A series of damage tests and axially repeated compressive tests with high strain rates were conducted to investigate the behavior of aramid fiber reinforced polymer (AFRP) wrapped concrete under repeated impacts. The relation between damage condition and variables such as impact number and polymer thickness were examined. The tests were performed using a 100 mm diameter Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) apparatus and a nonmetal supersonic test meter. Various AFRP layers were applied to produce varied confinement ratios. The experimental results indicated that the AFRP-wrapped concrete exhibited excellent performance in resisting repeated impacts. Also, the specimens maintained their shapes and bearing capacity after multiple impacts with a mean strain rate of 50 s−1. No distinct decline was observed from the history of peak stress and impact toughness in AFRP-wrapped concrete. Moreover, additional AFRP layers significantly decreased the impact damage on the core concrete, as reflected by the different strain rate histories in damage progression.
United States Department of State – Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism. Country Reports on Terrorism2014. April, 2014.
2.
RobertoR., AnnalisaN., JoaquínG.R.P.Cyclic behavior of RC beam-column joints strengthened with FRP systems. Constr. Build. Mater., (2014) 54, 282–97.
3.
VincentT., OzbakkalogluT.Influence of concrete strength and confinement method on axial compressive behavior of FRP confined high- and ultra high-strength concrete. Compo. B. Eng., (2013) 50, 413–28.
4.
MarkN., AmirF.Full bridge testing at scale constructed with novel FRP stay-in-place structural forms for concrete deck. Constr. Build. Mater., (2014) 50, 368–76.
5.
IdrisY., OzbakkalogluT.Seismic behavior of high-strength concrete-filled FRP tube columns. J. Compos. Constr., (2013) 17(6), 1943–5614.
6.
IdrisY., OzbakkalogluT.Flexural behavior of FRP-HSC-steel double skin tubular beams under reversed-cyclic loading. Thin Wall Struct., (2015) 87, 89–101.
7.
FardisM.N., KhaliliH.FRP-encased concrete as a structural material. Mag. Concr. Res. (1982) 34(122), 191–202.
8.
RealfonzoR., NapoliA.Results from cyclic tests on high aspect ratio RC columns strengthened with FRP systems. Constr. Build. Mater., (2012) 37, 606–20.
9.
OzbakkalogluT.Behavior of square and rectangular ultra high-strength concrete-filled FRP tubes under axial compression. Compos. B. Eng., (2013) 54, 97–111.
10.
YuT., HuY.M., TengJ.G.FRP-confined circular concrete-filled steel tubular columns under cyclic axial compression. J. Constr. Steel Res., (2014), 94, 33–48.
11.
TengJ.G., HuY.M.Behaviour of FRP-jacketed circular steel tubes and cylindrical shells under axial compression. Constr. Build. Mater., (2007) 4, 827–38.
12.
YangH., SongH.W., ZhangS.Experimental investigation of the behavior of aramid fiber reinforced polymer confined concrete subjected to high strain-rate compression. Constr. Build. Mater., (2015) 95, 143–51.
13.
YangH., SongH.W.Dynamic compressive behavior of FRP-confined concrete under impact and a new design-oriented strength model. Polymers & Polymer Composites, (2016) 24 (2), 127–31.
14.
OzbakkalogluT., LimJ.C.Axial compressive behavior of FRP-confined concrete: Experimental test database and a new design-oriented model. Composites: Part B (2013) 55, 607–634.
15.
ZhouX., KuznetzovV., HaoH., WaschlJ.Numerical prediction of concrete slab response to blast loading. Int. J. Impact. Eng., (2008) 35(10), 1186–200.
16.
TabatabaeiZ., VolzJ., BairdJ., GlihaB., KeenerD.Experimental and numerical analyses of long carbon fiber reinforced concrete panels exposed to blast loading. Int. J. Impact Eng. (2013) 57, 70–80.
17.
MachalabaM.N., KurylevaN.N., OkhlobystinaL.V.Tver’ fibres of the armostype: manufacture and properties. Fibre Chemistry, (2000) 32(5), 319–24.
18.
ZhaoK.X.The chemical structure and physical–mechanical properties of the fibres and matrixed of aramid composite used in solid rocket motor case in the former USSR. Aerospace Materials and Technology, (1995) 25(5), 8–19.
19.
ParkR., JangJ.Effect of laminate thickness on impact behavior of aramid fiber/vinylester composites, Polym. Test. (2003) 22, 939–946.
20.
SuH.Y., XuJ.Y.Dynamic compressive behavior of ceramic fiber reinforced concrete under impact load. Constr. Build. Mater., (2013) 45, 306–13.
21.
BazleA.G.Split Hopkinson pressure bar technique: experiments, analyses and applications.United States: the Faculty of the University of Delaware, Spring; 2004.
GamaB.A., LopatnikovS.L., GillespieJ.W.Jr.Hopkinson bar experimental technique: a critical review. Appl. Mech. Rev., (2004) 57(4), 223–50.
24.
FollansbeeP.S.The Hopkinson bar. Mech. Test, (1985) 8, 198–203.
25.
SuzukiT., OhtsuM.Damage estimation of concrete canal due to earthquake effects by acoustic emission method. Constr. Build. Mater., (2014) 67, 186–91.
26.
LiS.W., LinW.Z., LiS.B. etc. Supersonic damage detection on concrete. Nondes Tests, (2004), 26(3), 127–8 (in Chinese).
27.
LiQ.M., ReidS.R., MengH.Local impact effects of hard missiles on concrete targets. Int. J. Impact Eng., (2005) 32(1–4), 224–84.
28.
LiL.Y., XieH.P., JuY., MaX. etc. Experimental investigations of releasable energy and dissipative energy within rock. Eng. Mech., (2011) 28(3), 35–40 (in Chinese).
