The South China Sea: ASEAN’s Security Concerns about China

Abstract

This article investigates whether the South China Sea is a source of internal disagreement or unity in ASEAN. It argues that when the focus is on the possibilities of cooperation beyond what is necessary for regional peace and stability, five different member-state groupings can beidentified according to their outlook on the desirable level of US and Chinese regional engagement, their support for a dialogue focusing on Sino-Southeast Asian cooperation and their viewson the scope of a code of conduct. By contrast, when addressing the prospects of coexistence, unity prevails within ASEAN. The memberstates are in agreement that Southeast Asia cannot opt out of the structure of deterrence that is consolidated between the USA and China. In addition, they agree that a practice of consultation and a conservative code of conduct between Southeast Asia and China will contribute to peace and stability by offering assurance that pending disputes in the South China Sea will be settled by the indigenous powers through peaceful means and will remain separate from the outer structure of strategic competition.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ASEAN, 1992. ‘ASEAN Declaration on the South China Sea (1992), Manila, the Philippines, 22 July’; available at http://www.asean.or.id/3634.htm (28 November 2002).

ASEAN, 1995. ‘Recent Developments in the South China Sea (1995), 18 March 1995’ available at http://www.asean.or.id/5232.htm (28 November 2002).

Associated Press (New York), 1999. ‘Malaysia Seeks to Contain Dispute over Spratly Islands’ , 26 July.

Bangkok Post, 2001. ‘Bush Faces Tests in Asian Policy’ , 16 January.

Chanda, Nayan, 1994. ‘Divide and Rule: Beijing Scores Points on South China Sea’, Far Eastern Economic Review (Hong Kong), 11 August.

Collins, Alan, 2000.The Security Dilemmas of Southeast Asia. Basingstoke: Macmillan .

Djalal, Hasjim, 1990. ‘Opening Remarks’ at the Workshop of Managing Potential Conflicts on the South China Sea, Bali, Indonesia, 22 January.

Djalal, Hasjim & Ian Townsend-Gault, 1999. ‘Managing Potential Conflicts in the South China Sea: Informal Diplomacy for Conflict Prevention’, in Chester A. Crocker,Fen Osler Hampson & Pamela Aall, eds, Herding Cats: Multiparty Mediation in a Complex World. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press (107–133).

FBIS Daily Report (Hong Kong AFP), 1997. ‘Malaysia: Further on Prime Minister’s Remarks at ASEAN Meeting’ , FBIS-TAC-97-205, 24 July.

10.

FBIS Daily Report (Hong Kong AFP), 1998. ‘Philippines: Philippines Rejects Chinese Offer To Share Mischief Reef’ , FBIS-EAS-98-218, 6 August.

11.

Hiramatsu, Shigeo, 2001. ‘China’s Advances in the South China Sea: Strategies and Objectives’ , Asia-Pacific Review 8(1): 40–50 .

12.

Huxley, Tim, 1998. ‘A Threat in the South China Sea? A Rejoinder’ , Security Dialogue 29(1): 113–118 .

13.

Jayanth, V., 1996. ‘Military Ties With the ASEAN’ , The Hindu (Madras), 21 September.

14.

Kazmin, Amy, 2002. ‘China Agrees Pact on Disputed Islands’ , Financial Times (London), 5 November.

15.

Lee Lai To, 1999.China and the South China Sea Dialogues. Westport, CT: Praeger .

16.

Leifer, Michael, 1989.ASEAN and the Security of South-East Asia. London: Routledge .

17.

Leifer, Michael, 1999. ‘The ASEAN Peace Process: A Category Mistake’ , The Pacific Review 12(1): 25–38 .

18.

Mitton, Roger, 1999. ‘ASEAN Will Not Fail’ , Asiaweek (New York), 28 July.

19.

Odgaard, Liselotte, 2002.Maritime Security Between China and Southeast Asia: Conflict and Cooperation in the Making of Regional Order. Aldershot: Ashgate .

20.

Pathan, Don & Yindi Loetcharoenchok, 1996. ‘ASEAN Members Express “Strong Concern” Over PRC Claim’ , The Sunday Nation (Bangkok), 21 July.

21.

Second Workshop on Managing Potential Conflicts in the South China Sea, 1991. ‘Joint Statement’ , Bandung, Indonesia, 15–18 July.

22.

South China Morning Post (Hong Kong), 1999. ‘Problem-Solving’ , 27 July.

23.

Tasker, Rodney, 1992. ‘Facing up to Security’ , Far Eastern Economic Review (Hong Kong), 6 August.

24.

Zha Daojiong & Mark J. Valencia, 2001. ‘Mischief Reef: Geopolitics and Implications’ , Journal of Contemporary Asia 31(1): 86–103 .

25.

Zi Hua, 2000. ‘As the Security Situation of East Asia Undergoes Change, the United States Shifts its Security Strategic Focus to the East’ , FBIS Daily Report (Hong Kong Wen Wei Po), FBIS-CHI-2000-0710, 10 July.