Popular and scholarly responses to nonconsensual pornography (colloquially known as ‘revenge porn’) have largely, though not exclusively, focused on cases that fit within the paradigmatic mold of men nonconsensually distributing intimate images with the intention to harass or abuse their female partners/ex-partners. However, several recent studies offer evidence that the dynamics of this act are more diverse than previously assumed. In this article I analyze 49 Canadian legal cases to determine the extent to which those cases that make it to the court level fit within the typical framing and to explore the dynamics of cases laying outside this paradigm. I find that, while a large portion of cases fit the commonly imagined pattern, the case law also includes several cases that complicate dominant framings of nonconsensual pornography. Using intersectional and postmodern feminist theory, I argue that this variety of case contexts necessitates more diverse socio-legal understandings of and responses to nonconsensual pornography.
AikenheadM (2018) Non-consensual disclosure of intimate images as a crime of gender-based violence. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law30(1): 117–142.
2.
AlburyK (2015) Selfies, sexts, and sneaky hats: young people’s understandings of gendered practices of self-representation. International Journal of Communication9: 1734–1745.
3.
AuldA (2017) Sentencing delayed for N.S. teens in intimate photo-sharing case. CTV News31 July.
4.
BaileyJ (2015) A perfect storm: how the online environment, social norms, and law shape girls’ lives. In: BaileyJSteevesV (eds) Egirls, Ecitizens. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, pp. 21–54.
5.
BatesS (2017) Revenge porn and mental health: a qualitative analysis of the mental health effects of revenge porn on female survivors. Feminist Criminology12(1): 22–42.
6.
BloomS (2016) No vengeance for ‘revenge porn’ victims: Unraveling why this latest female-centric, intimate-partner offense is still legal, and why we should criminalize it. Fordham Urban Law Journal42(1): 233–88.
7.
Canadian Press (2017) Sault woman distributed intimate photos of ex with another woman. CBC20 March.
8.
CaseyL (2019) 3 Former St. Michael’s College School students sentenced to 2 years’ probation. Global News19 December.
9.
ChunWHFriedlandS (2015) Habits of leaking: of sluts and network cards. Differences26(2): 1–28.
10.
CitronDFranksMA (2014) Criminalizing revenge porn. Wake Forest Law Review49: 345–391.
11.
CoburnPDeborahCRonaldR (2015) Cyberbullying: Is federal criminal legislation the solution?Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice57(4): 566–579.
12.
CornerL (2017) Chappy launches screenshot alert feature to protect users from revenge porn. Gaytimes17 October.
13.
CossmanBDanielsenDHalleyJ, et al. (2003) Gender, sexuality, and power: is feminist theory enough. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law12(3): 601–637.
14.
CrenshawK (1991) Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review43(6): 1241–1299.
15.
CroftsTKirchengastT (2019) A ladder approach to criminalising revenge pornography. Journal of Criminal Law83(1): 87–103.
16.
CroftsTLeeM (2013) ‘Sexting’, children and child pornography. Sydney Law Review35: 85–106.
17.
Cyber Civil Rights Initiative (2014) End Revenge Porn. Available at: www.cybercivilrights.org. (accessed 7 January 2018)
18.
De AngelisR (2018) Sudbury police say social media posts being used to solicit intimate images without consent. CBC, 19 March.
19.
DodgeA (2016) Digitizing rape culture: Online sexual violence and the power of the digital photograph. Crime, Media, Culture12(1): 65–82.
20.
DodgeA (2019) Nudes are forever: Legal interpretations of digital technology’s impact on ‘revenge porn’. Canadian Journal of Law & Society34(1): 121–143.
21.
DodgeASpencerD (2018) Online sexual violence, child pornography or something else entirely? Police responses to non-consensual intimate image sharing among youth. Social & Legal Studies27(5): 636–657.
22.
DouglasHHarrisBDragiewiczM (2019) Technology-facilitated domestic and family violence: women’s experiences. The British Journal of Criminology59(3): 551–570.
23.
DragiewiczMBurgessJMatamoros-FernándezA, et al. (2018) Technology facilitated coercive control: domestic violence and the competing role of digital media platforms. Feminist MediaOnline First.
24.
EatonAJacobsHRuvalcabaY (2017) Nationwide Online Study of Nonconsensual Porn Victimization and Perpetration. Report, Cyber Civil Rights Initiative, June.
25.
FairbairnJ (2015) Rape threats and revenge porn: Defining sexual violence in the digital age. In: BaileyJSteevesV (eds) Egirls, Ecitizens. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, pp. 229–252.
26.
FilipovicJ (2013) ‘Revenge porn’ is about degrading women sexually and professionally. The Guardian, 28 January.
27.
FitzpatrickK (2018) Former Coronation Street actress gives inspirational message after intimate photos leaked online. Manchester Evening News, 21 January.
28.
FranksMA (2017) ‘Revenge porn’ reform: a wiew from the front lines. Florida Law Review69: 1252–1278.
29.
