Monitoring changes in soil properties is essential to ensure ecosystem function and agricultural productivity. This study evaluated the ability of visible near infrared (Vis-NIR) spectroscopy to detect the temporal trend in soil organic carbon (SOC) content after 5 years in a 12 km2 agricultural catchment in western France. Partial least squares regression models were developed using soil samples from a local dataset collected in 2013 at two depths (198 samples at 0–15 cm and 196 samples at 15–25 cm) to predict SOC content of 111 new samples collected in 2018 at the same locations and at similar depths (0–15 cm and 15–25 cm). Two approaches, which differed in whether or not they considered the SOC content variability that can result from collecting soil samples at two depths, were applied. For both approaches, the potential benefit of “temporal spiking” was evaluated by adding 10% of 2018 samples to the 2013 dataset. The results showed that removing outliers and stratifying the calibration dataset by depth yielded the highest accuracy, with SOC RMSEP of 4.1 and 2.7 g.kg−1 for 0–15 and 15–25 cm, respectively. Moreover, temporal spiking improved five of eight predictions (stratifying or not the calibration dataset by depth, removing or not poorly predicted outliers), with increases in the ratio of performance to deviation of 0.10–0.44. Furthermore, comparing observed and predicted changes in SOC content showed that Vis-NIR spectroscopy estimated its trend over time in most cases.
GraceJ. Understanding and managing the global carbon cycle. J Ecol2004; 92: 189–202.
2.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Intergovernmental technical panel on soils. Status of the world’s soil resources (SWSR) - main report. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization, 2015.
3.
LalRSoil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science2004; 304: 1623–1627.
4.
StockmannUAdamsMACrawfordJW, et al.The knowns, known unknowns and unknowns of sequestration of soil organic carbon. Agric Ecosyst Environ2013; 164: 80–99.
5.
Le QuéréCRaupachMRCanadellJG, et al.Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Nat Geosci2009; 2: 831–836.
6.
MontanarellaLJonesRJADusartJ. The European soil bureau network. In: JonesRJAHouškováBBullockP, et al. (eds) Soil resources of Europe. 2nd ed.Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2005, pp. 3–14.
VoltzMArrouaysDBispoA, et al.La cartographie des sols en France: etat des lieux et perspectives. Paris: INRAE, 2018.
9.
European Commission. Concept note for the EU soil observatory. Ispra, 2021.
10.
Soil Science Division Staff. Kellogg soil survey laboratory methods manual. In: Burt and Soil Survey Staff (ed) Soil survey investigations report no. 42, version 5.0. Lincoln, Nebreska: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2014.
11.
Ben-DorETaylorRGHillJ, et al.Imaging spectrometry for soil applications. Adv Agron2008; 97: 321–392.
12.
DemattêJAMMorganCLSRizzoR, et al.Spectral sensing from ground to space in soil science: state of the art, applications, potentail, and perspectives. In: ThenkabailPS (ed) Remote sensing handbook - land resources monitoring, modeling, and mapping with remote sensing. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2015, pp. 661–718.
13.
NanniMRDemattêJAM. Spectral reflectance methodology in comparison to traditional soil analysis. Soil Sci Soc Am J2006; 70: 393–407.
Soriano-DislaJMJanikLJViscarra RosselRA, et al.The performance of visible, near-and mid-infrared reflectance spectroscopy for prediction of soil physical, chemical, and biological properties. Appl Spectrosc Rev2014; 49: 139–186.
16.
MalleyDFMartinPDDBen-DorE. Application in analysis of soils. Near‐infrared spectroscopy in agriculture, agronomy monograph no. 44. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, 2004, pp. 729–784.
17.
Ben-DorEBaninA. Near-infrared analysis as a rapid method to simultaneously evaluate several soil properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J1995; 59: 364–372.
18.
StenbergBViscarra RosselRAMouazenAM, et al.Visible and near infrared spectroscopy in soil science. Adv Agron2010; 107: ,163–215. Elsevier Inc.
19.
ZhouTGengYChenJ, et al.Mapping soil organic carbon content using multi-source remote sensing variables in the Heihe river basin in China. Ecol Indicat2020; 114: 1–9.
20.
GomezCChevallierTMoulinP, et al.Prediction of soil organic and inorganic carbon concentrations in Tunisian samples by mid-infrared reflectance spectroscopy using a French national library. Geoderma2020; 375: 114469–144614.
21.
Viscarra RosselRABehrensTBen-dorE, et al.A global spectral library to characterize the world’s soil. Earth Sci Rev2016; 155: 198–230.
22.
ChabrillatSBen-DorEViscarra RosselRA, et al.Quantitative soil spectroscopy. Appl Environ Soil Sci2013; 2013: 1–3.
23.
