BernhagenPBräuningerT (
2005)
Structural power and public policy: A signaling model of business lobbying in democratic capitalism. Polit Stud53(
1):
43–
64.
2.
BrownS (
2019)
Un-boxing vulnerability in protection of the credit consumer. J Business Law7:
511–
533.
3.
CohenJE (
2019) Between Truth and Power: The Legal Constructions of Informational Capitalism. Oxford, UK:
Oxford University Press.
4.
DalyA (
2016) Private Power, Online Information Flows and EU Law: Mind the Gap.
Oxford,
UK:
Hart Publishing.
5.
Fitch-RoyOFairbrassJBensonD (
2020)
Ideas, coalitions and compromise: reinterpreting EU-ETS lobbying through discursive institutionalism. J Eur Pub Pol27(
1):
82–
101.
6.
JasanoffS (
2015) Future Imperfect: Science, Technology and the Imaginations of Modernity. In: JasanoffSKimS-H (eds) Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–33.
7.
MosconV (
2020)
Free circulation of information and online intermediaries – replacing one “value gap” with another. Int Rev Intellect Prop Compet Law51(
8):
977–
982.
8.
PegueraM (
2022)
The platform neutrality conundrum and the digital services act. Int Rev Intell Prop Compet Law53(
5):
681–
684.
9.
QuintaisJPSchwemerSF (
2022)
The interplay between the digital services act and sector regulation: how special is copyright?Eur J Risk Regulat13(
2):
191–
217.
10.
SenftlebenM, et al. (
2018)
The recommendation on measures to safeguard fundamental rights and the open internet in the framework of the EU copyright reform. Eur Intellect Prop Rev40(
3):
149–
163.
11.
StanescuC-GGikayAA (eds) (
2020) Discrimination, Vulnerable Consumers and Financial Inclusion: Fair Access to Financial Services and the Law, 1st editionMilton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY:
Routledge.
