AdamsEM (2012) Errors of fact and law: Race, space, and hockey in Christie v York. University of Toronto Law Journal62(4): 463–497.
2.
AdamsEM (2016) The dean who went to law school: Crossing borders and searching for purpose in North American legal education, 1930-1950. Alberta Law Review54(1): 1–40.
3.
BackhouseC (1996a) Greta Wong Grant: Canada’s first Chinese-Canadian female lawyer. Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice15: 3–46.
4.
BackhouseC (1996b) The white women’s labor laws: Anti-Chinese racism in early twentieth-century Canada. Law and History Review14(2): 315–368.
5.
BackhouseC (2008) Carnal Crimes: Sexual Assault Law, 1900-1975. Toronto: Irwin Law for the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History.
6.
BakerGB (1985) The reconstitution of upper Canadian legal thought in Late-Victorian empire. Law and History Review3(2): 219–292.
7.
BakerGB (2017) Musing and silences of chief justice William Osgoode: Digest marginalia about the reception of imperial law. Osgoode Hall Law Journal54(3): 741–776.
8.
BakerJ (2007) Legal Education in London, 1250-1850: Selden Society Lecture Delivered at University College London, 4 July 2005. London: Selden Society.
9.
BakerJ (2012) Reflections on ‘doing’ legal history. In: MussonAStebbingsC (eds.), Making Legal History: Approaches and Methodologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 7–17.
10.
BakerJH (1990) The Third University of England: The Inns of Court and the Common Law Tradition. London: Selden Society.
11.
BallingerA (2012) A muted voice from the past: The ‘silent silencing’ of Ruth Ellis. Social and Legal Studies21(4): 445–467.
12.
BaronJB (1999) Law, literature, and the problems of interdisciplinarity. Yale Law Journal108(5): 1059–1085.
13.
BartieS (2014) Towards a history of law as an academic discipline. Melbourne University Law Review38(2): 444–481.
14.
BartlettP (1997) Sodomites in the pillory in eighteenth-century London. Social & Legal Studies6(4): 553–572.
15.
BeeverARickettC (2005) Interpretive legal theory and the academic lawyer. Modern Law Review68(2): 320–337.
16.
BenidicksonJ (1990) The Canadian board of railway commissioners: Regulation, policy and legal process at the turn-of-the-century. McGill Law Journal36(4): 1222–1281.
17.
BentonL (2010) A Search for Sovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires 1400-1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
BerlansteinLR (1975) The Barristers of Toulouse in the Eighteenth Century (1740-1793). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
19.
BrandP (2012) Editing law reports and doing legal history: Compatible or incompatible projects? In: MussonAStebbingsC (eds.), Making Legal History: Approaches and Methodologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 18–29.
20.
BreisachE (2007) Historiography: Ancient, Medieval and Modern, 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21.
BrooksCW (1998) Lawyers, Litigation and English Society Since 1450. London: The Hambleton Press.
22.
BrooksCW (2008) Law, Politics and Society in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
BrophyAL (2013) Introducing applied legal history. Law and History Review31(1): 233–240.
24.
CarrEH (1961) What is History?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
CastlesA (1982) An Australian Legal History. Sydney: Law Book Company.
26.
ChaseWC (1982) The American Law School and the Rise of Administrative Government. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
27.
Christie v. The York Corporation (1940) SCR 139.
28.
CollingwoodRG (1946) The Idea of History. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
29.
CosgroveRA (2002) The culture of academic legal history: Lawyers’ history and historians’ law 1870-1930. Cambrian Law Review33: 23–34.
30.
CunliffeE (2011) Murder, Medicine and Motherhood. Oxford: Hart.
31.
DaviesB (2013) Why EU legal history matters – a historian’s response. American University International Law Review28(5): 1337–1356.
32.
DelgadoR (1989) Storytelling for oppositionists and others: A plea for narrative. Michigan Law Review87(8): 2411–2441.
33.
Del MarMLobbanM (eds.) (2014) Legal Theory and Legal History. Volume IV. Farnham: Ashgate.
34.
Desautels-SteinJ (2015) Structuralist legal histories. Law and Contemporary Problems78(1&2): 37–59.
35.
Desautels-SteinJ (2016) A context for legal history, or, this is not your father’s contextualism. American Journal of Legal History56(1): 29–40.
36.
Desautels-SteinJ (2018) The Jurisprudence of Style: A Structuralist History of American Pragmatism and Liberal Legal Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
DouglasSHickeyRWaringE (eds.) (2015) Landmark Cases in Property Law. Oxford: Hart.
38.
