Augustine’s legacy, particularly his view of marriage as being primarily procreative and the sin of mutually desired non-procreative sex, has had a lasting impact on sexual theology and ethics in the Catholic Church. Yet indulging in the Augustinian legacy without reflection and regarding children as the end goal of marriage has led to the unchallenged assumption that children are needed in every marriage. I will examine the problematic concept of matrimony as a necessary producer of children through a variety of ethical lenses – the environmental, the feminist, and the bioethical – and provide an alternative to the procreative norm of sexual expression. By focusing on the unitive aspect of marital love instead of the procreative, partners are liberated to realize their union as fully mature, regardless of biological generation thus addressing ethical concerns and providing a theological alternative to the procreative marriage.
Augustine (1957) Against Julian (trans. SchumacherMathew A.). Washington DC: Catholic University Press.
2.
Augustine (1984) City of God. London: Penguin Books.
3.
Augustine (1997a) On the Excellence of Marriage. In: HunterDG (ed) Marriage and Virginity (Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century). Hyde Park: New City Press.
4.
Augustine (1997b) The Excellence of Widowhood. In: HunterDG (ed) Marriage and Virginity (Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century). Hyde Park: New City Press.
5.
Augustine (1998) Confessions (trans. ChadwickHenry ). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
BrownP (2000) Augustine of Hippo: A Biography, Revised Edition with a New Epilogue. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7.
CahillLS (1986) Sexual ethics, marriage, and divorce. Theological Studies47(1): 102–17.
8.
CahillLS (1996) Sex, Gender, and Christian Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
CahillLS (2005) Theological Bioethics. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
10.
ClarkE (ed) (1996) Saint Augustine on Marriage and Sexuality. Washington DC: Catholic University of America Press.
11.
Code of Canon Law (1918) Washington DC: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.
12.
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (1968) Of Human Life: Humanae Vitae. Washington DC: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.
13.
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (1987) Instruction on Respect for Human Life in Its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation: Replies to Certain Questions of the Day: Donum Vitae. Washington DC: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.
14.
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (2009) The Dignity of a Person: Dignitas personae. Washington DC: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.
15.
DavisD (1997) Genetic dilemmas and the child’s right to an open future. Hastings Center Report27(2): 7–15.
16.
De BeauvoirS (1989) The Second Sex. New York: Vintage Publishers.
17.
FarleyM (2006) Just Love: A Framework for Christian Sexual Ethics. New York: Continuum.
18.
FriedanB (1963) The Feminine Mystique. New York: Norton.
19.
FuchsJ (1983) Personal Responsibility and Christian Morality. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
20.
GillsepieR (2003) Childfree and feminine: understanding the gender identity of voluntarily childless women. Gender and Society17(1): 122–36.
HaasJ (1998) The inseparability of the two meanings of the marriage act. In: McCarthyDG (ed) Reproductive Technologies, Marriage and the Church. Braintree, MA: The Pope John XXIII Center, 89–106.
24.
HallAL (2008) Conceiving Parenthood: American Protestantism and the Spirit of Reproduction. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.
25.
HunterDG (1997) Marriage and Virginity (Works of Saint Augustine: A Translation for the 21st Century). Hyde Park: New City Press.
MasonP (1968) Marriage is the First Step Toward Divorce. New York: P.S. Eriksson.
34.
MbuwayesangoDR (1997) Childlessness and woman-to-woman relationships in Genesis and in african patriarchal society: Sarah and Hagar from a Zimbabwean woman’s perspective (Gen. 16:1-16; 21:8-21). SEMEIA78: 27–36.
35.
McCarthyDG (1998) Pastoral concerns. In: McCarthyDG (ed) Reproductive Technologies, Marriage and the Church. Braintree, MA: The Pope John XXIII Center, 164–82.
36.
McInernyRM (1998) Two visions of human life and procreation: Christian and secular. In: McCarthyDG (ed) Reproductive Technologies, Marriage and the Church. Braintree, MA: The Pope John XXIII Center, 1–12.
37.
McKennyGP (1997) To Relieve the Human Condition: Bioethics, Technology, and the Body. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
ParensEAschA (1999) The disability rights critique of prenatal genetic testing: reflections and recommendations. Special Supplement Hastings Center Report29(5): S1–S22.
40.
PeckE (1976) The Baby Trap. New York: Pinnacle Books.
41.
PiusXI (1930) On Christian Marriage: Casti Connubii. Washington DC: United States Catholic Conference.
42.
RaymondJ (1993) Women as Wombs. San Francisco, CA: Harper Collins.
43.
RichieC (2012) Applying Catholic responsibility to in-vitro fertilization: obligations to the spouse, the body, and the common good. Christian Bioethics18(3): 271–86.
44.
RichieC (2013) Voluntary sterilization for childfree women: understanding patient profiles, evaluating accessibility, examining legislation. The Hastings Center Report43(6): 36–44.
45.
RyanM (1994) Particular sorrows, common challenges specialized infertility treatment and the common good. In: The Annual of the Society of Christian Ethics. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 183–200.
46.
RyanM (2001) The Ethics and Economics of Assisted Reproduction: The Cost of Longing. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
47.
RyanMWhitmoreTD (eds) (1997) The Challenges of Global Stewardship: Roman Catholic Responses. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
48.
SavulescuJKahaneG (2009) The moral obligation to create children with the best chance of the best life. Bioethics23(5): 274–90.
49.
SeraJM (1996) Surrogacy and prostitution: a comparative analysis. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy and Law5(2): 315–42.
50.
SilkaLKieslerS (1977) Couples who choose to remain childless. Family Planning Perspectives9(1): 16–25.
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (2009) Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services 5th Edn. Washington DC: United States Catholic Conference.
53.
VerheyA (2003) Reading the Bible in the Strange World of Medicine. Grand Rapids, MI, Eerdmans.
54.
WagnerW (1998) Public policy recommendations. In: McCarthyDG (ed) Reproductive Technologies, Marriage and the Church. Braintree, MA: The Pope John XXIII Center, 267–308.
