AlixJ (2014) Réprimer la participation au terrorisme. Revue de Science Criminelle et de droit Pénal Comparé4(4): 849–865.
2.
AltELe TheuleM-A (2011) La justice aux prises avec l’éthique et la performance. Pyramides22: 137–159.
3.
BelloniFHodgsonJ (2000) Criminal Injustice: An Evaluation of the Criminal Justice Process in Britain. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
4.
BlackstockJSpronkenTOgorodovaA, et al. (2014) Inside Police Custody: An Empirical Account of Suspects’ Rights in Four Jurisdictions. Cambridge: Intersentia.
5.
BohmRM (2006) “McJustice”: On the McDonaldization of criminal justice. Justice Quarterly23(1): 127–146.
6.
BrownleeI (1998) New labour – new penology? Punitive rhetoric and the limits of managerialism in criminal justice policy. Journal of Law and Society25(3): 313–335.
7.
FieldS (2009) Fair trials and procedural tradition in Europe. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies29(2): 365–387.
8.
FiondaJ (2000) New managerialism, credibility and the sanitisation of criminal justice. In: GreenPRutherfordA (eds) Criminal Policy in Transition. Oxford/Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, pp. 121–140.
9.
GarlandD (2001) The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Late Modernity. Oxford: Clarendon.
10.
GautronV (2014a) La «barémisation» et la standardisation des réponses pénales saisies au travers d’une étude empirique de l’administration de la justice pénale. In: SaynI (ed) Le droit mis en barèmes?Paris: Dalloz, pp. 85–97.
11.
GautronV (2014b) L’impact des préoccupations managériales sur l’administration locale de la justice pénale française. Champ Pénal/Penal FieldXI. Available at: http://champpenal.revues.org/8715 (accessed 21 January 2021).
12.
GautronVRetièreJ-N (2014) Le traitement pénal aujourd’hui: Juger ou gérer?Droit et Sociéte3(88): 579–590.
13.
GlendonMA (2018) Reflection on the comparative study of law in the 21st century. In: Boele-WoelkiKFernandez ArroyoDP (eds) The Past, Present and Future of Comparative Law [Le Passé, Le Présent et Le Futur Du Droit Comparé]. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 3–10.
14.
HodgsonJ (2005) French Criminal Justice: A Comparative Account of the Investigation and Prosecution of Crime in France. Oxford/Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
15.
LangerM (2004) From legal transplants to legal translations: The globalization of plea bargaining and the Americanization thesis in criminal procedure. Harvard International Law Journal45(1): 1–64.
16.
LangerM (2016) Strength, weakness or both? On the endurance of the adversarial-inquisitorial systems in comparative criminal procedure. In: RossJThamanS (eds) Research Handbook on Comparative Criminal Procedure. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 519–536.
17.
LegrandP (1996) How to compare now. Legal Studies16(2): 232–242.
18.
LenoirAGautronV (2014) Les pratiques des parquets face à l’injonction politique de réduire le taux de classement sans suite. Droit et Sociéte3(88): 591–606.
19.
McConvilleMBridgesLHodgsonJ, et al. (1994) Standing Accused: The Organisation and Practices of Criminal Defence Lawyers in Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
20.
McEwanJ (2011) From adversarialism to managerialism: Criminal justice in transition. Legal Studies31(4): 519–546.
21.
McLaughlinEMuncieJHughesG (2001) The permanent revolution: New labour, new public management and the modernization of criminal justice. Criminology and Criminal Justice1(3): 301–318.