EdwardsLF (2009) The People and Their Peace: Legal Culture and the Transformation of Inequality in the Post-Revolutionary South. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
39.
EdwardsLF (2011) The peace: The meaning and production of law in the post-revolutionary United States. University of California Irvine Law Review1(3): 565–585.
40.
EdwardsLF (2012) The history in “critical legal histories”. Law & Social Inquiry37(1): 187–199.
41.
FernandezA (2012) Future(s) of American legal history. University of Toronto Law Journal62(3): 439–452.
42.
FinlayJ (2000) Men of Law in Pre-Reformation Scotland. East Linton: Tuckwell Press.
43.
FisherWWIII (1997) Texts and contexts: The application to American legal history of the methodologies of intellectual history. Stanford Law Review49(5): 1065–1110.
44.
FiskCLGordonRW (2011) “Law as…”: Theory and method in legal history: Foreword. University of California Irvine Law Review1(3): 519–542.
45.
FitzmauriceA (2014) Sovereignty, Property and Empire, 1500-2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
GirardP (2007) Who’s afraid of Canadian legal history?University of Toronto Law Journal57(4): 727–754.
47.
GirardP (2011) Lawyers and Legal Culture in British North America: Beamish Murdoch of Halifax. Toronto: University of Toronto Press for the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History.
48.
GirardP (2013) The DeLloyd Guth visiting lecture in legal history: Writing Canadian legal history: Origins. Manitoba Law Journal37(1): 85–100.
49.
GirardPPhilipsJBrownB (2018) A History of Law in Canada Volume 1: Beginnings to 1866. Toronto: University of Toronto.
50.
GordonRW (1984) Critical legal histories. Stanford Law Review36(1): 57–125.
51.
GordonRW (1990) The politics of legal history and the search for a usable past. Benchmark4(3): 269–282.
52.
GordonRW (2012) “Critical legal histories revisited”: A response. Law & Social Inquiry37(1): 200–215.
53.
HamillSE (2016) Liquor laws, legal continuity, and hotel beer parlours in Alberta, 1924 to c 1939. Histoire Sociale/Social History49(100): 581–602.
54.
HamillSE (2017) Sex, race, and motel guests: Another look at King v Barclay. Osgoode Hall Law Journal54(3): 851–875.
55.
HartHLA (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.
HartogH (1985) Pigs and postivism. Wisconsin Law Review4: 889–935.
57.
HartogH (2012) Introduction to symposium on “critical legal histories”. Law & Social Inquiry37(1): 147–154.
58.
HibbittsBJ (1991) A change of mind: The supreme court and the board of railway commissioners, 1903-1929. University of Toronto Law Journal41(1): 60–113.
59.
HierbautD (2012) Exploring the law in medieval minds: The duty of the legal historian to write the books of non-written law. In: MussonAStebbingsC (eds.), Making Legal History: Approaches and Methodologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 118–130.
HollowayIBuckAR (2003) Why legal history matters. Australian Journal of Legal History7(1): 1–4.
62.
HorwitzMJ (1997) Why is Anglo-American jurisprudence unhistorical?Oxford Journal of Legal Studies17(4): 551–586.
63.
IbbetsonD (2012) Comparative legal history: A methodology. In: MussonAStebbingsC (eds.), Making Legal History: Approaches and Methodologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–145.
64.
JarvisRMColemanPGRichmondGL (1996) Contextual thinking: Why law students (and lawyers) need to know history. The Wayne Law Review42(3): 1603–1615.
65.
KaryJ (2016) Judgments of peace: Montreal’s Jewish arbitration courts, 1914-1976. American Journal of Legal History56(4): 436–489.
66.
KeenanS (2017) Smoke, curtains and mirrors: The production of race through time and title registration. Law and Critique28(1): 87–108.
67.
KelsenH (1949) General Theory of Law and State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
68.
KennedyC (2017) Immanence and transcendence: History’s roles in normative legal theory. Jurisprudence8(3): 557–579.
69.
KercherB (2000) Recovering and reporting Australia’s early colonial case law: The Macquarie project. Law and History Review18(3): 659–665.
70.
KercherB (2004) Why the history of Australian law is not English: Second Alex Castles lecture in legal history. Flinders Journal of Law Reform7(2): 177–204.
71.
KimK (2000) Aliens in Medieval Law: The Origins of Modern Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
72.
KornbluhF (2011) Queer legal history: A field grows up and comes out. Law & Social Inquiry36(2): 537–559.
73.
KoskenniemiM (2004) Why the history of international law today?Rechtsgeschichte4: 61–66.
74.
LakeJ (2014) Privacy, property or propriety: The case of “pretty portraits” in late nineteenth-century America. Law, Culture and the Humanities10(1): 111–129.
