Smallenberg v. Smallenberg (1978), 5 R.F.L. (2d) 315 (B.C.S.C.).
43.
Sulit v. Sulit (1993), 47 R.F.L. (3d) 148 (Ont. U.F.C.).
44.
Schon v. Hall (1991), 35 R.F.L. (3d) 161 (B.C.C.A.).
45.
Thorogood v. Thorogood (1987), 11 R.F.L. (3d) 82 (Ont. U.F.C.).
46.
Tyabji v. Sandana (1994), 2 R.F.L. (4d) 265 (B.C.S.C.).
47.
Voortman v. Voortman (1994), 4 R.F.L. (4d) 250 (O.C.A.).
48.
Weindl v. Weindl (1981), 23 R.F.L. (2d) 14 (Ont. S.C.).
49.
White v. White (1990) 28 R.F.L. (3d) 439 (B.C.S.C.).
50.
Young v. Young (1993), 49 R.F.L. (3d) 117 (S.C.C.).
51.
ArnupKatherine (1989) ‘“Mothers Just Like Others”: Lesbians, Divorce, and Child Custody in Canada’, Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 3(1): 18–32.
52.
ArnupKatherine (1994) ‘Finding Fathers: Artificial Insemination, Lesbians, and the Law’, Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 7(1): 97–115.
53.
ArnupKatherineBoydSusan (1995) ‘Familial Disputes? Sperm Donors, Lesbian Mothers, and Legal Parenthood’, pp. 77–101 in HermanDidiStychinCarl (eds), Legal Inversions.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
54.
BaileyMartha J. (1994) ‘Custody, Access, and Religion: A Comment on Young v. Young and D.P. v. C.S.‘Canadian Family Law Quarterly11: 317–49.
55.
BalaNicholasMiklasSusan (1993) Rethinking Decisions about Children: Is the ‘Best Interests of the Child’ Approach Really in the Best Interests of Children?Toronto: The Policy Research Centre on Children, Youth and Families.
56.
BarrettMichèleMcIntoshMary (1982) The Anti-Social Family.London: Verso.
57.
BhavnaniKum-KumCoulsonMargaret (1986) ‘Transforming Socialist–Feminism: The Challenge of Racism’, Feminist Review23: 81–92.
58.
BoydSusan B. (1989a) ‘Child Custody, Ideologies and Employment’Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 3(1): 111–33.
59.
BoydSusan B. (1989b) ‘From Gender-Specificity to Gender-Neutrality? Ideologies in Canadian Child Custody Law’, pp. 126–57 in SmartCarolSevenhuijsenSelma (eds), Child Custody and the Politics of Gender.London: Routledge.
60.
BoydSusan B. (1990) ‘Potentialities and Perils of the Primary Caregiver Presumption’, Canadian Family Law Quarterly, 7(1): 1–30.
61.
BoydSusan B. (1991) ‘Some Postmodernist Challenges to Feminist Analyses of Law, Family and State: Ideology and Discourse in Child Custody Law’, Canadian Journal of Family Law10: 79–113.
62.
BoydSusan B. (1993) ‘Investigating Gender Bias in Canadian Child Custody Law: Reflections on Questions and Methods’, pp. 169–90 in BrockmanJoanChunnDorothy (eds), Investigating Gender Bias: Law, Courts and the Legal Profession.Toronto: Thompson Educational.
63.
BoydSusan B. (1994) ‘(Re)Placing the State: Family, Law and Oppression’, Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 9(1): 39–73.
64.
BoydSusan (1995) ‘W(h)ither Feminism? The Department of Justice Public Discussion Paper on Custody and Access’, Canadian Journal of Family Law, 12(2): 331–65.
65.
BrophyJulia (1985) ‘Child Care and the Growth of Power: The Status of Mothers in Child Custody Disputes’, pp. 97–116 in BrophyJuliaSmartCarol (eds), Women in Law: Explorations in Law, Family and Sexuality.London: Routledge.
66.
BrophyJulia (1989) ‘Custody Law, Child Care and Inequality in Britain’, pp. 217–42 in SmartCarolSevenhuijsenSelma (eds), Child Custody and the Politics of Gender.London: Routledge.
67.
BrophyJuliaSmartCarol (1981) ‘From Disregard to Disrepute: The Position of Women in Family Law’, Feminist Review9: 3–16.
68.
BusbyKaren (eds) (1990) Equality Issues in Family Law.Winnipeg: Legal Research Institute of the University of Manitoba.
