Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
1 International Legal Materials , vol. 32, 1993, p. 1525.
2.
2 International Legal Materials , vol. 33, 1994, p. 622.
3.
3 See Y. Dinstein, 1978, `The International Law of Belligrent Occupation and Human Rights', Israel Yearbook on Human Rights , vol. 8, pp. 104-143.
4.
4 A. Roberts & R. Guelff, eds, Documents on the Laws of War , (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989 (2nd ed.)), pp. 43, 55-57.
5.
5 Documents on the Laws of War , ibid, p. 271.
6.
6 M. Shamgar, `The Observance of International Law in the Administered Territories', Israel Yearbook on Human Rights , vol. 1, 1971, pp. 262, 266.
7.
7 On the meaning of this phrase, see Y. Dinstein, `International Humanitarian Law', in I. Cotler & F. P. Eliadis, eds, International Human Rights Law: Theory and Practice , (Montreal: The Canadian Human Rights Foundation 1992), pp. 203-206.
8.
8 See Y. Dinstein, `The Israel Supreme Court and the Law of Belligent Occupation: Deportations', Israel Yearbook on Human Rights , vol. 23, 1993, pp. 1-26.
9.
9 See Y. Dinstein, `The Application of Customary International Law Concerning Armed Conflicts in the National Legal Order', in M. Boethe, ed., National Implementation of International Humanitarian Law , (Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1990), pp. 29, 31-33.
10.
10 M. M. Whiteman, ed., Digest of International Law , (Washington, DC: Department of State Publication), vol. 2, 1963, pp. 1165-1166.
11.
11 State of Israel, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Peace between the State of Israel and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan , p. 9 (Article 3(1), 25 (Annex I(a), Article 1)).
12.
12 Ibid. , p. 10 (Article 3(2)).
13.
13 Ibid. , p. 15.
14.
14 Israel-Egypt, Camp David Framework for Peace in the Middle East, Kitvei Amana (Israel Treaty Series), vol. 25, 1978, pp. 510, 512-514.
15.
15 Treaty of Peace between the State of Israel and the Arab Republic of Egypt, Kitvei Amana , vol. 25, 1979, pp. 695, 698 (Article II).
16.
16 Ibid. , 697 (Article I(1)).
17.
17 Ibid. , id. (Article I(2)).
18.
18 See note 14 above, at pp. 512-514.
19.
19 See note 11 above, at p. 21 (Article 27).
20.
20 It has been suggested that the legal regime might qualify as `pacific occupation'. M. Bothe, `Occupation after Armistice' in R. Bernhardt, ed., Encyclopedia of Public International Law , (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company), vol. 4, 1982, p. 63.
21.
21 See J. Stone, Legal Controls of International Conflicts , (London: Stevens & Son, 1954), p. 721.
22.
22 See note 5 above, at p. 275.
23.
23 See note 2 above, at p. 631.
24.
24 See note 5 above, at p. 294.
25.
25 See note 2 above, at p. 689.
26.
26 See especially H. Hannum & R. B. Lillich, `The Concept of Autonomy in International Law', in Y. Dinstein, ed., Models of Autonomy , (New Brunswick NJ/London: Transaction Books, 1981) pp. 215-254.
27.
27 See especially Interpretation of the Statute of the Memel Territory [Merits ] (1932); M. O. Hudson, ed., World Court Reports , (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, reprinted by Oceana Publications, Dobbs Ferry, NY) vol. 3, 1938, p. 35.