75.
LeckeyR (2017) Review of comparative law. Social and Legal Studies26(1): 3–24.
76.
LemmingsD (1990) Gentlemen and Barristers: The Inns of Court and the English Bar, 1680-1730. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
77.
LevineLW (1989) The unpredictable past: Reflections on recent American historiography. The American Historical Review94(3): 671–679.
78.
LobbanM (2012) The varieties of legal history. Clio @ Thémis5: 1–29.
79.
LobbanMDel MarM (eds.) (2016) Law in Theory and History: New Essays on a Neglected Dialogue. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
80.
LombardoPA (2008) Teaching health law – legal archaeology: The stories behind the cases. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics36(3): 589–593.
81.
LunneyM (1997) Sugarman’s legal history. Journal of Legal History18(3): 56–61.
82.
MacIntyreA (2007) After Virtue. 3rd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
83.
NünningV. (2014) Reading Fictions, Changing Minds: The Cognitive Value of Fiction. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.
84.
OldhamJ (2012) The indispensability of manuscript case notes to eighteenth-century barristers and judges. In: MussonAStebbingsC (eds.), Making Legal History: Approaches and Methodologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 30–52.
85.
ParkerG (1974) The masochism of the legal historian. University of Toronto Law Journal24(2): 279–317.
86.
PaulAM (2012) Your brain on fiction. New York Times. 17 March.
87.
PearlstonK (2017) Avoiding the vulva: Judicial interpretations of lesbian sex under the Divorce Act, 1986. Canadian Journal of Law and Society32(1): 37–54.
88.
PetrowS (2000) The future of the past – the developments of Australian legal history. Australian Law Librarian8(1): 4–16.
89.
PhillipsJ (2010) Why legal history matters. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review41(3): 293–316.
90.
PhillipsJ (2013) Book review of Is Eating People Wrong: Great legal cases and how they shaped the world by Allan C Hutchinson. University of Toronto Law Journal63(2): 342–346.
91.
PueWW (1995) Common law legal education in Canada’s age of light, soap and water. Manitoba Law Journal23: 654–688.
92.
PueWWSugarmanS (eds.) (2003) Lawyers and Vampires: Cultural Histories of Legal Professions. Oxford: Hart.
93.
RabbanDM (2003) The historiography of late nineteenth-century American legal history. Theoretical Inquiries in Law4(2): 541–578.
94.
RazJ (1979) The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
95.
RoseJ (2010) Studying the past: The nature and development of legal history as an academic discipline. Journal of Legal History31(2): 101–128.
96.
SchiavoneA (2012) The Invention of Law in the West. Trans, CardenJShugaarA. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
97.
SchultzK (2015) Legal history turns: Topics and optics. Law in Context33(1): 1–20.
98.
SeedP (1995) Ceremonies of Possession in Europe’s Conquest of the New World, 1492-1640. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
99.
SeedP (2001) American Pentimento: The Invention of Indians and the Pursuit of Riches. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
100.
SennM (2012) The methodological debates in German-speaking Europe (1960-1990). In: MussonAStebbingsC (eds.), Making Legal History: Approaches and Methodologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 108–117.
101.
SimpsonAWB (1981) The rise and fall of the legal treatise: Legal principles and the forms of legal literature. The University of Chicago Law Review48(3): 632–679.
102.
SimpsonAWB (1995) Leading Cases in the Common Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
103.
SlatterMIrelandR (1985) Report on legal history in the universities and polytechnics of the United Kingdom. Journal of Legal History6(2): 214–232.
SmithKLMMcLarenJPS (2001) History’s living legacy: An outline of modern historiography of the common law. Legal Studies21(2): 251–324.
106.
SmithSA (2011) The normativity of private law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies31(2): 215–242.
107.
StebbingsC (2006) Legal Foundations of Tribunals in Nineteenth Century England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
108.
SteinbergT (2002) Down to earth; nature, agency, and power in history. American Historical Review107(3): 798–820.
109.
SugarmanD (2011a) Great beyond his knowing: Morton Horwitz’s influence on legal education and scholarship in England, Canada, and Australia. In: HamiltonDWBrophyAL (eds.), Law, Ideology and Methods: Essays in Honour of Morton J Horwitz. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 505–542.
110.
SugarmanD (2011b) A special relationship? American influences on English legal education, c.1870-1965. International Journal of the Legal Profession18(1–2): 7–57.
111.
SugarmanD (2015) From legal biography to legal life writing: Broadening conceptions of legal history and socio-legal scholarship. Journal of Law and Society42(1): 7–33.
