AdamsMGriffithsJ (2012) Against ‘comparative method’: Explaining similarities and differences. In: AdamsMBomhoffJ (eds) Practice and Theory in Comparative Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 279–301.
2.
AinsworthJE (1996) Categories and culture: On the ‘rectification of names’ in comparative law. Cornell Law Review82(1): 19–42.
3.
BaxiU (2003) The colonialist heritage. In: LegrandPMundayR (eds) Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 46–75.
4.
BlankenburgE (1998) Patterns of legal culture: The Netherlands compared to neighboring Germany. American Journal of Comparative Law46(1): 1–41.
5.
BomhoffJ (2008) Balancing, the global and the local: Judicial balancing as a problematic topic in comparative (constitutional) law. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review31(2): 555–586.
6.
BomhoffJ (2012) Comparing legal argument. In: AdamsMBomhoffJ (eds) Practice and Theory in Comparative Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 74–95.
7.
BomhoffJ (2013) Balancing Constitutional Rights: The Origins and Meanings of Postwar Legal Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BussaniM (1998) Current trends in European comparative law: The common core approach. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review21(4): 785–801.
9.
BussaniMMatteiU (2002) The Common Core of European Private Law: Essays on the Project. Boston: Kluwer Law International.
10.
ChoudhryS (2006) Migration as a new metaphor in comparative constitutional law. In: ChoudhryS (ed) The Migration of Constitutional Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–35.
11.
CossmanB (1997) Turning the gaze back on itself: Comparative law, feminist legal studies, and the postcolonial project. Utah Law Review (2): 525–544.
12.
CôtéDGaboreanF (2015) Nouvelles normativités de la famille: La garde partagée au Québec, en France et en Belgique. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law27(1): 22–46.
13.
CotterrellR (2006a) Comparative law and legal culture. In: ReimannMZimmermannR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 709–737.
14.
CotterrellR (2006b) Law, Culture and Society: Legal Ideas in the Mirror of Social Theory. Aldershot: Ashgate.
15.
CurranVG (2006) Comparative law and language. In: ReimannMZimmermannR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 675–707.
16.
Darian-SmithE (2013) Laws and Societies in Global Contexts: Contemporary Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17.
DavidRBrierleyJEC (1985) Major Legal Systems in the World Today: An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law. 3rd ed. London: Stevens.
18.
DavisDM (2003) Constitutional borrowing: The influence of legal culture and local history in the reconstitution of comparative influence: The South African experience. International Journal of Constitutional Law1(2): 181–195.
19.
DawsonJP (1968) The Oracles of the Law. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Law School.
20.
De Sousa SantosB (1987) Law: A map of misreading. Toward a postmodern conception of law. Journal of Law and Society14(3): 279–302.
21.
DedekH (2014) When law became cultivated: ‘European legal culture’ between Kultur and civilization. In: HelleringerGPurnhagenK (eds) Towards a European Legal Culture. Portland: Hart, pp. 351–374.
22.
DemleitnerNV (1999) Combating legal ethnocentrism: Comparative law sets boundaries. Arizona State Law Journal31(3): 737–762.
23.
DoyleO (2016) Constitutional cases, foreign law and theoretical authority. Global Constitutionalism5(1): 85–108.
24.
EwaldW (1995) Comparative jurisprudence (I): What was it like to try a rat?University of Pennsylvania Law Review143(6): 1889–2149.
25.
Fauvargue-CossonBKerhuelA-J (2009) Is law an economic contest? French reactions to the Doing Business World Bank reports and economic analysis of the law. American Journal of Comparative Law57(4): 811–829.
26.
FieldingNG (2011) Judges and their work. Social & Legal Studies20(1): 97–115.
27.
FitzpatrickP (1984) Law and societies. Osgoode Hall Law Journal22(1): 115–138.
28.
FletcherGP (1998) Comparative law as a subversive discipline. American Journal of Comparative Law46(4): 683–700.
29.
FournierP (2010) Muslim Marriage in Western Courts: Lost in Transplantation. Farnham: Ashgate.
