This article critically examines the importance of Hauke Brunkhorst’s work for the sociology of law, arguing that it provides new bearings for contemporary legal–sociological research. It pays particular attention to his methodological fusion of Systems Theory and Critical Theory and to the analysis of the correlation between national and cosmopolitan political structures in his theory of legal normativity. The article concludes by offering an alternative framework for observing the sociolegal processes at the center of Brunkhorst’s work.
AdornoTW (1966) Negative Dialektik[Negative Dialectics]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
2.
AdornoTW (1995) Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft [Kant’s Critique of Pure Reasons]. In: AdornoTheodor W., Nachgelassene Schriften edited by TiedemannR., planned for 13 vols. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, IV/4.
3.
AnayaSJ (1991) Indigenous rights norms in contemporary international law. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law8
(2): 1–39.
4.
AnghieA (2004) Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BartoleSVandelliL (1980) Le regioni nella giurisprudenza[The Regions in Jurisprudence]. Bologna: Mulino.
6.
Bartolus deS (1555) Super prima Parte in Digestum Vetus[On the First Part in the Digestum Vetus].
7.
BrunkhorstH (2002) Solidarität. Von der Bürgerfreundschaft zur globalen Rechtsgenossenschaft[Solidarity. From Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Order]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
8.
BryceJ (1923) Modern Democracies, 2 vols., vol. 2. London: Macmillan.
9.
CavarozziM (1992) Beyond transitions to democracy in Latin America. Journal of Latin American Studies24
(3): 665–684.
10.
DeanM (1999) Governmentality. Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage.
11.
DicksonB (1997) Protecting human rights through a constitutional court: The case of South Africa. Fordham Law Review66: 531–566.
12.
DonnarummaMR (1983) Il decentramento regionale in Italia e il diritto internazionale[Regional Decentralization in Italy and International Law]. Milan: Giuffrè.
13.
DupuyP-M (1997) The constitutional dimension of the charter of the United Nations revisited. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law1: 1–33.
14.
DurkheimÉ (1960 [1893]) De la division du travail sociale[On the Division of Social Labour]. 7th ed.Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
15.
EhrlichE (1989 [1913]) Grundlegung der Soziologie des Rechts. 4th ed.Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.
16.
EideA (2006) Rights of indigenous peoples: Achievements in international law during the last quarter of a century. Netherlands Yearbook of International Law37: 155–212.
17.
EngelsFMarxK (1958–1968) Die heilige Familie[The Holy Family]. In: MarxKEngelsF (ed) Werke, in 43 vols. Berlin: Dietz, 1957, Vol. II: pp. 7–223.
18.
FassbenderB (1998) The United Nations charter as constitution of the international community. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law36
(3): 539–619.
19.
FeldmanGD (1997) The Great Disorder. Politics, Economics and Society in the German Inflation 1914–1924. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
FranckTM (1992) The emerging right to democratic governance. The American Journal of International Law86
(1): 46–91.
21.
GeddesB (1994) Politician’s Dilemma. Building State Capacity in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22.
GreweWG (ed) (1988) Fontes Historiae Iuris Gentium[Historical Sources of the Law of Nations]. Berlin: de Gruyter, II.
23.
GrohD (1986) Spuren der Vernunft in der Geschichte. Der Weg von Jürgen Habermas zur ‘Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns im Schatten Max Webers’ [Traces of Reason in History. Jürgen Habermas’s Path to The Theory of Communicative Action in the Shadow of Max Weber]. Geschichte und Gesellschaft12: 443–476.
24.
GrindleMS (1996) Challenging the State: Crisis and Innovation in Latin America and Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25.
HabermasJ (1973) Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus[The Crisis of Legitimation in Late Capitalism]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
26.
HabermasJ (1976) Zur Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus[A Reconstruction of Historical Materialism]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
27.
HabermasJ (1992) Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats[Between Facts and Norms]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
28.
HamiltonAMadisonJ (2007) The Pacificus-Helvidius Debates of 1793–1794. Towards the Completion of the American Founding, edited by FrischMJ. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
29.
HaverkampA (1971) Herrschaftsformen der Frühstaufer in Reichsitalien[Governmental Forms of the early Hohenstaufen in Imperial Italy]. Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann.
30.
HegelGWF (1969 [1907]) Der Geist des Christentums und sein Schicksal [The Spirit of Christianity and its Fate]. In: MoldenhauerEMichelKM (eds) Werke, 20 vols., vol. I. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 274–418.
31.
HegelGWF (1970 [1807]) Phänomenologie des Geistes [Phenomenology of Spirit]. In: MoldenhauerEMichelKM (eds) Werke in 20 vols., vol. III. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
32.
HendleyK (2009) ‘Telephone law’ and the ‘rule of law’: The Russian case. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law1(2): 241–262.
33.
HenkinL (1995) Human rights and state ‘sovereignty’. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law25: 31–44.
34.
HorkheimerMAdornoTW (1969 [1944]). Dialektik der Aufklärung[Dialectic of Enlightenment]. Philosophische Fragmente. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
35.