69.
Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women (1994) Child Custody and Access Policy: A Brief to the Federal/Provincial/Territorial Family Law Committee. Ottawa.
70.
CaplanPaulaWilsonJ. (1990) ‘Assessing the Child Custody Assessors’, Reports of Family Law27: 121–34.
71.
CarbyHazel V. (1982) ‘White Woman Listen! Black Feminism and the Boundaries of Sisterhood’, pp. 212–35 in Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, The Empire Strikes Back: Race and Racism in 70s Britain.London: Hutchinson.
72.
CerulloMargaret (1990) ‘Hope and Terror: The Paradox of Gay and Lesbian Politics in the 90s’, Radical America, 24(3): 10–16.
73.
Changing the Landscape: Ending Violence – Achieving Equality (1993) Final Report of the Canadian Panel on Violence against Women. Ottawa.
74.
ChunnDorothy (1992) From Punishment to Doing Good: Family Courts and Socialized Justice in Ontario 1880–1940.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
75.
ClarkLorenne (1990) ‘Wife Battery and Determinations of Custody and Access: A Comparison of U.S. and Canadian Findings’, Ottawa Law Review22: 691–724.
76.
CochranR.F. (1985) ‘The Search for Guidance in Determining the Best Interests of the Child at Divorce: Reconciling the Primary Caretaker and Joint Custody Preferences’, University of Richmond Law Review20: 1–65.
77.
CollinsPatricia Hill (1989) ‘A Comparison of Two Works on Black Family Life’, Signs14: 875–84.
78.
CooperDavinaHermanDidi (1991) ‘Getting “The Family Right”: Legislating Heterosexuality in Britain, 1986–1991’, Canadian Journal of Family Law, 10(1): 41–78.
79.
DavisAngela (1983) ‘The Legacy of Slavery: Standards for a New Womanhood’, pp. 3–29 in DavisAngela, Women, Race and Class.New York: Vintage.
80.
DrakichJanice (1989) ‘In Search of the Better Parent: The Social Construction of Ideologies of Fatherhood’, Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 3(1): 69–87.
81.
Dutton-DouglasMary AnnDionneDorothy (1991) ‘Counselling and Shelter Services for Battered Women’, pp. 113–30 in SteinmanMichael (ed.), Woman Battering: Policy Responses.Cinn: Anderson Publishing Co./Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences.
82.
EagletonTerry (1991) Ideology: An Introduction.London: Verso.
83.
EichlerMargrit (1990) ‘The Limits of Family Law Reform or, The Privatization of Female and Child Poverty’, Canadian Family Law Quarterly, 7(1): 59–84.
84.
FineMichelleAschAdrienne (eds) (1988) Women with Disabilities: Essays in Psychology, Culture and Politics.Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
85.
FinemanM. A. (1989) ‘The Politics of Custody and Gender: Child Advocacy and the Transformation of Custody Decisionmaking in the USA’, pp. 27–50 in SmartCarolSevenhuijsenSelma (eds), Child Custody and the Politics of Gender.London: Routledge.
86.
FinemanM. A. (1991a) The Illusion of Equality: The Rhetoric and Reality of Divorce Reform.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
87.
FinemanM. A. (1991b) ‘Images of Mothers in Poverty Discourses’Duke Law Journal: 274–95.
88.
FinemanM. A. (1992) ‘The Neutered Mother’, University of Miami Law Review46: 653–69.
89.
FinemanM. A. (1995) The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies.New York: Routledge.
90.
FudgeJudy (1989) ‘The Privatization of the Costs of Social Reproduction: Some Recent Charter Cases’, Canadian Journal of Women and Law, 3(1): 246–55.
91.
GaviganShelley A.M. (1988) ‘Law, Gender and Ideology’, pp. 283–95 in BayefskyAnne (ed.), Legal Theory Meets Legal Practice.Edmonton: Academic.
92.
GirdnerLinda K. (1986) ‘Child Custody Determination: Ideological Dimensions of a Social Problem’, pp. 165–83 in SeidmanE.RappaportJ. (eds), Redefining Social Problems.New York: Plenum.
93.
HermanDidi (1994) Rights of Passage: Struggles for Lesbian and Gay Legal Equality.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
94.
HoviusBerend (1993) ‘The Changing Role of the Access Parent’, Canadian Family Law Quarterly, 10(1): 123–85.
95.