GholizadehABorůvkaLSaberioonM, et al.Visible, near-infrared, and mid-infrared spectroscopy applications for soil assessment with emphasis on soil organic matter content and quality: state-of-the-art and key issues. Appl Spectrosc2013; 67: 1349–1362.
24.
KuangBMahmoodHSQuraishiMZ, et al.Sensing soil properties in the laboratory, in situ, and on-line. A review. 1st ed.Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc, 2012. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394275-3.00003-1. Epub ahead of print.
25.
StenbergBJonssonABörjessonT. Near infrared technology for soil analysis with implications for precision agriculture. Chichester, UK: Near Infrared Spectrosc Proc 10th Int Conf Kyongju S Korea NIR Publ, 2002, pp. 279–284.
26.
StevensANocitaMTóthG, et al.Prediction of soil organic carbon at the European scale by visible and near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. PLoS One2013; 8: e66409–e66413.
27.
Ramirez-LopezLBehrensTSchmidtK, et al.. The spectrum-based learner: a new local approach for modeling soil vis-NIR spectra of complex datasets. Geoderma2013; 195–196: 268–279.
28.
ShepherdKDWalshMG. Development of reflectance spectral libraries for characterization of soil properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J2002; 66: 988–998.
29.
AïchiHFouadYWalterC, et al.Regional predictions of soil organic carbon content from spectral reflectance measurements. Biosyst Eng2009; 104: 442–446.
30.
LobseyCRViscarra RosselRARoudierP, et al.Rs-Local data-mines information from spectral libraries to Improve local calibrations. Eur J Soil Sci2017; 68: 840–852.
31.
Viscarra RosselRAHicksWS. Soil organic carbon and its fractions estimated by visible-near infrared transfer functions. Eur J Soil Sci2015; 66: 438–450.
32.
Viscarra RosselRA. ParLeS: software for chemometric analysis of spectroscopic data. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst2008; 90: 72–83.
33.
GholizadehASaberioonMCarmonN, et al.Examining the performance of PARACUDA-II data-mining engine versus selected techniques to model soil carbon from reflectance spectra. Rem Sens2018; 10: 1172–1178.
34.
IgneBReevesJBMcCartyG, et al.Evaluation of spectral pretreatments, partial least squares, least squares support vector machines and locally weighted regression for quantitative spectroscopic analysis of soils. J Near Infrared Spectrosc2010; 18: 167–176.
35.
VaudourEGilliotJMBelL, et al.Regional prediction of soil organic carbon content over temperate croplands using visible near-infrared airborne hyperspectral imagery and synchronous field spectra. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf2016; 49: 24–38.
36.
MengXBaoYLiuJ, et al.Regional soil organic carbon prediction model based on a discrete wavelet analysis of hyperspectral satellite data. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf2020; 89: 102–111.
37.
VohlandMLudwigMHarbichM, et al.Using variable selection and wavelets to exploit the full potential of visible-near infrared spectra for predicting soil properties. J Near Infrared Spectrosc2016; 24: 255–269.
38.
RodionovAPätzoldSWelpG, et al.Sensing of soil organic carbon using visible and near-infrared spectroscopy at variable moisture and surface roughness. Soil Sci Soc Am J2014; 78: 949–957.
39.
ReevesJIIIMcCartyGMimmoT. The potential of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for the determination of carbon inventories in soils. Environ Pollut2002; 116: 277–284.
40.
DunnBWBattenGDBeecherHG, et al.The potential of near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy for soil analysis — a case study from the riverine plain of south-eastern Australia. Aust J Exp Agric2002; 42: 607–614.
41.
St LuceMZiadiNZebarthBJ, et al.Rapid determination of soil organic matter quality indicators using visible near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Geoderma2014; 232–234: 449–458.
42.
GomezCCouloumaG. Importance of the spatial extent for using soil properties estimated by laboratory VNIR/SWIR spectroscopy: examples of the clay and calcium carbonate content. Geoderma2018; 330: 244–253.
43.
GuerreroCZornozaRGómezI, et al.Spiking of NIR regional models using samples from target sites: effect of model size on prediction accuracy. Geoderma2010; 158: 66–77.
44.
LeoneAAViscarra-RosselRAmentaP, et al.Prediction of soil properties with PLSR and vis-NIR spectroscopy: application to mediterranean soils from southern Italy. Curr Anal Chem2012; 8: 283–299.
45.
GenotVColinetGBockL, et al.Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy for estimating soil characteristics valuable in the diagnosis of soil fertility. J Near Infrared Spectrosc2011; 19: 117–138.
46.
LucàFConfortiMCastrignanòA, et al.Effect of calibration set size on prediction at local scale of soil carbon by Vis-NIR spectroscopy. Geoderma2017; 288: 175–183.
47.
KuangBMouazenAM. Influence of the number of samples on prediction error of visible and near infrared spectroscopy of selected soil properties at the farm scale. Eur J Soil Sci2012; 63: 421–429.