KadelbachSKleinleinT (2007) International law: A constitution for mankind? An attempt at a reappraisal with an analysis of constitutional principles. German Yearbook of International Law50: 303–437.
36.
KahnPW (2000) Speaking law to power: Popular sovereignty, human rights, and the new international order. Chicago Journal of International Law1
(1): 1–18.
37.
KeetonGWSchwarzenbergerG (1946) Making International Law Work. London: Stevens & Sons.
38.
LenzeriniF (2007) Sovereignty revisited: international law and parallel sovereignty of indigenous peoples. Texas International Law Journal42: 155–189.
39.
LoraE (2007) State reform in Latin America: A silent revolution. In: LoraE (ed) The State of State Reform in Latin America. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 1–56.
40.
LuhmannN (1991) Verfassung als evolutionäre errungenschaft [Constitution as evolutionary Accomplishment]. Rechtshistorisches Journal9: 176–220.
41.
LuhmannN (1993) Das Recht der Gesellschaft[Law as a Social System]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
42.
MarxK (1956a) Verhandlungen des 6. Rheinischen Landtags. Debatten über das Holzdiebtahlgesetz [Debates on Law on the Theft of Wood]. In: MarxKEngelsF (eds) Werke, in 43 vols. Berlin: Dietz, Vol. I, pp. 109–147.
43.
MarxK (1956b [1844]) Zur Judenfrage[On the Jewish Question]. In: MarxKEngelsF (eds) Werke, in 43 vols. Berlin: Dietz, Vol. I, pp. 347–377.
44.
MarxK (1971 [1859]) Zur Kritik der politischen Ökonomie[Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy]. Berlin: Dietz.
45.
MeštrovićSGBrownHM (1985) Durkheim’s concept of anomie as dérèglement. Social Problems33
(2): 81–99.
46.
MunckGL (1998) Authoritarianism and Democratization. Soldiers and Workers in Argentina, 1976–1983. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
47.
NzouankeuJM (1994) Decentralization and democracy in Africa. International Review of Administrative Sciences60: 213–227.
48.
OkaforOC (2000) After Martyrdom: International law, sub-state groups, and the construction of legitimate statehood in Africa. Harvard International Law Journal41
(2): 503–528.
49.
OldendorpJ (1529) Wat byllick und recht ys[On Equity and Law]. Rostock: Dietz.
50.
OquistP (1980) Violence, Conflict and Politics in Colombia. New York: Academic Press.
51.
ParsonsT (1965) Full citizenship for the Negro American? A sociological problem. Daedalus94
(4): 1004–1054.
52.
PasqualucciJM (2006) The evolution of international indigenous rights in the Inter-American human rights system. Human Rights Law Review6
(2): 281–322.
53.
PasqualucciJM (2008) The right to a dignified life (Vida Digna): The integration of economic and social rights with civil and political rights in the inter-American human rights system. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review31
(1): 1–32.
54.
RebentischD (1989) Führerstaat und Verwaltung im Zweiten Weltkrieg. Verfassungsentwicklung und Verwaltungspolitik 1939–1945[Dictatorial State and Administration in World War II. Constitutional Development and Administrative Politics 1939–1945]. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.
55.
RoseN (1999) Powers of Freedom. Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
SakwaR (2010) The dual state in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs26
(3): 185–206.
StephaniJ (1612) Institutiones iuris canonici[Institutions of Canon Law]. Frankfurt am Main: Kopff.
59.
StephaniM (1611) Tractatus de Iurisdictione, Qualemque Habeant omnes Iudices, tam Seculares, quam Ecclesiastici in Imperio Romano[A Treatise on the Jurisdiction which Judges, both Secular and Ecclesiastical, Possess in the Holy Roman Empire], in 3 vols, vol. II. Frankfurt am Main: Kopff.
60.
ThornhillC (2007) German Political Philosophy: The Metaphysics of Law. London: Routledge.
61.
ThornhillC (2013) National sovereignty and the constitution of transnational law: A sociological approach to a classical antinomy. Transnational Legal Theory3
(4): 394–460.
62.
TomkinsA (2003) Public Law. Oxford: Clarendon.
63.
Van CottDL (2000) A political analysis of legal pluralism in Bolivia and Colombia. Journal of Latin American Studies32
(1): 207–234.
64.
ViljoenF (2007) International Human Rights Law in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
65.
von SavignyFC (1840–1863) System des Heutigen Römischen Rechts[A System of Contemporary Roman Law], in 7 vols. Berlin: Veit und comp.
66.
ZumbansenP (2012) Comparative, global and transnational constitutionalism: The emergence of a transnational legal-pluralist order. Global Constitutionalism1
(1): 16–52.
67.
ZwingliH (1905–1958) Die 67 artikel [The 67 articles]. In: EgliEFinslerG, Huldrych Zwingli, Sämtliche Werke, in 14 vols. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag, I, pp. 458–471.
