Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Amid good intentions, such as providing humanitarian assistance to refugees, the use of biometric technology in humanitarian refugee management may entail various risks for the implicated refugee populations. Drawing on insights from science and technology studies, this article introduces a distinction between risks stemming from technology failure and risks stemming from successful uses of biometric technology. The article thus departs from the literature in which technology failure has been in focus by showing that analysing the effect of technology success adds an important dimension to our analysis of the range of risks that may emerge in the context of humanitarian technology uses. The usefulness of this distinction is then illustrated through an analysis of the use by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) of iris recognition in the repatriation of Afghan refugees; besides risks of failure at the implementation stage, risks also emerged once refugees had successfully registered their biometric data with UNHCR. To recognize how humanitarian refugee biometrics produces digital refugees at risk of exposure to new forms of intrusion and insecurity, we need to appreciate how successful technology can have critical implications arising from how technology is constituted in and constitutive of social phenomena.

Keywords

biometrics co-constitution experimentation humanitarian refugee management science and technology studies UNHCR

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aas

(2006) The body does not lie: Identity, risk and trust in techno-culture. Crime Media Culture 2(2): 143–158.

Agamben

(1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Translated by Heller-Roazen

. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Agence France-Presse (AFP) (2003) UN sees results with eye tests to keep track of Afghan refugees. 22 July 2003. Available at: http://reliefweb.int/report/afghanistan/un-sees-results-eye-tests-keep-track-afghan-refugees (accessed 11 July 2014).

Agier

(2011) Managing the Undesirables: Refugee Camps and Humanitarian Government. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

Alterman

(2003) A piece of yourself: Ethical issues in biometric identification. Ethics and Information Technology 5(3): 139–150.

Ansorge

(2012) Registry, print, resistance. Journal of Cultural Economy 5(1): 29–47.

Barnett

(2005) Humanitarianism transformed. Perspectives on Politics 3(4): 723–740.

BBC News (2002) Airport tests passenger eye IDs, 8 February. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1808187.stm (accessed 13 July 2014).

Bennett

(2010) Vibrant Matter. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

10.

Betts

Loescher

Milner

(2012) The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR): The Politics and Practice of Refugee Protection into the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.

11.

BioID (2012) UNHCR refugee identification system. Available at: http://www.bioidtech.co.uk/BioID/Projects.html (accessed 16 July 2014).

12.

Biometric Technology Today (2005) Iris recognition excels in refugee scheme. Biometric Technology Today 13(5): 5

13.

Business Wire (2003) Iridian announces further expansion of United Nations refugee program, 26 March. Available at: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20030326005505/en/Iridian-Announces-Expansion-Iris-Repatriation-Program-Afghan#.U8bRx1YnhvU (accessed 16 July 2014).

14.

Collinson

Duffield

(2013) Paradoxes of Presence. With: Berger C, Felix da Costa D and Sandstrom K. London: Humanitarian Policy Group, Overseas Development Institute.

15.

Connolly

(2013) The ‘new materialism’ and the fragility of things. Millennium – Journal of International Studies 41(3): 399–412.

16.

Coole

(2013) Agentic capacities and capacious historical materialism. Millennium – Journal of International Studies 41(3): 451–469.

17.

Coole

Frost

(2010) Introducing the new materialisms. In: Coole

Frost

(eds) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1–46.

18.

Daugman

(2003) The importance of being random: Statistical principles of iris recognition. Pattern Recognition 36(2): 279–291.

19.

Daugman

(2004) How iris recognition works. IEEE Transactions on Circuit and Systems for Video Technology 14(1): 21–30.

20.

Daugman

(2007) New methods in iris recognition. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man & Cybernetics – Part B: Cybernetics 37(5): 1167–1175.

21.

Dillon

Reid

(2001) Global liberal governance: Biopolitics, security and war. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 30(1): 41–66.

22.

Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) (2003) Biometrics: Who’s watching you? Available at: https://www.eff.org/wp/biometrics-whos-watching-you (accessed 16 July 2014).

23.

European Commission (2012) More safeguards for online privacy rights, 25 November. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/news/business/120125_en.htm (accessed 16 July 2014).

24.

European Commission Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection Department (ECHO) (2005) Support to humanitarian operations to provide, in accordance with UNHCR’s mandate, international protection to refugees and other persons of concern to UNHCR. ECHO/THM/BUD/2005/01000, Humanitarian Aid Decision 23 02 01.

