As part of the counterinsurgency initiatives in Afghanistan and Iraq, military forces have been making payments to civilians in cases of ‘inadvertent’ injury, death and/or damage to property. There are no legal norms governing civilian compensation in war. Rather, military payments are seen as a way to help ‘win’ the hearts and minds of the population. This article examines this turn to military payments, with a focus on US practices and the implications for our understanding of contemporary changes to warfare. I suggest that while monetary payments can alleviate short-term economic need, the lack of legal liability is problematic as it may help amplify the impunity of warring soldiers. The article begins with an overview of the bureaucratic ways in which monetary values are attributed to death and injury. It then turns to consider how military payments reinforce the notion of ‘collateral damage’ that is legitimized in international humanitarian law. Finally, I draw upon theories of the gift, and of the gift of war, to interrogate the affective register in which military payments are made, inserted as they are in narratives of sympathy and condolence that bind the giver and receiver in relations of indebtedness and dependence.
AndersonB (2011) Population and affective perception: Biopolitics and anticipatory action in US counterinsurgency doctrine. Antipode43(2): 205–236.
2.
BellC (2012) Hybrid warfare and its metaphors. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism and Development3(2): 225–247.
3.
BenderB (2006) Condolence payments to Iraqis soar: Military gave nearly $20m to families of civilians. Boston Globe, 8June.
4.
BorosCShawCKehoeK (2014) A few thousand dollars: The price of life for civilians killed in war zones. The Guardian, 16July.
5.
BourdieuP (1997) Marginalia: Some additional notes on the gift. In: SchriftAD (ed.) The Logic of the Gift: Toward an Ethic of Generosity. New York: Routledge, 231–244.
6.
BroomfieldN (2012) For the families of Haditha, this is a matter of honour. The Guardian, 13January.
7.
ButlerJ (2009) Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable?New York: Verso.
8.
Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict (CIVIC) (2007) Adding Insult to Injury: US Military Claims System for Civilians. Washington, DC: CIVIC.
CurrierC (2013) Hearts, minds and dollars: Condolence payments in the drone strike age. ProPublica: Journalism in the Public Interest, 5April.
13.
DefertD (1991) ‘Popular life’ and insurance technology. In: BurchellGGordonCMillerP (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 211–234.
14.
DuffieldM (2007) Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the World of Peoples. Cambridge: Polity.
15.
DuffieldM (2010) The liberal way of development and the development–security impasse: Exploring the global life-chance divide. Security Dialogue41(1): 53–76.
16.
EwaldF (1991) Insurance and risk. In: BurchellGGordonCMillerP (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 197–210.
FassinD (2012) Humanitarian Reason: A Moral History of the Present. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
19.
FergusonK (2007) The gift of freedom. Social Text91: 39–52.
20.
FluriJL (2010) Bodies, bombs and barricades: Geographies of conflict and civilian (in)security. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers36(2): 475–566.
21.
FoucaultM (2003) Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1975–1976, trans. MaceyD. London: Penguin.
22.
FriscolantiM (2011) What’s a life worth?Maclean’s, 10January.
23.
GilbertE (2015) Money as a ‘weapons system’ and the entrepreneurial way of war. Critical Military Studies Epub ahead of print 13 July 2015. DOI: 10.1080/23337486.2015.1063810.
24.
Government Accountability Office (GAO) (2007) Military Operations: The Department of Defense’s Use of Solatia and Condolence Payments in Iraq and Afghanistan. Washington, DC: GAO. Available at: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-07–699 (accessed 26 May 2015).
25.
GregoryD (2008) The biopolitics of Baghdad: Counter-insurgency and the countercity. Human Geography1(1): 6–27.
26.
HallaqWB (2009) Sharī`a: Theory, Practice, Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
HarooniMTaylorR (2012) Afghanistan’s Karzai slams US over massacre. Reuters, 17March.
28.
HedgesCAl-ArianL (2008) Collateral Damage: America’s War Against Iraqi Civilians. New York: Nation Books.
29.