48.
GogéFJoffreRJolivetC, et al.Optimization criteria in sample selection step of local regression for quantitative analysis of large soil NIRS database. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst2012; 110: 168–176.
49.
BrunetDBarthèsBGChotteJ-L, et al.Determination of carbon and nitrogen contents in alfisols, oxisols and ultisols from Africa and Brazil using NIRS analysis: effects of sample grinding and set heterogeneity. Geoderma2007; 139: 106–117.
50.
GogéFGomezCJolivetC, et al.Which strategy is best to predict soil properties of a local site from a national Vis-NIR database?Geoderma2014; 213: 1–9.
51.
OgenYNeumannCChabrillatS, et al.Evaluating the detection limit of organic matter using point and imaging spectroscopy. Geoderma2018; 321: 100–109.
52.
LiuYShiZZhangG, et al.Application of spectrally derived soil type as ancillary data to improve the estimation of soil organic carbon by using the Chinese soil vis-NIR spectral library. Rem Sens2018; 10: 1–16.
53.
SunBZhouSZhaoQ. Evaluation of spatial and temporal changes of soil quality based on geostatistical analysis in the hill region of subtropical China. Geoderma2003; 115: 85–99.
54.
WangSXuLZhuangQ, et al.Investigating the spatio-temporal variability of soil organic carbon stocks in different ecosystems of China. Sci Total Environ2021; 758: 1–10.
55.
ZhengGJiaoCZhouS, et al.Analysis of soil chronosequence studies using reflectance spectroscopy. Int J Rem Sens2016; 37: 1881–1901.
56.
AwitiAOWalshMGShepherdKD, et al.Soil condition classification using infrared spectroscopy: a proposition for assessment of soil condition along a tropical forest-cropland chronosequence. Geoderma2008; 143: 73–84.
57.
ZhengGRyuDJiaoC. Visible and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy analysis of a coastal soil chronosequence. Rem Sens2019; 11: 1–19.
58.
DemattêJAMGarciaGJ. Alteration of soil properties through a weathering sequence as evaluated by spectral reflectance. Soil Sci Soc Am J1999; 63: 327–342.
59.
DemattêJAMda Silva TerraF. Spectral pedology: a new perspective on evaluation of soils along pedogenetic alterations. Geoderma2014; 217–218: 190–200.
60.
DemattêJAMHorák-TerraIBeirigoRM, et al.Genesis and properties of wetland soils by VIS-NIR-SWIR as a technique for environmental monitoring. J Environ Manag2017; 197: 50–62.
61.
SorelLViaudVDurandP, et al.Modeling spatio-temporal crop allocation patterns by a stochastic decision tree method, considering agronomic driving factors. Agric Syst2010; 103: 647–655.
62.
ViaudVSantillàn-CarvantesPAkkal-CorfiniN, et al.Landscape-scale analysis of cropping system effects on soil quality in a context of crop-livestock farming. Agric Ecosyst Environ2018; 265: 166–177.
63.
HrkalZLangevinCLebretP, et al.Bassin versant représentatif expérimental du coët-dan (Naizin - Morbihan). Hydrogéologie: evaluation des ressources en eau. Orleans, France: BRGM Services Sol et Sous-Sol Direction Technique de l’Eau, 1993, p. 36.
64.
WalterC. Description des profils pédologiques du bassin versant du coet-dan (Naizin)1992; 2: 23. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.3941.5203. Epub ahead of print 1992.
65.
CurmiPBidoisJBourriéG, et al.Rôle du sol sur la circulation et la qualité des eaux au sein de paysages présentant un domaine hydromorphe T. Etude Gest des sols1997; 4: 95–114.
66.
MorelBDurandPJaffrezicA, et al.Sources of dissolved organic carbon during stormflow in a headwater agricultural catchment. Hydrol Process2009; 23: 2888–2901.
67.
AFNOR. NF ISO 10694: qualité du sol - dosage du carbone organique et du carbone total après combustion sèche (analyse élémentaire). Paris - La défense, France: Association Française de Normalisation, 1995.
68.
ChangCWLairdDAHurburghCRJr. Influence of soil moisture on near-infrared reflectance spectroscopic measurement of soil properties. Soil Sci2005; 170: 244–255.
69.
Malvern Panalytical Ltd. FieldSpec ® 3 user manual. Boulder, USA: ASD Inc, 2010. ASD Rev. J.
70.
DannerMLochererMHankT, et al.Spectral sampling with the ASD FIELDSPEC 4 - theory, measurment, problems, interpretation. EnMAP field guides technical report. Potsdam, Germany: GFZ Data Services, 2015, p. 20.
71.
LiuYLiuYChenY, et al.The influence of spectral pretreatment on the selection of representative calibration samples for soil organic matter estimation using vis-NIR reflectance spectroscopy. Rem Sens2019; 11: 450.
