We explore what we refer to as municipal corporate security (MCS) units, a new form of security organization that differs significantly from public police and private contract security. Based on 36 interviews with MCS managers in 16 cities across Canada and in the United States, we examine how in-house security practices developed in private corporations are being transferred to municipal governments. We draw from the sociology of security governance to demonstrate how the Department of Homeland Security funding and policy has shaped MCS in the USA since 2001. The absence of similar centralized funding and policy for MCS in Canada has led to more piecemeal policy transfer, fewer links to federal government or national security, and more focus on nuisance policing than anti-terrorism. We also engage with the sociology of security consumption to argue that governments should be conceived as major buyers of security goods.
9/11 Commission (2004) The 9/11 Commission report: Final report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States. Washington, DC: Government Publishing Office, 22July.
2.
American National Government (2006) Congressional research service report: Fiscal year 2005 Homeland Security Grant Program: State Allocations and Issues for Congressional Oversight.
3.
AradauC (2010) Security that matters: Critical infrastructure and objects of protection. Security Dialogue41(5): 491–514.
4.
BorodziczEGibsonS (2006) Corporate security education: Towards meeting the challenge. Security Journal19(3): 180–195.
5.
ButtonMGeorgeB (1994) Why some organizations prefer in-house to contract security staff. In: GillM (ed.) Crime at Work: Studies in Security and Crime Prevention. Leicester: Perpetuity Press, 201–213.
CarusonKMacManusS (2006) Mandates and management challenges in the trenches: An intergovernmental perspective on homeland security. Public Administration Review66(4): 522–536.
8.
City of Ottawa, Canada, British Columbia (2009) Report to Community and Protective Services Committee and Council: Joint Emergency Preparedness Program (JEPP), 18June.
9.
City of Windsor, Canada, British Columbia (2012) Report to Public Safety Standing Committee: Joint Emergency Preparedness Program (JEPP), 28April.
10.
CrawfordA (2006) Networked governance and the post-regulatory state? Steering, rowing and anchoring the provision of policing and security. Theoretical Criminology10(4): 449–479.
11.
CrawfordA (2006) Policing and security as ‘club goods’: The new enclosures? In: WoodJDupontB (eds) Democracy, Society and the Governance of Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11–138.
12.
DaaseCKesslerO (2007) Knowns and unknowns in the ‘war on terror’: Uncertainty and the political construction of danger. Security Dialogue38(4): 411–434.
13.
de GoedeM (2008) Beyond risk: Premediation and the post-9/11 security imagination. Security Dialogue39(2–3): 155–176.
14.
DupontB (2004) Security in the age of networks. Policing & Society14(1): 76–91.
15.
DupontBGraboskyPShearingC (2003) The governance of security in weak and failing states. Criminal Justice3(4): 331–349.
FosherK (2009) Under Construction: Making Homeland Security at the Local Level. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
GooldBLoaderIThumalaA (2010) Consuming security? Tools for a sociology of security consumption. Theoretical Criminology14(1): 3–30.
20.
GreeneJ (2011) Community policing and homeland security: Problems and prospects for local community security. In: ForstBGreeneJLynchJ (eds) Criminologists on Terrorism and Homeland Security, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 208–244.
21.
JohnstonL (2003) From ‘pluralisation’ to ‘the police extended family’: Discourses on the governance of community policing in Britain. International Journal of the Sociology of Law31(2): 185–204.
22.
JohnstonLShearingC (2003) Governing Security: Explorations in Policing and Justice. New York:Routledge.
23.
JonesTNewburnT (1999) Urban change and policing: Mass private property re-considered. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research7(2): 225–244.
24.
LakoffAKlinenbergE (2010) Of risk and pork: Urban security and the politics of objectivity. Theory and Society39(5): 503–525.
25.
LippertRO’ConnorD (2003) Security assemblages: Airport security, flexible work, and liberal governance. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political28(3): 331–358.
26.
LippertRWalbyKSteckleR (2013) Multiplicities of corporate security: Identifying emerging types and trends. Security Journal26(3): 206–221.
27.
LoaderI (1999) Consumer culture and the commodification of policing and security. Sociology33(2): 373–392.
28.
LoaderI (2000) Plural policing and democratic governance. Social & Legal Studies9(3): 323–345.
29.
LoaderIGooldBThumalaA (2014) The moral economy of security. Theoretical Criminology18(4): 469–488.
30.
LoaderIWalkerN (2007) Civilizing Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
MaguireEKingW (2011) Federal-local coordination in homeland security. In: ForstBGreeneJLynchJ (eds) Criminologists on Terrorism and Homeland Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 322–356.
32.
ManningP (2006) Two case studies of American anti-terrorism. In: WoodJDupontB (eds) Democracy, Society and the Governance of Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 52–85.
MeškoGTomincBSotlarA (2013) Urban security management in the capitals of the former Yugoslav. European Journal of Criminology10(3): 284–296.
35.
MonahanTPalmerN (2009) The emerging politics of DHS fusion centers. Security Dialogue40(6): 617–636.
36.
MuloneM (2013) Researching private security consumption. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research19(4): 401–417.
37.
NallaMMorashM (2002) Assessing the scope of corporate security: Common practices and relationships with other business functions. Security Journal15(3): 7–19.
38.
NewburnT (2001) The commodification of policing: Security networks in the late modern city. Urban Studies38(5–6): 829–848.
39.
NorrisC (2011) There’s no success like failure and failure’s no success at all: Some critical reflections on understanding the global growth of CCTV surveillance. In: DoyleALippertRLyonD (eds) Eyes Everywhere: The Global Growth of Camera Surveillance. London: Routledge, 23–45.
40.
OcqueteauF (1997) Les défis de la sécurité privée [The challenges of private security]. Paris: l’Harmattan.
41.
PawlakP (2009) Network politics in transatlantic homeland security cooperation. Perspectives on European Politics and Society10(4): 560–581.
42.
PetersenK (2014) The politics of corporate security and the translation of national security. In: WalbyKLippertR (eds) Corporate Security in the 21st Century: Theory and Practice in International Perspective. London: Palgrave-Macmillan, 78–94.
43.
RidgeT (2004) Remarks by Secretary of Homeland Security, given at the Technologies for Public Safety in Critical Incident Response Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 27 September. Available at: https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=475392.
44.
SchaferJBurrussGJrGiblinM (2009) Measuring homeland security innovation in small municipal agencies policing in a post-9/11 world. Police Quarterly12(3): 263–288.
45.
ShearingCJohnstonL (2010) Nodal wars and network fallacies: A genealogical analysis of global insecurities. Theoretical Criminology14(4): 495–514.
46.
ShearingCWoodJ (2003) Governing security for common goods. International Journal of the Sociology of Law31: 205–225.
47.
StewartDMorrisR (2009) A new era of policing? An examination of Texas police chiefs’ perceptions of homeland security. Criminal Justice Policy Review20(3): 290–309.