HallMHearnJ (2018) Revenge Pornography: Gender, Sexuality, and Motivations. New York: Routledge.
30.
HandysideSRingroseJ (2017) Snapchat memory and youth digital sexual cultures: Mediated temporality, duration, and affect. Journal of Gender Studies26(3): 347–360.
31.
HenryNPowellAFlynnA (2017) Not just ‘revenge pornography’: Australians’ experiences of image-based abuse. Report, RMIT University, May.
32.
HillR (2015) Cyber-misogyny: Should ‘revenge porn’ be regulated in Scotland, and if so, how?Scripted12(2): 118–140.
33.
JohnsonM (2015) Digital literacy and digital citizenship: Approaches to girls’ online experiences. In: BaileyJSteevesV (eds) eGirls, eCitizens. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, pp. 339–360.
34.
KaraianL (2014) Policing ‘sexting’: Responsibilization, respectability and sexual subjectivity in child protection/crime prevention responses to teenagers’ digital sexual expression. Theoretical Criminology18: 1–18.
35.
KimmelM (2005) Men, masculinity, and the rape culture. In: BuchwaldEFletcherPRothM (eds) Transforming a Rape Culture. Minneaplois: Milkweed Editions, pp. 139–158.
36.
LangloisGSlaneA (2017) Economies of reputation: the case of revenge porn. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies14(2): 120–138.
37.
LeeMCroftsT (2015) Gender, pressure, coercion, and pleasure: untangling motivations for sexting between young people. British Journal of Criminology55: 454–473.
38.
LenhartAYbarraMPrice-FeeneyM (2016) Nonconsensual Image Sharing. Report, Data and Society Research Institute and Center for Innovative Public Health Research.
39.
LockhartE (2018) Youth navigating sexuality in post-2013 Nova Scotia. In: Annual Conference of the Law and Society Association, Toronto, Canada, 7–10 June 2018.
40.
MacKayW (2012) Respectful and responsible relationships: there’s No App for That. Report, Nova Scotia Task Force on Bullying and Cyberbullying, February.
41.
McGlynnCRackleyEHoughtonR (2017) Beyond ‘revenge porn’: The continuum of image- based sexual abuse. Feminist Legal Studies25: 25–46.
42.
McHughMLivingstonNFordA (2005) A postmodern approach to women’s use of violence: developing multiple and complex conceptualizations. Psychology of Women Quarterly29(3): 323–336.
43.
MillerS (2016) ‘How you bully a girl’: Sexual drama and the negotiation of gendered sexuality in high school. Gender and Society30(5): 721–744.
44.
MishnaFSchwanKJBirzeA, et al. (2018) Gendered and sexualized bullying and cyberbullying: Spotlighting girls and making boys invisible. Youth and Society52(3): 403–426.
45.
MooreD (2008) Feminist criminology: Gain, loss and backlash. Sociology Compass2(1): 48–61.
46.
NikolovN (2018) Women warriors: There’s a global movement forming to fight online misogyny. Mashable, 11 September.
47.
No Place to Hide: The Rehtaeh Parsons Story (2015) [Motion Picture].
48.
PachecoEMelhuishNFiskeJ (2019) Image-based sexual abuse: A snapshot of New Zealand adults’ experiences. Report, Netsafe, NZ, January.
49.
PowellAHenryN (2017) Sexual Violence in a Digital Age. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
RicciardelliRAdorjanM (2019) ‘If a girl’s photo gets sent around, that’s a way bigger deal than if a guy’s photo gets sent around’: Gender, sexting, and the teenage years. Journal of Gender Studies28(5): 563–577.
51.
RingroseJHarveyL (2015) BBM is like match.com: Social networking and the digital mediation of teens’ sexual cultures. In: BaileyJSteevesV (eds) eGirls, eCitizens. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, pp. 199–228.
52.
RingroseJGillRLivingstoneS, et al. (2012) A qualitative study of children, young people and ‘sexting’. Report, NSPCC, May.
53.
RingroseJGillRLivingstoneS, et al. (2013) Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Feminist Theory14(3): 305–323.
54.
SalterMCroftsT (2015) Responding to revenge porn: Challenges to online legal impunity. In: ComellaLTarrantS (eds) New Views on Pornography. Santa Barbara: Praeger, pp. 233–256.
55.
ShariffSDeMartiniA (2015) Defining the legal lines: egirls and intimate images. In: BaileyJSteevesV (eds) eGirls, eCitizens. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, pp.282–307.
56.
SokoloffNDuPontI (2005) Domestic Violence and the Intersections of Race, Class, and Gender. Violence Against Women11(1): 38–64.
57.
SteevesV (2014) Young Canadians in a wired world: Sexuality and romantic relationships in the digital age. Report, MediaSmarts, Ottawa.
58.
ValentiJ (2014) It’s still revenge porn when the victim is a man and the picture is of his penis. The Guardian, 26 June.
59.
WoodlockD (2017) The abuse of technology in domestic violence and stalking. Violence Against Women23(5): 584–602.
