Due to child pornography laws, non-consensual intimate image sharing among youth is subjected to complex legal landscapes in a variety of jurisdictions such as Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. While a growing number of scholars have problematized the use of child pornography charges to respond to these cases, there remains little understanding regarding how the police that enforce these laws conceptualize this issue and how this influences responses to these cases. Drawing from interviews with members of sex crime–related units in police service organizations from across Canada, this article examines how police conceptions of non-consensual intimate image sharing among youth correspond with and/or diverge from legal and critical understandings of this issue. While it is widely understood that online and digitally enabled forms of sexual violence pose unique challenges for police, our research fills a gap in the literature by examining how police themselves understand and respond to these challenges.
AlpertGPMacdonaldJMDunhamRG (2005) Police suspicion and discretionary decision making during citizen stops. Criminology43(2): 407–434.
2.
AngelidesS (2013) Technology, hormones, and stupidity: The affective politics of teenage sexting. Sexualities16(5–6): 665–689.
3.
BaileyJHannaM (2011) The gendered dimensions of sexting: Assessing the applicability of Canada’s child pornography provisions. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law23: 405–441.
4.
BaileyJSteevesV (2015) eGirls, eCitizens. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
5.
BenoitCShumkaLPhillipsRet al. (2014) Issue Brief: Sexual Violence Against Women in Canada. Ottawa: Status of Women Canada.
6.
BettcherTM (2007) Evil deceivers and make-believers: On transphobic violence and the politics of illusion. Hypatia22(3): 43–65. DOI:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2007.tb01090.x.
7.
BlakemoreB (2012) Cyberspace, cyber crime and cyber terrorism. In: AwanIBlakemoreB (eds) Policing Cyber Hate, Cyber Threats and Cyber Terrorism. Surrey: Ashgate, pp. 5–20.
8.
Bluett-BoydNFilebornBQuadaraAet al. (2013) The Role of Emerging Communication Technologies in Experiences of Sexual violence: A New Legal Frontier?Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.
9.
BoydD (2014) It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. New Haven: Yale University Press.
10.
BrollRHueyL (2015) ‘Just being mean to somebody isn’t a police matter’: Police perspectives on policing cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence14(2): 155–176.
11.
CalvertC (2000) Voyeur Nation: Media, Privacy and Peering In Modern Culture. Boulder: Basic Books.
12.
CampbellJLQuincyCOssermanJet al. (2013) Coding in-depth semistructured interviews problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods and Research42(3): 294–320.
CareyJWMorganMOxtobyMJ (1996) Intercoder agreement in analysis of responses to open-ended interview questions: Examples from tuberculosis research. Field Methods8(3): 1–5.
15.
CarringtonPJSchulenbergJL (2008) Structuring police discretion: The effect on referrals to youth court. Criminal Justice Policy Review19(3): 349–367.
CCSO Cybercrime Working Group (2013) Report to the Federal/Provincial/Territorial Ministers Responsible for Justice and Public Safety: Cyberbullying and the Non-consensual Distribution of Intimate Images. Ottawa: Department of Justice Canada.
18.
CitronDKFranksMA (2014) Criminalizing revenge porn. Wake Forest Law Review49: 345–391.
19.
ChanJ (1996) Changing police culture. British Journal of Criminology36(1): 109–134.
20.
ChanJBLDeveryCDoranS (2003) Fair Cop: Learning the Art of Policing. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
21.
CharmazK (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
22.
ChristieN (1986) An ideal victim. In: FattahE (ed) From Crime Policy to Victim Policy: Reinventing the justice system. London: MacMillan, pp. 17–30.
23.
CoburnPConnollyDRoeschR (2015) Cyberbullying: Is federal criminal legislation the solution?Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice57(4): 566–579.
EricsonRV (1982) Reproducing Order: A Study of Police Patrol Work. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
27.
FairbairnJBivensRDawsonM (2013) Sexual Violence and Social Media: Building a Framework for Prevention. Ottawa: OCTEVAW and Crime Prevention Ottawa.
28.
FairbairnJSpencerD (2017) Virtualized violence and anonymous juries: Unpacking steubenville’s “big red” sexual assault case and the role of social media. Feminist Criminology, Online First: 1557085116687032. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085116687032
FriedmanJValentiJ (2008) Yes Means Yes!: Visions of Female Sexual Power and A World Without Rape (unknown edition). Berkeley, CA: Seal Press.
31.
FlickU (2014) An Introduction to Qualitative Research, 5th ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
32.
GoldsteinJ (1960) Police discretion not to invoke the criminal process: Low-Visibility decisions in the administration of justice. The Yale Law Journal69(4): 543–594.
33.
GoldsmithA (1990) Taking police culture seriously: Police discretion and the limits of law. Policing and Society1(2): 91–114.
34.
HasinoffA (2015) Sexting Panic: Rethinking Criminalization, Privacy, and Consent. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
35.
HenryNPowellA (2015) Embodied harms gender, shame, and technology-facilitated sexual violence. Violence Against Women21(6): 758–779.
36.
HindujaSKPatchinJW (2014) Bullying Beyond the Schoolyard: Preventing and Responding to Cyberbullying, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
37.
