* An earlier and longer version of this piece was presented to the conference on the `Research Agenda in International Politics in the Aftermath of September 11th', Swedish Institute of International Affairs, Stockholm, 10-11 April 2002.
2.
and `Meanings of Victory: American Power After the Towers', in Ken Both & Tim Dunne, eds, The Great Terror and Global Order (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002).
3.
and Strobe Talbott & Nayan Chanda, eds, The Age of Terror and the World After 11 September (Oxford: Perseus, 2002).
4.
and International Relations, vol. 16, no. 2, August 2002).
5.
4 Barry Buzan, `The Implications of September 11 for the Study of International Relations', draft manuscript, conference on the `Research Agenda in International Politics in the Aftermath of September 11th', Swedish Institute of International Affairs, Stockholm, 10-11 April 2002.
6.
5 Cox, `American Power Before and After 11 September' (note 1 above), p. 262.
7.
6 The term was used by Tony Blair in a speech to the Texas A & M University, 7 April 2002.
8.
7 See E. H. Carr, The Twenty Years' Crisis (with new introduction by Michael Cox; Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001; 1st edn, 1939).
9.
8 Steven Walt, `International Relations: One World, Many Theories', Foreign Policy, no. 100, Spring 1998, pp. 29-46.
10.
9 I discuss this in Michael Cox, `The Continuing Story of Another Death Foretold: Radical Theory and the New International Relations', in Michael Brecher & David Harvey, eds, Millennial Reflections on International Relations (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, forthcoming).
11.
10 Michael Cox, US Foreign Policy After the Cold War: Superpower Without a Mission? (London: Pinter, for the Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1995).
12.
11 Even that old theorist of US decline has intervened in the new debate about the United States - if only to argue that the USA is no longer in decline; see Paul Kennedy, `The Eagle Has Landed', Financial Times, 2-3 February 2002.
13.
and Anthony J. Blinken, `The False Crisis over the Atlantic', Foreign Affairs, vol. 80, no. 3, May/June 2001, pp. 35-48.
14.
13 See Stewart Patrick, `Don't Fence Me In: The Perils of Going It Alone', World Policy Journal, vol. XVIII, no. 3, Fall 2001, pp. 2-14.
15.
14 Ivo H. Daalder, `Are the United States and Europe Heading for Divorce?', International Affairs, vol. 77, no. 3, July 2001, pp. 553-568.
16.
15 See Martin Walker, `Post 9/11: The European Dimension', World Policy Journal, vol. XVIII, no. 4, Winter 2001/2002, pp. 1-10.
17.
16 Paul Schroeder, `The Risks of Victory: An Historian's Provocation', National Interest, no. 66, Winter 2001/02, p. 22.
18.
17 Rand H. Fishbein, `Echoes from the Barbary Coast', National Interest, no. 66, Winter 2001/02, pp. 47-58.
19.
18 See Lawrence Freedman, `The Third World War?', Survival, vol. 43, no. 4, Winter 2001, pp. 61-87.
20.
1 Le Monde, 12 April 2002.
21.
2 Ibid.
22.
3 Charles de Gaulle, Discours et messages, 1962-1965 [Speeches and Correspondence] (Paris: Plon, 1970), p. 428.
23.
4 Symposium organized by Arte on `Memory and Identity', Genshagen Castle, Berlin, 24-25 September 1999.
24.
5 Jerusalem Post, 5 February 2002.
25.
6 Statement by Igal Rosenberg, one of the organizers of the `Letter of the 12th Graders'; available at http://www.nimn.org/refuse/IgalRosenberg.html.
26.
7 See Tom Segev, `Sans Etat, les Palestiniens ne sortiront pas du stade du terrorisme' [Without a State, the Palestinians Cannot Put Terrorism Behind Them], Le Monde, 3 April 2002.
27.
8 Tom Segev, Le septiéme million: Les Israéliens et le génocide [The Seventh Million: The Israelis and Genocide] (Paris: Liana Levi, 1993), p. 591.
28.
9 Ilan Greilsammer, La nouvelle histoire: Essai sur une nouvelle identité nationale [The New History: Reflections on a New National Identity] (Paris: Gallimard, 1998), p. 493.
