This article addresses the claim that some contemporary states may possess obligations to pay reparations as a result of the lasting effects of colonialism. Claims about the harms and benefits caused by colonialism must make some kind of comparison between the world as it currently is, and a counterfactual state where the injustice which characterized so much of the historic interaction between colonizers and the colonized did not occur. Rather than imagining a world where there was no interaction between such communities, this article maintains that the appropriate counterfactual state is one whereby relations between different communities took place in a context characterized by an absence of domination and exploitation. The conclusion is that there are good reasons to go beyond a focus on symbolic reparations and hold that many affluent contemporary states possess extensive but unfulfilled duties of rectificatory justice to some of the world’s poorest peoples.
BlakeM (2002) Distributive justice, state coercion, and autonomy. Philosophy and Public Affairs30: 257–926.
6.
BoxillBR (2003) A Lockean argument for black reparations. The Journal of Ethics7: 63–91.
7.
BrendonP (2007) A moral audit of the British Empire. History Today57: 44–47.
8.
BrooksRL (1999) When Sorry Isn’t Enough: The Controversy over Apologies for Human Injustice. New York: New York University Press.
9.
ButtD (2006) Nations, overlapping generations and historic injustice. American Philosophical Quarterly43: 357–367.
10.
ButtD (2007) On benefiting from injustice. Canadian Journal of Philosophy37: 129–152.
11.
ButtD (2009a) Rectifying International Injustice: Principles of Compensation and Restitution between Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
ButtD (2009b) Victors’ justice? Historic injustice and the legitimacy of international law. In: MeyerLH (ed.) Legitimacy, Justice and Public International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 163–185.
13.
CaneyS (2002) Survey article: Cosmopolitanism and the law of peoples. The Journal of Political Philosophy10: 95–123.
14.
ColemanJL (1992) Risks and Wrongs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
De GreiffP (2006) Justice and reparations. In: de GreiffP (ed.) The Handbook of Reparations. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 451–477.
16.
FabreC (2007) Justice in a Changing World. Cambridge: Polity.
17.
FeinbergJ (1992) Freedom and Fulfilment: Philosophical Essays. Princeton: Chichester.
18.
FergusonN (2002) Empire: The Rise and Demise of the British World Order and the Lessons for Global Power. London: Allen Lane.
19.
FerroM (1997) Colonization: A Global History, trans. KDPrithipaul. London: Routledge.
20.
FeyrerJSacerdoteB (2009) Colonialism and modern income: Islands as natural experiments. The Review of Economics and Statistics91: 245–226.
21.
FullinwiderR (2002) Preferential hiring and compensation. In: CahnSM (ed.) The Affirmative Action Debate. New York: Routledge, pp. 68–78.
22.
Glenn GrayJ (1998) The Warriors: Reflections on Men in Battle. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
23.
GoodinR (1987) Exploiting a situation and exploiting a person. In: ReeveA (ed.) Modern Theories of Exploitation. London: Sage, pp. 166–200.
24.
GosseriesA (2004) Historical emissions and free-riding. Ethical Perspectives11: 38–62.
MillerD (2007) National Responsibility and Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
MillerJKumarR (eds) (2007) Reparations: Interdisciplinary Inquiries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
NagelT (2005) The problem of global justice. Philosophy and Public Affairs33: 113–147.
33.
NewsingerJ (2006) The Blood Never Dried: A People’s History of the British Empire. London: Bookmarks.
34.
NickelJ (1977) Preferential policies in hiring and admissions: A jurisprudential approach. in GrossB (ed.) Reverse Discrimination. Buffalo: Prometheus, pp. 324–347.
35.
NozickR (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
36.
OlaniyanT (2000) Africa: Varied colonial legacies. In: SchwarzHRayS (eds) A Companion to Postcolonial Studies. Oxford: Blackwell.
37.
OsterhammelJ (1997) Colonialism: A Theoretical Overview, trans. SLFrisch. Princeton, NJ: Marcus Wiener, pp. 269–281.
38.
PasternakA (2011) The collective responsibility of democratic publics. Canadian Journal of Philosophy41: 99–124.
39.
PoggeT (2002) World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity.
40.
RawlsJ (1999) The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
ReshetovIA (1990) The temporal operation of norms on criminal responsibility. In: GinsburgGKudriavtsevVN (eds) The Nuremberg Trial and International Law. Dordecht: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 111–117.
42.
SandJ (1999) Historians and public memory in Japan: The ‘comfort women’ controversy: introduction. History & Memory11: 117–126
43.
SherG (2005) Transgenerational compensation. Philosophy and Public Affairs33: 181–200.
44.
TanK-C (2007) Colonialism, reparations, and global justice. In: MillerJKumarR (eds) Reparations: Interdisciplinary Inquiries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 280–306.
45.
TeitelRG (2000) Transitional Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
46.
ThompsonJ (2002) Taking Responsibility for the Past: Reparations and Historical Injustice. Cambridge: Polity.
47.
ThomsonJudith Jarvis (1986) Rights, Restitution and Risk: Essays in Moral Theory. London: Harvard University Press.
48.
TyreS (2008) France and its colonies: Historiography. In: PoddarPPatkeRSJensenL (eds) A Historical Companion to Postcolonial Literatures: Continental Europe and Its Empires. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 152–157.
49.
United Nations (2001) Declaration of the World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance. Available at: http://www.un.org/WCAR/durban.pdf(accessed 24 November 2011).
50.
Urban WalkerM (2006) Restorative justice and reparations. Journal of Social Philosophy37: 377–395.
51.
VernonR (2003) Against restitution. Political Studies51: 542–557