HruschkaDJSchwartzDSt JohnDCet al. (2004) Reliability in coding open-ended data: Lessons learned from HIV behavioral research. Field Methods16(3): 307–331.
38.
KaraianL (2014) Policing ‘sexting’: Responsibilization, respectability and sexual subjectivity in child protection/crime prevention responses to teenagers’ digital sexual expression. Theoretical Criminology18: 1–18.
39.
KaraianL (2015) What is self-exploitation? Rethinking the relationship between sexualization and ‘sexting’ in law and order times. In: RenoldERingroseJEganRD (eds) Children, Sexuality and Sexualization. London: Palgrave MacMillan Ltd, pp. 337–351.
40.
KitchenAN (2015) The need to criminalize revenge porn: How a law protecting victims can avoid running afoul of the first amendment. Chicago-Kent Law Review90: 247–299.
41.
KurasakiKS (2000) Intercoder reliability for validating conclusions drawn from open-ended interview data. Field Methods12(3): 179–194.
42.
KvaleSBrinkmannS (2008) InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
43.
LidskyLBGarciaAP (2012) How not to criminalize cyberbullying. Missouri Law Review77: 693–726.
44.
LieblingA (2000) Prison officers, policing and the use of discretion. Theoretical Criminology4(3): 333–357.
45.
LivingstoneS (2008) Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society10(3): 393–411.
MacIvorA (2017) Teen girls were ‘humiliated’ after sexually explicit photos were shared, says victim. CBC News, 19 Apr.
48.
MarshallCRossmanGB (2011) Designing Qualitative Research, 5th ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
49.
MasonG (2002) The Spectacle of Violence: Homophobia, Gender and Knowledge. London: Psychology Press.
50.
MastrofskiSParksRB (1990) Improving observational studies of police. Criminology28(3): 475–496.
51.
MastrofskiSD (2004) Controlling street-level police discretion. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science593(1): 100–118.
52.
McCarthyDJ (2010) Self-governance or professionalized paternalism? The police, contractual injunctions and the differential management of deviant populations. The British Journal of Criminology50(5): 896–913.
53.
MilesMBHubermanMSaldanaJ (2013) Qualitative Data Analysis, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
54.
MuncieJ (2006) Governing young people: Coherence and contradiction in contemporary youth justice. Critical Social Policy26(4): 770–793.
55.
NgoFTPaternosterR (2011) Cybercrime victimization: An examination of individual and situational level factors. International Journal of Cyber Criminology5(1): 773.
PaolineIII EA (2003) Taking stock: Toward a richer understanding of police culture. Journal of Criminal Justice31(3): 199–214.
58.
PedersenS (2013) UK young adults’ safety awareness online – is it a “girl thing”?Journal of Youth Studies16(3): 404–419.
59.
PowellA (2010) Configuring consent: Emerging technologies, unauthorized sexual images and sexual assault. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology43: 76–90.
60.
RandallM (2010) Sexual assault law, credibility, and “ideal victims”: Consent, resistance, and victim blaming. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law22(2): 397–433.
61.
RazackS (1994) What is to be gained by looking white people in the eye? Culture, race, and gender in cases of sexual violence. Signs19(4): 894–923.
62.
RoulstonK (2010) Considering quality in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research10(2): 199–228.
63.
R. v. M.B (2016) BCCA 476.
64.
R. v. S.B.et al. (2014) BCPC 279.
65.
SalterMCroftsTLeeM (2013) Beyond criminalization and responsibilization: Sexting, gender and young people. Current Issues in Criminal Justice24(3): 301–316.
66.
SalterM (2015) Privates in the online public: Sex(ting) and reputation on social media. New Media and Society18(11): 2723–2739. DOI: 10.1777/1461444815604133.
67.
SchulenbergJ (2003) The social context of police discretion with young offenders: An ecological analysis. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice45(2): 127–158.
68.
SegalMD (2015) Independent Review of the Police and Prosecution Response to the Rehtaeh Parsons Case. Commissioned by the Ministry of the Attorney General and Status of Women. Halifax: Canada.
69.
ShariffSDeMartiniA (2015) Defining the legal lines: egirls and intimate images. In: BaileyJSteevesV (eds) eGirls, eCitizens. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, pp. 282–307.
70.
ShortD (2013) AB v Bragg communications law’s next steps: Should bullying be a tort…or even a crime?Manitoba Law Journal37(1): 341–352.
71.
StallerKM (2002) Working the scam: Policing urban street youth in a new world context. Qualitative Inquiry8(5): 550–574.
72.
WalkerN (1996) Defining core police tasks: The neglect of the symbolic dimension?Policing and Society6(1): 53–71.
73.
West Coast LEAF (2014) #CyberMisogyny: Using and Strengthening Canadian Legal Responses to Gendered Hate and Harassment Online. Vancouver: West Coast LEAF.
YarM (2013) Internet sex offending: Patterns, problems, and policy. In: BrayfordJCoweFDeeringJ (eds) Sex Offending: Punish, Help, Change or Control. London: Routledge, pp. 170–186.
