and submicron-sized chitosan particles prepared from Scylla serrata shells. Mater Int 2020; 2: 0139–0149.

27.

Kiruba

Uthayakumar

Munirasu

, et al. Extraction, characterization and physico chemical properties of chitin and chitosan from mud crab shell (Scylla Serrata). Indian J Appl Res 2013; 3: 44–46.

28.

Hajji

Younes

Ghorbel-Bellaaja

, et al. Structural differences between chitin and chitosan extracted from three different marine sources. Int J Biol Macromol 2014; 65: 298–306.

29.

Lapasin

Pricl

. Industrial applications of polysaccharides. In: Rheology of Industrial Polysaccharides: Theory and Applications, Lapasin R and Pricl S. Boston, MA, USA: Springer, 1995, pp. 134–161.

30.

Brugnerotto

Desbrières

Roberts

, et al. Characterization of chitosan by steric exclusion chromatography. Polymer 2001; 42: 09927.

31.

de Souza

Giudici

. Effect of diffusional limitations on the kinetics of deacetylation of chitin/chitosan. Carbohydr Polym 2021; 254: 117278.

32.

Ahlafi

Moussout

Boukhlifi

, et al. Kinetics of N-deacetylation of chitin extracted from shrimp shells collected from coastal area of Morocco. Mediterr J Chem 2013; 2: 503–513.

33.

Jaworska

. Kinetics of enzymatic deacetylation of chitosan. Cellulose 2012; 19: 363–369.

34.

Liu

, et al. Enzymatic degradation of nanosized chitin whiskers with different degrees of deacetylation. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2019; 5: 5316–5326.

35.

Lamarque

Viton

Domard

. Comparative study of the second and third heterogeneous deacetylations of α- and β-chitins in a multistep process. Biomacromolecules 2004; 5: 1899–1907.

36.

Cho

Kim

, et al. Effective deacetylation of chitin under conditions of 15 Psi/121 °C. J Agric Food Chem 2000; 48: 2625–2627.

37.

Lavertu

Darras

Buschmann

. Kinetics and efficiency of chitosan reacetylation. Carbohydr Polym 2012; 87: 1192–1198.

38.

Sarhan

Ayad

Badawy

, et al. Phase transfer catalyzed heterogeneous N-deacetylation of chitin in alkaline solution. React Funct Polym 2009; 69: 358–363.

39.

Methacanona

PrasitsilpaPothsreea

Pattaraarchachai

, et al. Heterogeneous N-deacetylation of squid chitin in alkaline solution. Carbohydr Polym 2003; 52: 119–123.

40.

Tolaimate

Desbrières

Rhazi

, et al. On the influence of deacetylation process on the physicochemical characteristics of chitosan from squid chitin. Polymer 2000; 41: 2463–2469.

41.

Dolgopiatova

Kuchina

Dyakina

, et al. Effect of heterogeneous deacetylation on the properties of northern shrimp chitin and chitosan. In: International Applied Research Conference «Biological Resources Development and Environmental Management». KnE Life Sci, 2020, pp. 315–324.

42.

Khong

Aachmann

Vrum

. Kinetics of de-N-acetylation of the chitin disaccharide in aqueous sodium hydroxide solution. Carbohydr Res 2012; 352: 82–87.

43.

Yaghobi

Hormozi

. Multistage deacetylation of chitin: Kinetics study. Carbohydr Polym 2010; 81: 892–896.

44.

Wang

Chang

, et al. Crystalline structure and thermal property characterization of chitin from Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba). Carbohydr Polym 2013; 92: 90–97.

45.

Shahabuddin

Baharin

SNA

Suhaimi

, et al. Preparation of shrimp-based chitin blend with polyaniline for chromium (VI) removal from aqueous solution. Mater Today Proc 2022. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.299.

46.

Cárdenas

Cabrera

Taboada

, et al. Chitin characterization by SEM, FTIR, XRD, and ¹³C cross polarization/mass angle spinning NMR. J Appl Polym Sci 2004; 93: 1876–1885.

47.

Zhang

Xue

, et al. Determination of the degree of deacetylation of chitin and chitosan by X-ray powder diffraction. Carbohydr Res 2005; 340: 1914–1917.

48.

Wan

Creber

KAM

Peppley

, et al. Ionic conductivity and related properties of crosslinked chitosan membranes. J Appl Polym Sci 2003; 89: 306–317.

49.

Abdou

Nagy

Elsabee

. Extraction and characterization of chitin and chitosan from local sources. Bioresour Technol 2008; 99: 1359–1367.

50.

Focher

Naggi

Torri

, et al. Structural differences between chitin polymorphs and their precipitates from solutionse–vidence from CP-MAS ¹³C-NMR, FTIR and FT-Raman spectroscopy. Carbohydr Polym 1992; 17: 97–102.

51.

Kumari

Rath

Kumar

ASH

, et al. Extraction and characterization of chitin and chitosan from fishery waste by chemical method. Environ Technol Innov 2015; 3: 77–85.

Extraction,characterization,and kinetics of N-deacetylation of chitin obtained from mud crab shells

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Experimental

Chemicals

Preparation and demineralization of mud crab shells

Isolation of chitin

Deacetylation of chitin

Characterization

Results and discussion

The kinetics of deacetylation of chitin

Activation energy, Ea

Surface morphology

Mud crab shell characterization

X-Ray crystal structure

Conclusions

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iDs

References

Activation energy, E_a