25.

Farraj

(2011) Refugees and the biometric future. Columbia Human Rights Law Review 43(1): 891–942.

26.

Fassin

D’Halluin

(2005) The truth from the body: Medical certificates as ultimate evidence for asylum seekers. American Anthropologist 107(4): 597–608.

27.

Feldman

(2007) Difficult distinctions: Refugee law, humanitarian practice, and political identification in Gaza. Cultural Anthropology 22(1): 129–169.

28.

Floridi

(2005) The ontological interpretation of informational privacy. Ethics and Information Technology 7(4): 185–200.

29.

Fox

(2004) For secure ID, the eyes have it. BiometricGroup.com. Available at: http://www.biometricgroup.com/in_the_news/02_25_04.html (accessed 2012).

30.

Franke

(2009) Refugee registration as foreclosure of the freedom to move. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 27(2): 352–369.

31.

Gelb

Clark

(2013) Identification for development: The biometrics revolution. Working Paper 315. Washington, DC: Centre for Global Development.

32.

Gilroy

(2012) New Notre Dame research raises questions about iris recognition systems. Notre Dame News, 12 July. Indiana: University of Notre Dame.

33.

Government Accountability Office (2008) Defense management: DOD can establish more guidance for biometrics collection and explore broader data sharing. GAO-09–49. Available at: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d0949.pdf (accessed 16 July 2014).

34.

Gulmire

Ganorkar

(2012) Iris recognition using independent component analysis. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering 2(7): 433–437.

35.

Hao

Daugman

Zielinski

(2008) A fast search algorithm for a large fuzzy database. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 3(2): 203–212.

36.

Haraway

(1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599.

37.

Hildebrandt

(2007) Profiling into the future: An assessment of profiling technologies in the context of ambient intelligence. FIDIS Journal on Identity in the Information Society IDIS 1(1): 1–20. Available at: http://www.fidis.net/fileadmin/journal/issues/1–2007/Profiling_into_the_future.pdf (accessed 16 July 2014).

38.

Hildebrandt

(2008) Defining profiling: A new type of knowledge. In: Hildebrandt

Gutwirth

(eds) Profiling the European Citizen. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, 17–45.

39.

Hosein

(2011) Why we Work on Refugee Privacy. London: Privacy International. Available at: https://www.privacyinternational.org/blog/why-we-work-on-refugee-privacy (accessed 11 July 2014).

40.

Hosein

Nyst

(2013) Aiding Surveillance: An Exploration of how Development and Humanitarian Aid Initiatives are Enabling Surveillance in Developing Countries. London: Privacy International. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2326229 (accessed 11 July 2014).

41.

International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) (2013) World Disasters Report: Focus on Technology and the Future of Humanitarian Action. Geneva: IFRC.

42.

IRIN (2003) Pakistan: UNHCR returnee iris testing tops 200,000, 13 October. Available at: http://www.irinnews.org/fr/report/20766/advancedsearch.aspx (accessed 11 July 2014).

43.

Jabri

(2006) War, security and the liberal state. Security Dialogue 37(1): 47–64.

44.

Jacobsen

EKU

(2012) Unique identification: Inclusion and surveillance in the Indian biometric assemblage. Security Dialogue 43(5): 457–474.

45.

Jacobsen

(2010) Making design safe: A hidden history of humanitarian experimentation. Citizenship Studies 14(1): 89–103.

46.

Jacobsen

(2011) Rethinking the ‘Bio’ of Biopolitical Security Through Humanitarian Experimentation. PhD thesis, Lancaster University.

47.

Jasanoff

(1996) Beyond epistemology: Relativism and engagement in the politics of science. Social Studies of Science 26(2): 393–418.

48.

Jasanoff

(ed.) (2004) The idiom of co-production. In Jasanoff

(ed.) States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order. London: Routledge, 1–12.

49.

Kaiser

Spiegel

Henderson

Gerber

(2003) The application of geographic information systems and global positioning systems in humanitarian emergencies. Disasters 27(2): 127–140.

50.

Khan

(2003) UN sees results with eye tests to keep track of Afghan refugees. Afghanistan News, 23 July.

51.