KlineMarlee (1989) ‘Race, Racism, and Feminist Legal Theory’, Harvard Women's Law Journal12: 115–150.
96.
KlineMarlee (1993) ‘Complicating the Ideology of Motherhood: Child Welfare Law and First Nation Women’Queen's Law Journal18: 306–42.
97.
LightfootLiz (1994) ‘Men Who Impregnate Lesbians To Be Hunted Down by CSA’The Sunday Times, 3 July, p. 1.
98.
McGrawJ. M.SmithH. A. (1992) ‘Child Sexual Abuse Allegations amidst Divorce and Custody Proceedings: Refining the Validation Process’, Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 1(1): 49–62.
99.
MillbankJenni (1992) ‘Lesbian Mothers, Gay Fathers: Sameness and Difference’, Australian Gay and Lesbian Law Journal2: 21–40.
100.
MillbankJenni (1994) ‘What Do Lesbians Do? Motherhood Ideology, Lesbian Mothers and Family Law’ LL.M. Thesis on microfilm, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
101.
MosoffJudith (1995) ‘Motherhood, Madness, and Law’, University of Toronto Law Journal45: 107–42.
102.
MosoffJudith (forthcoming) ‘“A Jury Dressed in Medical White and Judicial Black”: Mothers with Mental Health Histories’, in BoydSusan B. (ed.), Challenging the Public/Private Divide.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
103.
OlsenFran (1984) ‘The Politics of Family Law’, Law and Inequality, 2(1): 1–19.
104.
PharrSuzanne (1990) ‘Community Organizing and the Religious Right: Lessons from Oregon's Measure Nine Campaign (An Interview with Suzanne Pharr)’, Radical America, 24(4): 67–75.
105.
PolikoffNancy D. (1983) ‘Gender and Child-Custody Determinations: Exploding the Myths’, pp. 182–202 in DiamondIrene (ed.), Families, Politics, and Public Policy: A Feminist Dialogue on Women and the State.New York: Longman.
106.
PulkinghamJane (1994) ‘Private Troubles, Private Solution: Poverty among Divorced Women and the Politics of Support Enforcement and Child Custody Determination’, Canadian Journal of Law and Society, 9(2): 73–97.
107.
RobertsDorothy E. (1993) ‘Racism and Patriarchy in the Meaning of Motherhood’, American University Journal of Gender and the Law1: 1–38.
108.
SackLaura (1992) ‘Women and Children First: A Feminist Analysis of the Primary Caretaker Standard in Child Custody Cases’, Yale Journal of Law and Feminism4: 291–328.
109.
SchudsonC. B. (1992) ‘Antagonistic Parents in Family Courts: False Allegations or False Assumptions about True Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse?’Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 1(2): 113–16.
110.
SmartCarol (1984) The Ties That Bind.London: Routledge.
111.
SmartCarol (1987) ‘“There Is of course the Distinction Dictated by Nature”: Law and the Problem of Paternity’, pp. 98–117 in StanworthMichelle (ed.) Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
112.
SmartCarol (1991) ‘The Legal and Moral Ordering of Child Custody’, Journal of Law and Society, 18(4): 485–500.
113.
SmartCarolSevenhuijsenSelma (eds) (1989) Child Custody and the Politics of Gender.London: Routledge.
114.
SyrtashJohn Tibor (1992) Religion and Culture in Canadian Family Law.Toronto: Butterworths.
115.
TrontoJoan C. (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care.London: Routledge.
116.
UrselJane (1992) Private Lives, Public Policy: 100 Years of State Intervention in the Family.Toronto: Women's Press.
117.
Van PraaghShauna (1993) ‘Book Review: Religion and Culture in Canadian Family Law by John Tibor Syrtash’, McGill Law Journal38: 233–50.
118.
WeitzmanLenore (1985) The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America.New York: Free Press.
119.
WilsonJeffrey (1986/87) ‘The Ripple Effect of the Sexual Abuse Allegation and Representation of the Protecting Parent’, Canadian Family Law Quarterly1: 159–71.
120.
ZarbLise Helene (1994) ‘Allegations of Childhood Sexual Abuse in Custody and Access Disputes: What Care Is in the Best Interests of the Child?’Canadian Journal of Family Law, 12(1): 91–114.
121.
ZhaoY. (1993) ‘The “End of Ideology” Again? The Concept of Ideology in the Era of Postmodern Theory’, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 18(1): 70–85.