AnleuSRMackK (
2023) Constructing remorse: interactional dimensions of finding an emotion. In FieldSTataC (eds) Criminal Justice and the Ideal Defendant in the Making of Remorse and Responsibility.
London:
Bloomsbury Publishing,
49–
71.
2.
FaulknerD (
2010) Criminal Justice and Government at a Time of Austerity.
Criminal Justice Alliance.
3.
FieldS (
2023) The enactment of political cultures in criminal court process: remorse, responsibility and the unique individual before the French cours d'assises. In FieldSTataC (eds) Criminal Justice and the Ideal Defendant in the Making of Remorse and Responsibility.
London:
Bloomsbury Publishing,
191–
212.
4.
GautronV (
2023) Remorse in the French criminal justice system A subterranean influence. In: FieldSTataC (eds) Criminal Justice & the Ideal Defendant in the Making of Remorse and Responsibility.
London:
Bloomsbury Publishing,
29–
47.
5.
HodgsonJ (
2023) The construction of the ideal defendant: comparative understandings of the normalisation of guilt. In FieldSTataC (eds) Criminal Justice and the Ideal Defendant in the Making of Remorse and Responsibility.
London:
Bloomsbury Publishing,
145–
167.
6.
JohansenLV (
2023) Constructing ideal defendants in the Pre-sentence phase: the connection between responsibility and potential remorse. In FieldSTataC (eds) Criminal Justice and the Ideal Defendant in the Making of Remorse and Responsibility.
London:
Bloomsbury Publishing,
73–
92.
7.
MaglioneG (
2023) Punishment and the ‘blind Symbiosis’ of legal and rehabilitation work in the making of the ‘ideal’ defendant. In: FieldSTataC (eds) Criminal Justice and the Ideal Defendant in the Making of Remorse and Responsibility.
London:
Bloomsbury Publishing,
239–
259.
8.
NashCDioso-VillaRPorterL (
2023)
Efficiency over accuracy?: exploring front-line Practitioners’ experiences and opinions on the “guilty plea system”. Social & Legal Studies420–442:
09646639231197778.
9.
PadfieldN (
2023) Looking for the ideal parole applicant?. In FieldSTataC (eds) Criminal justice and the ideal Defendant in the Making of Remorse and responsibility.
London:
Bloomsbury Publishing,
169–
188.
10.
RossmanithK (
2023) Cultural sensitivity training, judicial feelings, and everyday practice: conversations at the edge of research. In FieldSTataC (eds) Criminal Justice and the Ideal Defendant in the Making of Remorse and Responsibility.
London:
Bloomsbury Publishing,
111–
124.
11.
Rothschild-ElyassiGKoehlerJSimonJ (
2018) Actuarial justice. In The Handbook of Social Control,
194–
206.
12.
TataC (
2023) Punishment and the'blind symbiosis’ of legal and rehabilitation work in the making of the'ideal'defendant. In: FieldSTataC (eds) Criminal Justice and the Ideal Defendant in the Making of Remorse and Responsibility.
London:
Bloomsbury Publishing,
213–
237.
13.
Van OorschotI (
2023) The paradoxical uses of ‘Culture’ in judicial assessment of defendant demeanour and remorse. Criminal Justice and the Ideal Defendant in the Making of Remorse and Responsibility.
London: Bloomsbury Publishing,
93–
109.
14.
WeismanR (
2023) Remorse is not enough: disentangling the roles of remorse and insight in the construction of the ideal defendant. In FieldSTataC (eds) Criminal Justice and the Ideal Defendant in the Making of Remorse and Responsibility.
London:
Bloomsbury Publishing,
127–
143.