Khaw

(2002) Iris Recognition Technology for Improved Authentication. Version 1.3. SANS Institute. Available at: http://www.sans.org/reading-room/whitepapers/authentication/iris-recognition-technology-improved-authentication-132 (accessed 27 February 2015).

52.

Latour

(2008) When things strike back. British Journal of Sociology 51(1): 107–123.

53.

Long

(2002) UN finds novel way to keep an eye on Afghans. Afghanistan News Centre, 9 November. Available at: http://www.afghanistannewscenter.com/news/2002/november/nov92002.html (accessed 16 July 2014).

54.

Lyon

(2003) Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk, and Digital Discrimination. London: Routledge.

55.

Malkki

(1995) Refugees and exile: From ‘refugee studies’ to the national order of things. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 495–523.

56.

Malkki

(1996) Speechless emissaries: Refugees, humanitarianism, and dehistoricization. Cultural Anthropology 11(3): 377–404.

57.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark (2005) The Regions of Origin Initiative. Copenhagen, Denmark: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark.

58.

Moore

(2003a) The eyes have it. Or how to prevent repatriation ‘recycling’. The Advocacy Project Blogs, Afghan Women’s Network, Afghan Diary no. 5, 22 April–4 May. Available at: http://www.advocacynet.org/blogs/index.php/2003/05/05/afghan_diary_5?blog=24 (accessed 16 July 2014).

59.

Moore

(2003b) From the editorial desk. The Advocacy Project Blogs, Afghan Women’s Network, Afghan Diary no. 6, 8 May–27 May.

60.

Mordini

Massari

(2008) Body, biometrics & identity. Biosocieties 22(9): 488–498.

61.

Muller

(2004) (Dis)qualified bodies: Securitization, citizenship and ‘identity management’. Citizenship Studies 8(3): 279–294.

62.

National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) (2006) The National Biometric Challenge. Available at: http://www.biometrics.gov/Documents/biochallengedoc.pdf (accessed 16 July 2014).

63.

Nelson

(2011) America Identified: Biometric Technology and Society. Boston, MA: MIT Press.

64.

Newton

Phillips

(2006) Meta-analysis of third-party evaluations of iris recognition. Systems, man and cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 39(1): 4–11.

65.

Nichols

(2013) UN deployment of surveillance drone in Congo delayed to December. Reuters, 12 September. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/09/12/us-congo-democratic-un-idUSBRE98B17T20130912 (accessed 16 July 2014).

66.

Petryna

(2009) When Experiments Travel: Clinical Trials and the Global Search for Human Subjects. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

67.

Pugliese

(2010) Biometrics: Bodies, Technologies, Biopolitics. New York & London: Routledge.

68.

Rouvroy

(2008) Privacy, data protection, and the unprecedented challenges of ambient intelligence. Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 2(1): 1–51.

69.

Sandvik

(2011) Blurring boundaries: Refugee resettlement in Kampala – between the formal, the informal, and the illegal. Polar: Political and Legal Anthropology Review 34(1): 11–32.

70.

Sasse

(2007) Red-eye blink, bendy shuffle, and the yuck factor. Security and Privacy 5(3): 78–81.

71.

Savage

Delesgues

Martin

Ulfat

(2007) Corruption perceptions and risks in humanitarian assistance: An Afghanistan case study. HPG Working Paper. London: Overseas Development Institute.

72.

Savithiri

Murugan

(2011) Performance analysis on half iris feature extraction using GW, LBP and HOG. International Journal of Computer Applications 22(2): 27–32.

73.

Shah

(2006) The Body Hunters: Testing New Drugs on the World’s Poorest Patients. New York: New Press.

74.

Smith

(2007) Analysis of Pigmentation and Wavefront Coding^TM Acquisition in Iris Recognition. Master’s thesis, College of Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, US.

75.

Spenser

(2012) New study shows iris recognition is not infallible. Biometric Update, 16 July. Available at: http://www.biometricupdate.com/201207/new-study-shows-iris-recognition-is-not-infallible (accessed 16 July 2014).

76.

Statewatch (2003) UNHCR imposing compulsory iris-scans on returning refugees over six years old. 4 August. Available at:http://www.statewatch.org/news/2003/aug/04afghan.htm (accessed 16 July 2014).

77.

Suganami

(2013) Causation-in-the-world: A contribution to meta-theory of IR. Millennium – Journal of International Studies 41(3): 623–643.

