Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Large backlogs of untested sexual assault kits have recently come to light in cities across the United States, fueling public controversies over criminal justice responses to sexual assault and sexual assault forensic services. This article examines these controversies to reveal how kit backlogs have come to matter as a political problem. Using a range of textual data, this article traces the history of the sexual assault kit backlog in New York City and contemporary national campaigns around kit backlogs to examine how sexual assault kit backlogs are being defined as threats to public safety, justice, and healing for victims of crime. Drawing on theoretical insights from actor-network theory, institutional ethnography, and feminist technoscience studies, this article examines the implications of the current framing of kit backlogs for sexual assault survivors and their allies, and current dialogues about criminal justice responses to sexual assault.

Keywords

Actor-network theory feminist technoscience studies institutional ethnography rape kit backlogs sexual assault forensics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexenko

(2012) Injustice for rape victims as thousands of rape kits go unprocessed. The Takeaway [Radio interview]. Available at: http://www.wnyc.org/story/193108-injustice-rape-victims-thousands-rape-kits-go-unprocessed/ (accessed April 2017).

Anonymous (1972) The rape corroboration requirement: Repeal not reform. The Yale Law Journal 81(7): 1365–1391.

Baker

(2009) Indicting DNA profiles is vital in old rape cases. The New York Times. October 19. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/19/nyregion/19dna.html (accessed September 2018).

Bevacqua

(2000) Rape on the Public Agenda: Feminism and the Politics of Sexual Assault. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

Black

Basile

Breiding

, et al. (2011) The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary Report. Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Bronson

(2017) Where are the rape-kit nurses? The New York Times, June 6. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/20/opinion/rape-kit-nurses.html (accessed August 2018).

Callon

(1999) Actor-network theory: The market test. In: Law

Hassard

(eds.) Actor Network Theory and after. Oxford; Malden: Blackwell, pp. 181–195.

Campbell

Patterson

Bybee

, et al. (2009) Predicting sexual assault prosecution outcomes: The role of medical forensic evidence collected by sexual assault nurse examiners. Criminal Justice Behaviour 36(7): 712–727.

Campbell

Patterson

Lichty

(2005) The effectiveness of sexual assault nurse examiner (SANE) programs: A review of psychological, medical, legal, and community outcomes. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse 6(4): 313–329.

10.

Campbell

Shaw

Fehler Cabral

(2015) Shelving justice: The discovery of thousands of untested rape kits in Detroit. City and Community 14(2): 151–166.

11.

Caplan Bricker

(2014) The backlog of 400,000 unprocessed rape kits is a disgrace. New Republic, March, 9. Available at: http://www.newrepublic.com/article/116945/rape-kits-backlog-joe-biden-announces-35-million-reopen-cases (accessed August 2017).

12.

CBS New York (2014) Congress poised to dedicate $41 million to help end backlog of rape kits December 11. Available at: http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2014/12/11/congress-poised-to-dedicate-41-million-to-help-end-backlog-of-rape-kits/ (accessed September 2017).

13.

Corrigan

(2013) Up against a Wall: Rape Reform and the Failure of Success. New York: New York University Press.

14.

Crew

(2012) Striking back: The viability of a civil action against the police for the ‘wrongful unfounding’ of reported rapes. In: Sheehy

(ed.) Sexual Assault Law in Canada: Law, Legal Practice and Women’s Activism. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, pp. 211–239.

15.

Cuyahoga County Office of the Prosecutor (2015) Cuyahoga county sexual assault kit task force. Available at: http://prosecutor.cuyahogacounty.us/en-US/DNA-cold-case-task-force.aspx (accessed May 2017).

16.

Bureau of Justice Statistics (2015) National Crime Victimization Survey, 2010-2014. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.

17.

Dickson

(2014) How the U.S. ended up with 400,000 untested rape kits. U.S. News. September 23. Available at: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/09/23/how-the-u-s-ended-up-with-400-000-untested-rape-kits.html (accessed July 2017).

18.

Doe

(2012) Who benefits from the sexual assault evidence kit? In: Sheehy

(ed.) Sexual Assault Law in Canada: Law, Legal Practice and Women’s Activism. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, pp. 355–388.

19.

Du Mont

Parnis

(2003) Forensic nursing in the context of sexual assault: Comparing the opinions and practices of nurse examiners. Applied Nursing Research 16(3): 173–183.

20.

Du Mont

White

(2007) The uses and impacts of medico-legal evidence in sexual assault cases: A global review. Sexual Violence Research Initiative. Available at: http://www.svri.org/medico.pdf (accessed June 2017).

21.

Du Mont

McGregor

Myhr

, et al. (2000) Predicting legal outcomes from medicolegal findings: An examination of sexual assault in two jurisdictions. Journal of Women’s Health and Law 1(3): 219–233.

22.

Du Mont

Miller

Myhr

(2003) The role of “real rape” and “real victim” stereotypes in the police reporting practices of sexually assaulted women. Violence Against Women 9(4): 466–486.

