Embodying algorithmic war: Gender,race,and the posthuman in drone warfare

Abstract

Through a discussion of drone warfare, and in particular the massacre of 23 people in the Uruzgan province in Afghanistan in 2010, I argue that drone warfare is both embodied and embodying. Drawing from posthuman feminist theorists such as Donna Haraway and N Katherine Hayles, I understand the turn toward data and machine intelligence not as an other-than-human process of decisionmaking that deprives humans of sovereignty, but as a form of embodiment that reworks and undermines essentialist notions of culture and nature, biology and technology. Through the intermediation of algorithmic, visual, and affective modes of embodiment, drone warfare reproduces gendered and racialized bodies that enable a necropolitics of massacre. Finally, the category of gender demonstrates a flaw in the supposed perfectibility of the algorithm in removing issues of identity or prejudice from security practices, as well as the perceptions of drone assemblages as comprising sublime technologies of perfect analysis and vision. Gender as both a mode of embodiment and a category of analysis is not removed by algorithmic war, but rather is put into the service of the violence it enables.

Keywords

Affect drones embodiment gender visuality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abé

(2012) Dreams in infrared. Der Spiegel Online, 14 December. Available at: http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/pain-continues-after-war-for-american-drone-pilot-a-872726.html (accesssed 27 May 2015).

Ahmed

(2014 [2004]) The Cultural Politics of Emotion, 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Allinson

(2015) The necropolitics of drones. International Political Sociology 9(2): 113–127.

Amoore

(2009) Algorithmic war: Everyday geographies of the war on terror. Antipode 41(1): 49–69.

Amoore

(2011) Data derivatives: On the emergence of a security risk calculus for our times. Theory, Culture & Society 28(6): 24–43.

Amoore

(2013) The Politics of Possibility: Risk and Security Beyond Probability. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Anderson

(2011) Facing the future enemy: US counterinsurgency doctrine and the pre-insurgent. Theory, Culture & Society 28(7–8): 216–240.

Balsamo

(1996) Technologies of the Gendered Body. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Barkawi

Brighton

(2011) Powers of war: Fighting, knowledge, and critique. International Political Sociology 5: 126–143.

10.

Becker

Shane

(2012) Secret ‘kill list’ proves a test of Obama’s principles and will. New York Times, May 29. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2013/05/29/world/obamas-leadership-in-war-on-al-qaeda.html (accessed 25 August 2015).

11.

Berkowitz

(2014) Drones and the question of ‘the human’. Ethics and International Affairs 28(2): 159–169.

12.

Blanchard

(2011) The technoscience question in feminist international relations: Unmanning the U.S. war on terror. In: Tickner

Sjoberg

(eds) Feminism and International Relations: Conversations about the Past, Present and Future. New York: Oxford University Press, 146–163.

13.

Borch-Jacobsen

(1993) The Emotional Tie: Psychoanalysis, Mimesis, and Affect. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

14.

Braidotti

(2013) The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.

15.

Butler

(1993) Endangered/endangering: Schematic racism and white paranoia. In: Gooding-Williams

(ed.) Reading Rodney King, Reading Urban Uprising. New York: Routledge, 15–22.

16.

Chamayou

(2014) A Theory of the Drone. Trans. Lloyd

. New York: The New Press.

17.

Chatterjee

(2015) The unbearable heaviness of the drone cowboy. Informed Comment, July 13. Available at: http://www.juancole.com/2015/07/unbearable-heaviness-cowboy.html (accessed 4 August 2015).

18.

Cloud

(2011) Anatomy of an Afghan war tragedy. Los Angeles Times, April 10. Available at: http://www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-afghanistan-drone-20110410-story.html (accessed 30 August 2015).

19.

Cockburn

(2015) Kill Chain: The Rise of the High-tech Assassins. London: Verso.

20.

Cole

(2014) ‘We kill people based on metadata’. The New York Review of Books, May 10. Available at: www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2014/may/10/we-kill-people-based-metadata/ (accessed 27 May 2015).

21.

Coward

(2013) Networks, nodes and de-territorialised battlespace: The scopic regime of rapid dominance. In: Adey

Whitehead

Williams

(eds) From Above: War, Violence and Verticality. London: C. Hurst & Co, 95–118.

22.

Cullen

(2011) The MQ-9 Reaper remotely piloted aircraft: Humans and machines in action. PhD Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available at: http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/80249/836824271-MIT.pdf?sequence=2 (accessed 22 August 2015).

23.

Currier

(2015) The kill chain: The lethal bureaucracy behind Obama’s drone war. The Intercept, 15 October. Available at: https://theintercept.com/drone-papers/the-kill-chain/ (accessed 14 December 2015).

24.

Currier

Maass

(2015) Firing blind. The Intercept, 15 October. Available at: https://theintercept.com/drone-papers/firing-blind/ (accessed 13 January 2016).

25.

Daggett

(2015) Drone disorientations. International Feminist Journal of Politics 17(3): 361–379.

26.

Fanon

(1986) Black Skin, White Masks. Trans. Markmann

. New York: Pluto Press.

27.

Feldman

(2011) Empire’s verticality: The Af/Pak frontier, visual culture, and racialization from above. Comparative American Studies 9(4): 325–341.

28.

Gregory

(2011a) From a view to a kill: Drones and late modern war. Theory, Culture & Society 28(7-8): 118–215.

29.

Gregory

(2011b) The everywhere war. The Geographical Journal 177(3): 238–250.

30.

