This article focuses on the temporalities of visibility that are at stake in the functioning of two mapping monitoring softwares devised by Frontex: Eurosur and Jora. Through a study of border practices and security devices that builds on interviews and direct observation, the article shows that while these two systems elaborate on data and information collected in real time, they work as archives for generating future migration risk scenarios and not for border surveillance purposes. After illustrating in detail the functioning and modes of visualization of Jora and Eurosur, the article takes into account how police officers, Frontex and navies use these devices, and how risk analyses are produced. The article demonstrates that these monitoring mapping devices are sustained by coeval temporalities: the detection of migrants ‘on the spot’ coexists with both a future-oriented temporality and an archival one. The second part of the article analyses the impact that mapping monitoring softwares have on migrant journeys and migrant lives. The article concludes by bringing attention to the ways in which migrants in part strategically appropriate and twist the temporality of security and the field of visibility enacted by these devices.
AasKF (2005) ‘Getting ahead of the game’: Border technologies and the changing space of governance. In: ZureikESalterMB (eds) Global Surveillance and Policing: Borders, Security, Identity. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, 194–214.
2.
AdeyPWhiteheadMWilliamsAJ (2013) From Above: War, Violence, and Verticality. London: Hurst.
AmooreL (2007) Vigilant visualities: The watchful politics of the war on terror. Security Dialogue38(2): 139–156.
5.
AmooreL (2009) Lines of sight: On the visualization of unknown futures. Citizenship Studies13(1): 17–30.
6.
AndersonB (2010) Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography34(6): 777–798.
7.
AnderssonR (2016) Hardwiring the frontier? The politics of security technology in Europe’s ‘fight against illegal migration’. Security Dialogue47(1): 22–39.
8.
AradauC (2010) Security that matters: Critical infrastructure and objects of protection. Security Dialogue41(5): 491–514.
9.
AradauCVan MunsterR (2011) Politics of Catastrophe: Genealogies of the Unknown. Abingdon: Routledge.
10.
AradauCLobo-GuerreroLVan MunsterR (2008) Security, technologies of risk, and the political: Guest editors’ introduction. Security Dialogue39(2/3): 147–154.
11.
BasaranT (2008) Security, law, borders: Spaces of exclusion. International Political Sociology2(4): 339–354.
12.
BellanovaRDuezD (2016) The making (sense) of EUROSUR: How to control the sea borders? In: BossongRCarrapicoH (eds) EU Borders and Shifting Internal Security. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 23–44.
13.
BigoD (2002) Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political27(1_Supp): 63–92.
14.
BigoD (2008) Globalized (in)security: The field and the ban-opticon. In: BigoDTsoukalaA (eds) Terror, Insecurity, Liberty: Illiberal Practices of Liberal Regimes – The (In) Security Games. New York: Routledge, 10–49.
15.
BourneMJohnsonHLisleD (2015) Laboratizing the border: The production, translation and anticipation of security technologies. Security Dialogue46(4): 307–325.
Côté-BoucherK (2017) Of ‘old’ and ‘new’ ways: Generations, border control and the temporality of security. Theoretical Criminology. Epub ahead of print 10 February 2017. DOI: 1362480617690800.
19.
Côté-BoucherKInfantinoFSalterMB (2014) Border security as practice: An agenda for research. Security Dialogue45(3): 195–208.
20.
CowenD (2014) The Deadly Life of Logistics: Mapping Violence in Global Trade. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
21.
De GenovaN (2010) The queer politics of migration: Reflections on ‘illegality’ and incorrigibility. Studies in Social Justice4(2): 100–126.
22.
De GoedeMSimonSHoijtinkM (2014) Performing preemption. Security Dialogue45(5): 411–422.
23.
DijstelbloemHVan ReekumRSchinkelW (2017) Surveillance at sea: The transactional politics of border control in the Aegean. Security Dialogue48(3): 224–240.
24.
EllebrechtS (2014) The European Border Surveillance System EUROSUR: The computerization, standardization and virtualization of border management in Europe. In: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (ed.) OSCE Yearbook 2013. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 231–243.
25.