23.

Du Mont

White

McGregor

(2009) Investigating the medical forensic examination from the perspectives of sexually assaulted women. Social Science and Medicine 68: 774–780.

24.

Fallik

Wells

(2015) Testing previously unsubmitted sexual assault kits: What are the investigative results? Criminal Justice Policy Review 26(6): 598–619.

25.

Feldberg

(1997) Defining the facts of rape: The uses of medical evidence in sexual assault trials. Canadian Journal of Women and Law 9(1): 89–114.

26.

Fry

(2007) How SAFE is New York City? Sexual Assault Services in Emergency Departments. New York, NY: New York City Alliance Against Sexual Assault.

27.

Gialamas

(2010) Backlogs and their impact on the criminal justice system. Meeting conducted as a National Institute of Justice Conference Panel. June. Available at: https://nij.ncjrs.gov/multimedia/transcripts/trans-audio-nijconf2010-backlogs.htm (accessed June 2017).

28.

Hansen

(2010) Testing justice: Prospects for constitutional claims by victims whose rape kits remain untested. Columbia Human Rights Law Review 42(3): 943–992.

29.

Hathaway

(2014) Bill to end rape kit backlog introduced in congress. ABC News. December 4. Available at: http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/12/bill-to-end-rape-kit-backlog-introduced-in-congress/ (accessed June 2017).

30.

Hatmaker

Pinholster

Saye

(2002) A community-based approach to sexual assault. Public Health Nursing 19(2): 124–127.

31.

Human Rights Watch (2009) Testing Justice: The Rape Kit Backlog in Los Angeles City and County. New York: Human Rights Watch.

32.

Johnson

Peterson

Sommers

, et al. (2012) Use of forensic science in investigating crimes of sexual violence: Contrasting its theoretical potential with empirical realities. Violence Against Women 18(2): 193–222.

33.

Joyful Heart Foundation (2015) End the backlog. Available at: http://www.endthebacklog.org (accessed June 2015).

34.

Knecht

(2014) Untested rape kits: The issue, the impact, and the response. [Webinar]. National Center for Victims of Crime. Available at: https://victimsofcrime.org/training/archived-trainings/2014/06/25/default-calendar/untested-rape-kits-the-issue-the-impact-and-the-response (accessed June 2017).

35.

Latour

(2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

36.

Law

(2004) After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. New York: Routledge.

37.

Lothridge

(2009) Making sense of the DNA backlog. Meeting conducted as a National Institute of Justice Conference Panel. June. Available at: https://nij.ncjrs.gov/multimedia/audio-nijconf2009-dna-backlog.htm (accessed June 2017).

38.

Ludwig

(1970) The case for repeal of the sex corroboration requirement in New York. Brooklyn Law Review 36: 1365–1378.

39.

Maloney

(2004) Reps. Green, Maloney, 30 others urge senate to schedule immediate vote on H.R. 3214 to get rapists off the streets [Press Release]. 9 March. Available at: http://maloney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/reps-green-malo…y-30-others-urge-senate-schedule-immediate-vote-hr-3214-get-rapists (accessed April 2017).

40.

Maloney

(2009) Maloney, Heller introduce bill to eliminate rape kit testing backlog nationwide [Press Release]. 19 November. Available at: https://maloney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/maloney-heller-introduce-bill-eliminate-rape-kit-testing-backlog-nationwide (accessed May 2017).

41.

Maloney

(2014) Rep. Maloney announces effort to reduce dangerous national rape kit backlog [Press Release]. January 11. Available at: http://maloney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-maloney-announces-effort-to-reduce-dangerous-national-rape-kit (accessed July 2017).

42.

Martin

(2005) Rape Work: Victims, Gender, and Emotions in Organization and Community Context. New York: Routledge.

43.

Matheson

(2009) Meeting conducted as a National Institute of Justice Conference Panel. June. Available at: https://nij.ncjrs.gov/multimedia/audio-nijconf2009-dna-backlog.htm (accessed July 2017).

44.

McGregor

Du Mont

Myhr

(2002) Sexual assault forensic medical examination: Is evidence related to successful prosecution? Annals of Emergency Medicine 39(6): 639–647.

45.

Mol

(1999) Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In: Law

Hassard

(eds.), Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford; Malden: Blackwell, pp. 74–89.

46.

Mol

(2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.

47.

Moore

(2008) Progress is minimal in clearing DNA cases. The New York Times, October 24. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/25/us/25dna.html (accessed July 2017).

48.

Mulla

(2014) The Violence of Care: Rape Victims, Forensic Nurses, and Sexual Assault Intervention. New York: New York University Press.

49.

Natasha’s Justice Project (2017) Rape kit action project details. Available at: https://natashasjusticeproject.org/rape-kit-action-project/rape-kit-action-project-details/ (accessed July 2017).

50.

National Alliance to End Sexual Violence (2014) 2014 Rape Crisis Center survey. Available at: http://endsexualviolence.org/files/NAESV2014RapeCrisisCenterSurveyFinal.pdf (accessed June 2017).