Gregory

(2014) Drone geographies. Radical Philosophy 18(Jan/Feb): 7–19.

31.

Gettinger

(2015) The disposition matrix. Center for the Study of the Drone, 25 April. Available at: http://dronecentre/bard.edu/the-disposition-matrix (accessed 27 May 2015).

32.

Gregory

(2016) Reach From the Sky. Tanner Lectures. Clare Hall, University of Cambridge, 13 January. Video available at: http://sms.cam.ac.uk/media/2175498 (accessed 12 February 2016).

33.

Gregory

(2015) Dismembering the dead: Violence, vulnerability and the body in war. European Journal of International Relations. Epub ahead of print 7 December 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1354066115618244.

34.

Halberstam

(1991) Automating gender: Postmodern feminism in the age of the intelligent machine. Feminist Studies 17(3): 439–460.

35.

Haraway

(1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599.

36.

Haraway

(1991) A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In: Haraway

, Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York and London: Routledge, 149–181.

37.

Haraway

(1994) A Game of cat’s cradle: Science studies, feminist theory, cultural studies. Configurations 2(1): 59–71.

38.

Haraway

(1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets OncoMouse^tm. New York and London: Routledge.

39.

Hayles

(1999) How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

40.

Hayles

(2005) My Mother was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.

41.

Holmqvist

(2013) Undoing war: War ontologies and the materiality of drone warfare. Millennium 41(3): 535–552.

42.

Holmqvist

(2014) Policing Wars: On Military Intervention in the Twenty-first Century. New York: Palgrave.

43.

Kaplan

(2006) Mobility and war: The cosmic view of US ‘air power’. Environment and Planning A 38(2): 395–407.

44.

Kinsella

(2005) Securing the civilian: Sex and gender in the laws of war. In: Barnett

Duvall

(eds) Power and Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 249–272.

45.

Manchanda

(2015) Queering the Pashtun: Afghan sexuality in the homo-nationalist Imaginary. Third World Quarterly 36(1): 130–146.

46.

Mbembe

(2003) Necropolitics. Public Culture 15(1): 11–40.

47.

Neocleous

(2014) War Power, Police Power. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

48.

Pötzsch

(2015) The emergence of iBorder: Bordering bodies, networks and machines. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 33: 101–118.

49.

Puar

(2007) Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

50.

Pugliese

(2013) State Violence and the Execution of Law: Biopolitical Caesurae of Torture, Black Sites, Drones. New York: Routledge.

51.

Scahill

Greenwald

(2014) The NSA’s secret role in the U.S. assassination program. First Look, 10 February. Available at: www.firstlook.org/theintercept/article/2013/02/10/the-nsas-secret-role/ (accessed 15 August 2015).

52.

Shaw

(2012) Intervention – From baseworld to droneworld. Antipode Foundation, August 14. Available at: http://antipodefoundation.org/2012/08/14/intervention-from-baseworld-to-droneworld/ (accessed 2 September 2015).

53.

Shaw

IGR

(2013) Predator empire: The geopolitics of drone warfare. Geopolitics 18(3): 536–559.

54.

Shaw

IGR

Akhtar

(2012) The unbearable humanness of drone warfare in FATA, Pakistan. Antipode 44(4): 1490–1509.

55.

Shepherd

(2006) Veiled references: Constructions of gender in the Bush administration discourse on the attacks on Afghanistan post 9/11. International Feminist Journal of Politics 8(1): 19–41.

56.

Singer

(2009) Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the Twenty-first Century. New York: Penguin Press.

57.

Stahl

(2013) What the drone saw: The cultural optics of the unmanned war. Australian Journal of International Affairs 67(5): 659–674.

58.

Stanford Law School International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic and New York University School of Law Global Justice Clinic (2012) Living Under Drones: Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan. Available at: http://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/default/files/publication/313671/doc/slspublic/Stanford_NYU_LIVING_UNDER_DRONES.pdf (accessed 25 August 2015).

59.

Suchman

(2015) Situational awareness: Deadly bioconvergence at the boundaries of bodies and machines. MediaTropes V(1): 1–24.

60.

Turse

(2013) America’s lethal profiling of Afghan men. The Nation, 18 September. Available at: www.thenation.com/article/americas-lethal-profiling-afghan-men/ (accessed 27 August 2015).

61.

US Department of Justice (n.d.) Lawfulness of a lethal operation directed against a U.S. citizen who is a senior operational leader of al-Qa’ida or an associated force. Available at: www.msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/020413_DOJ_White_Paper.pdf (accessed 15 August 2015).

62.

Walters

(2011) Rezoning the global: Technological zones, technological work and the (un-)making of biometric borders. In: Squire

(ed.) The Contested Politics of Mobility: Borderzones and Irregularity. New York and London: Routledge, 51–73.

63.

Weber

(2015) Keep adding: On kill lists, drone warfare and the politics of databases. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34(1): 107–125.

64.

Wilcox

(2015) Bodies of Violence: Theorizing Embodied Subjects in International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.

65.

Williams

(2011) Enabling persistent presence? Performing the embodied geopolitics of the unmanned aerial vehicle assemblage. Political Geography 30: 381–390.

66.

Zehfuss

(2011) Targeting: Precision and the production of ethics. European Journal of International Relations 17(3): 543–566.

67.

Zucchino

(2012) Stress of combat reaches drone crews. Los Angeles Times, 18 March. Available at: http://articles.latimes.com/2012/mar/18/nation/la-na-drone-stress-20120318 (accessed 5 September 2015).