Harm does not happen to humans in isolation, but rather to worlds composed of diverse beings. This article asks how worlds and the conditions of worldliness should be framed as ‘subjects of security’. It explores three possible pathways: rejecting anthropocentrism; expanding existing ethical categories; and adopting ‘new materialist’ ontology and ethics. Ultimately, it argues for a fusion of the key elements of each of these pathways. This offers the basis for a new concept of harm (‘mundicide’) specifically intended to reflect harms to worlds and the conditions of worldliness. The value of this concept is demonstrated in the light of an empirical example: the ‘Rainforest Chernobyl’ case. The article concludes that a worldly approach is necessary if we are to capture the full enormity of the harms confronted by international security.
AradauC (2010) Security that matters: Critical infrastructure and objects of protection. Security Dialogue41(2): 491–514.
2.
ArendtH (1998) The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BarnettJ (2001) The Meaning of Environmental Security: Ecological Politics and Policy in the New Security Era. London & New York: Zed Books.
4.
BennettJ (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
BevanR (2006) The Destruction of Memory: Architecture at War. London: Reaktion Books.
6.
BirchTH (1993) Moral considerability and universal consideration. Environmental Ethics15(1): 313–332.
7.
BourneM (2012) Guns don’t kill people, cyborgs do: A Latourian provocation for transformatory arms control and disarmament. Global Change, Peace and Security24(1): 141–163.
8.
BraidottiR (2010) The politics of ‘life itself’ and new ways of dying. In: CooleDFrostS (eds) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 201–218.
9.
BuzanBWæverODe WildeJ (1999) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
10.
CalarcoM (2008) Zoographies: The Question of the Animal, from Heidegger to Derrida. New York: Columbia University Press.
11.
CavalieriP (2004) The Animal Question: Why Non-human Animals Deserve Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
ChandlerDHynekN (2011) Critical Perspectives on Human Security. London: Routledge.
13.
CochraneA (2012) From human rights to sentient rights. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy16(5): 655–675.
14.
Commission on Human Security (2003) Human Security Now. New York: Commission on Human Security.
15.
ConnollyW (2011) A World of Becoming. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
16.
CooleDFrostS (2010) Introducing the new materialisms. In: CooleDFrostS (eds) New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 1–43.
17.
CowardM (2009) Urbicide: The Politics of Urban Destruction. London: Routledge.
18.
CudworthEHobdenS (2013) Complexity, ecologism and posthuman politics. Review of International Studies39(3): 643–664.
19.
DasV (2007) Life and Words: Violence and the Descent into the Ordinary. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
20.
DerridaJ (2004) Violence against animals. In: For What Tomorrow . . .: A Dialogue. Trans. RoudinescoEFortJ. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 62–76.
21.
DonzigerSGarrLPageAM (2010) Rainforest Chernobyl: The clash of human rights and bit investor claims: Chevron’s abusive litigation in Ecuador’s Amazon. Human Rights Brief2(2): 8–15.
22.
EckersleyR (2007) Ecological intervention: Prospects and limits. Ethics and International Affairs21(3): 293–317.
23.
HargroveE (1992) Weak anthropocentric intrinsic value. The Monist75(2): 183–207.
24.
LatourB (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25.
LinklaterA (2011) The Problem of Harm in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
LundborgTVaughan-WilliamsN (2011) Resilience, critical infrastructure and molecular security: The excess of ‘life’ in biopolitics. International Political Sociology5(4): 367–383.
27.
MitchellA (2014) International Intervention in a Secular Age: Re-enchanting Humanity?London: Routledge.
28.
NancyJ (1997) The Sense of the World. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
29.
NancyJ (2000) Being Singular Plural. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30.
NordstromC (1997) A Different Kind of War Story. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
31.
NortonBG (1984) Environmental ethics and weak anthropocentrismEnvironmental Ethics6(2): 131–148.
32.
NussbaumM (2006) Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Harvard.
33.
O’NeillJ (2003) The varieties of intrinsic value. In: LightARolstonHHIII (eds) Environmental Ethics: An Anthology. London: Blackwell, pp. 131–142.
34.
O’NeillJ (2013) The price of an apology. Paper presented at the workshop on ‘Public Apologies’, University of York, 6June.
35.
PorteousDSmithSE (2001) Domicide: The Global Destruction of Home. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
36.
ScarryE (1985) The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
ScarryE (2012) Thinking in an Emergency. New York: W.W. Norton.
38.
SingerP (2011) The Expanding Circle: Ethics, Evolution and Moral Progress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39.
TadjbakshSChenoyAM (2007) Human Security: Concepts and Implications. London: Routledge.
40.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (1994) UN Development Report. New York: United Nations.
41.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (1954) Final Act of the Intergovernmental Conference on the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict. The Hague: UNESCO.
42.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2003) Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO.
43.
UrryJ (2005) The complexity turn. Theory, Culture & Society22(1): 1–14.
44.
WalkerRBJ (1997) The subject of security. In: KrauseKWilliamsMC (eds) Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 61–82.
WeizmanE (2011) The Least of all Possible Evils: Humanitarian Violence from Arendt to Gaza. London: Verso.
47.
WestonA (2006) Multi-centrism: A manifesto. The Trumpeter22(1): 69–88.
48.
WoodsK (2006) What does the language of human rights bring to campaigns for environmental justice?Environmental Politics15(4): 572–591.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