EwaldF (2002) The return of Descartes’ malicious demon: An outline of a philosophy of precaution. In: BakerTSimonJ (eds) Embracing Risk: The Changing Culture of Insurance and Responsibility. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 273–301.
26.
FoucaultM (1995) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.
27.
GregoryD (2010) Seeing red: Baghdad and the event-ful city. Political Geography29(5): 266–279.
28.
GarelliGTazzioliM (2017) The humanitarian war on smugglers at sea. Antipode. Epub ahead of print 21 November 2017. DOI: 10.1111/anti.12375.
29.
HansenL (2013) Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London & New York: Routledge.
HellerCPezzaniL (2014) Liquid traces: Investigating the deaths of migrants at the EU’s maritime frontier. In: WeizmanE (ed.) Forensis: The Architecture of Public Truth. New York: Sternberg Press, 657–684.
32.
JeandesbozJ (2011) Beyond the Tartar steppe: EUROSUR and the ethics of European border control practices. In: BurgessJPGutwirthS (eds) A Threat Against Europe? Security, Migration and Integration. Brussels: VB Press, 111–132.
33.
MarinL (2011) Is Europe turning into a ‘technological fortress’? Innovation and technology for the management of EU’s external borders: Reflections on FRONTEX and EUROSUR. In: HeldewegMAKicaE (eds) Regulating Technological Innovation. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 131–150.
34.
MezzadraSNeilsonB (2013) Border as Method, or, The Multiplication of Labor. Durham, NC & London: Duke University Press.
35.
MountzA (2010) Seeking Asylum: Human Smuggling and Bureaucracy at the Border. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
36.
MullerBJ (2010) Security, Risk and the Biometric State: Governing Borders and Bodies. London: Routledge.
37.
Pallister-WilkinsP (2016) How walls do work: Security barriers as devices of interruption and data capture. Security Dialogue47(2): 151–164.
38.
RuppertELawJSavageM (2013) Reassembling social science methods: The challenge of digital devices. Theory, Culture & Society30(4): 22–46.
39.
SalterMB (2012) Theory of the / : The suture and critical border studies. Geopolitics17(4): 734–755.
40.
SeiffarthO (2012) The development of the European Border Surveillance System (EUROSUR). In: BurgessJPGutwirthS (eds) A Threat Against Europe? Security, Migration and Integration. Brussels: VB Press, 133–152.
41.
SquireV (2015) Reshaping critical geopolitics? The materialist challenge. Review of International Studies41(1): 139–159.
42.
TazzioliM (2015) Spaces of Governmentality: Autonomous Migrations and the Arab Uprisings. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
43.
TazzioliMWaltersW (2016) The sight of migration: Governmentality, visibility, and Europe’s contested borders. Global Society30(3): 445–464.
44.
WaltersW (2014a) Migration, vehicles, and politics: Three theses on viapolitics. European Journal of Social Theory18(4): 469–488.
45.
WaltersW (2014b) Drone strikes, dingpolitik and beyond: Furthering the debate on materiality and security. Security Dialogue45(2): 101–118.
WilsonDWeberL (2002) Surveillance, risk and preemption on the Australian border. Surveillance & Society5(2): 124–141.
48.
Interview conducted with a Frontex officer during my visit to the International Coordination Centre (ICC) based in the military airport of Pratica di Mare near Rome, 20 October 2015. The ICC is the coordination centre in Italy for Frontex joint operations and the national coordination point of the JORA system.
49.
Interview with the director of the Italian national coordination point of Eurosur, Rome, November 2015.
50.
Interview with the coordinator of European Regional Task Force, Catania, 21 November 2016.
51.
Skype interview with GMV representative, 15 September 2016. (For information regarding GMV’s activities for developing Eurosur, see http://www.gmv.com/en.)
52.
Interview with police officer working at Eurosur at the national coordination point in Rome, 15 November 2016.
53.
Interview with Italian Navy representatives, Navy headquarters, Rome, July 2015.
54.
Interview at Eurosur national coordination point, Rome, November 2014.
55.
Skype interview with researchers at the BlueHub research centre of the European Union, 28 July 2016.
56.
Interview with European Maritime Safety Agency officer, Skype interview, 17 October 2016.