30.
FrankenbergG (1985) Critical comparisons: Re-thinking comparative law. Harvard International Law Journal26(2): 411–455.
31.
FrankenbergG (1997) Stranger than paradise: Identity & politics in comparative law. Utah Law Review (2): 259–274.
32.
FrankenbergG (2014) The innocence of method − unveiled: Comparison as an ethical and political act. Journal of Comparative Law9(2): 222–258.
33.
FriedmanLM (1994) Is there a modern legal culture?Ratio Juris7(2): 117–131.
34.
GardbaumS (2013) The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
GeertzC (2000) Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
36.
GlennHP (1987) Persuasive authority. McGill Law Journal32(2): 261–298.
37.
GlennHP (2006) Comparative legal families and comparative legal traditions. In: ReimannMZimmermannR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 421–440.
38.
GlennHP (2007) Comparing. In: ÖrücüENelkenD (eds) Comparative Law: A Handbook. Oxford: Hart, pp. 91–108.
39.
GlennHP (2013) The Cosmopolitan State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40.
GlennHP (2014) Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
41.
GlennHP (2015) Against method? In: AdamsMHeirbautD (eds) The Method and Culture of Comparative Law: Essays in Honour of Mark Van Hoecke. Oxford: Hart, pp. 177–188.
42.
GlensyRD (2010) Constitutional interpretation through a global lens. Missouri Law Review75(4): 1171–1242.
43.
GoodaleMMerrySE (2007) The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law between the Global and the Local. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
GraziadeiM (2003) The functionalist heritage. In: LegrandPMundayR (eds) Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 100–127.
45.
HadfieldG (2009) The strategy of methodology: The virtues of being reductionist for comparative law. University of Toronto Law Journal59(2): 223–235.
46.
HalleyJRittichK (2010) Critical directions in comparative family law: Genealogies and contemporary studies of family law exceptionalism. American Journal of Comparative Law58(4): 753–776.
47.
HallidayTCShafferG (2015) Transnational Legal Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48.
HalmaiG (2012) The use of foreign law in constitutional interpretation. In: RosenfeldMSajóA (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1328–1348.
49.
HardingA (2000) Comparative public law: A neglected discipline? In: EdgeI (ed) Comparative Law in Global Perspective. Ardsley: Transnational Publishers, pp. 101–120.
50.
HillJ (1989) Comparative law, law reform and legal theory. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies9(1): 101–115.
51.
HirschlR (2005) The question of case selection in comparative constitutional law. American Journal of Comparative Law53(1): 125–155.
52.
HylandR (1999) Comparative law. In: PattersonD (ed) A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 184–199.
53.
HylandR (2009) Gifts: A Study in Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
KapurRCossmanB (1996) Subversive Sites: Feminist Engagements with Law in India. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
56.
KasirerN (1990) The annotated criminal code en version quebecoise: Signs of territoriality in Canadian criminal law. Dalhousie Law Journal13(2): 520–563.
57.
KasirerN (1992) The infans as bon père de famille: ‘Objectively wrongful conduct’ in the civil law tradition. American Journal of Comparative Law40(2): 343–377.
58.
KavanaghA (2015) What’s so weak about ‘weak-form review’? The case of the UK Human Rights Act 1998. International Journal of Constitutional Law13(4): 1008–1039.
59.
KennedyD (2003) The methods and the politics. In: LegrandPMundayR (eds) Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 345–433.
60.
LangerM (2004) From legal transplants to legal translation: The globalization of plea bargaining and the Americanization thesis in criminal procedure. Harvard International Law Journal45(1): 1–64.
61.
Lasser Mde S-O-l’E (1995) Judicial (self-) portraits: Judicial discourse in the French legal system. Yale Law Journal104(6): 1325–1410.
62.
LauH (2013) The language of westernization in legal commentary. American Journal of Comparative Law61(3): 507–537.
63.
LeckeyR (2009a) Cohabitation and comparative method. Modern Law Review72(1): 48–72.