78.

Thieme

(2005) Independent testing of iris recognition technology (IBG). Presentation delivered at the Biometric Consortium Symposium, Hyatt Regency Crystal City, Arlington, VA, 19 September. Available at: http://www.biometrics.org/bc2005/Presentations/Conference/1%20Monday%20September%2019/Mon_Ballroom%20A/RS_Thieme.pdf (accessed 16 July 2014).

79.

Ticktin

(2006) Where ethics and politics meet: The violence of humanitarianism in France. American Ethnologist 33(1): 33–49.

80.

UNHCR (2002a) Afghan ‘recyclers’ under scrutiny of new technology. News Stories, 3 October. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/3d9c57708.html (accessed 16 July 2014).

81.

UNHCR (2002b) Afghanistan: New technology to help deter ‘recycling’. Briefing Notes, 1 October. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/3d998236d.html (accessed 16 July 2014).

82.

UNHCR (2003a) Iris testing of returning Afghans passes 200,000 mark. UN News Story, 10 October. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/3f86b4784.html (accessed 16 July 2014).

83.

UNHCR (2003b) Afghanistan: Iris-testing proves successful. UNHCR Briefing Note, 10 October 2003.

84.

UNHCR (2003c) UNHCR gears up for 2003 Afghan repatriation. UN News Story, 24 February 2003. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/3e5a38924.html (accessed 16 July 2014).

85.

UNHCR (2003d) Pakistan. In The Global Report 2003. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/40c6d7670.html (accessed 16 July 2014).

86.

UNHCR (2003e) Return: Information update, 15 October. Available at: http://www.aims.org.af/services/sectoral/emergency_assistance/refugee/unhcr_return_issues/issue_43.pdf (accessed 16 July 2014).

87.

UNHCR (2006a) Repatriation from Pakistan: A circular for Afghan refugees from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Available at: www.unhcr.org/4497b2b02.pdf (accessed 11 July 2014).

88.

UNHCR (2006b) First Afghan families leave Pakistan as repatriation season resumes. UN News Story, 3 March. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/44085b554.html (accessed 16 July 2014).

89.

UNHCR (2006c) Fingerprints mark new direction in refugee registration. News Stories, 30 November. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/456ede422.html (accessed 16 July 2014).

90.

UNHCR (2007) Agreement between the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, and the UNHCR Governing the Repatriation of Afghan citizens living in Pakistan. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/46c98acd2.pdf (accessed 16 July 2014).

91.

UNHCR (2008) The Use of Cash Grants in UNHCR Voluntary Repatriation Operations. Report of a ‘Lessons Learned’ Workshop. Geneva: UNHCR.

92.

UNHCR (2012a) Modern technology helps meet the needs of refugees in South Sudan. UN News Story, 27 December. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/50dc5a309.html (accessed 16 July 2014).

93.

UNHCR (2012b) Report of the International Conference on the Solutions Strategy for Afghan Refugees to Support Voluntary Repatriation, Geneva, 2–3 May. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/4fdb28a79.pdf (accessed 16 July 2014).

94.

UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN OCHA) (2013) Humanitarianism in the Network Age. Available at: http://www.unocha.org/hina (accessed 11 July 2014).

95.

US Department of State (2004) The United States Refugee Admissions Program: Reforms for a new era of refugee resettlement. 8 July. Available at: http://2001-2009.state.gov/g/prm/refadm/rls/rpts/36958.htm (accessed 16 July 2014).

96.

Van der Ploeg

(1999) The illegal body: ‘EURODAC’ and the politics of biometric identification. Ethics and Information Technology 1(4): 295–302.

97.

Van der Ploeg

(2005) The Machine-Readable Body: Essays on Biometrics and the Informatization of the Body. Maastricht, the Netherlands: Shaker Publishing.

98.

Wajcman

(1995) Feminist theories of technology. In: Jasanoff

Markle

Peterson

Pinch

(eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 189–204.

99.

Woodward

Jr Orlans

Higgins

(2003) Biometrics: Identity Assurance in the Information Age. Berkeley, CA: McGraw-Hill/Osborne.

100.

Zhu

Tan

Wang

(2000) Biometric personal identification based on iris patterns. In: Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. Vol II. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society, 801–804.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

Experimentation in humanitarian locations: UNHCR and biometric registration of Afghan refugees

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material