Abstract
The quality of distal run-off is one of the most important factors in determining outcome of femorodistal bypass. Accurate evaluation is important. Preoperative intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography and Doppler evaluation with pulse-generated augmentation of 90 patients who underwent femorodistal reconstruction were compared with postoperative angiography. Underestimation of distal run-off of the calf vessels occurred in 33% of cases by preoperative intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography. A below-knee pulse-generated run-off score of 3 or less was associated with a 12-month cumulative patency of 73% compared with 85% with a below-knee pulse-generated run-off score of 4 or more (P= 0.079, log rank test; P= 0.060, Wilcoxon signed rank test). The 12-month cumulative patency for grafts with a complete, incomplete and occluded arch as defined by pulse-generated run-off was 78.90 and 38% respectively (P< 0.0001 log rank and Wilcoxon signed rank tests). Preoperative evaluation of distal run-off before femorodistal bypass should not be based exclusively on intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