64.
LeckeyR (2009b) Thick instrumentalism and comparative constitutionalism: The case of gay rights. Columbia Human Rights Law Review40(2): 425–478.
65.
LeckeyR (2015) Bills of Rights in the Common Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
LeckeyRFavierY (2016) Cohabitation’s boundaries and the confines of tradition. Social & Legal Studies25(5): 525–543.
67.
LegrandP (1995) Comparative legal studies and commitment to theory. Modern Law Review58(2): 262–273.
68.
LegrandP (1996) European legal systems are not converging. International and Comparative Law Quarterly45(1): 52–81.
69.
LegrandP (1997) The impossibility of legal transplants. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law4(2): 111–124.
70.
LegrandP (2006a) Antivonbar. Journal of Comparative Law1(1): 13–40.
71.
LegrandP (2006b) Comparative legal studies and the matter of authenticity. Journal of Comparative Law1(2): 365–460.
MacdonaldRA (2009) Three metaphors of norm migration in international context. Brooklyn Journal of International Law34(3): 603–653.
74.
MatteiU (2006) Comparative law and critical legal studies. In: ReimannMZimmermannR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 815–836.
75.
McCruddenC (2007) Judicial comparativism and human rights. In: ÖrücüENelkenD (eds) Comparative Law: A Handbook. Oxford: Hart, pp. 371–397.
76.
MeuweseAVersteegM (2012) Quantitative methods for comparative constitutional law. In: AdamsMBomhoffJ (eds) Practice and Theory in Comparative Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 230–257.
77.
MichaelsR (2006a) The functional method of comparative law. In: ReimannMZimmermannR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 339–382.
78.
MichaelsR (2006b) Two paradigms of jurisdiction. Michigan Journal of International Law27(4): 1003–1069.
79.
MichaelsR (2012) Comparative law. In: BasedowJHoptRZimmermannR (eds) The Max Planck Encyclopedia of European Private Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 297–301.
80.
Muir WattH (2000) La fonction subversive du droit comparé. Revue internationale de droit comparé52(3): 503–527.
81.
Muir WattH (2006) Globalization and comparative law. In: ReimannMZimmermannR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 579–607.
NelkenD (2003) Comparatists and transferability. In: LegrandPMundayR (eds) Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 437–466.
ÖrücüE (2007) A general view of ‘legal families’ and of ‘mixing systems’. In: ÖrücüENelkenD (eds) Comparative Law: A Handbook. Oxford: Hart, pp. 169–187.
86.
PalmerVV (2012) Mixed Jurisdictions Worldwide: The Third Legal Family. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
87.
PetersASchwenkeH (2000) Comparative law beyond post-modernism. International & Comparative Law Quarterly49(4): 800–834.
88.
PirieF (2013) The Anthropology of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
89.
PopoviciASmithLTremblayR (2014) Les intraduisibles en droit civil. Montreal: Thémis.
90.
ReimannM (2002) The progress and failure of comparative law in the second half of the twentieth century. American Journal of Comparative Law50(4): 671–700.
91.
RilesA (1999) Wigmore’s treasure box: Comparative law in the era of information. Harvard International Law Journal40(1): 221–283.
92.
RilesA (2001) Introduction: The projects of comparison. In: RilesA (ed) Rethinking the Masters of Comparative Law. Oxford: Hart, pp. 1–18.
93.
RilesA (2006) Comparative law and socio-legal studies. In: ReimannMZimmermannR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 775–813.
94.
RosenL (2003) Beyond compare. In: LegrandPMundayR (eds) Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 493–510.
95.
RosenblumD (2007) Internalizing gender: Why international law theory should adopt comparative methods. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law45(3): 759–828.
96.
RosenfeldMSajóA (2012) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
97.
RuskolaT (2002) Legal orientalism. Michigan Law Review101(1): 179–234.
98.
RuskolaT (2010) Raping like a state. UCLA Law Review57(5): 1477–1536.
99.