WaruruBKShepherdKDNdegwaGM, et al.Estimation of wet aggregation indices using soil properties and diffuse reflectance near infrared spectroscopy: an application of classification and regression tree analysis. Biosyst Eng2016; 152: 148–164.
74.
Viscarra RosselRAWalvoortDJJMcBratneyAB, et al.Visible, near infrared, mid infrared or combined diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for simultaneous assessment of various soil properties. Geoderma2006; 131: 59–75.
75.
SavitzkyAGolayMJE. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal Chem1964; 36: 1627–1639.
76.
RinnanÅBergFEngelsenSB. Review of the most common pre-processing techniques for near-infrared spectra. Trends Anal Chem2009; 28: 1201–1222.
77.
BarnesRJDhanoaMs.ListerSJ. Standard normal variate transformation and de-trending of near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectra. Appl Spectrosc1989; 43: 772–777.
78.
WilliamsPCSoberingDC. Comparison of commercial near infrared transmittance and reflectance instruments for analysis of whole grains and seeds. J Near Infrared Spectrosc1993; 1: 25–32.
79.
ChangC-WLairdDAMausbachMJ, et al.Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy-principal components regression analyses of soil properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J2001; 65: 480–490.
80.
Bellon-MaurelVFernandez-AhumadaEPalagosB, et al.Critical review of chemometric indicators commonly used for assessing the quality of the prediction of soil attributes by NIR spectroscopy. Trends Anal Chem2010; 29: 1073–1081.
81.
NawarSMouazenAM. Predictive performance of mobile vis-near infrared spectroscopy for key soil properties at different geographical scales by using spiking and data mining techniques. Catena2017; 151: 118–129.
82.
BrownDJ. Using a global VNIR soil-spectral library for local soil characterization and landscape modeling in a 2nd-order Uganda watershed. Geoderma2007; 140: 444–453.
83.
GuerreroCStenbergBWetterlindJ, et al.Assessment of soil organic carbon at local scale with spiked NIR calibrations: effects of selection and extra-weighting on the spiking subset. Eur J Soil Sci2014; 65: 248–263.
84.
JiangQLiQWangX, et al.Estimation of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in different soil layers using VNIR spectroscopy: effects of spiking on model applicability. Geoderma2017; 293: 54–63.
85.
SankeyJBBrownDJBernardML, et al.Comparing local vs. global visible and near-infrared (VisNIR) diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) calibrations for the prediction of soil clay, organic C and inorganic C. Geoderma2008; 148: 149–158.
86.
GoidtsEVan WesemaelBCrucifixM. Magnitude and sources of uncertainties in soil organic carbon (SOC) stock assessments at various scales. Eur J Soil Sci2009; 60: 723–739.
87.
FAO. Measuring and modelling soil carbon stocks and stock changes in livestock production systems: guidlines for assessment (Version 1). Rome, Italy: Livestock Environmental Assessment and Performance (LEAP) Partnership, 2019, http://www.fao.org/3/I9693EN/i9693en.pdf.
88.
BaumgardnerMFSilvaLFBiehlLL, et al.Reflectance propertles of soils. Adv Agron1986; 38: 1–44.
89.
MarquesKPPRizzoRCarnieletto DottoA, et al.How qualitative spectral information can improve soil profile classification?J Near Infrared Spectrosc2019; 27: 156–174.
90.
MurphyRJMonteiroST. Mapping the distribution of ferric iron minerals on a vertical mine face using derivative analysis of hyperspectral imagery (430 – 970 nm). ISPRS J Photogrammetry Remote Sens2013; 75: 29–39.
91.
ChristyCD. Real-time measurement of soil attributes using on-the-go near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Comput Electron Agric2008; 61: 10–19.
92.
WetterlindJStenbergBSöderströmM. Increased sample point density in farm soil mapping by local calibration of visible and near infrared prediction models. Geoderma2010; 156: 152–160.
93.
Ahmad JaniHFMederRHamidHA, et al.Near infrared spectroscopy of plantation forest soil nutrients in Sabah, Malaysia, and the potential for microsite assessment. J Near Infrared Spectrosc2021; 29: 148–157.
94.
VohlandMLudwigMThiele-BruhnS, et al.Determination of soil properties with visible to near- and mid-infrared spectroscopy: effects of spectral variable selection. Geoderma2014; 223–225: 88–96.
95.
AlbrechtRJoffreRGrosR, et al.Efficiency of near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy to assess and predict the stage of transformation of organic matter in the composting process. Bioresour Technol2008; 99: 448–455.
96.
AlbrechtRJoffreRLe PetitJ, et al.Calibration of chemical and biological changes in cocomposting of biowastes using near-infrared spectroscopy. Environ Sci Technol2009; 43: 804–811.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
