AasKF (
2012) ‘
The earth is one but the world is not’: criminological theory and its geopolitical divisions. Theoretical Criminology16(
1):
5–
20.
2.
AgozinoB (
2003) Counter-Colonial Criminology: A Critique of Imperialist Reason.
London:
Pluto.
3.
AlivertiACarvalhoHChamberlenA, et al. (
2023) Conclusion: teasing out the criminal question, building a decolonizing horizon. In: AlivertiACarvalhoHChamberlenA, et al. (eds) Decolonising the Criminal Question: Colonial Legacies, Contemporary Problems.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press,
347–
362.
BrownM (
2014) Penal Power and Colonial Rule.
Abingdon:
Routledge.
6.
CarringtonKHoggRScottJ, et al. (eds) (
2018) The Palgrave Handbook of Criminology and the Global South.
London:
Palgrave.
7.
CuneenC (
2011) Postcolonial perspectives in criminology. In: BosworthMHoyleC (eds) What is Criminology?Oxford:
Oxford University Press,
249–
269.
8.
CuneenC (
2018)
Sentencing, punishment and indigenous people in Australia. Journal of Global Indigeneity3(
1):
1–
24.
9.
del OlmoR (
1990) Segunda Ruptura Criminológica.
Caracas:
Universidad Central de Venezuela.
10.
GodfreyBDunstallG (eds) (
2005) Crime and Empire 1840–1940. Criminal Justice in Local and Global Context.
Devon:
Willam.
11.
HoggRBrownD, et al. (
2018) Rethinking penal modernism from the global South: the case of convict transportation to Australia. In: CarringtonKHoggRScottJ (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Criminology and the Global South.
London:
Palgrave Macmillan,
751–
774.
12.
MedinaJ (
2011) Doing criminology in the ‘semi-periphery’ and the ‘periphery’. In: ArberetRSmithCJSXZ (eds) Routledge Handbook of International Criminology.
New York:
Routledge,
13–
24.
13.
O’ReillyC (
2023) Emancipatory pathways or postcolonial pitfalls: Navigating global policing mobilities through the Atlantic Archipelago of Cape Verde. In: Aliverti ACarvalhoHChamberlenA, et al. (eds) Decolonising the Criminal Question: Colonial Legacies, Contemporary Problems.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press,
219–
239.
14.
PorterA (
2018).
Non-State policing, legal pluralism and The Mundane Governance Of ‘Crime’. Syd Law Review40(
4):
445–
467.