Unlike some other staples of security studies that do not even register the issue, Buzan & Hansen’s (2009) The Evolution of International Security Studies unambiguously identifies ‘Western-centrism’ as a problem. This article seeks to make the point, however, that treating heretofore-understudied insecurities (such as those experienced in the non-West) as a ‘blind spot’ of the discipline may prevent us from fully recognizing the ways in which such ‘historical absences’ have been constitutive of security both in theory and in practice. Put differently, the discipline’s ‘Western-centric’ character is no mere challenge for students of security studies. The ‘historical absence’ from security studies of non-Western insecurities and approaches has been a ‘constitutive practice’ that has shaped (and continues to shape) both the discipline and subjects and objects of security in different parts of the world.
Acharya, Amitav & Barry Buzan, eds, 2009. Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and Beyond Asia. London : Routledge.
2.
Al-Mashat, Abdel Monem, 1985. National Security in the Third World. Boulder, CO: Westview.
3.
Alexander, Ben, 2006. ‘Excluding Archival Silences: Oral History and Historical Absence’, Archival Science6(1): 1-11.
4.
Anderson, Lisa, 2003. Pursuing Truth, Exercising Power: Social Science and Public Policy in the 21st Century. New York: Columbia University Press.
5.
Ayoob, Mohammed, 1995. The Third World Security Predicament: State Making, Regional Conflict, and the International System. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
6.
Azar, Edward E. & Chung-in Moon, 1988. ‘Legitimacy, Integration and Policy Capacity: The "Software" Side of Third World National Security’, in Edward E. Azar & Chung-in Moon, eds, National Security in the Third World: The Management of Internal and External Threats. Aldershot: Edward Elgar (77-101).
7.
Barkawi, Tarak, 2005. Globalization and War. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
8.
Barkawi, Tarak & Mark Laffey, 2006. ‘The Postcolonial Moment in Security Studies’ , Review of International Studies32(2): 329-352.
9.
Bell, Peter F., 1991. ‘The Impact of the United States on the Development of Social Sciences in Thailand’, in John A. Lent, ed. Social Science Models and Their Impact on the Third World, Studies in Third World Societies, no. 45. Williamsburg, VA: Department of Anthropology, College of William and Mary (95-116).
10.
Bilgin, Pinar, 2005. Regional Security in the Middle East: A Critical Perspective . London: Routledge.
11.
Bilgin, Pinar, forthcoming. ‘Security in the Arab World and Turkey: Differently Different’, in Arlene Tickner, David Blaney & Ole Wæver , eds, Thinking the International Differently: Worlding Beyond the West. London: Routledge .
12.
Bilgin, Pinar & Adam David Morton, 2002. ‘Historicising Representations of "Failed States": Beyond the Cold-War Annexation of the Social Sciences?’, Third World Quarterly23(1): 55-80.
13.
Booth, Ken, 2008. Theory of World Security. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
14.
Buzan, Barry, 1991. People, States, and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era, 2nd edn. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
15.
Buzan, Barry & Lene Hansen, 2009. The Evolution of International Security Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Cohn, Carol, 1987. ‘Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society12(4): 687-718.
17.
Elshtain, Jean Bethke, 1987. Women and War. New York: Basic.
18.
Enloe, Cynthia, 1990. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
19.
Enloe, Cynthia, 1996. ‘Margins, Silences and Bottom Rungs: How To Overcome the Underestimation of Power in the Study of International Relations’ , in Ken Booth, Steve Smith & Marysia Zalewski, eds, International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (186-202).
20.
Halperin, Sandra, 1997. In the Mirror of the Third World: Capitalist Development in Modern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21.
Hansen, Lene, 2000. ‘The Little Mermaid’s Silent Security Dilemma and the Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies29(2): 285-306.
22.
Hobson, John M., 2004. The Eastern Origins of Western Civilization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Korany, Bahgat, 1986. ‘Strategic Studies and the Third World: A Critical Evaluation’, International Social Science Journal38(4): 547-562.
24.
Ling, L.H.M., 2002. Postcolonial International Relations: Conquest and Desire Between Asia and the West. New York: Palgrave.
25.
Miller, Steven E., 2010. ‘The Hegemonic Illusion? Traditional Strategic Studies In Context’, Security Dialogue41(6): 639-648.
26.
Milliken, Jennifer & Keith Krause, 2002. ‘State Failure, State Collapse, and State Reconstruction: Concepts, Lessons and Strategies’, Development & Change33(5): 753- 774.
27.
Muppidi, Himadeep, 2004. The Politics of the Global. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
28.
Shah, Nisha, 2010. ‘Security Must Be Defended - Or, the Survival of Security’, Security Dialogue41(6): 631-638.
29.
Sharp, Joanne P., 2009. Geographies of Postcolonialism. London : Sage.
30.
Sheriff, Robin E., 2000. ‘Exposing Silence as Cultural Censorship: A Brazilian Case’, American Anthropologist102(1): 114-132.
31.
Slater, David, 1998. ‘Post-Colonial Questions for Global Times’ , Review of International Political Economy5(4): 647-678.
32.
Tickner, J. Ann, 1992. Gender in International Relations: Feminist Perspectives on Achieving Global Security. New York: Columbia University Press.
33.
Walker, R.B.J., 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