RuskolaT (2013) Legal Orientalism: China, the United States, and Modern Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
100.
SaccoR (1991a) Legal formants: A dynamic approach to comparative law (I). American Journal of Comparative Law39(1): 1–34.
101.
SaccoR (1991b) Legal formants: A dynamic approach to comparative law (II). American Journal of Comparative Law39(2): 343–401.
102.
SamuelG (1998) Comparative law and jurisprudence. International & Comparative Law Quarterly47(4): 817–836.
103.
Sefton-GreenR (2002) Compare and contrast: Monstre à deux têtes. Revue internationale de Droit Comparé54(1): 85–95.
104.
Sefton-GreenR (2015) Lawmakers in the shadows: Legal academics in the construction of European private law. In: FaheyE (ed) The Actors of Postnational Rule-making: Contemporary Challenges of European and International Law. London: Routledge, pp. 185–206.
105.
SilbeySS (2010) Legal culture and cultures of legality. In: HallJRGrindstaffLLoM-C (eds) Handbook of Cultural Sociology. New York: Routledge, pp. 470–479.
106.
SmithSA (2010) Comparative law scholarship as ordinary legal scholarship. Journal of Comparative Law5(2): 331–356.
107.
TamanahaBZ (2010) Beyond the Formalist−Realist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
108.
TeubnerG (1998) Legal irritants: Good faith in British law or how unifying law ends up in new divergences. Modern Law Review61(1): 11–32.
109.
TurRHS (1977) The dialectic of general jurisprudence and comparative law. Juridical Review22(2): 238–249.
110.
TushnetM (1999) The possibilities of comparative constitutional law. Yale Law Journal108(6): 1225–1309.
111.
TushnetM (2006) Some reflections on method in comparative constitutional law. In: ChoudhryS (ed) The Migration of Constitutional Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 67–83.
112.
TushnetM (2008) Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
113.
TwiningW (2000a) Comparative law and legal theory: The country and western tradition. In: EdgeI (ed) Comparative Law in Global Perspective. Ardsley: Transnational Publishers, pp. 21–76.
114.
TwiningW (2000b) Globalisation and Legal Theory. London: Butterworths.
115.
TwiningW (2005) Have concepts, will travel: Analytical jurisprudence in a global context. International Journal of Law in Context1(1): 5–40.
116.
ValckeC (2004) Comparative law as comparative jurisprudence – the comparability of legal systems. American Journal of Comparative Law52(3): 713–740.
117.
ValckeC (2012) Reflections on comparative law methodology − getting inside contract law. In: AdamsMBomhoffJ (eds) Practice and Theory in Comparative Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 22–48.
118.
ValverdeM (2015) Chronotopes of Law: Jurisdiction, Scale and Governance. Milton Park: Routledge.
119.
Van HoeckeMWarringtonM (1998) Legal cultures, legal paradigms and legal doctrine: Towards a new model for comparative law. International & Comparative Law Quarterly47(3): 495–536.
120.
von MehrenAT (1971) An academic tradition for comparative law?American Journal of Comparative Law19(4): 624–632.
121.
WatsonA (1993) Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. 2nd ed. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
122.
WattG (2014) The poverty of economics and the hope for humanities in comparative law. Journal of Comparative Law9(2): 166–190.
123.
WeinribEJ (2012) The Idea of Private Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
124.
WhiteJB (1990) Justice as Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
125.
WhitmanJQ (2003) The neo-romantic turn. In: LegrandPMundayR (eds) Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 312–344.
126.
WhitmanJQ (2004) The two Western cultures of privacy: Dignity versus liberty. Yale Law Journal113(6): 1151–1221.
127.
World Bank (2003) Doing Business in 2004: Understanding Regulation. Washington: World Bank Publications.
ZumbansenP (2012) Defining the space of transnational law: Legal theory, global governance, and legal pluralism. Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems21(2): 305–335.
130.
ZweigertKKötzH (1998) An Introduction to Comparative Law, WeirT (Trans.), 3rd rev edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.