See e.g. D. Senghaas, Abschreckung und Frieden. Studien zur Kritik organisierter Friedlosigkeit, Frankfurt (Europ. Verlagsanstalt) 1968; by the same author: Rüstung und Militarismus, Frankfurt/M. (Suhrkamp) 1972.
2.
For an excellent evaluation of the theoretical and empirical shortcomings of the Innen- versus Aussenleitung controversy with regard to U.S. armament policy, see E. Müller, Rüstungspolitik und Rüstungsdynamik: Fall USA, Baden-Baden (Nomos) 1985. For an earlier contribution to that debate see G. Krell: Rüstungsdynamik und Rüstungskontrolle. Die gesellschaftlichen Auseinandersetzungen um SALT in den USA 1969-1975, 2nd ed., Frankfurt/M. (Haag & Herchen) 1978.
3.
The terminology refers to D. Easton, A Systems Analysis of Political Life, New York (J. Wiley) 1965. See also K. W. Deutsch: The Nerves of Government, New York (Free Press) 1966.
4.
It should be noted here that the early works of Dieter Senghaas who initiated the Innenleitung vs. Aussenleitung debate argue in a much more differentiated way than many of his followers did who used the 'autism' theorem.
5.
See e.g. A. Mechtersheimer, Rüstung und Politik in der Bundesrepublik - MRCA Tornado. Geschichte und Funktion des grössten westeuropäischen Rüstungsprogramms, Bad Honnef (Osang) 1977; P. Schlotter: Rüstwzgspolitik in der Burtdesrepublik. Die Beispiele Starfighter und Phantom, Frankfurt/M. (Campus) 1975.
6.
See, for example, T. Risse-Kappen, 'Fahrplan zur Abrüstung'? Zur INF-Politik der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1970-1983, Frankfurt/M. (HSFK-Forschungsbericht) 1985; S. L. Wasserman: The Neutron Bomb Controversy, New York (Praeger) 1983; E. Müller: Rüstungspolitik, note 2; G. Krell: Rüstungsdynamik, note 2.
7.
See among others, G. Krell/H. J. Schmidt, Der Rüstungswettlauf in Europa, Frankfurt/M. (Campus) 1982; C. S. Gray: The Soviet-American Arms Race, Westmead et.al. (Saxon House & Lexington) 1976.
8.
On the level of analysis problem see the classical study of D. S. Singer, 'The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations', in: K. Knorr/S. Verba (Eds.) The International System, Princeton (Princeton Univ. Pr.) 1961, pp. 77-92.
9.
See for this terminology G. Krell/H. J. Schmidt, Der Rüstungswettlauf, note 10, pp. 157-159.
10.
See e.g. H. J. Schmidt, 'Der konventionelle Rüstungswettlauf in Europa,' in: G. Krell/H. J. Schmidt, note 7, pp. 87-154; H. J. Schmidt/E. Forndran (Eds.): Konventionelle Waffen im Ost-West-Vergleich, Baden-Baden (Nomos) 1986, forthcoming.
11.
See D.N.Schwartz, NATO's Nuclear Dilemmas, Washington (Brookings) 1983, pp. 123-135.
12.
See J. M. Legge, Theater Nuclear Weapons and the NATO strategy of Flexible Response, Santa Monica (Rand Corp.) 1983; S. L. Wasserman: Neutron Bomb Controversy, note 6, pp. 9-18, 30-31.
13.
For details see T. Risse-Kappen, 'Fahrplan', note 6.
14.
See J. M. Legge, Theater Nuclear Weapons, note 12; J. A. Thomson: 'The LRTNF decision: evolution of US theatre nuclear policy 1975-9', International Affaris, Vol. 40, No. 4, 1984, pp. 601-614.
15.
For details see S. L. Wasserman, Neutron Bomb Controversy, note 6.
16.
For a similar account see M. Thee, Military Technology, Military Strategy, and the Arms Race, London-Sidney (Croom Helm) 1986.