Abstract

Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 Hasan Akhtar, `First Strike: No Change in Pakistan's Nuclear Strategy', Dawn , 20 June 1999.
2.
2 Subramaniam Swamy, `India's Defense Needs', The Hindustan Times , 12 July 1998; Bharat Karnad, `A Thermonuclear Deterrent', in Amitabh Mattoo, ed., India's Nuclear Deterrent: Pokhran II and Beyond (New Delhi: Har-Anand, 1998), pp. 128, 139.
3.
3 John Cherian, `The Arms Race', Frontline , vol. 16, no. 9, 24 April-7 May 1999.
4.
4 Rahul Roy-Chaudhury, `Equipping the Navy for War on Land', The Times of India , 13 July 1998.
5.
5 R. Ramachandran, `Pakistan's Ballistic Response', Frontline , vol. 16, no. 9, 24 April-7 May 1999; Ben Sheppard, `News in Brief: Pakistan Ready to Test New Solid-Fuel SSM', Jane's Intelligence Review , vol. 11, no. 1, January 1999, p. 4.
6.
6 Umer Farooq, `Pakistan Needs up to 70 Nuclear Warheads', Jane's Defence Weekly , 10 June 1998, p. 3.
7.
7 Jyoti Malhotra, `China's No Threat: Talks Clear Air', The Indian Express , 16 June 1999.
8.
8 Cherian, note 3 above.
9.
9 Indian defense expenditure declined from 3.3% of GDP in 1987 to 2.4% in 1992 and 1993, but rose to 2.8% in 1995 and 3.3% in 1996 and 1997. In the case of Pakistan, expenditure went from 8% in 1987 to 7.4% in 1993, then rebounded to an estimated 8% in 1995, but declined to 5.9% in 1996 and 5.8% in 1997. See SIPRI Yearbook 1997 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997), p. 203; The Military Balance 1998/99 (London: Oxford University Press for the International Institute of Strategic Studies, 1998), p. 297.
10.
10 India increased its defense budget to approximately $11 billion for 1999-2000, while Pakistan raised its defense budget to approximately $3 billion. See www.cbr.gov.pk/Budget for Pakistan's budget, and www.indiamap.com/government for that of India.
11.
11 Subramaniam Swamy, `India's Defense Needs', The Hindustan Times , 12 July 1998.
12.
12 Jayati Ghosh, `The Bomb and the Economy', Frontline , vol. 16, no. 10, 8-21 May 1999.
13.
13 Manzur Ejaz, `Redefining State Priorities', The News (Pakistan), 3 August 1998.
14.
14 Maleeha Lodhi, `Testing Times for Pakistan's Nuclear Diplomacy', The News (Pakistan), 30 July 1998.
15.
15 Molly Moore, `Bomb Tests Wound Indian Economy', The Washington Post , 20 June 1998.
16.
16 Statement by Dr. Bimal Jalan, Governor, Reserve Bank of India on Monetary and Credit Policy for the Year 1999-2000, 20 April 1999 (available at http://www.rbi.org.in/index.dll/70). Recent Indian reports, however, suggest that foreign institutional investment is on the rebound and actually growing. See, `FII Investments Reach All Time High of 9.5 billion US dollars', The Financial Express , 24 June 1999.
17.
17 Rahul Roy-Chaudhury, `Equipping the Navy for War on Land', The Times of India , 13 July 1998; `India Buckles, Test-Firing of Agni Put Off Indefinitely', The Hindustan Times , 21 January 1999.
18.
18 `India Set to Test Fire Long-Range Agni II', The Hindustan Times , 27 December 1998.
19.
19 Dinshaw Mistry, `India's Emerging Space Program', Pacific Affairs , vol. 71, no. 2, Summer 1998, p. 164.
20.
20 `Fernandes: U.S. Nuclear Policy is Hypocritical', The Hindustan Times , 19 June 1998.
21.
21 K. Subrahmanyam, `Past Imperfect: Time for New Nuclearspeak', The Times of India , 3 August 1998.
22.
22 The entire memorandum is available on the Indian Ministry of External Affairs website, The Lahore Declaration (http://www.meadev.gov.in/govt/lahore.htm).
23.
23 Kenneth J. Cooper, `India, Pakistan Agree to Work to Ease Strains', The Washington Post , 22 February 1999.
24.
24 Amit Baruah, The South Asian Nuclear Mess, Frontline , vol. 16, no. 10, 8-21 May 1999.
25.
25 Cooper, note 23 above.
26.
26 Harinder Baweja & Raj Chengappa, `From Breakdown to Détente and Entente Cordiale', India Today , 1 March 1999.
27.
27 When conducting missile tests in April 1999, India postponed testing the shorter-range Dhanush missile because it could be perceived as targeted against Pakistan. See Cherian, note 3 above.
28.
28 Jim Hoagland, `India: The Nuclear Challenge', The Washington Post , 21 February 1999.
29.
29 For a detailed discussion of Washington's position see the interview with US Ambassador to India, Richard Celeste, `Foreign Panorama: Waiting for the Take-Off', The Hindu , 28 January 1999.
30.
30 T. Jayaraman, `Nuclear Issues: A Destabilizing Misadventure', Frontline , vol. 16, no. 4, 13-26 February 1999.
31.
31 `Celeste Defends Demand on Deterrence', The Hindu , 23 January 1999.
32.
32 Strobe Talbott, `Dealing With the Bomb in South Asia', Foreign Affairs , vol. 78, no. 2, March/April 1999, pp. 119-120.
33.
33 `US Denies Reports on Move to Lift Sanctions Against India', Deccan Herald , 24 January 1999.
34.
34 Cooper, note 23 above.
35.
35 Achin Vanaik, `The BJP's Calculations', The Hindu , 30 July 1998.
36.
36 Amit Gupta, `Determining India's Force Structure and Military Doctrine: I Want My MiG', Asian Survey , vol. 35, no. 5, May 1995, p. 456.
37.
37 Samina Ahmed & David Cortright, `Sanctions, Modify Them', The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists , vol. 54, no. 5, September/October 1998, pp. 22-24.
38.
38 Sisir Gupta, `The Indian Dilemma', in Alastair Buchan, ed., A World of Nuclear Powers (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1966), on p. 67.
