A total of 44 patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement received either anterograde (20 patients) or retrograde (24 patients), cold St Thomas's Hospital cardioplegia. The patients were similar with respect to age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular-aortic pressure gradient, cross-clamping time and mean dose of cardioplegia. After surgery, there were no differences in enzyme release, low cardiac output syndrome, rhythm disturbances or clinical outcome between the two groups. Analysis of the postoperative haemodynamic data, however, suggests better preservation of left ventricular contractility with retrograde delivery of cardioplegic solution.
BuckbergGD, RosenkransEL. Principles of cardioplegic myocardial protection. In: RobertsAJ, ed. Myocardial Protection in Cardiac Surgery. New York and Basel: Marcel Dekker, 1986; 71–94.
2.
GundrySR, SequieraA, RazzoukAM, McLaughlinJS, BaileyLL. Facile retrograde cardioplegia: transatrial cannulation of the coronary sinus. Ann Thorac Surg1990; 50: 882–7.
3.
MenaschéP, KuralS, FauchetMRetrograde coronary sinus perfusion: a safe alternative for ensuring cardioplegic delivery in aortic valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg1982; 34: 647–58
4.
MenaschéP, KucharskiK, MundlerOAdequate preservation of the right ventricular function after coronary sinus cardioplegia. A clinical study. Circulation1989; 80(Suppl III): 19–24.
5.
MenaschéP, SubayiJB, PiwnicaA.Retrograde coronary sinus cardioplegia for aortic valve operations: a clinical report on 500 patients. Ann Thorac Surg1990; 49: 556–64.
6.
NoyezL, van SonJAM, LacquetLK. Retrograde delivery of cardioplegia in aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)1992; 33: 235–9.
7.
SarnoffSJ. Myocardial contractility as described by ventricular function curves: observations on Starling's law of the heart. Physiol Rev1955; 35: 107–9.
8.
PartingtonMT, AcarC, BuckbergGD, JuliaP, KofskyER, BugyiHI. Studies of retrograde cardioplegia I. Capillary blood flow distribution to myocardium supplied by open and occluded arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1989; 97: 605–12.
9.
PartingtonMT, AcarC, BuckbergGD, JuliaP.Studies of retrograde cardioplegia II. Advantages of anterograde/retrograde cardioplegia to optimize distribution in jeopardized myocardium. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1989; 97: 613–22.
10.
SinkJD, PellomGL, CurrieA.Response of hypertrophied myocardium to ischemia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1981; 81: 865–72
11.
FioreAC, NaunheimKS, KaiserGCCoronary sinus versus aortic root perfusion with blood cardioplegia in elective myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg1989; 47: 684–8.
12.
GuiraudonGM, CampbellCS, McLellanDGRetrograde coronary sinus versus aortic root perfusion with cold cardioplegia: randomized study of levels of cardiac enzymes in 40 patients. Circulation1986; 74(Suppl III): 111–15.
13.
NoyezL, van SonJAM, Van der WerfTRetrograde coronary sinus cardioplegia in myocardial revascularization: hemodynamic evaluation of the influence on the rightventricular function. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg1992; 40: 209–13.