112.
SugarmanD (2017) Promoting dialogue between history and socio-legal studies: The contribution of Christopher W Brooks and the ‘legal turn’ in early modern english history. Journal of Law and Society44(supp 1): S37–S60.
ThreedyD (2000) A fish story: Alaska Packers Association v Domenico. Utah Law Review2: 185–222.
115.
TomlinsC (2007) How autonomous is law?Annual Review of Law and Society3: 45–68.
116.
TomlinsC (2011) Review essay – The consumption of history in the legal academy: Science and synthesis, perils and prospects. Journal of Legal Education61(1): 139–165.
117.
TomlinsC (2012a) After critical legal history: Scope, scale structure. Annual Reivew of Law and Social Sciences8: 31–68.
118.
TomlinsC (2012b) What is left of the law and society paradigm after critique? Revisiting Gordon’s “critical legal histories”. Law & Social Inquiry37(1): 155–166.
119.
TomlinsCComaroffJ (2011) “Law as…”: Theory and practice in legal history. University of California Irvine Law Review1(3): 1039–1080.
120.
TuckerE (2017) On writing labour law history: A reconnaissance. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations33: 39–57.
121.
TuckerEMuirJZiffB (eds.) (2012) Property on Trial: Canadian Cases in Context. Toronto: Irwin Law for the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History.
122.
TwiningW (2012) What is the point of legal archaeology?Transnational Legal Theory3(2): 166–172.
123.
VadiV (2017) International law and its histories: Methodological risks and opportunities. Harvard International Law Journal58(2): 311–352.
124.
ValverdeM (1998) Diseases of the Will: Alcohol and the Dilemmas of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
125.
ValverdeM (2012) Everyday Law on the Street: City Governance in an Age of Diversity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
126.
ValverdeM (2015) Chronotopes of Law: Jurisdiction, Scale, and Governance. Abington: Routledge.
127.
ValverdeM (2016) What counts as theory, today: A post-philosophical framework for socio-legal empirical research. Brazilian Journal of Empirical Legal Studies3(1): 172–181.
128.
ValverdeM (2017) Miserology. In: DolovichSNatapoffA (eds.), The New Criminal Justice Thinking. New York: NYU Press, pp. 325–338.
129.
WaitesM (2002) Inventing an ‘lesbian age of consent’? The history of the minimum age for sex between women in the UK. Social and Legal Studies11(3): 323–342.
130.
WalkerB (2010) Race On Trial: Black Defendants in Ontario’s Criminal Courts. Toronto: University of Toronto Press and the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History.
131.
WalkerB (ed.) (2012) The African Canadian Legal Odyssey: Historical Essays. Toronto: University of Toronto Press and the Osgoode Society for Canadian Legal History.
132.
WalshRFox O’MahonyL (2018) Land law, property ideologies and the British-Irish relationship. Common Law World Review47(1): 7–34.
133.
WardT (1999) The sad subject of infanticide: Law, medicine and child murder, 1860-1938. Social and Legal Studies8(2): 163–197.
134.
WardT (2004) Experts, juries and witch-hunts: From Fitzjames Stephen to Angela Cannings. Journal of Law and Society31(3): 369–386.
135.
WarrenCN (forthcoming) History, literature and authority in international law. In: Del MarMMeylerBSternS (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Law and Humanities. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:19395/ (accessed 28 May 2018).
136.
WebberJ (2006) The past and foreign countries. Legal History10(1): 1–11.
137.
WeinribEJ (2007) Can law survive legal education?Vanderbilt Law Review60(2): 401–438.
138.
WilfS (2011) Law/text/past. University of California Irvine Law Review1(3): 543–564.
139.
WilsonNJ (2005) History in Crisis: Recent Directions in Historiography, 2d ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
140.
WoodardC (1967) History, legal history and legal education. Virginia Law Review53(1): 89–121.
141.
WrightsonK (1980) Two concepts of order: Justices, constables and jurymen in seventeenth-century England. In: BrewerJStylesJ (eds.), An Ungovernable People: The English and their Law in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries. London: Hutchison, pp. 21–46.
142.
YirushC (2011a) “Chief princes and owners of all”: Native American appeals to the crown in the early-modern British Atlantic. In: BelmessousS (ed.), Native Claims: Indigenous Law against Empire, 1500-1920. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 129–151.
143.
YirushCB (2011b) Claiming the new world: Empire, law, and indigenous rights in the Mohegan case, 1704-174. Law and History Review29(2): 333–374.
144.
ZiffB (2013) The great Onyx cave cases – A micro-history. Northern Kentucky Law Review40(1): 1–48.