HolewinskiS (2012) Making amends: A new expectation for civilian losses in armed conflict. In: RothbartDKorostelinaKCherkaouiM (eds) Civilians and Modern War: Armed Conflict and the Ideology of Violence. New York: Routledge, 317–333.
30.
HowellA (2010) Sovereignty, security, psychiatry: Liberation and the failure of mental health governance in Iraq. Security Dialogue41(4): 347–367.
JabriV (2010) War and the Transformation of Global Politics. New York: Palgrave.
34.
KennedyD (2006) Of War and Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
KienscherfM (2011) A programme of global pacification: US counterinsurgency doctrine and the biopolitics of human (in)security. Security Dialogue42(6): 517–535.
36.
LangleyP (2007) Uncertain subjects of Anglo-American financialization. Cultural Critique65(Winter): 67–91.
37.
Lobo-GuerreroL (2011) Insuring Security: Biopolitics, Security and Risk. New York: Routledge.
38.
MaussM (1954) The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies, trans. CunnisonI. London: Cohen & West.
39.
MooreT (2009) Anger mounts in Germany over its Afghan airstrike. Time, 10December.
40.
NguyenMT (2012) The Gift of Freedom: War, Debt, and Other Refugee Passages. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
41.
NicholsM (2011) NATO pays Afghans $1.4 million damages in south. Reuters, 14January.
42.
NixonR (2011) Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43.
OsanlooA (2012) When blood has spilled: Gender, honour and compensation in Iranian criminal sanctions. Political and Legal Anthropology Review35(2): 308–326.
44.
OwensP (2003) Accidents don’t just happen: The liberal politics of high-technology ‘humanitarian’ war. Millennium: Journal of International Studies32(3): 595–616.
45.
PetersR (2005) Crime and Punishment in Islamic Law: Theory and Practice from the Sixteenth to the Twenty-first Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
QuinnBBallJTranM (2011) MoD pays £1.3m compensation to Afghans for death, injury and damage. Guardian, 28March.
47.
RamadanHM (2006) On Islamic punishment. In: RamadanHM (ed.) Understanding Islamic Law: From Classical to Contemporary. New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 43–64.
48.
RasmussenMV (2006) The Risk Society at War: Terror, Technology and Strategy in the Twenty-first Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
RazackS (2004) Dark Threats and White Knights: The Somalia Affair, Peacekeeping, and the New Imperialism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
50.
RosenbergMRahimiS (2012) U.S. pays families of Afghan victims in massacre by soldier. New York Times, March25.
51.
RothbartD (2012) The politics of civilian identity. In: RothbartDKorostelinaKCherkaouiM (eds) Civilians and Modern War: Armed Conflict and the Ideology of Violence. New York: Routledge, 115–129.
52.
SitaramanG (2009) Counterinsurgency, the War on Terror, and the laws of war. Virginia Law Review95: 1745–1840.
53.
SnukalKGilbertE (forthcomig in 2015) War, law, jurisdiction, and juridical othering: Private Military Security Contractors and the Nisour Square Massacre. Society & Space. Paper available from the author.
TurseN (2013) Blood money. The Nation, 19September.
60.
United Nations Assistance Mission to Afghanistan (UNAMA) (2010) Afghanistan: Annual Report 2010: Protection of Civilians in Armed Conflict. Kabul: UNAMA, Human Rights Unit.
61.
US Army (2010) Money as a Weapon System Iraq. USF-I J8 SOP, March.
62.
US Army (2011) Money as a Weapon System Afghanistan. USFOR-A Pub 1–06, February.
63.
VirilioP (2000) A Landscape of Events. Trans. RoseJ. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
64.
WallT (2011) Philanthropic soldiers, practical orientalism, and the occupation of Iraq. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power18(5): 481–501.
65.
WeizmanE (2011) The Least of All Possible Evils: Humanitarian Violence from Arendt to Gaza. London: Verso.
66.
WerkhäuserN (2011) Merkel faces questioning over Kunduz airstrike. Deutsche Welle, 10February.
67.
WittJF (2008) Form and substance in the law of counterinsurgency damages. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review41(4): 1455–1482.
68.
ZucchinoD (2005) US condolence payments translate Iraqi’s losses into cash. Seattle Times, 12March.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