51.

National Center for Victims of Crime (2012) Sexual assault kit backlogs: Survivor perspectives. Available at: https://victimsofcrime.org/our-programs/dna-resource-center/untested-sexual-assault-kits/backlog-resources (accessed August 2017).

52.

National Center for Victims of Crime (Producer) (2013) New York City’s sexual assault backlog project: Lessons learned [Webinar]. 13 February. Available at: http://victimsofcrime.org/our-programs/dna-resource-center/training/webinar-recordings/february-13-2013 (accessed August 2017).

53.

Nelson

(2011) Making sense of DNA backlogs – Myths vs. reality (Report No. NCJ 232197). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

54.

New York County District Attorney’s Office (2015) District Attorney Vance launches formal application process for $35 million rape kit testing initiative [Press release]. 1 April. Available at: http://manhattanda.org/press-release/district-attorney-vance-launches-formal-application-process-35-million-rape-kit-testin (accessed July 2017).

55.

Noyes

(2014) Rape kit testing bill facing opposition from law enforcement organization. ABC7 News. 16 June. Available at: http://abc7news.com/politics/rape-kit-testing-bill-facing-opposition-from-law-enforcement-organization/118123/ (accessed June 2017).

56.

O’Connor

(2003) Eliminating the rape-kit backlog: Bringing necessary changes to the criminal justice system. UMKC Law Review 72(1): 193–214.

57.

Patterson

Campbell

(2012) The problem of untested sexual assault kits: Why are some kits never submitted to a crime laboratory? Journal of Interpersonal Violence 27(11): 2259–2275.

58.

Peterson

Johnson

Herz

, et al. (2012) Sexual assault backlog study. Report for Department of Justice. Report no. 3-5-12, June 2012. Available at: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/238500.pdf (accessed July 2017).

59.

Pozarycki

(2014) Justice served in rape cases. Times News Weekly.com. 10 January. Available at: http://qns.com/story/2014/01/30/justice_served_in_rape_cold_cases/ (accessed May 2017).

60.

Quinlan

(2017) The technoscientific witness of rape: Contentious histories of law, feminism, and forensic science. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

61.

Rawlings

(2011) Inside the sex-crimes unit prosecuting DSK. Time. 22 June. Available at: http://content.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,2079068,00.html (accessed July 2017).

62.

Rees

(2010) ‘It is not for me to say whether consent was given or not’: Forensic medical examiners’ construction of ‘neutral reports’ in rape cases. Social and Legal 19(3): 371–386.

63.

Sampsel

Szobota

Joyce

, et al. (2009) The impact of sexual assault/domestic violence program on ED care. Journal of Emergency Nursing 35(4): 282–289.

64.

Sievers

Murphy

Miller

(2003) Sexual assault evidence collection more accurate when completed by sexual assault nurse examiners: Colorado’s experience. Journal of Emergency Medicine 29(6): 511–514.

65.

Smith

(2005) Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. New York: Altamira Press.

66.

Smith

(ed.) (2006) Institutional Ethnography as Practice. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

67.

Spohn

(2016) Untested sexual assault kits: A national dilemma. Criminology & public policy 15(2): 551–554.

68.

Stermac

Stripe

(2002) Efficacy of a 2-year-old sexual assault nurse examiner program in a Canadian hospital. Journal of Emergency Nursing 28(1): 18–23.

69.

Strom

Ropero Miller

Jones

, et al. (2009) The 2007 survey of law enforcement forensic evidence processing. Report prepared for U.S. Department of Justice. Report no. 228415. Available at: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/228415.pdf (accessed July 2016).

70.

Telsavaara

Arrigo

(2006) DNA evidence in rape cases and the Debbie Smith act. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 50(5): 487–505.

71.

Tofte

(2011) The year of national rape kit backlog reform. Huffington Post. 20 December. Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sarah-tofte/2011-the-year-of-national_b_799059.html (accessed July 2016).

72.

Tudor

(2017) Coming together for rape kit reform in Oklahoma. Joyful Heart Foundation 12 May. Available at: http://www.endthebacklog.org/blog/coming-together-rape-kit-reform-oklahoma (accessed January 2018).

73.

United States Government Accountability Office (2016) Sexual assault: Information on training, funding, and the availability of forensic examiners. Report no. GAO-16-334. Available at: https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-16-334 (accessed January 2018).

74.

Wells

(2016) Some considerations when making decisions about prioritizing sexual assault kits for forensic testing. Criminology and Public Policy 15(2): 585–592.

75.

White

Du Mont

(2009) Visualizing sexual assault: An exploration of the use of optical technologies in the medico-legal context. Social Science and Medicine 68: 1–8.

76.

Younger

(1971) The requirement of corroboration in prosecutions for sex offenses in New York. Fordham Law Review 40(2): 263–278.

Visions of Public Safety,Justice,and Healing: The Making of the Rape Kit Backlog in the United States

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References